I hope it's merely fearmongering nerds with power, but I won't rest easy until they go back to playing Dungeons and Dragons and leave the rest of us well and good alone.
Of that I'm absolutely certain. The goodtwats reading the Guardian or the NYT will lap it up, too. As they're wasting away from VAIDS. "Just one more jab, Sir. Please."
" loss of virulence as viruses evolve is a common misconception" Really? It certainly is not a misconception for respiratory viruses. So with OC-43 coronavirus, which is endemic and supposedly emerged in 1890, it can suddenly became a killer virus rather than producing cold symptoms? Really?? How many times has OC-43 mutated since 1890?
It sounds like a typical 'cover their arses' paper so when TSHTF and the mob are at their doors with pitchforks they can point to the paper and say: "But we did warn that this was a danger."
The UK published all its emergency authorisation papers online from early in 2020. I read them all at the time. They clearly pointed out, when it came to the jabs in late 2020, that they were being offered to people due to the emergency. This was in contrast to the immense media pressure that gave the impression that the jabs were mandatory. In other words, the politicians and civil servants covered their arses.
That is EXACTLY what is happening in Australia. When asked what programs were being drawn up for those with vaccine injuries the answer was:
You gave informed consent. You will have to deal with it.
They will take your health and then your wealth and most people with vax damage will go to their graves saying "It wasn't the vaccine". To admit they screwed up and trusted a completely untrustworthy authority is harder for them than dying.
It was never mandatory. They always said it loudly that vaccination is a choice. And it is your choice to refuse it or keep your job. Nothing wrong with that according to them.
I'm not concerned by their predictions in the slightest. The "experts" have lied from day one, and everything the experts have said has been, not just wrong, but spectacularly wrong.
I have not and will not be injected with their Glorious Goo, nor have I, or will computer with their mandates.
My opinion about this SAGE: they are people like you and me, with their own biases and limitations.
They do not really know anything beyond what you, me and a few other substackers know. Their models are no good either.
So if you, or I, pull some predictions out of our asses, we would be really just as good as SAGE and exactly as worth listening to as SAGE. Where do you think THEY pull their predictions out of? The same exact place as you and me.
But, while you admit to having biases with the understanding that they might impact your analysis and so, I hope, work to avoid the effect of unconscious bias, these goons in Sage lack the self awareness to do this, and, of course, their wage depends on them not understanding.
Ah the Case Fatality Rate! What to do when no one has any idea how many cases are out there, past or present. The PCR test was the right choice for the tyrants, complete with CT threshold dial capability to ramp case rates up or down based on political exigencies. Covid was never a pandemic, although the vaccines and boosters are. And now we have Covid, Long Covid and Vaccine injuries, nearly a cafeteria style data mine for the tyrants, an impossible ball of confusion for the rest of us. Today, call them all extant Covid cases. Tomorrow, a new Variant. The next day, the emergence of a new airborne strain of HIV(to explain the skyrocketing vaccine injuries). Is it the first liar that doesn’t stand a chance, or the last one? I give up.
I love your substack, and I have subscribed. Question: do you know of any Substacks cataloguing protests against COVID mandates, masking, etc.- that is sharing about real human beings in the real world in specific places protesting or drafting legislation to oppose emergency powers, vaccine mandates, etc? What we need most right now is positive examples to encourage, embolden, and teach us how. The truckers are a great start, but I'm looking for a running list of dozens of protest efforts, to normalize and inspire more active dissent on these policies. Thanks if you know of any such!
De-attenuation…does the virus de attenuate to it’s natural state or does it de attenuate back to the “Frankenstein” version? If this virus has been pieced together, what origin does it de attenuate to?
The biggest hurdle for any politician is to realise when doing nothing is the best policy, all the while appearing to be doing everything. Unfortunately, the reverse is also true: it is nigh on impossible for a politician to realise that what they are doing is what is creating the problem.
Possibly because they (well, and most of us really) evaluate facts and consequences based on intent. Therefore, good intentions cannot have bad consequences.
"Sir Richard Wharton: In stage one we say nothing is going to happen.
Sir Humphrey Appleby: Stage two, we say something may be about to happen, but we should do nothing about it.
Sir Richard Wharton: In stage three, we say that maybe we should do something about it, but there's nothing we *can* do.
Sir Humphrey Appleby: Stage four, we say maybe there was something we could have done, but it's too late now." Yes, Prime Minister, ep 6 (?) 1986.
I'd also bet every one of their meetings are like an episode of The Apprentice ie; a bunch of panicky morons, totally out of their depth and with nothing to say, throwing around buzzwords as they desperately try to condense the work of whole teams over months into a single 20 minute session.
this crème de la crème includes Neil Ferguson and his broken calculator
imo they are preparing the ground for ADE
It's the highly prized skill of Enron accounting & Ferguson knows how it butters his bread!
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/how-big-pharma-sold-vaccines-to-the-world-part-2/
"They predict that antigenic drift will almost certainly lead to current vaccine failure." Not difficult to predict the past.
They're on the ball
Hmmm...I should have read the comments 1st!
Great minds...
I hope it's merely fearmongering nerds with power, but I won't rest easy until they go back to playing Dungeons and Dragons and leave the rest of us well and good alone.
Like the Dungeon Master, they can make up the rules of science as they go along to fit their narrative. See my comment below.
Of that I'm absolutely certain. The goodtwats reading the Guardian or the NYT will lap it up, too. As they're wasting away from VAIDS. "Just one more jab, Sir. Please."
" loss of virulence as viruses evolve is a common misconception" Really? It certainly is not a misconception for respiratory viruses. So with OC-43 coronavirus, which is endemic and supposedly emerged in 1890, it can suddenly became a killer virus rather than producing cold symptoms? Really?? How many times has OC-43 mutated since 1890?
Yes, it is a misconception according to Dr. Vanden Bossche. Plus OC-43 wasn't affected by a mass vaccination project.
https://voiceforscienceandsolidarity.substack.com/p/omicron-a-wolf-in-sheeps-clothing
Perhaps someone could help a little. I hear Gray Tony has some connections.
Some of them would regard it "not unthinkable" that something could come up in China somewhere. https://odysee.com/@fauci:f/Universal-Flu-Vaccine.-C-SPAN,-October-29,-2019:3
Just as a follow up, Bojo directly contradicted his cabal of advisers when he announced the "living with corona" plan and end of isolation.
It sounds like a typical 'cover their arses' paper so when TSHTF and the mob are at their doors with pitchforks they can point to the paper and say: "But we did warn that this was a danger."
The UK published all its emergency authorisation papers online from early in 2020. I read them all at the time. They clearly pointed out, when it came to the jabs in late 2020, that they were being offered to people due to the emergency. This was in contrast to the immense media pressure that gave the impression that the jabs were mandatory. In other words, the politicians and civil servants covered their arses.
Can you imagine the govt officials denying it was ever mandatory but suggested? They will place the blame on all the corporations and hospitals.
They will blame the people who got jabbed saying that it was their choice and no one forced them.
Yes, 100%. I bet Psaki has the statement written already.
"We believe in personal responsibility blah blah Nuermburg code blah blah no one forced or if they were it was Trump blah blah"
castro in canada and that morrison the nazi in australia are the best example.
Castreau, I think you will find his name is spelled ;-)
Turdeau, Poodeau. Brandeau, Castreau, Trudeșescu
That is EXACTLY what is happening in Australia. When asked what programs were being drawn up for those with vaccine injuries the answer was:
You gave informed consent. You will have to deal with it.
They will take your health and then your wealth and most people with vax damage will go to their graves saying "It wasn't the vaccine". To admit they screwed up and trusted a completely untrustworthy authority is harder for them than dying.
It was never mandatory. They always said it loudly that vaccination is a choice. And it is your choice to refuse it or keep your job. Nothing wrong with that according to them.
I'm not concerned by their predictions in the slightest. The "experts" have lied from day one, and everything the experts have said has been, not just wrong, but spectacularly wrong.
I have not and will not be injected with their Glorious Goo, nor have I, or will computer with their mandates.
I am concerned about William Henry III's predictions
"They predict that antigenic drift will almost certainly lead to current vaccine failure."
Lead to? They're "predicting" last month in Israel, lol. 🙄
My opinion about this SAGE: they are people like you and me, with their own biases and limitations.
They do not really know anything beyond what you, me and a few other substackers know. Their models are no good either.
So if you, or I, pull some predictions out of our asses, we would be really just as good as SAGE and exactly as worth listening to as SAGE. Where do you think THEY pull their predictions out of? The same exact place as you and me.
But, while you admit to having biases with the understanding that they might impact your analysis and so, I hope, work to avoid the effect of unconscious bias, these goons in Sage lack the self awareness to do this, and, of course, their wage depends on them not understanding.
Ah the Case Fatality Rate! What to do when no one has any idea how many cases are out there, past or present. The PCR test was the right choice for the tyrants, complete with CT threshold dial capability to ramp case rates up or down based on political exigencies. Covid was never a pandemic, although the vaccines and boosters are. And now we have Covid, Long Covid and Vaccine injuries, nearly a cafeteria style data mine for the tyrants, an impossible ball of confusion for the rest of us. Today, call them all extant Covid cases. Tomorrow, a new Variant. The next day, the emergence of a new airborne strain of HIV(to explain the skyrocketing vaccine injuries). Is it the first liar that doesn’t stand a chance, or the last one? I give up.
More illogic nonsense tossed for rumination.
I love your substack, and I have subscribed. Question: do you know of any Substacks cataloguing protests against COVID mandates, masking, etc.- that is sharing about real human beings in the real world in specific places protesting or drafting legislation to oppose emergency powers, vaccine mandates, etc? What we need most right now is positive examples to encourage, embolden, and teach us how. The truckers are a great start, but I'm looking for a running list of dozens of protest efforts, to normalize and inspire more active dissent on these policies. Thanks if you know of any such!
Has SAGE hired an immunologist yet?
what is that? all they need is that clown from royal college predicting hunderds of millions ...
De-attenuation…does the virus de attenuate to it’s natural state or does it de attenuate back to the “Frankenstein” version? If this virus has been pieced together, what origin does it de attenuate to?
The biggest hurdle for any politician is to realise when doing nothing is the best policy, all the while appearing to be doing everything. Unfortunately, the reverse is also true: it is nigh on impossible for a politician to realise that what they are doing is what is creating the problem.
Possibly because they (well, and most of us really) evaluate facts and consequences based on intent. Therefore, good intentions cannot have bad consequences.
"Sir Richard Wharton: In stage one we say nothing is going to happen.
Sir Humphrey Appleby: Stage two, we say something may be about to happen, but we should do nothing about it.
Sir Richard Wharton: In stage three, we say that maybe we should do something about it, but there's nothing we *can* do.
Sir Humphrey Appleby: Stage four, we say maybe there was something we could have done, but it's too late now." Yes, Prime Minister, ep 6 (?) 1986.
Rinse and repeat.
"NERVTAG" - what kind of acronym is that?
I bet they spend ~90% of time in any given meeting on asinine nonsense like "what do we call ourselves?" too
I'd also bet every one of their meetings are like an episode of The Apprentice ie; a bunch of panicky morons, totally out of their depth and with nothing to say, throwing around buzzwords as they desperately try to condense the work of whole teams over months into a single 20 minute session.
Masks and social distancing decrease the amount of hugs we receive--and hugs actually help the immune system.