My theory, is that “conspiracy theories” are true. And they’re intentionally leaked by the government, so when the truth finally does come out, it’s not a soul shocking revelation.
Look at the JFK assasination, look at Epsteins island, look at the twitter leaks.
The truth comes out, and everyone’s like “Yeah. We’ve been saying that for years! Hahahahah”.
That’s the vaccine “conspiracy theories” in 5 years they’ll be like, “damn… the vaccine does cause cancer.”
And everyone will be like “that’s what I’ve been saying for years.” And all the people who would have been shocked to learn the truth will be dead by then.
https://zingdad.com/adamu That is why there is a tech upgrade from spiritual advancements. This is not a completely unfair game, but how people choose to resist it is essentially a different technological tree than what they are used to.
Dec 25, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
My God, these "experts" just can't stop with the self-clowning. The lack of integrity of the supposed esteemed elites just blows my mind. It's like they know they're defeated and are just trying to get a last few scratches in against their vanquishers as they succumb to their fate.
Dec 25, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
Thank you for shining a light in this nonsense. These conspirators against humanity must be really worried if they are grasping at these straws. Now, I’m off to read about Santa/St Nicholas and Scrooge and Tiny Tim especially, my fav mythical character, lol.
A good treatment for cancer was discovered about 100 years ago by American scientist Raymond Royal Rife. It is frequency. Please read "The Rife Handbook of Frequency - 5th Edition" by Nenah Sylver www.nenahsylver.com - The cancer virus can either be killed off directly (but it will come back) or frequency can be used to repair damaged T cells to fight the cancer. This second method is currently being used to treat leukemia. Dr. Marcus Butler is using this method
Dec 25, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
But how about we take a closer look at those cancers we are talking about ... what percentage of wildfire cancers come within a month of injection? What portion of these cases is made up by anti vaxxers who eschew all commonly held truths? Seems as easy a thing to ascertain as the political beliefs of unvaccinated people in general? Any reason why we are not running THAT study?
Did you hear about that recent study that (if my understanding is correct) purported to say that vaccine hesitancy increases one's chances of being in a car accident?
I couldn't even bring myself to write about that one! Nothing to do with younger people being unvaccinated and old people hiding away at home. Maybe not claiming a pension increased the chance of being in an accident as well!
Yes, Dr. Campbell's first analysis video on this (I think he did 2 analysis videos), really showed some of the almost laughable shortcomings of this study.
I wish I had the time to write an article on this study, because I think it would be informative and educational: it would really show that not all studies are really methodologically sound. (Not that I'm an expert in conducting studies, but even a layperson like me, with Dr. Campbell's help, can see the holes in that paper.)
Friend, being an intellectually curious layperson in this time appears to be a position of strength ... it seems we can see what is right before us when the “experts” cannot?
The anti-meat movement minions will do anything to further their cause. Real studies - not the epidemiological traif that the mainstream likes to pass off as legit - consistently show that meat consumption and saturated fat are not the problem.
We get these stories about how people over 50 lose muscle and fall short in strength and it’s treated as an inevitability or a mystery, when in fact it’s because people have been eating less meat/protein since the 70s, because that’s what the government and so-called experts have been touting!
The experts have been lying to us for at least 50 years, in ways subtle and sublime. The people who heed this advice are worse off for it.
So one percent of the unvacksed people who choose to participate in the study both believe in flat earth and/or odd reptiles AND prefer non-conventional medical care.
As you say, most unvacksed people who participated believe in neither.
Where is their graph for vacksed people? I know quite a few who aren’t keen on conventional medicine who took the Safe and Effective.
And yeah, define “mythological” causes of cancer. Red meat is not one of them, but they claim it is. 🙄. And everyone knows that stress is inordinately bad for our health but of course no one discusses this. 😠. Not to mention the other things you mention like sweeteners and GMOs and pesticides.
The Establishment Everything (Govts/MSM/Judiciary/Hospitals - most of the people who work in these areas are terrified at the upper levels, that their rank and file, as well as the general public - are now waking up to the fact that WE WERE RIGHT. The Tipping Point has been reached and they will not be able to pull the public back to the "Lie-O-Metre" end. The Narrative changes to try to recapture ignorance, are now so desperate and so obvious that they are easy to spot. Plus the public got sick on the first 2 shots, so they can see it themselves.
Santa as in Saint Nikolaos, eh, that's for christians. Fine by me, only someone evil or wicked or insane would take umbrage or offense at being wished aMerry Christmas or God Jul or Feliz Navidad or whatever.
As for cancer, to paraphrase a microbiologist I know:
"Cancer is always a question of 'when, never 'if', due to how cell-replication works."
So if you understand probabilities, you know to avoid anything which increases the odds.
I have been seeing an inordinate volume of cancer fear porn and non-sense suspect analysis lately.
It is all pre-game marketing for the big "cancer vaccine" they will be pushing soon.
Just wait for it. Cap this comment.
Predict in less than six months they will try and convince people cancer can be transmitted.
"Asymptomatic" cancer is coming. D'u think masks will help? haha
The only real cure for cancer is world government and a global taxation system, don'cha know?
mRNA generated cancer “treatments” already in the pipeline
It's like trying to cure cancer with asbestos
My theory, is that “conspiracy theories” are true. And they’re intentionally leaked by the government, so when the truth finally does come out, it’s not a soul shocking revelation.
Look at the JFK assasination, look at Epsteins island, look at the twitter leaks.
The truth comes out, and everyone’s like “Yeah. We’ve been saying that for years! Hahahahah”.
That’s the vaccine “conspiracy theories” in 5 years they’ll be like, “damn… the vaccine does cause cancer.”
And everyone will be like “that’s what I’ve been saying for years.” And all the people who would have been shocked to learn the truth will be dead by then.
Yep. mRNA is going into everything, including probably very soon food & water
Or radiation and poison.
Nay, asbestos was very helpful in many ways.
Cancer can already be transmitted ... via injection.
If they keep using shedding and 5g, of course they can spread cancer via radiation weapons.
It seems like they are going to “get” us 1 way or the other. It’s very discouraging
https://zingdad.com/adamu That is why there is a tech upgrade from spiritual advancements. This is not a completely unfair game, but how people choose to resist it is essentially a different technological tree than what they are used to.
Never restrain your enemy when he's making a mistake. Safe and effective! Time for your 6th booster!
My God, these "experts" just can't stop with the self-clowning. The lack of integrity of the supposed esteemed elites just blows my mind. It's like they know they're defeated and are just trying to get a last few scratches in against their vanquishers as they succumb to their fate.
Thank you for shining a light in this nonsense. These conspirators against humanity must be really worried if they are grasping at these straws. Now, I’m off to read about Santa/St Nicholas and Scrooge and Tiny Tim especially, my fav mythical character, lol.
Merry Christmas to all!🎄🎄🎄🌟🌟🌟
After 80 years and how much money and still no actual cure for cancer? Is that true or a conspiracy theory?
A good treatment for cancer was discovered about 100 years ago by American scientist Raymond Royal Rife. It is frequency. Please read "The Rife Handbook of Frequency - 5th Edition" by Nenah Sylver www.nenahsylver.com - The cancer virus can either be killed off directly (but it will come back) or frequency can be used to repair damaged T cells to fight the cancer. This second method is currently being used to treat leukemia. Dr. Marcus Butler is using this method
and there are many others - https://oicr.on.ca/researchers/dr-marcus-butler/ This second method was also featured on the BBC - https://www.bbc.com/news/health-63859184
But how about we take a closer look at those cancers we are talking about ... what percentage of wildfire cancers come within a month of injection? What portion of these cases is made up by anti vaxxers who eschew all commonly held truths? Seems as easy a thing to ascertain as the political beliefs of unvaccinated people in general? Any reason why we are not running THAT study?
Who was it that posted cervical cancer rates have been increasing despite the HPV vaccine?
I mean who knew right?
It would be so much worse without the vacksine.
😠
Stop posting misinformation,
Did you hear about that recent study that (if my understanding is correct) purported to say that vaccine hesitancy increases one's chances of being in a car accident?
It's hilarious.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAl7jHHuG9E
https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(22)00822-1/fulltext
I couldn't even bring myself to write about that one! Nothing to do with younger people being unvaccinated and old people hiding away at home. Maybe not claiming a pension increased the chance of being in an accident as well!
Yes, Dr. Campbell's first analysis video on this (I think he did 2 analysis videos), really showed some of the almost laughable shortcomings of this study.
I wish I had the time to write an article on this study, because I think it would be informative and educational: it would really show that not all studies are really methodologically sound. (Not that I'm an expert in conducting studies, but even a layperson like me, with Dr. Campbell's help, can see the holes in that paper.)
Friend, being an intellectually curious layperson in this time appears to be a position of strength ... it seems we can see what is right before us when the “experts” cannot?
Yes, true. I find it just so...surreal that so-called "educated" people and those saying "follow the science" can't see what's in front of them.
It's been one of the most (maybe the most) revealing times of my life.
It originated in Canada. Just another Trudeau misogynistic scientific study.
Of course reptiles control the world!
Just watch this high profile reptilian, Albert Bourla:
https://twitter.com/CharlieCigar65/status/1465391723618570244
The anti-meat movement minions will do anything to further their cause. Real studies - not the epidemiological traif that the mainstream likes to pass off as legit - consistently show that meat consumption and saturated fat are not the problem.
We get these stories about how people over 50 lose muscle and fall short in strength and it’s treated as an inevitability or a mystery, when in fact it’s because people have been eating less meat/protein since the 70s, because that’s what the government and so-called experts have been touting!
The experts have been lying to us for at least 50 years, in ways subtle and sublime. The people who heed this advice are worse off for it.
So one percent of the unvacksed people who choose to participate in the study both believe in flat earth and/or odd reptiles AND prefer non-conventional medical care.
As you say, most unvacksed people who participated believe in neither.
Where is their graph for vacksed people? I know quite a few who aren’t keen on conventional medicine who took the Safe and Effective.
And yeah, define “mythological” causes of cancer. Red meat is not one of them, but they claim it is. 🙄. And everyone knows that stress is inordinately bad for our health but of course no one discusses this. 😠. Not to mention the other things you mention like sweeteners and GMOs and pesticides.
Ridiculous.
Maybe I should go read about the reptiles. 🤪
1970- “1 in 20 people will get cancer, donate money to research!”
1980- “1 in 10 people will get cancer, donate money to research!”
1990- “1 in 5 people will get cancer, donate money to research!”
Today- “1 in 2 people will get cancer, donate money to research.”
It’s clear, the “research” is in developing ways to give us all cancer.
The Establishment Everything (Govts/MSM/Judiciary/Hospitals - most of the people who work in these areas are terrified at the upper levels, that their rank and file, as well as the general public - are now waking up to the fact that WE WERE RIGHT. The Tipping Point has been reached and they will not be able to pull the public back to the "Lie-O-Metre" end. The Narrative changes to try to recapture ignorance, are now so desperate and so obvious that they are easy to spot. Plus the public got sick on the first 2 shots, so they can see it themselves.
Tomten, yes.
Santa as in Saint Nikolaos, eh, that's for christians. Fine by me, only someone evil or wicked or insane would take umbrage or offense at being wished aMerry Christmas or God Jul or Feliz Navidad or whatever.
As for cancer, to paraphrase a microbiologist I know:
"Cancer is always a question of 'when, never 'if', due to how cell-replication works."
So if you understand probabilities, you know to avoid anything which increases the odds.
flat earth theory post 2015 has turned out to be more accurate in its data findings than the modern science of 2020+.
That article is the product of academic/journalistic cancer.
Or:
"That article is academic/journalistic cancer."
Potato, tomaaahto, perhaps.
BINGO!