Sep 21, 2023·edited Sep 21, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Great piece with a lot of useful and key details! You’re lifting the veil on how the City of London’s intelligence networks operate.
This paragraph stood out:
“Would it also surprise you to learn that Dinenage was Minister of State for Digital and Culture during the pandemic. At the same time her husband, Mark Lancaster, Baron Lancaster of Kimbolton was Deputy Commander of 77th Brigade before being promoted to brigadier in August 2020. The 77th Brigade turned its attention on UK citizens during the pandemic by “helping to quash rumour from misinformation, but also to counter disinformation”. Basically, it spied on anyone who wrote anything negative about lockdowns and the Covid vaccines.”
This is really the City of London slime mold coming for Brand. Innocent until proven guilty, of course, but the furious pace and maneuvering of the London octopus and its many tentacles seems quite telling.
If Brand is proven innocent and comes out of this, it will be a major loss for the bad guys and a proof that victory against the imperial slime mold is quite possible.
You have more trust in an impartial justice system than I have. Why wouldn't some influential judges be part of the slime? Julian Assange is a prime example. His judges were completely biased. In totalitarian systems, the judges always sided with the elites. I fear for Russell. If they don't finish him off before a trial, they will in the trial. Often with rape cases it comes down to consent and who is believed rather than objective evidence. A trial and jury can be manipulated by a judge. Not only do the elites scare off any other dissident influencer with this drama, it also serves as a wonderful distracting meta-story. While the attention of the world will be captured by this drama for years, the elites further their power unnoticed in the background, writing policies. Another evil masterpiece. I don't think freedom can still win this. I prepare for defeat.
I think it is very true. Eventually it will all swing back to the light. With defeat I mean short - to - medium term. Hence the preparing, To go for cover and survive. I don't have that many years left, so I try to use them wisely. Enjoyment, Love, Fun, Family, Friends, Nature have to bebalanced with the energy spent on resistance I do my little part, say my little part, support a few big guys.
This is like a freight train gaining momentum, thundering towards the abyss of this totalitarean cliff. In a corrupt and greedy system, a lasting balance is very difficult to achieve. But I am not hoping in front of that traiTn because that would be suicide.
Only very powerful people with a good heart might be able to stop it. They have to wake up to the danger before it is too late. But more likely. the tyrants will destroy themselves before any resistance will, if history repeats itself.
This Russell Brand episode is a bit of a test were everyone stands. Who of the big guys will support him in public and call out the set-up? Rogan? Peterson? Maajid Nawaz? Malone? Wolf? Haven't heard much so far. Good of the Emperor to bring it up. Who of the big guys will risk it?
The bad guys are very clever. They picked the most controversial and the most vulnerable of them first: Brand. And they used the dirtiest accussations: Rape. A minefield in a woke cancelling society.
They made a mistake when they tried to cancel Rogan. Rogan is too solid, too good, too American. And he defended well. But that wasn't a really dirty attack.
The other vulnerable one is Jordan Peterson, in my opinion. They already working on him. Jordan is a brilliant thinker but he is physically and emotionally frail. Doesn't have a thick skin. Tries his best though - so good luck to him.
From those I mentioned, Wolf would be attacked next. Malone is pretty solid but I think Maajid and Tate are the toughest. Think of Tate what you like, this guy is a true fighter and he can play dirty if needed. And Maaji can too. And Maaji is a very smart guy - the smartest of them all. He is a professional.
So, if I needed to chose two of the big influencer when the resistance moves from words to actions on the ground - I would trust and feel safest with these two.
But these two can't do that much either. What we need is really big guys, high up and connected in these cycles, that really want to stop that. They propably need to stay under cover but connected and give intel and strategic leadership to hopefullly many guys like Maaji and Tate. The others, Rogan, Tucker, Malone etc. will also play some parts, of course.
What do you think? What will happen next? What do you think of Kennedy and his chances? He really sets himself to be shot - amazing, the fearlessness.
Sep 21, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
I met Rupert Murdoch at the John Jay scholars' supper in 1982. He was very kind and full of bonhomie. I asked him about his newspapers and he said he wanted to make money from them. Scandal and page six ladies sell papers. Though papers are more often digital, the same themes still work.
It's good to have allies in the fight for freedom. I'm not exactly confident of the allegiance of someone who has the mercenary sensibility of Rupert. But we shall see.
Sep 21, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
The UK government telling these social media platforms to demonetize Brand over mere decades old allegations should send chills up and down the spine of everyone who values any semblance of freedom of speech or any other freedom for that matter.
Blackrock is the third top owner of Rumble with 1.50% compared to the top owner Cantor Fitzgerald & & Co. with 8.30%. Vanguard Group, Inc 5.53%. So, I’m not sure Blackrock has the power to tell them what to do.
Correct on paper but surely they can manipulate ppl … they sure forced ESG into every co. They own a small part in a co I used to work for, they had the pronoun meetings and woke demands
Sep 21, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Aristocracy was the original Gangsterism.
With monopoly finance and Ponzi currencies they were able to expand the Hegelian Dialectic tool kit to Communism (the Satanic Death Cult version) and Fascism (the Corporatist Parasite version).
The end result is always chaos, wars, death and disease to advance their long term democidal and domination agenda.
But like the Wizard of Oz they are just cowards in bad costumes that to thwart, need only be exposed, winged monkeys and all.
Sep 21, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Bravo Rumble and TNE ! Like all critically thinking people of character if RB is found guilty of some serious crime by a competent and fair jury he will be judged appropriately and be subject to the punishment. The insults from the hypocritical elite including the new dolt of a king are getting harder and harder to stomach. Julian Assange has not received a fair trail so it’s not out of the question some or many of us will soon be in the same boat as Russell.
any rape allegations made years ago are suspect to me. If it takes you years to realize it was rape, maybe it was not rape in the first place (unless it's a minor, but then it's a whole different story)? Don't we have statute of limitations in this case? Otherwise, what would prevent any woman to weaponize the rape allegation the way she deems fit?
As a chaplain who has sat in with rape patients enduring ER rape kits (those can be as physically painful as the rape was, and take hours), I can, sadly, answer this. Sometimes rape victims need to heal-- a LOT--before they are ready to face family and friends, much less police, other authorities, and eventually formal cross-examination. The police intake process is humiliating--especially for a woman describing in gross detail to a man what another man did to her. On top of that, rape victims actually often furiously gaslight themselves enough long before powerful attorneys humiliate them if they do get up the guts to come forward (“Was I dressed in a way to I lead him on? Was I clear enough in my boundaries? Did I fight hard enough?”) A very large percentage of women do not have the emotional energy to go forward, and never say a word, and will go to their deaths without justice.
(This is not a comment on the Brand case in any way.)
But please don’t misunderstand that I am arguing against your point. No man deserves to be falsely accused of rape. I think we agree men have as much right not to be thrown in prison for what they haven’t done, as women have not to be raped. I just wanted to comment about how dark life really becomes once someone has been violated that way. Rape DESTROYS lives. It destroys a woman’s ability to trust her own perceptions, much less the presence of any man around her, ever again, *especially* if he has any authority (power) over her.
In addition, the courts are terribly corrupt. The “good ol” boy” system is alive and well.
Thank you, all good points. It's the timing in this case which makes it highly suspect. Too many times men have been accused of rape for political reasons, and rape is something which is very hard to prove or disprove, especially years after, so it becomes a very efficient political tool. At the same time real rapists walk around unpunished, so it's a very selective application of justice
These are all very good points, especially that women will gaslight themselves afterwords.
As I think about this, the big question in my mind is, how would I react in this situation? Would I have waited years to come forward? Would I still not have been ready during #MeToo? Possibly. Once I got the courage to speak, would I go to the media and not the police? No. No freaking way. I would go to the police. If I didn't get any satisfaction from the police, then I would go to the media.
The next big question is, would my reaction be typical? Maybe. Probably in the majority of cases, people would follow the path I think I would follow. There might be people who would go to the media first, rather than the police, to dish out a little payback for the hurt, pain and suffering the rape caused. But then I think for five women to choose this route, rather than the police? No. Again, no freaking way.
I don't know if the accusations are true or not, but I do believe all five victims' behavior is not in keeping with how true rape survivors would respond.
Add to that the concerted effort to eliminate his ability to provide for himself and his family, and his ability to speak, I am leaning towards this being a hit job. They want to take him down. It's what communists do.
Exactly. If I waited all those years to avoid publicity, why would I all of a sudden do this very public thing? And adding the fact that they want to de-platform him before going through the normal legal process - and so we have all signs of trial and managing by media, public lynching, all to circumvent the existing law.
Of the three who attacked my niece, one was given 5 years and is out in November, the other two, because the jury couldn't make up its mind were found guilty of aiding and abetting and were given 2 years suspended.
The girl lives in terror of the convicted rapist coming out.
Absolutely right about it destroying lives and it should never be trivialised, as so often happens by those who simply don't understand.
There is no rape statute of limitations in the UK and it's the London Met that's investigating... you might also have spotted that the allegations and assaults have all been made in the UK, not the US.
Also, if you had any first hand knowledge of rape victims not coming forward you would know that there are no end of reasons why a single, as in only one, girl/woman wouldn't come forward, but if a dam breaks then it's safety in numbers and more will come forward.
I have no idea whether he's guilty or not and I'm not making any judgement in the case, but you cannot just dismiss complaints simply because they didn't come forward at the time.
It happened to my niece and she was, under death threat from the 3 rapists, extremely reluctant to go to the police. It was only when she opened up to her parents that they made sure it was made known and one of the three was imprisoned for the rape. She was 15 and completely traumatised at the time.
all good points, thank you. It does have to be looked into on a case by case basis, of course. The problem is that those "fake" ones actually harm real victims. Like the case with your niece is very different from a case when a grown-up porn star complains of being "raped" years after spending a night with a young handsome billionaire and even paid for staying silent.
Sep 21, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
She's an idiot and totally unhinged. She has no right to do anything of the sort.
The 77th Brigade was a nasty piece of work and should be disbanded.
Yes, if Brand is found innocent it will be a major embarrassment for her and her dishonest shill of a husband, but if he's guilty it will give her "complete justification" and empower the ruling cabal to go even further... so why not suspend habeas corpus while they're at it?
Interesting. They don’t need an investigation then as you’ve already decided the outcome and that he’s innocent. Best send them an email and tell them to call it off.
Yep, no need to talk to people who’ve been affected by his behaviour then as to whether his actions were criminal or consensual.
I forgot to add IF. if he found guilty it will be main article everywhere fanfares etc. If he found not guilty will be not reported the ones hear about will do as I say. Erase the event and rewire it in the brain.
Sep 21, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
How disrespectful. SHE goes as "Dame", but addresses the CEO of Rumble as "Chris". Should we therefore assume that she has a comfortable, established friend/relationship with him?
Sep 22, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Even if Brand is guilty, please explain to me how that affects his revenue streams (YouTube and Rumble)... Did he use those to commit a crime? No, so why are they on the table at all?
I can understand an accountant guilty of fraud no longer being able to work as an accountant, but Brand's social media activity has little do with the chargea against him (yes? I don't follow him). That is what I find disturbing, yes comvicting him before he is found guilty, but also the arbitrary judgement/punishment that is being meeted out.
Sep 21, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
You know, it's a funny thing. I've always wished I'd discovered Dickens' "A Child's History of England" long before I was forced to read "A Tale of Two Cities" and "Great Expectations." That first-named book to which I came last, finally made me admire that man. He so beautifully, movingly described the achievements of the common people in fighting for justice and the concept that even the monarch was subject to the Common Law (and if he wanted to bend it, had better hire a really good team of lawyers).
There's been such cowardice in public discourse about the nature of cultures and how some are indeed superior to others, though the people who form them may individually be as wretched or as fine as any other individuals anywhere, bred by any culture anywhere.
That a man may stand up with dignity and demand justice, and proof of the factualness of anything he might be accused of, and to be judged openly by his peers under the oversight of a judge bound to uphold the law, is an extraordinary evolution of human thought and the most remarkable instrument of attempting, however imperfectly in the actuals, to channel human nature away from mob rule and towards respect for the rights of every person, no matter how we might despise him for any of a gazillion reasons.
People's tastes are quite individual. But I suggest that anyone wanting to give really useful gifts for the upcoming holiday season might consider paperback versions of "A Child's History of England" and the US Constitution. This will effectively cover all ages. Even babies enjoy hearing words they can't yet understand.
There was a day in 1649 when the people of England watched a headsman with a sword part the neck of Charles the first. A good example to all who claim to be kings. (No king but Jesus Christ. Amen.)
For my part, I celebrate the words of Bill Buppert. The constitution is the casket in which they buried the declaration of independence. ymmv
What a beautiful letter from Murdoch. There is something funny, though, about him referring to "elites" as if he is not one himself. But on a more serious note, I am wondering if there is any way Dame D can be charged and prosecuted. She clearly broke the law. She should at least be sued.
Sep 21, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
I keep wondering how long until Joe Rogan gets the full bore authoritarian cancel treatment. Surely with his Hollywood past TPTB can dredge up half a dozen sexual assault “victims” (for big cash payouts). He reaches too many people to not be a 🎯
Sep 22, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Britain is apparently no longer British, or the British are no longer British. Well at least this will be proven true if the Great British public stand for any of this WEF Trojan horse shit... This Britain is supposed to be the cradle of modern democracy and stood alone in opposition to despotic totalitarianism twice while others (including the USA) stood by and said none of our business. It is supposed to be the bedrock of the legal system for all of the great Western democracies but now we get everyone is guilty until the censorship cannot continue to blind people to the truth. Do the British people think it will not touch them? Think again and read your history and not the reworked Woke history that is just pure lies and fantasy. The current generations of British should hang their heads in shame next to their exalted fore-bearers (who must be exhausted from the spinning in their graves) and remember that if they do not now stand against tyranny they will condemn their children to have to fight a war of independence from the tyrant WEF elites. Members of the police and armed forces should remember that serve the people and not the elites. Now is easier to fight, we are still a democracy, just. Later will be bloody and only after much more blood has been shed, as history tells us all totalitarian regimes descend to, and remember this one wants fewer people on the planet... These elites have nothing but bad intentions. They offer nothing but lies and a bleak dystopia. They cannot be trusted, they are lizard people. You cannot trust the $cience! You cannot trust the Media. You cannot trust big business and you sure as shit cannot trust your government not the unelected detached UN, WHO, WEF.
"The way Russell Brand is being treated by the relic media is plain wrong. The fracture between reasonable people and this travesty of a media is being made permanent."
I go even farther: people who are convicted of crimes don’t lose their right to make a living. I think it’s dangerous to give any credence to this BS. All accusations aren’t equal and we’ve seen this playbook enough to chuck the “open mind” BS. Its an assassination attempt. Change my mind. THE END
Great piece with a lot of useful and key details! You’re lifting the veil on how the City of London’s intelligence networks operate.
This paragraph stood out:
“Would it also surprise you to learn that Dinenage was Minister of State for Digital and Culture during the pandemic. At the same time her husband, Mark Lancaster, Baron Lancaster of Kimbolton was Deputy Commander of 77th Brigade before being promoted to brigadier in August 2020. The 77th Brigade turned its attention on UK citizens during the pandemic by “helping to quash rumour from misinformation, but also to counter disinformation”. Basically, it spied on anyone who wrote anything negative about lockdowns and the Covid vaccines.”
This is really the City of London slime mold coming for Brand. Innocent until proven guilty, of course, but the furious pace and maneuvering of the London octopus and its many tentacles seems quite telling.
If Brand is proven innocent and comes out of this, it will be a major loss for the bad guys and a proof that victory against the imperial slime mold is quite possible.
Thanks again for your work!
I feel that your comments are degrading and demeaning to slime moulds which are a useful feature of many biomes. jk lol
Apologies to all natural slime molds hahaha
😎😁🎶👍
You have more trust in an impartial justice system than I have. Why wouldn't some influential judges be part of the slime? Julian Assange is a prime example. His judges were completely biased. In totalitarian systems, the judges always sided with the elites. I fear for Russell. If they don't finish him off before a trial, they will in the trial. Often with rape cases it comes down to consent and who is believed rather than objective evidence. A trial and jury can be manipulated by a judge. Not only do the elites scare off any other dissident influencer with this drama, it also serves as a wonderful distracting meta-story. While the attention of the world will be captured by this drama for years, the elites further their power unnoticed in the background, writing policies. Another evil masterpiece. I don't think freedom can still win this. I prepare for defeat.
So the saying “the devil always overplays his hand” doesn’t ring true for you?
I think it is very true. Eventually it will all swing back to the light. With defeat I mean short - to - medium term. Hence the preparing, To go for cover and survive. I don't have that many years left, so I try to use them wisely. Enjoyment, Love, Fun, Family, Friends, Nature have to bebalanced with the energy spent on resistance I do my little part, say my little part, support a few big guys.
This is like a freight train gaining momentum, thundering towards the abyss of this totalitarean cliff. In a corrupt and greedy system, a lasting balance is very difficult to achieve. But I am not hoping in front of that traiTn because that would be suicide.
Only very powerful people with a good heart might be able to stop it. They have to wake up to the danger before it is too late. But more likely. the tyrants will destroy themselves before any resistance will, if history repeats itself.
This Russell Brand episode is a bit of a test were everyone stands. Who of the big guys will support him in public and call out the set-up? Rogan? Peterson? Maajid Nawaz? Malone? Wolf? Haven't heard much so far. Good of the Emperor to bring it up. Who of the big guys will risk it?
The bad guys are very clever. They picked the most controversial and the most vulnerable of them first: Brand. And they used the dirtiest accussations: Rape. A minefield in a woke cancelling society.
They made a mistake when they tried to cancel Rogan. Rogan is too solid, too good, too American. And he defended well. But that wasn't a really dirty attack.
The other vulnerable one is Jordan Peterson, in my opinion. They already working on him. Jordan is a brilliant thinker but he is physically and emotionally frail. Doesn't have a thick skin. Tries his best though - so good luck to him.
From those I mentioned, Wolf would be attacked next. Malone is pretty solid but I think Maajid and Tate are the toughest. Think of Tate what you like, this guy is a true fighter and he can play dirty if needed. And Maaji can too. And Maaji is a very smart guy - the smartest of them all. He is a professional.
So, if I needed to chose two of the big influencer when the resistance moves from words to actions on the ground - I would trust and feel safest with these two.
But these two can't do that much either. What we need is really big guys, high up and connected in these cycles, that really want to stop that. They propably need to stay under cover but connected and give intel and strategic leadership to hopefullly many guys like Maaji and Tate. The others, Rogan, Tucker, Malone etc. will also play some parts, of course.
What do you think? What will happen next? What do you think of Kennedy and his chances? He really sets himself to be shot - amazing, the fearlessness.
Bravo! Great comment!
Don't you mean "guilty until proven guilty"?
I met Rupert Murdoch at the John Jay scholars' supper in 1982. He was very kind and full of bonhomie. I asked him about his newspapers and he said he wanted to make money from them. Scandal and page six ladies sell papers. Though papers are more often digital, the same themes still work.
It's good to have allies in the fight for freedom. I'm not exactly confident of the allegiance of someone who has the mercenary sensibility of Rupert. But we shall see.
The UK government telling these social media platforms to demonetize Brand over mere decades old allegations should send chills up and down the spine of everyone who values any semblance of freedom of speech or any other freedom for that matter.
Blackrock owns shares in Rumble.
Blackrock, Vanguard and State Street own shares in every company of any size. Nothing to see there.
Lol true, environmental lab and the trains.
So do I. In fact, when Rumble was first going public (as Cantor Fitzgerald VI--if I don't mistake), I made it be my very own "social investment".
I thought Bongiorno was a startup investor
Blackrock is the third top owner of Rumble with 1.50% compared to the top owner Cantor Fitzgerald & & Co. with 8.30%. Vanguard Group, Inc 5.53%. So, I’m not sure Blackrock has the power to tell them what to do.
No State Street in there with them? Those three work together all the time, saves having to declare interests that might attract regulatory approvals.
Correct on paper but surely they can manipulate ppl … they sure forced ESG into every co. They own a small part in a co I used to work for, they had the pronoun meetings and woke demands
Of course, undermining normal is their preferred modus operandi. Get everyone scared of their own shadows and nobody will notice what they're doing.
Aristocracy was the original Gangsterism.
With monopoly finance and Ponzi currencies they were able to expand the Hegelian Dialectic tool kit to Communism (the Satanic Death Cult version) and Fascism (the Corporatist Parasite version).
The end result is always chaos, wars, death and disease to advance their long term democidal and domination agenda.
But like the Wizard of Oz they are just cowards in bad costumes that to thwart, need only be exposed, winged monkeys and all.
100% they’re cowards, corrupt, crooked and many times perverted cowards.
Wait wait wait. Say more about the wingéd monkees please. Those would be very useful.
The MP featured in the article would qualify as one of those airborne primates.
They are only useful to their Goblin Overlords.
She chairs the zoo committee! lmmfao!
https://www.theyworkforyou.com/whall/?id=2023-03-14b.241.0
Haha! The plot thickens.
Also explains her penchant for flinging excrement.
Imma get pix. We'll just see about that!
Bravo Rumble and TNE ! Like all critically thinking people of character if RB is found guilty of some serious crime by a competent and fair jury he will be judged appropriately and be subject to the punishment. The insults from the hypocritical elite including the new dolt of a king are getting harder and harder to stomach. Julian Assange has not received a fair trail so it’s not out of the question some or many of us will soon be in the same boat as Russell.
I kinda thought the vaxxing and grooming would be a red line but adults in the room are few
any rape allegations made years ago are suspect to me. If it takes you years to realize it was rape, maybe it was not rape in the first place (unless it's a minor, but then it's a whole different story)? Don't we have statute of limitations in this case? Otherwise, what would prevent any woman to weaponize the rape allegation the way she deems fit?
As a chaplain who has sat in with rape patients enduring ER rape kits (those can be as physically painful as the rape was, and take hours), I can, sadly, answer this. Sometimes rape victims need to heal-- a LOT--before they are ready to face family and friends, much less police, other authorities, and eventually formal cross-examination. The police intake process is humiliating--especially for a woman describing in gross detail to a man what another man did to her. On top of that, rape victims actually often furiously gaslight themselves enough long before powerful attorneys humiliate them if they do get up the guts to come forward (“Was I dressed in a way to I lead him on? Was I clear enough in my boundaries? Did I fight hard enough?”) A very large percentage of women do not have the emotional energy to go forward, and never say a word, and will go to their deaths without justice.
(This is not a comment on the Brand case in any way.)
But please don’t misunderstand that I am arguing against your point. No man deserves to be falsely accused of rape. I think we agree men have as much right not to be thrown in prison for what they haven’t done, as women have not to be raped. I just wanted to comment about how dark life really becomes once someone has been violated that way. Rape DESTROYS lives. It destroys a woman’s ability to trust her own perceptions, much less the presence of any man around her, ever again, *especially* if he has any authority (power) over her.
In addition, the courts are terribly corrupt. The “good ol” boy” system is alive and well.
Thank you, all good points. It's the timing in this case which makes it highly suspect. Too many times men have been accused of rape for political reasons, and rape is something which is very hard to prove or disprove, especially years after, so it becomes a very efficient political tool. At the same time real rapists walk around unpunished, so it's a very selective application of justice
These are all very good points, especially that women will gaslight themselves afterwords.
As I think about this, the big question in my mind is, how would I react in this situation? Would I have waited years to come forward? Would I still not have been ready during #MeToo? Possibly. Once I got the courage to speak, would I go to the media and not the police? No. No freaking way. I would go to the police. If I didn't get any satisfaction from the police, then I would go to the media.
The next big question is, would my reaction be typical? Maybe. Probably in the majority of cases, people would follow the path I think I would follow. There might be people who would go to the media first, rather than the police, to dish out a little payback for the hurt, pain and suffering the rape caused. But then I think for five women to choose this route, rather than the police? No. Again, no freaking way.
I don't know if the accusations are true or not, but I do believe all five victims' behavior is not in keeping with how true rape survivors would respond.
Add to that the concerted effort to eliminate his ability to provide for himself and his family, and his ability to speak, I am leaning towards this being a hit job. They want to take him down. It's what communists do.
Exactly. If I waited all those years to avoid publicity, why would I all of a sudden do this very public thing? And adding the fact that they want to de-platform him before going through the normal legal process - and so we have all signs of trial and managing by media, public lynching, all to circumvent the existing law.
Spot on. Well done.
Of the three who attacked my niece, one was given 5 years and is out in November, the other two, because the jury couldn't make up its mind were found guilty of aiding and abetting and were given 2 years suspended.
The girl lives in terror of the convicted rapist coming out.
Absolutely right about it destroying lives and it should never be trivialised, as so often happens by those who simply don't understand.
There is no rape statute of limitations in the UK and it's the London Met that's investigating... you might also have spotted that the allegations and assaults have all been made in the UK, not the US.
Also, if you had any first hand knowledge of rape victims not coming forward you would know that there are no end of reasons why a single, as in only one, girl/woman wouldn't come forward, but if a dam breaks then it's safety in numbers and more will come forward.
I have no idea whether he's guilty or not and I'm not making any judgement in the case, but you cannot just dismiss complaints simply because they didn't come forward at the time.
It happened to my niece and she was, under death threat from the 3 rapists, extremely reluctant to go to the police. It was only when she opened up to her parents that they made sure it was made known and one of the three was imprisoned for the rape. She was 15 and completely traumatised at the time.
all good points, thank you. It does have to be looked into on a case by case basis, of course. The problem is that those "fake" ones actually harm real victims. Like the case with your niece is very different from a case when a grown-up porn star complains of being "raped" years after spending a night with a young handsome billionaire and even paid for staying silent.
“ grown-up porn star ” ? Was there one? Were there more than one?
I wasn’t aware that porn stars were fair game either to any passing rapist.
She's an idiot and totally unhinged. She has no right to do anything of the sort.
The 77th Brigade was a nasty piece of work and should be disbanded.
Yes, if Brand is found innocent it will be a major embarrassment for her and her dishonest shill of a husband, but if he's guilty it will give her "complete justification" and empower the ruling cabal to go even further... so why not suspend habeas corpus while they're at it?
By the time they will find Brand innocent most dimwits will perform a total reset about the story and claim nonexistent facts.
Interesting. They don’t need an investigation then as you’ve already decided the outcome and that he’s innocent. Best send them an email and tell them to call it off.
Yep, no need to talk to people who’ve been affected by his behaviour then as to whether his actions were criminal or consensual.
Sorted.
I forgot to add IF. if he found guilty it will be main article everywhere fanfares etc. If he found not guilty will be not reported the ones hear about will do as I say. Erase the event and rewire it in the brain.
How disrespectful. SHE goes as "Dame", but addresses the CEO of Rumble as "Chris". Should we therefore assume that she has a comfortable, established friend/relationship with him?
Even if Brand is guilty, please explain to me how that affects his revenue streams (YouTube and Rumble)... Did he use those to commit a crime? No, so why are they on the table at all?
I can understand an accountant guilty of fraud no longer being able to work as an accountant, but Brand's social media activity has little do with the chargea against him (yes? I don't follow him). That is what I find disturbing, yes comvicting him before he is found guilty, but also the arbitrary judgement/punishment that is being meeted out.
You know, it's a funny thing. I've always wished I'd discovered Dickens' "A Child's History of England" long before I was forced to read "A Tale of Two Cities" and "Great Expectations." That first-named book to which I came last, finally made me admire that man. He so beautifully, movingly described the achievements of the common people in fighting for justice and the concept that even the monarch was subject to the Common Law (and if he wanted to bend it, had better hire a really good team of lawyers).
There's been such cowardice in public discourse about the nature of cultures and how some are indeed superior to others, though the people who form them may individually be as wretched or as fine as any other individuals anywhere, bred by any culture anywhere.
That a man may stand up with dignity and demand justice, and proof of the factualness of anything he might be accused of, and to be judged openly by his peers under the oversight of a judge bound to uphold the law, is an extraordinary evolution of human thought and the most remarkable instrument of attempting, however imperfectly in the actuals, to channel human nature away from mob rule and towards respect for the rights of every person, no matter how we might despise him for any of a gazillion reasons.
People's tastes are quite individual. But I suggest that anyone wanting to give really useful gifts for the upcoming holiday season might consider paperback versions of "A Child's History of England" and the US Constitution. This will effectively cover all ages. Even babies enjoy hearing words they can't yet understand.
There was a day in 1649 when the people of England watched a headsman with a sword part the neck of Charles the first. A good example to all who claim to be kings. (No king but Jesus Christ. Amen.)
For my part, I celebrate the words of Bill Buppert. The constitution is the casket in which they buried the declaration of independence. ymmv
God bless you. Amen.
My mileage varies extremely.
Extremism in the defence of liberty is no vice. ~ Goldwater
I am extremely not an extremist.
What a beautiful letter from Murdoch. There is something funny, though, about him referring to "elites" as if he is not one himself. But on a more serious note, I am wondering if there is any way Dame D can be charged and prosecuted. She clearly broke the law. She should at least be sued.
most likely she was told to write it by a higher authority. That's the way they operate, always staying in shadows
I keep wondering how long until Joe Rogan gets the full bore authoritarian cancel treatment. Surely with his Hollywood past TPTB can dredge up half a dozen sexual assault “victims” (for big cash payouts). He reaches too many people to not be a 🎯
Rogan, Tucker, RFKJr. There are others. That's what is really going on here.
Britain is apparently no longer British, or the British are no longer British. Well at least this will be proven true if the Great British public stand for any of this WEF Trojan horse shit... This Britain is supposed to be the cradle of modern democracy and stood alone in opposition to despotic totalitarianism twice while others (including the USA) stood by and said none of our business. It is supposed to be the bedrock of the legal system for all of the great Western democracies but now we get everyone is guilty until the censorship cannot continue to blind people to the truth. Do the British people think it will not touch them? Think again and read your history and not the reworked Woke history that is just pure lies and fantasy. The current generations of British should hang their heads in shame next to their exalted fore-bearers (who must be exhausted from the spinning in their graves) and remember that if they do not now stand against tyranny they will condemn their children to have to fight a war of independence from the tyrant WEF elites. Members of the police and armed forces should remember that serve the people and not the elites. Now is easier to fight, we are still a democracy, just. Later will be bloody and only after much more blood has been shed, as history tells us all totalitarian regimes descend to, and remember this one wants fewer people on the planet... These elites have nothing but bad intentions. They offer nothing but lies and a bleak dystopia. They cannot be trusted, they are lizard people. You cannot trust the $cience! You cannot trust the Media. You cannot trust big business and you sure as shit cannot trust your government not the unelected detached UN, WHO, WEF.
Interested in hearing Neil Oliver's take on this.
"The way Russell Brand is being treated by the relic media is plain wrong. The fracture between reasonable people and this travesty of a media is being made permanent."
-Neil Oliver
I go even farther: people who are convicted of crimes don’t lose their right to make a living. I think it’s dangerous to give any credence to this BS. All accusations aren’t equal and we’ve seen this playbook enough to chuck the “open mind” BS. Its an assassination attempt. Change my mind. THE END