May 27, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
sounds like they are using the same fraud that Pfizer did. Ooops, these people died of our vaccine so we'll just dump them from the study results so they don't count.
May 27, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
Yes, corporate media is all BS but all along there have been alternative sources we gradually begin to trust. Being cautious is a good thing and we need to get better at this for certain. Our best guide has been and remains our gut reactions as we learn how to know when we’re being played and by whom. Serial abusers are expert at creating learned helplessness.
May 27, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
Eternal skepticism of all things, but especially of anything having to do with, or originating in, the State, which, although mindless, is inherently expansionist and anti-individual in nature.
That's all that the CovIDIOTS will read - if you send them stuff like this article --- they will say it's all bullshit conspiracy theory. We are at a serious impasse. But because they are CovIDIOTS we know that they are wrong
On the other hand, by examining the stool or the spoor of corporate media, you can sort-of discern what the sh*t they pump out started as.
Also, it helps you blend in and not draw attention to yourself as a free thinker, which is dangerous (maybe not too much in the US yet, but us europeans old enough to have experienced East Germany and the USSR first hand knows full well that /not/ knowing what the state-approved media tell is today's truth, is enough to draw the wrong kind of attention).
There are celebrities and celebrities. 67yo healthy actor not known to have substance abuse dies in sleep is different from hard living, risk taking celeb shockingly! dies young.
Sure, 67 yo dying suddenly isn't too shocking but there does seem to be alot going around. Somebody needs to make an exhaustive list of public figures with medical deaths over the last year and compare it to previous years for baseline. Is All Cause Celebrity Deaths elevated?
Don't actors/cast/crew have to have stringent physicals before they start working on a movie, for insurance purposes? Which would seem anything untoward would be caught before filming started. And for the past 2 years, haven't all the actors/cast/crew had to have gotten the shots?
It is quite normal for apparently healthy men in their 50's, 60's and 70's to die. I can think of far too many of my own friends who have died young.
But celebrities - even sober ones - do have a higher than usual death rate: take (at Random) the Bee Gees - all brothers...just as an example.
- On 10 March 1988, younger brother Andy Gibb died, aged 30, as a result of myocarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle due to a recent viral infection.
Rock n rollers often die young. 27 is one target, who ends up with the money? In Brian Jones case it was likely Allen Klein. Also the same case with Sam Cooke, same guy, Allen Klein. Hendrix's manager was in financial trouble. Mama Cass may have been fat but her death too is suspicious. Steve Marriott had problems with the mafia and died in a burning house. The Kray twins are suspected of killing Brian Epstein along with a desire to manage the Beatles. Jim Morrison died two years to the day after his friend Brian Jones. Hate to say it but Marianne Faithfull was in the vicinity of both deaths. Maybe she should have been questioned a little harder as I'm sure she knows more.
Rock n roll managers should have been fingered for more murders than they have been (have they been fingered for any?).
May 27, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
The concern for me (looking at these graphs) isn't even when the peak is, ie how many weeks until it is reached and for how long counts increase. The concern is the plateau that happens after... There is no return to pre-vaccination levels, the death count remains elevated.
May 28, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
The Ethical Skeptic has shown that excess deaths have been elevated since April 2021 in the US. This is an ongoing catastrophe yet no one in the authority is alarmed, at least in public.
May 27, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
Statistics in the proper hands can prove enlightening thanks. Good article. Many of us have noticed and commented on the many unusual appearing deaths which appeared after vaccines came on the scene. And many suspicious unusual case of strokes, heart disease, CNS issues, and more. It would be interesting to try quantifying our suspicions versus the actual incidence of deaths and the actual incidence of illness. Very likely entirely impossible but interesting.
May 27, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
Am I misunderstanding something fundamental? Why would the non-COVID death rate be a function of time since being jabbed? Seems to me that the death rate should either always be stable, or oscillate with the seasons of the *year*. Those charts for the first 3-4 weeks after being jabbed suggest to me that non-COVID deaths are a function of time since being jabbed, which *should* be a concern. Especially when there are government charts out there suggesting lower all-cause mortality in the jabbed. What am I missing?
Why would we, or even they, assume non covid death within 2 weeks of jab is not jab related? I would think that the closer to jab the more suspicious correlation there is.
It might well be that a non-covid death within 2 weeks of jab IS jab related (and it IS important for us to determine THAT, also).
And I might be misinterpreting our host in today's column.
I am under the impression that the subject was the deaths possibly caused by the suppression of immunity caused by the jab, in which case you would want to correct OUT the covid and non-covid deaths that were NOT related to the jab.
My interpretation: It sounds like they are acknowledging the 2 week post vax window for increased risk of getting covid (that admission seems new. Small victory), but any noncovid excess deaths would be all cause. Meaning any of the known and unknown pathogies caused or exacerbated by the shots. General immune suppression would be just one.
I think you're right, M. Jon. Sorry, I'm still busy with other matters. I do want to resolve my confusion, but probably won't get to it for a day or two.
My thinking is that the jabs should be a placebo for non-COVID deaths. So each week following the jab should see close to the same number of deaths. These charts suggest adverse effects of this “placebo”. No?
I think you are right, if I understand what you say here, but I was just pointing out what I thought was your error in thinking that showing the non-COVID death rate as a function of time *since being jabbed* meant that non-COVID deaths *were* a function of time after being jabbed.
May 28, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
Anecdotal fact: of the people I know who had Covid confirmed by blood test when they got sick, and who are vaccinated, all of them keeps getting "flu-like" symptoms every 10-12 weeks. They're down for 2-3 days to a week. No follow up from health care, no investigations, no testing even other than the usual blood work for checking for signs of infection (though not any specific one).
And the ones I know who either had Covid without noticing much more than an extra-annoying cold, or never had it and who are unvaccinated, they aren't getting sick in any pattern than the normal one: kids bringing a new mutation home from school after holidays, or similar well-known vectors.
Anecdotal, but the pattern holds true over all ages and for other sociometric factors too.
May 27, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
Seems like the biggest eyebrow raiser is the last paragraph. 2k non covid deaths within 2 weeks of jab. How is that not highly suspicious of jab causation?
See if I have this right: the deaths that happened "soon" (within 2 weeks?) after jabs are excluded from the data going into the graph, because otherwise there would be a spike in the graph in those first 2-3 weeks that would look pretty embarrassing?
May 27, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
The way I see this is simple.
If silly middle-aged people choose to buy a huge powerful motorbike and drive too fast, then they tend to have a much higher risk of dying. This is a known risk.
If they choose to be jagged and jabbed, then it might work out well or badly. this is an unknown risk.
If Big Pharma and Governments encourage everyone to take a 'safe medication' then they need to ask themselves a couple of questions first: and 'follow the money'...
Now, I don't expect people to obsess over the science or the Maths: these are ordinary, decent, law-abiding people who buy lottery tickets,
OK?
I mean, morons.
The only solution is to try to educate your kids, in which case I clearly failed: my very academically capable (1st class degree) daughter took the jag: and I didn't.
However, no harm done: we have both had Covid and nothing bad happened.
Why were non-COVID deaths lower immediately post-vaccination?
The only plausible explanation I can think of is that vaccines were causing so much COVID death immediately post-vaccination, that the those other, non-COVID causes made up a lower share of the total.
The so-called "healthy-vaccinee effect" does not explain the more-than-doubling in non-COVID deaths in just a few weeks of time. If they were assumed healthy in week 1, they are assumed healthy in week 4.
A few weeks of time is not "enough" time for a person to change their natural health status.
When you think about, there is no natural cause of death which "decides" to kill more than twice as many people in just a few weeks. Instead, natural causes lead to fluctuations up and down of about 10% every few weeks.
If death by a cause more than doubles in under 3 weeks, it can be assumed that it is not a natural cause -- such as a disease -- which killed the extra amount of people.
I’m just putting this here as a hmmm.....warning, this person quotes Jeffery Morris, bless his cotton socks...Jeffery still hasn’t got back to me as to why he stated ‘flu is not asymptomatic, whereas covid is’ on his mask debunking of you, even though apparently flu is 😛😉
“There were 2,044 people who were vaccinated but not included in the NIMS data as they died soon after vaccination."
Why the heck were they not included?
sounds like they are using the same fraud that Pfizer did. Ooops, these people died of our vaccine so we'll just dump them from the study results so they don't count.
That’s why I don’t read any corporate media news, including any charts, statistics, graphs, etc. it’s all bullshit.
Yes, corporate media is all BS but all along there have been alternative sources we gradually begin to trust. Being cautious is a good thing and we need to get better at this for certain. Our best guide has been and remains our gut reactions as we learn how to know when we’re being played and by whom. Serial abusers are expert at creating learned helplessness.
Eternal skepticism of all things, but especially of anything having to do with, or originating in, the State, which, although mindless, is inherently expansionist and anti-individual in nature.
That's all that the CovIDIOTS will read - if you send them stuff like this article --- they will say it's all bullshit conspiracy theory. We are at a serious impasse. But because they are CovIDIOTS we know that they are wrong
On the other hand, by examining the stool or the spoor of corporate media, you can sort-of discern what the sh*t they pump out started as.
Also, it helps you blend in and not draw attention to yourself as a free thinker, which is dangerous (maybe not too much in the US yet, but us europeans old enough to have experienced East Germany and the USSR first hand knows full well that /not/ knowing what the state-approved media tell is today's truth, is enough to draw the wrong kind of attention).
Clever boy!
You see another celebrity died unexpectedly in his sleep this week? That bingo card is sure filling up...
Celebrities died young a long time before Covid, and they will continue to die young a long time after Covid:
Ergo:
This is more a comment about celebrity, than about Covid.
There are celebrities and celebrities. 67yo healthy actor not known to have substance abuse dies in sleep is different from hard living, risk taking celeb shockingly! dies young.
Sure, 67 yo dying suddenly isn't too shocking but there does seem to be alot going around. Somebody needs to make an exhaustive list of public figures with medical deaths over the last year and compare it to previous years for baseline. Is All Cause Celebrity Deaths elevated?
If we are talking about Ray here, he smoked for probably 20?+? years. I think the over/under for smokers is less than 67.
Don't actors/cast/crew have to have stringent physicals before they start working on a movie, for insurance purposes? Which would seem anything untoward would be caught before filming started. And for the past 2 years, haven't all the actors/cast/crew had to have gotten the shots?
It is quite normal for apparently healthy men in their 50's, 60's and 70's to die. I can think of far too many of my own friends who have died young.
But celebrities - even sober ones - do have a higher than usual death rate: take (at Random) the Bee Gees - all brothers...just as an example.
- On 10 March 1988, younger brother Andy Gibb died, aged 30, as a result of myocarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle due to a recent viral infection.
- Maurice died at 53 of a strangulated bowel.
- Robin in his early 60's of liver cancer.
Note that the brothers Gibb had autopsies after their deaths...
I think there were suspicions that Andy Gibb died by his own hand wasn't there?
In the case of those 3 Gibbs, substance abuse and/or bad genes+age make sense and are not so “out of the blue.”
Rock n rollers often die young. 27 is one target, who ends up with the money? In Brian Jones case it was likely Allen Klein. Also the same case with Sam Cooke, same guy, Allen Klein. Hendrix's manager was in financial trouble. Mama Cass may have been fat but her death too is suspicious. Steve Marriott had problems with the mafia and died in a burning house. The Kray twins are suspected of killing Brian Epstein along with a desire to manage the Beatles. Jim Morrison died two years to the day after his friend Brian Jones. Hate to say it but Marianne Faithfull was in the vicinity of both deaths. Maybe she should have been questioned a little harder as I'm sure she knows more.
Rock n roll managers should have been fingered for more murders than they have been (have they been fingered for any?).
Celebrity is just a high risk career...
Two of the Beatles died young: John was shot, and George died of cancer.
Buddy Holly, Elvis and Michael Jackson died young, of various causes.
Steve McQueen... (asbestos exposure, cancer)
Freddy Mercury - Aids.
The list is almost endless... and full of different and novel ways to die: not just drugs and swimming pools!
Manageritis.
The concern for me (looking at these graphs) isn't even when the peak is, ie how many weeks until it is reached and for how long counts increase. The concern is the plateau that happens after... There is no return to pre-vaccination levels, the death count remains elevated.
The Ethical Skeptic has shown that excess deaths have been elevated since April 2021 in the US. This is an ongoing catastrophe yet no one in the authority is alarmed, at least in public.
Statistics in the proper hands can prove enlightening thanks. Good article. Many of us have noticed and commented on the many unusual appearing deaths which appeared after vaccines came on the scene. And many suspicious unusual case of strokes, heart disease, CNS issues, and more. It would be interesting to try quantifying our suspicions versus the actual incidence of deaths and the actual incidence of illness. Very likely entirely impossible but interesting.
My brother, a fanatical pro-vaxxer, has just developed shingles.... ooops!
Am I misunderstanding something fundamental? Why would the non-COVID death rate be a function of time since being jabbed? Seems to me that the death rate should either always be stable, or oscillate with the seasons of the *year*. Those charts for the first 3-4 weeks after being jabbed suggest to me that non-COVID deaths are a function of time since being jabbed, which *should* be a concern. Especially when there are government charts out there suggesting lower all-cause mortality in the jabbed. What am I missing?
That the figures are all fucky?
could be seasonality: hard to say without more granular data.
"Why would the non-COVID death rate be a function of time since being jabbed?"
It isn't, per se. M. NE breaks out that data in order to compare with the Covid death rate. (M. NE can correct me if I am mistaken.)
Why would we, or even they, assume non covid death within 2 weeks of jab is not jab related? I would think that the closer to jab the more suspicious correlation there is.
No, I didn't mean to imply that.
It might well be that a non-covid death within 2 weeks of jab IS jab related (and it IS important for us to determine THAT, also).
And I might be misinterpreting our host in today's column.
I am under the impression that the subject was the deaths possibly caused by the suppression of immunity caused by the jab, in which case you would want to correct OUT the covid and non-covid deaths that were NOT related to the jab.
I will re-read.
Yeah I didnt take that from the article.
My interpretation: It sounds like they are acknowledging the 2 week post vax window for increased risk of getting covid (that admission seems new. Small victory), but any noncovid excess deaths would be all cause. Meaning any of the known and unknown pathogies caused or exacerbated by the shots. General immune suppression would be just one.
I think you're right, M. Jon. Sorry, I'm still busy with other matters. I do want to resolve my confusion, but probably won't get to it for a day or two.
My thinking is that the jabs should be a placebo for non-COVID deaths. So each week following the jab should see close to the same number of deaths. These charts suggest adverse effects of this “placebo”. No?
That's what I would have thought, apart from the first couple of weeks if the healthy vaccinee theory is correct.
I think you are right, if I understand what you say here, but I was just pointing out what I thought was your error in thinking that showing the non-COVID death rate as a function of time *since being jabbed* meant that non-COVID deaths *were* a function of time after being jabbed.
I could be more confused than anyone, however!
Edit: changed wording of second to last sentence.
“Low counts of deaths in the first few weeks after vaccination are indicative of the healthy vaccinee effect, ..."
Except for those 2,044 losers who had the impertinence to die right after being vaccinated. Turns out they weren't healthy after all. Good riddance!
I'd like to see the 'healthy vaccinee effect' analysed and proven: I'm the precise opposite, a very healthy (for my age) vaccine avoider!
Anecdotal fact: of the people I know who had Covid confirmed by blood test when they got sick, and who are vaccinated, all of them keeps getting "flu-like" symptoms every 10-12 weeks. They're down for 2-3 days to a week. No follow up from health care, no investigations, no testing even other than the usual blood work for checking for signs of infection (though not any specific one).
And the ones I know who either had Covid without noticing much more than an extra-annoying cold, or never had it and who are unvaccinated, they aren't getting sick in any pattern than the normal one: kids bringing a new mutation home from school after holidays, or similar well-known vectors.
Anecdotal, but the pattern holds true over all ages and for other sociometric factors too.
Ominously, your charts all show a rising trend.
No wonder the authorities have ceased ‘reporting’ the data!
Pretty sure monthly deaths in total should be around 50k at tops in the UK.
Seems like the biggest eyebrow raiser is the last paragraph. 2k non covid deaths within 2 weeks of jab. How is that not highly suspicious of jab causation?
See if I have this right: the deaths that happened "soon" (within 2 weeks?) after jabs are excluded from the data going into the graph, because otherwise there would be a spike in the graph in those first 2-3 weeks that would look pretty embarrassing?
No. I believe it is because deaths within 2 weeks from *jab* probably would have occurred anyway, regardless of inoculation.
Of course, one COULD study THOSE numbers to see if there is reason to believe they were DIRECTLY caused by the inoculations, as opposed to Covid.
But it wasn't Covid. This is the vax. So are you saying they would have died anyway vax, or no vax?
Thank you, M. JK. I mis-typed. Editing now.
Yes.
I’m not sure what “positive vaccination” means?
It means they've been vaccinated. It was a play on words because I am comparing when the death stats say died within 28 days of a positive test.
The way I see this is simple.
If silly middle-aged people choose to buy a huge powerful motorbike and drive too fast, then they tend to have a much higher risk of dying. This is a known risk.
If they choose to be jagged and jabbed, then it might work out well or badly. this is an unknown risk.
If Big Pharma and Governments encourage everyone to take a 'safe medication' then they need to ask themselves a couple of questions first: and 'follow the money'...
Now, I don't expect people to obsess over the science or the Maths: these are ordinary, decent, law-abiding people who buy lottery tickets,
OK?
I mean, morons.
The only solution is to try to educate your kids, in which case I clearly failed: my very academically capable (1st class degree) daughter took the jag: and I didn't.
However, no harm done: we have both had Covid and nothing bad happened.
Why were non-COVID deaths lower immediately post-vaccination?
The only plausible explanation I can think of is that vaccines were causing so much COVID death immediately post-vaccination, that the those other, non-COVID causes made up a lower share of the total.
The so-called "healthy-vaccinee effect" does not explain the more-than-doubling in non-COVID deaths in just a few weeks of time. If they were assumed healthy in week 1, they are assumed healthy in week 4.
A few weeks of time is not "enough" time for a person to change their natural health status.
When you think about, there is no natural cause of death which "decides" to kill more than twice as many people in just a few weeks. Instead, natural causes lead to fluctuations up and down of about 10% every few weeks.
If death by a cause more than doubles in under 3 weeks, it can be assumed that it is not a natural cause -- such as a disease -- which killed the extra amount of people.
I’m just putting this here as a hmmm.....warning, this person quotes Jeffery Morris, bless his cotton socks...Jeffery still hasn’t got back to me as to why he stated ‘flu is not asymptomatic, whereas covid is’ on his mask debunking of you, even though apparently flu is 😛😉
https://marypatcampbell.substack.com/p/covid-and-simpsons-paradox-why-so