I've read the original paper by Dunning and Kruger. Have you? Probably not because that's not exactly what the Dunning-Kruger hypothesis claimed, but anyway, even ignoring that, basically yes. When tested people are pretty good at estimating their own degree of skill. That doesn't mean there are zero such people only that if you do tests…
I've read the original paper by Dunning and Kruger. Have you? Probably not because that's not exactly what the Dunning-Kruger hypothesis claimed, but anyway, even ignoring that, basically yes. When tested people are pretty good at estimating their own degree of skill. That doesn't mean there are zero such people only that if you do tests of randomly selected people that problem will only rarely show up.
I've read the original paper by Dunning and Kruger. Have you? Probably not because that's not exactly what the Dunning-Kruger hypothesis claimed, but anyway, even ignoring that, basically yes. When tested people are pretty good at estimating their own degree of skill. That doesn't mean there are zero such people only that if you do tests of randomly selected people that problem will only rarely show up.
Nah I didn't read it ... I just made all of this up.... hahahaha Duh.
Most people are total F789ing MORE-ONS... idiots... clowns ... Fools.