Sep 25, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
How was it determined that they had "Covid." Through a fraudulent diagnostic method using PCR. There's no such thing as a "Covid hospitalization." Please desist with perpetuating this false assumption.
It’s imperative that you stop ceding ground to these fascists by reifying the Big Lie that "Covid" is a unique disease and that it is responsible for "hospitalizations" let alone some fictional global pandemic.
You’re only fortifying the narrative and implying that any extra-ordinary response was ever necessary, that a single one of their “public health” diktats was legitimate.
This has never had anything to with what is nothing more than a computer-generated genome falsely attributed to a novel pathogen. It is a global conspiracy by the worlds transnational ruling class which was planned out and war-gamed at the WEF, the central bankers summit in Jackson Hole, and at Event 201.
It’s all right there for anyone to look up and see for themselves. It is about radically transforming every aspect of society in response to the final crisis of capitalism, which was no long profitable or sustainable, transitioning to the new digital financial system, implementing the technologies of the so-called 4th Industrial Revolution, and exterminating and sterilizing broad swathes of the “useless eaters” and now-surplus labor/population, who in old crises would be sent off to war, which is too risky today with weapons of mass destruction that could blow up the world a hundred times over.
Today they’re accomplishing the same thing through the bio-medical weapons of mass destruction of “covid” measures (isolation, medical malpractice, sedation, ventilation, manufactured unemployment, neglect, austerity, etc.) and poison injections.
The lockdowns, mandatory muzzles, anti-social distancing, and the other measures that did nothing to protect or improve public health were all designed to deliberately break the global economy (and crush competition, especially small businesses) as well as break our minds and the social fabric, in order to “build back better”, according to the diabolical and dystopian visions of the psychopaths waging this class war, which is essentially a billionaires utopia, in which they own the planet like a techno-feudal fiefdom, and oversee the drastically reduced population of digitally branded humanity like cattle in a super-surveilled technocracy.
All talk of so-called "Covid" is a meaningless distraction and quite besides the (existentially urgent) point when you understand that the virus/disease they’re allegedly designed to protect against doesn’t exist in the first place and, additionally, what their real, above-mentioned purpose(s) is.
Sep 25, 2022·edited Sep 25, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
This is consistent with the Alberta CA data that was published on the web but then removed once they realized the story it was telling. I saved a copy, uploaded here: https://gofile.io/d/7eymL6
The last page has some charts showing cases, hospitalizations, and deaths time-phased after the first and second shots. It's actually insane that they're still pushing those things...
Sep 25, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
I'm impressed they at least sent you SOME useful data. In the U.S. they would just ignore you or give an excuse why they couldn't give you anything. Which is ok, since U.S. data (at least the publically supplied data) is absolute rubbish anyway.
Sep 25, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Data from Wan etc al on cells demonstrated an ADE dosage effect. Hence, primary humoral antibody responses are too low to enable SARS-COV-2 to infect phagocytic immune cells via IgG binding to Fc receptors. Very high levels of antibodies also blocked ADE. My model for ADE is that the risk is for intermediate antibody titer levels that would likely result post vaccination and also months later as antibody titers decline. To see similar data view Walgreens COVID-19 tracking site graph 3 of 5. This model is consistent with the results in this substack post.
Sep 26, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
This was something that we knew from the trial data. The 2 jab regimen that took 6 weeks to complete and would be counted in the data as unvaxxed until completion was the cover for propagandizing the vaxxed vs. unvaxxed hospitalization and death numbers. And that 14 days after the first jab where the immune system was suppressed and made infection much more likely also served as the perfect breeding ground for the selection of escape variants.
I knew this at the time, that during the initial wave of the mass vaccination campaigns in various countries (UK, Israel, US, etc.) most of the hospitals were filled with some truly unvaxxed but also many vaxxed that didn't count as vaxxed yet and were instead being counted as unvaxxed. A significant portion of the death numbers during this period were those who started the vaccine regimen but died before completing it. We couldn't verify this since the various health orgs didn't track the data that would destroy the narrative, but it was fairly obviously inferred from the data and understanding of how the two jab vaccine regimen actually worked, or perhaps didn't work if you will. It also made it impossible for the vaccine fanatics to validate the absurd claims that 99% of the people being hospitalized and dying were unvaxxed. Remember that? They could never provide the data that proved that because it didn't exist and that was by design. They intentionally used the blunt instrument of counting everybody who hadn't completed the full 6 week two jab process as unvaxxed and counting all unknowns as unvaxxed. Early in the mass vaccination campaign that would mean pretty much everybody was coded as unvaxxed. And going forward, again, it would ensure that all the people who got sick and died during the period of 6 weeks following their first jab (which is when infection was most likely to happen and those who were at risk of dying in the first place would di) would get thrown into the unvaxxed data set for propaganda purposes.
What they were doing was so obvious, yet only a handful of dissident bloggers and data analysts dared say so and attempted to tease out what was really happening from the data. Virtually none of the Ivy League knuckleheads, nobody in academia really, and nobody in the mainstream media dared even explore this manipulation. They all, even many who fell on the right politically, parroted Fauci's and the CDC's corrupt narratives and accepted the demonstrably BS efficacy of the vaccines in preventing infection, spread, hospitalization and death. They all spewed the same lies and didn't dare step out into the space of skepticism.
The truth is and always was (from the trials themselves) that the vaccine did not prevent spread and infection and that it showed NO efficacy in total health outcomes (one more person died in the vaccine arm of the trials than the placebo arm). And, the jab actually made you more vulnerable to infection rather than less during the first two weeks following jab 1. At best, at VERY BEST, all the jabs did was help to prevent severe disease from COVID in the fully vaxxed for an unknown (at the time) period of time. There was some indication in the trials that even that efficacy waned but they did not care about finding out exactly what that would be or mean. We found out fairly quickly what that was and meant, though again the "experts" denied and tried to obfuscate.
None of this even considers the adverse effects from the mRNA vaccines themselves. There was never a positive cost/benefit calculation for the young and healthy to get vaxxed with these experimental vaccines. This was known from the get go. There was never a positive cost/benefit calculation for anybody who had recovered from COVID and had natural immunity to get vaxxed. And we found out soon enough that the case for the higher risk population getting vaxxed was iffy at best. Still, here we are two years later with Pfizer and jab commercials spamming our airwaves 24/7, vaxx mandates sill in place in parts of the country and for non US citizens entering the country (unless illegal) and the corrupt EUA still firmly in place.
COVID exposed clown world in a way I never expected I'd know in my lifetime. I never fully understood how profound the combination of fear and human need for acceptance could move large majorities of populations into a brainwashed mob. But now I do. Things will never be the same and neither will I.
It seems to me a computer could easily separate the data by month, so I bet you're right about them lumping hospitalizations together when most people weren't vaccinated.
How about asking for the total data for hospitalisation and deaths breaking out the first 14 days after the first injection? they would not be able to refuse to release this by week or month on the basis of"small numbers' and enormous liberties have been taken by dumpimg events during the first 14 days into the "unvaccinated" category. Perhaps this dat ia already available but I have never seen it?
You may need to compare hospitalisation rates (or equivalent to your calculations here) pre and post vaccination day 1-14, in order to show that there is a spike.
Otherwise the argument might be “look there is a drop in hospitalisation rate after the vaccine takes effect”, “it’s not a spike, it’s a drop: see how safe and effective vaccines are”, especially since the apparent spike doesn’t happen after the second shot.
The 14 day gap is the most flagrant prove of foul play.
How was it determined that they had "Covid." Through a fraudulent diagnostic method using PCR. There's no such thing as a "Covid hospitalization." Please desist with perpetuating this false assumption.
It’s imperative that you stop ceding ground to these fascists by reifying the Big Lie that "Covid" is a unique disease and that it is responsible for "hospitalizations" let alone some fictional global pandemic.
You’re only fortifying the narrative and implying that any extra-ordinary response was ever necessary, that a single one of their “public health” diktats was legitimate.
This has never had anything to with what is nothing more than a computer-generated genome falsely attributed to a novel pathogen. It is a global conspiracy by the worlds transnational ruling class which was planned out and war-gamed at the WEF, the central bankers summit in Jackson Hole, and at Event 201.
It’s all right there for anyone to look up and see for themselves. It is about radically transforming every aspect of society in response to the final crisis of capitalism, which was no long profitable or sustainable, transitioning to the new digital financial system, implementing the technologies of the so-called 4th Industrial Revolution, and exterminating and sterilizing broad swathes of the “useless eaters” and now-surplus labor/population, who in old crises would be sent off to war, which is too risky today with weapons of mass destruction that could blow up the world a hundred times over.
Today they’re accomplishing the same thing through the bio-medical weapons of mass destruction of “covid” measures (isolation, medical malpractice, sedation, ventilation, manufactured unemployment, neglect, austerity, etc.) and poison injections.
The lockdowns, mandatory muzzles, anti-social distancing, and the other measures that did nothing to protect or improve public health were all designed to deliberately break the global economy (and crush competition, especially small businesses) as well as break our minds and the social fabric, in order to “build back better”, according to the diabolical and dystopian visions of the psychopaths waging this class war, which is essentially a billionaires utopia, in which they own the planet like a techno-feudal fiefdom, and oversee the drastically reduced population of digitally branded humanity like cattle in a super-surveilled technocracy.
All talk of so-called "Covid" is a meaningless distraction and quite besides the (existentially urgent) point when you understand that the virus/disease they’re allegedly designed to protect against doesn’t exist in the first place and, additionally, what their real, above-mentioned purpose(s) is.
This is consistent with the Alberta CA data that was published on the web but then removed once they realized the story it was telling. I saved a copy, uploaded here: https://gofile.io/d/7eymL6
The last page has some charts showing cases, hospitalizations, and deaths time-phased after the first and second shots. It's actually insane that they're still pushing those things...
I'm impressed they at least sent you SOME useful data. In the U.S. they would just ignore you or give an excuse why they couldn't give you anything. Which is ok, since U.S. data (at least the publically supplied data) is absolute rubbish anyway.
Data from Wan etc al on cells demonstrated an ADE dosage effect. Hence, primary humoral antibody responses are too low to enable SARS-COV-2 to infect phagocytic immune cells via IgG binding to Fc receptors. Very high levels of antibodies also blocked ADE. My model for ADE is that the risk is for intermediate antibody titer levels that would likely result post vaccination and also months later as antibody titers decline. To see similar data view Walgreens COVID-19 tracking site graph 3 of 5. This model is consistent with the results in this substack post.
This was something that we knew from the trial data. The 2 jab regimen that took 6 weeks to complete and would be counted in the data as unvaxxed until completion was the cover for propagandizing the vaxxed vs. unvaxxed hospitalization and death numbers. And that 14 days after the first jab where the immune system was suppressed and made infection much more likely also served as the perfect breeding ground for the selection of escape variants.
I knew this at the time, that during the initial wave of the mass vaccination campaigns in various countries (UK, Israel, US, etc.) most of the hospitals were filled with some truly unvaxxed but also many vaxxed that didn't count as vaxxed yet and were instead being counted as unvaxxed. A significant portion of the death numbers during this period were those who started the vaccine regimen but died before completing it. We couldn't verify this since the various health orgs didn't track the data that would destroy the narrative, but it was fairly obviously inferred from the data and understanding of how the two jab vaccine regimen actually worked, or perhaps didn't work if you will. It also made it impossible for the vaccine fanatics to validate the absurd claims that 99% of the people being hospitalized and dying were unvaxxed. Remember that? They could never provide the data that proved that because it didn't exist and that was by design. They intentionally used the blunt instrument of counting everybody who hadn't completed the full 6 week two jab process as unvaxxed and counting all unknowns as unvaxxed. Early in the mass vaccination campaign that would mean pretty much everybody was coded as unvaxxed. And going forward, again, it would ensure that all the people who got sick and died during the period of 6 weeks following their first jab (which is when infection was most likely to happen and those who were at risk of dying in the first place would di) would get thrown into the unvaxxed data set for propaganda purposes.
What they were doing was so obvious, yet only a handful of dissident bloggers and data analysts dared say so and attempted to tease out what was really happening from the data. Virtually none of the Ivy League knuckleheads, nobody in academia really, and nobody in the mainstream media dared even explore this manipulation. They all, even many who fell on the right politically, parroted Fauci's and the CDC's corrupt narratives and accepted the demonstrably BS efficacy of the vaccines in preventing infection, spread, hospitalization and death. They all spewed the same lies and didn't dare step out into the space of skepticism.
The truth is and always was (from the trials themselves) that the vaccine did not prevent spread and infection and that it showed NO efficacy in total health outcomes (one more person died in the vaccine arm of the trials than the placebo arm). And, the jab actually made you more vulnerable to infection rather than less during the first two weeks following jab 1. At best, at VERY BEST, all the jabs did was help to prevent severe disease from COVID in the fully vaxxed for an unknown (at the time) period of time. There was some indication in the trials that even that efficacy waned but they did not care about finding out exactly what that would be or mean. We found out fairly quickly what that was and meant, though again the "experts" denied and tried to obfuscate.
None of this even considers the adverse effects from the mRNA vaccines themselves. There was never a positive cost/benefit calculation for the young and healthy to get vaxxed with these experimental vaccines. This was known from the get go. There was never a positive cost/benefit calculation for anybody who had recovered from COVID and had natural immunity to get vaxxed. And we found out soon enough that the case for the higher risk population getting vaxxed was iffy at best. Still, here we are two years later with Pfizer and jab commercials spamming our airwaves 24/7, vaxx mandates sill in place in parts of the country and for non US citizens entering the country (unless illegal) and the corrupt EUA still firmly in place.
COVID exposed clown world in a way I never expected I'd know in my lifetime. I never fully understood how profound the combination of fear and human need for acceptance could move large majorities of populations into a brainwashed mob. But now I do. Things will never be the same and neither will I.
It can be clearly seen in the Alberta and Ontario stats:
https://twitter.com/DrMarcoEF/status/1543365125754822656?s=20&t=YIvPvaSSjFUCv_ccXRD1-g
https://twitter.com/DrMarcoEF/status/1576005072638525440?s=20&t=YIvPvaSSjFUCv_ccXRD1-g
It seems to me a computer could easily separate the data by month, so I bet you're right about them lumping hospitalizations together when most people weren't vaccinated.
How about asking for the total data for hospitalisation and deaths breaking out the first 14 days after the first injection? they would not be able to refuse to release this by week or month on the basis of"small numbers' and enormous liberties have been taken by dumpimg events during the first 14 days into the "unvaccinated" category. Perhaps this dat ia already available but I have never seen it?
Thanks for this cautious and careful analysis.
You may need to compare hospitalisation rates (or equivalent to your calculations here) pre and post vaccination day 1-14, in order to show that there is a spike.
Otherwise the argument might be “look there is a drop in hospitalisation rate after the vaccine takes effect”, “it’s not a spike, it’s a drop: see how safe and effective vaccines are”, especially since the apparent spike doesn’t happen after the second shot.
Maybe 14 days is not a small fraction of person days at risk. A lot of the single vaccinated would soon get a second shot.