Jul 26, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Regardless, shouldn’t we be seeing almost no deaths in jabbed categories? I mean if they truly functioned as a vaccine there should be a handful of unlucky souls who got a break through infection, maybe a few misdiagnosed deaths ie. people dying of Covid when they did not. If they truly worked we should see like 99% of all deaths in the unjabbed.
Jul 26, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
It is a bit more complicated than this.
(1) The anti-bodies make no sense, since the Wuhan variant does no longer exists. So we can not expect any protection. According to Bossche we can even expect negative protection. (2) Side-effects from the vaccine are often counted as Covid. (3) The vaccine status often has a 14 day delay. (4) Depending on the vax-status, the tests are performed differently. Vaxed are sometimes not even tested, while unvaxxed are treated as rats. In the US the PCR-count has been reduced from 45 (99% false positives) to 28 (30% false positives). And this PCR test can be positive with a different infection (like a cold). (5) Racial and wealth differences. Many poorer communities avoided the vax, because they had bad histories with them. (6) Differences between batches. The conservative states were sent the more toxic batches it seems. (7) Many cities and states already had herd immunity (in spring 2020) before the vax was introduced. (8) The governments and agencies are actively looking for stats to make the unvaxed look worse. Often making up "facts". (9) Certain communities have access to cheap medicine that actually work, and/or better food. (10) Deaths from guns and accidents (anything) may also be counted as covid deaths when a test turned out to be positive. Families and doctors were bribed to put covid on the death certificate. And not to put vax death on the death certificates.
Jul 26, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Excellent! I was going to do this myself but you beat me to it. Your analysis confirms my suspicions that one and two doses cause problems but boosters have YET to cause a problem, since they are more recent. Time will tell if I am right. Also, don’t the Brits use the same 14 day lag in calling someone vaxxed? How many people died within 14 days of receiving any vax and did they include those people in the unvaxxed group?
Jul 26, 2022·edited Jul 27, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
I completely understand and accept this analysis. BUT it is also the case that thousands of vaccinted people are dying from Covid and the comaprison with unvaccinated is irrelevant in the sense that the one remaining claim for the gene therapies is that they "protect against severe disease, hospitalization and death". Even on an overall basis (which I accept is not the correct way to view the data for precision) if the gene therapies can at best claim "similar" rates of death per 100K, isn't that another way of saying "the gene therapies do NOT work"?
Jul 26, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Very interesting indeed. You read my mind at the end... as I was reading I was thinking that it would be enlightening to see similar a comparison made when looking at all-cause mortality.
This is good. One question. Hasn't it come up that the deaths are in the wrong categories due to the 14 day delay? So if a boosted person dies within 14 days of the booster, they'd be recorded with the double-jabbed? And if a person got their second shot and died within 14 days, they'd be recorded with the single jabbed?
Jul 27, 2022·edited Jul 27, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
I think the absolute numbers of single-dosed needs to be considered - this is really a very small group!
Most of the single-dosed will have discontinued dosing because of underlying health issues or because of adverse reactions to their first dose. I am really not sure how significant this group is.
(I believe I am an extreme outlier in that I am single-dosed and discontinued because the information I found countering the MSM narrative became overwhelming)
The double-dosed is a much larger group and has a much larger percentage who have discontinued dosing because of disillusionment with the vaccine campaign and not necessarily due to personal health complications/issues.
Without more survey data on these groups to find out why they discontinued dosing it is very difficult to convincingly draw conclusions.
EDIT: You didn't mention how the UK Health Security Agency conveniently stopped publishing the rates for the double-dosed! Apparently only the triple-dosed now outperform the unvaccinated. Of course, that the double-dosed were no longer showing better rates than the unvaccinated was pointing to negative vaccine effectiveness!
Jul 26, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Three Canadian doctors from same health care/hospitals died suddenly last week just as 4th jab being given. Reported on globalresearch.ca. Sorry but unable to add link right now. Please look and share. Most jabbed I know have been quite ill with normal cold or developed infections requiring antibiotics, skin cancers, worsening of existing ailments such as arthritis and one elderly has developed significant memory loss. None have thought that recent experimental jabs may have contributed! Another had loss of consciousness, fell and bashed her head in bathroom. I dread to hear about any future illnesses.
Jul 26, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
When it comes to determine if someone died of COVID I suspect their may be some biases both in dx. For example undervaxxed may be more likely to go down as a COVID death than boosted.
As for the younger unvaxxed dying of COVID at lower rates than their population, this is likely due to the most unhealthy of the young are more likely to be vaxxed (opposite of very old population )
Jul 26, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Oh this is bloody lovely isn't it?
"For instance, if everyone were vaccinated, 100% of people would die vaccinated.”
Yeah of course they would be, but the main point of what this ninny of a fact checker states is that THEY ARE VACCINATED AND THEY DIE OF COVID!
While the unvaccinated doesn't die of Covid all that much at all, and the ****** doesn't even get what he wrote himself!
Reading that maes wish I was still a young one, out with my droogs wearing our steel-toed hob-nailed boots and coming across the abolute shithead who wrote that, in an out-of-the-way underpass or so. "Singing in the rain, just singing in the rain..."
I seem to remember reading at the beginning of the pandemic that Reuters is owned by someone that is also on Phizer's Board of Directors... That figures!
Jul 26, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
solid. thanks. i was always irked by those bold claims in the critics community and asked many times what about base rate fallacy? nobody ever responded.
Jul 27, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
My problems immediately:
-population size is debatable and most likely undercounted so saying the exact % of either the vaxxed or the unvaxxed is probably impossible. Undercounting makes the vaxxed group look bigger and the unvaxxed group look smaller skewing the statistics in the favor of the vaccinators.
-the 14 / 21 days delay trickery and reclassification of vax status due to this delay makes any statistics nearly useless
Just a sidenote: Switzerland quietly pulled their adverse reaction numbers from their covid19 dashboard.
Regardless, shouldn’t we be seeing almost no deaths in jabbed categories? I mean if they truly functioned as a vaccine there should be a handful of unlucky souls who got a break through infection, maybe a few misdiagnosed deaths ie. people dying of Covid when they did not. If they truly worked we should see like 99% of all deaths in the unjabbed.
It is a bit more complicated than this.
(1) The anti-bodies make no sense, since the Wuhan variant does no longer exists. So we can not expect any protection. According to Bossche we can even expect negative protection. (2) Side-effects from the vaccine are often counted as Covid. (3) The vaccine status often has a 14 day delay. (4) Depending on the vax-status, the tests are performed differently. Vaxed are sometimes not even tested, while unvaxxed are treated as rats. In the US the PCR-count has been reduced from 45 (99% false positives) to 28 (30% false positives). And this PCR test can be positive with a different infection (like a cold). (5) Racial and wealth differences. Many poorer communities avoided the vax, because they had bad histories with them. (6) Differences between batches. The conservative states were sent the more toxic batches it seems. (7) Many cities and states already had herd immunity (in spring 2020) before the vax was introduced. (8) The governments and agencies are actively looking for stats to make the unvaxed look worse. Often making up "facts". (9) Certain communities have access to cheap medicine that actually work, and/or better food. (10) Deaths from guns and accidents (anything) may also be counted as covid deaths when a test turned out to be positive. Families and doctors were bribed to put covid on the death certificate. And not to put vax death on the death certificates.
Excellent! I was going to do this myself but you beat me to it. Your analysis confirms my suspicions that one and two doses cause problems but boosters have YET to cause a problem, since they are more recent. Time will tell if I am right. Also, don’t the Brits use the same 14 day lag in calling someone vaxxed? How many people died within 14 days of receiving any vax and did they include those people in the unvaxxed group?
Can't wait for tomorrow. ACM == My Favourite Metric
This is so interesting! Please keep digging.
I completely understand and accept this analysis. BUT it is also the case that thousands of vaccinted people are dying from Covid and the comaprison with unvaccinated is irrelevant in the sense that the one remaining claim for the gene therapies is that they "protect against severe disease, hospitalization and death". Even on an overall basis (which I accept is not the correct way to view the data for precision) if the gene therapies can at best claim "similar" rates of death per 100K, isn't that another way of saying "the gene therapies do NOT work"?
Very interesting indeed. You read my mind at the end... as I was reading I was thinking that it would be enlightening to see similar a comparison made when looking at all-cause mortality.
Thank you for your great work.
Eustace Mullins warned us long before fact checkers reared their ugly heads.
https://www.eustacemullins.us/tag/eustace-mullins/
This is good. One question. Hasn't it come up that the deaths are in the wrong categories due to the 14 day delay? So if a boosted person dies within 14 days of the booster, they'd be recorded with the double-jabbed? And if a person got their second shot and died within 14 days, they'd be recorded with the single jabbed?
I think the absolute numbers of single-dosed needs to be considered - this is really a very small group!
Most of the single-dosed will have discontinued dosing because of underlying health issues or because of adverse reactions to their first dose. I am really not sure how significant this group is.
(I believe I am an extreme outlier in that I am single-dosed and discontinued because the information I found countering the MSM narrative became overwhelming)
The double-dosed is a much larger group and has a much larger percentage who have discontinued dosing because of disillusionment with the vaccine campaign and not necessarily due to personal health complications/issues.
Without more survey data on these groups to find out why they discontinued dosing it is very difficult to convincingly draw conclusions.
EDIT: You didn't mention how the UK Health Security Agency conveniently stopped publishing the rates for the double-dosed! Apparently only the triple-dosed now outperform the unvaccinated. Of course, that the double-dosed were no longer showing better rates than the unvaccinated was pointing to negative vaccine effectiveness!
Three Canadian doctors from same health care/hospitals died suddenly last week just as 4th jab being given. Reported on globalresearch.ca. Sorry but unable to add link right now. Please look and share. Most jabbed I know have been quite ill with normal cold or developed infections requiring antibiotics, skin cancers, worsening of existing ailments such as arthritis and one elderly has developed significant memory loss. None have thought that recent experimental jabs may have contributed! Another had loss of consciousness, fell and bashed her head in bathroom. I dread to hear about any future illnesses.
When it comes to determine if someone died of COVID I suspect their may be some biases both in dx. For example undervaxxed may be more likely to go down as a COVID death than boosted.
As for the younger unvaxxed dying of COVID at lower rates than their population, this is likely due to the most unhealthy of the young are more likely to be vaxxed (opposite of very old population )
Oh this is bloody lovely isn't it?
"For instance, if everyone were vaccinated, 100% of people would die vaccinated.”
Yeah of course they would be, but the main point of what this ninny of a fact checker states is that THEY ARE VACCINATED AND THEY DIE OF COVID!
While the unvaccinated doesn't die of Covid all that much at all, and the ****** doesn't even get what he wrote himself!
Reading that maes wish I was still a young one, out with my droogs wearing our steel-toed hob-nailed boots and coming across the abolute shithead who wrote that, in an out-of-the-way underpass or so. "Singing in the rain, just singing in the rain..."
I seem to remember reading at the beginning of the pandemic that Reuters is owned by someone that is also on Phizer's Board of Directors... That figures!
solid. thanks. i was always irked by those bold claims in the critics community and asked many times what about base rate fallacy? nobody ever responded.
My problems immediately:
-population size is debatable and most likely undercounted so saying the exact % of either the vaxxed or the unvaxxed is probably impossible. Undercounting makes the vaxxed group look bigger and the unvaxxed group look smaller skewing the statistics in the favor of the vaccinators.
-the 14 / 21 days delay trickery and reclassification of vax status due to this delay makes any statistics nearly useless
Just a sidenote: Switzerland quietly pulled their adverse reaction numbers from their covid19 dashboard.