27 Comments

The "vaccines" are bioweapons - categorised as "countermeasures" by the US Department of Defence which issued the contracts - and therefore not subject to any of the usual FDA public health regulations and scrutiny.

Substack investigators Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt have all the gory details.

Expand full comment

As everyone now knows, these spike proteins that the body is instructed to produce are toxic. If anyone given these (I met someone who had had 6) are immunocompromised), i.e. body unable to mount any reaction, why are they given any at all? It makes no sense to me and I wonder about all those also toxic delivery parcels, LNPs, as well as gizillions of spike proteins that are produced each jab with no response from body. Pfizer's man, Bancel, is on video Dec 2020 saying immunocompromised should NOT receive these jabs at all and said they should receive monocol? antibodies instead. Even UK JVCI said in Dec 2020 that frail and immunocompromised do not do well. Whether this meant just no reaction antibody wise or adverse outcomes was not clear.

Expand full comment

People keep taking these jabs because they really do believe they are "safe and effective" and have "saved millions of lives" and that side effects are "sad but very rare". That's all. No questions need be asked because they trust their healthcare providers. Any subsequent illness is nothing to do with the jabs (which are "safe and effective"). Can't argue with blind stupidity can you?

Expand full comment

What part of the jab is a bioweapon issued as a countermeasure by the DOD don’t you understand? You’re speaking as if the poison jab is a pharmaceutical. It’s not. It is a population control bioweapon.

Expand full comment

Stephane Bancel is CEO of Moderna.

Expand full comment

FOI for Moderna data has been granted and will be available in June sometime.

Expand full comment

Yes, sorry, I meant the Greek one, Albert Bourla - got my 'Bs' mixed up!

Expand full comment
Apr 24, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter

I don't understand the sentence "However, as with most nudging these days, you will retire because you decided not to retire, not because there is no money. " How "will you retire because you decided not to retire?" Can someone explain please?

Expand full comment
author

Good spot, I missed a 'not'. As with all good nudging, you will convince yourself that it was your decision not to retire, when in reality you were nudged into not retiring because there is no money in the pot,

Expand full comment

Makes sense, thanks!

Expand full comment

When I was studying it in the 1980s NLP was neurolinguistic programming. Now Normal Language Programming?

Expand full comment

I think it's two different things. Neurolinguistic programming is the use of words to reinforce what you want, this NLP is scanning already-written words trying to understand if the overall sentiment is positive/negative and in which direction it's trending.

Expand full comment

Got it. Just had not heard of the newer NLP before. Thank you.

Expand full comment

Interesting poll. My version of retirement is working for myself and I am headed in that direction. I have been gardening for over 20 years. We have a tiny piece of land and have spent the last 3 years planting fruit and nut trees and putting in berry bushes. We have chickens and more to come. Honeybees are on the way. What I do every day is hard work and I hope to soon turn a profit, the investment of time and money has been considerable. At the end of it all I am doing something I love and, if need be, can feed my own family and contribute to my family, neighbors, and friends.

I have no intention of stopping work, I have just chosen to do work that provides value to myself and others.

Expand full comment

The reason why people aren't having kids is mostly financial, just like with retirement.

How the heck can a working class person afford a house?

Also, why didn't the economists call out inflation of housing prices rapid rise for 2 decades?

Nah let's focus on food and energy, even though most of our pay goes to housing....

Expand full comment

"FDA’s authorization and licensure standards for vaccines do not require demonstration of the prevention of infection or transmission"

Wasn't it Stalin who said, "He who controls the language controls the debate."

We can't be guilty of fraud, because we redefined what fraud means.

Expand full comment

Once again, thank you for the valuable news round up. - On the subject of MSM let me share this nugget from BBC Wales news: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-65358308

The article cites research from Swansea university which admits (finally!) that shielding, or sheltering in place for US readers, had no measurable benefit for avoiding catching covid. Most people will not bother to read until the end, but that is where a veritable treasure trove of inconsistency and selling-us-for-stupid lies. The professor who led the research admits "we evaluated ... the policy of writing to people and recommending very strongly that they stay at home. It wasn't underpinned at that time by any evidence. It was sort of made up at the time and implemented."

Ah, so policy was "made up at the time". Well, well, who would have guessed. Obviously not the Welsh government, because in the same article, the BBC quotes a Welsh government spokesbod (to maintain "balanced reporting", no doubt), who stated: "The introduction of shielding was one of a number of public health interventions made to keep Wales safe that followed medical and scientific advice."

So, interventions followed medical and scientific advice which was based on being made up at the time. You couldn't make it up if you tried.

Expand full comment

Re Mercator Projection: https://youtu.be/eLqC3FNNOaI

Still one of my favourite shows... And not because I agree with the ideology, most of the time I didn't.

Expand full comment

Agreed. I instantly thought of this scene.

Expand full comment

Big block of cheese day!

Expand full comment

The Democratic party, which is no longer a political party, does not want to allow RFK jr. to speak. It is sort of a cult, at least for the devotees, but actually a corporate extraction machine, maybe. They want to deplatform him, the big Woke strategy. We need those debates.

Someone should ask ChatGPT if it would drink the kool-aid!

Thanks for these articles!

Expand full comment

I said that he was going to get the Ron Paul treatment, but at least they just ignored Paul during the debates -- they didn't cancel them!

Expand full comment

For the country sizes: www.thetruesize.com

It's a very nice interactive map. Gives you some real surprises!

Expand full comment

"Safe and Effective" for who?

Expand full comment

Excellent coverage as usual—(however the fda link doesn’t seem to work).

Keep up the great work

Expand full comment