Re: Richard Medhurst. I must be a terrorist too. It just means that The State is my enemy because they are tyrants. Come and get me. You tried very hard with your mRNA needles but never succeeded. And you won't succeed now.
"Today intensive efforts are being made to revive the Cults of Cybele/Demeter as well as the cult’s Christian gnostic synthetic cults (outlined in the Nag Hamadi texts) in the works of Elaine Pagels, Brian Muraresku, Diana Pasulka, Graham Hancock and countless others."
I find this pretty revealing. These seem like very different people with different ideas. Muraresku writes of two strains, one hedonistic and Dionysiac, and the other entheogenic, prefiguring NDE and paranormal research and William Blake and the rejection of physicalism/materialism. So, we are supposed to believe that monotheism is the antidote to this stream of occultism he identifies? Look at that history, Martin Luther reacting to Catholics selling hallucinogenic beers and indulgences and sybartic popes, then Protestantism giving rise to disenchantment, no myth, the repression and suppression of Erich Neumann. Not that I don't think luciferian occultism isn't being promoted in as many places as possible---the "joy" of the DNC for instance---but I think something has been after human flourishing for at least 2000 years, and we haven't yet figured out what is going on. Religion, in its political forms, with its burning of women for centuries, Inquisitions, pedophila, and Vatican ratlines helping Nazis escape, and political Islam, is not, in itself, by force of its content and gods, the antidote to occultism.
Putin's 'traditional values' Russia is beginning to seem an attractive country to live in.
Perhaps he and Trump should join forces?
Aren’t they already working behind the scenes? Letter writing so nothing can be traced? It’s what I believe.
Re: Richard Medhurst. I must be a terrorist too. It just means that The State is my enemy because they are tyrants. Come and get me. You tried very hard with your mRNA needles but never succeeded. And you won't succeed now.
"Today intensive efforts are being made to revive the Cults of Cybele/Demeter as well as the cult’s Christian gnostic synthetic cults (outlined in the Nag Hamadi texts) in the works of Elaine Pagels, Brian Muraresku, Diana Pasulka, Graham Hancock and countless others."
I find this pretty revealing. These seem like very different people with different ideas. Muraresku writes of two strains, one hedonistic and Dionysiac, and the other entheogenic, prefiguring NDE and paranormal research and William Blake and the rejection of physicalism/materialism. So, we are supposed to believe that monotheism is the antidote to this stream of occultism he identifies? Look at that history, Martin Luther reacting to Catholics selling hallucinogenic beers and indulgences and sybartic popes, then Protestantism giving rise to disenchantment, no myth, the repression and suppression of Erich Neumann. Not that I don't think luciferian occultism isn't being promoted in as many places as possible---the "joy" of the DNC for instance---but I think something has been after human flourishing for at least 2000 years, and we haven't yet figured out what is going on. Religion, in its political forms, with its burning of women for centuries, Inquisitions, pedophila, and Vatican ratlines helping Nazis escape, and political Islam, is not, in itself, by force of its content and gods, the antidote to occultism.