Maybe they could keep her carcass on life support in F789ingham Palace and charge money for a peak? Could become a HUGE tourist attraction ... and as we know The Royals are all about the $$$$... cha ching the f789 outta that
It's an Instagram account, quite possibly the Royals have direct access in the modern style. I don't quite get where this idea that the Royals/the Palace are military-grade photoshoppers come from. Shocking government ineptitude is pretty common, what makes the Palace immune?
They have lots of money and they have a team at a PR Company that ensures professionalism.
It's kinda like a major luxury brand like Louis Vuitton always puts own immaculate creatives in their PR and ad campaigns. You will never see a hair out of place...
That's cuz LV - like the Royals... has the money ... to pay professionals... to ensure quality control.
That's how.
Did I mention I've got over two decades of experience in this area? Look up Dunning Kruger and you'll see where you are wrong
Lol, Dunning-Kruger was debunked years ago, it's just a statistical artifact (auto correlation). Look it up!
Your fallacy is (a) assuming that money automatically buys competence and (b) assuming that whoever did this was willing engage professionals to do it. Hit it's a conspiracy so they had good reasons not to do that.
So you are saying that there are not people who think they know a lot about a topic which they know absolutely nothing about ... yet insist they do.... do not exist?
Perhaps you do not understand what the syndrome actually is...
In layman's terminology these people are referred to as fools.
I've read the original paper by Dunning and Kruger. Have you? Probably not because that's not exactly what the Dunning-Kruger hypothesis claimed, but anyway, even ignoring that, basically yes. When tested people are pretty good at estimating their own degree of skill. That doesn't mean there are zero such people only that if you do tests of randomly selected people that problem will only rarely show up.
The release of the poorly photoshopped photo was obviously done on purpose... followed by the home page retractions...
I have a fair bit of experience with the advertising industry and no f789ing way would something this amateurish get published.
The question is - what is the agenda? Is it meant to stoke conspiracy theories? Is it meant to confuse and unsettle and demoralize the mob?
Who the hell knows - other than this was done on purpose
Yes... a diversion. Then Kate appears in the end with a reasonable excuse to prove the world is filled with conspiracy theorists.
That's the likely outcome ... however I hold up hope that she is experiencing an irreversible coma
Recall this https://royalcentral.co.uk/asia/thailand/princess-bajrakitiyabha-remains-hospitalised-what-we-know-186940/ that's what I am hoping for for dear Kate - the Rat Juice pusher
Maybe they could keep her carcass on life support in F789ingham Palace and charge money for a peak? Could become a HUGE tourist attraction ... and as we know The Royals are all about the $$$$... cha ching the f789 outta that
I have continued to wonder about that princess.
I heard they dumped her carcass into a fetish brothel on Soi Nana that specializes in necrophilia ... apparently she's a huge money spinner.
It's an Instagram account, quite possibly the Royals have direct access in the modern style. I don't quite get where this idea that the Royals/the Palace are military-grade photoshoppers come from. Shocking government ineptitude is pretty common, what makes the Palace immune?
What makes them immune?
They have lots of money and they have a team at a PR Company that ensures professionalism.
It's kinda like a major luxury brand like Louis Vuitton always puts own immaculate creatives in their PR and ad campaigns. You will never see a hair out of place...
That's cuz LV - like the Royals... has the money ... to pay professionals... to ensure quality control.
That's how.
Did I mention I've got over two decades of experience in this area? Look up Dunning Kruger and you'll see where you are wrong
Lol, Dunning-Kruger was debunked years ago, it's just a statistical artifact (auto correlation). Look it up!
Your fallacy is (a) assuming that money automatically buys competence and (b) assuming that whoever did this was willing engage professionals to do it. Hit it's a conspiracy so they had good reasons not to do that.
I would posit that DIE automatically (or almost) insures the purchase of incompetence.
So you are saying that there are not people who think they know a lot about a topic which they know absolutely nothing about ... yet insist they do.... do not exist?
Perhaps you do not understand what the syndrome actually is...
In layman's terminology these people are referred to as fools.
I've read the original paper by Dunning and Kruger. Have you? Probably not because that's not exactly what the Dunning-Kruger hypothesis claimed, but anyway, even ignoring that, basically yes. When tested people are pretty good at estimating their own degree of skill. That doesn't mean there are zero such people only that if you do tests of randomly selected people that problem will only rarely show up.
Nah I didn't read it ... I just made all of this up.... hahahaha Duh.
Most people are total F789ing MORE-ONS... idiots... clowns ... Fools.