14 Comments

That's why "are you an anti-vaxxer?" has been used as a weapon against anyone with the slightest question about vaccines at large. They fend off preemptively and aggressively. And all that don't agree with the mRNA jabs must profess that "I am not against the vaccines, I am not against the vaccines, I am not against the vaccines!" before moving on to the subject. HOW UTTERLY RIDICULOUS! ALL VACCINES (save 2-3) SHOULD BE BANNED! Look what they've done to the kids (most adult now) since 1984. DR DEATH FAUCI!

Expand full comment

I do think viruses are real, overwhelming evidence including 1,300,000 peer-reviewed papers in PubMed. Anyone who has another theory has lots of data to explain, including the Gompertz curve of illness for seasonal viruses.

At the same time, they have a lot of stuff correct. The strength of one's immune system determines how dangerous a particular virus is to you. 100 people exposed to the same level of virus can have very different responses, from no observable effect to extreme sickness and death. Failing to factor in our individual immune response, and help strengthen them, is a MAJOR failing of public health.

Expand full comment

Germ theory is to study how 10 people were in a room with a sick person, and 3 got sick.

Terrain theory is to study how 10 people were in a room with a sick person, and 7 did not get sick.

Pharmacology is deliberate sidelining, discrediting, and when possible outright prohibition, of cheap and effective measures that people could use to not get sick, so as to maximize the number of people who require germ-theory-based, "life-saving" interventions.

Expand full comment

If you really, REALLY want to understand (!) viruses than reading the books by Günther Witzany is a must:

http://www.biocommunication.at/modules/books/index.php?id=1:1

If you like it a bit lighter than Frank Ryan is highly recommended:

https://www.amazon.com/Frank-Ryan/e/B011232S9E?ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_4&qid=1643141330&sr=8-4

And understanding viruses is more important than ever because:

https://guidovobig.files.wordpress.com/2022/01/pic20201.png

By the way, VIRUS MANIA is a great book, too. A lot of input for thought provocation.

Expand full comment

Thanks, I'll have a read.

Expand full comment

As soon as someone claims viruses have never been proven to exist, they lose me. We have photographed them with electron microscopy. We have amplified their dna. We can identify their surface proteins. We can grow them in culture, & measure their growth.

The explanations they expound sound "sciency," even as they defy basic science, including a&p & microbiology

When someone makes the claim directly to me, I ask them how they spread from one person to another. They either go silent or they try to deflect, sometimes with subtle (or not so subtle) personal attacks.

Haven't read the book. Not going to waste my time or money.

Expand full comment

I think that viruses don't exist is ridiculous. Among my degrees is an MS in Biophysics. In college I took virology classes where we modified and built RNA and DNA in viruses to modify bacteria to produce proteins of our choice. I don't see how we were polluting the bacterias' environment.

Expand full comment

Can you recall the preparation methods in your virology class? Were they similar to how this person describes it: https://youtu.be/thsDCmtkcOA

1) Fixation

2) Dehydration

3) Embedding

4) Cooling to harden

5) Slicing

6) Staining

How do you think these methods would affect said samples in the laboratory under an electron microscope compared to how they might exist or might behave in the living, human body?

Are you are familiar with Harold Hillman's work?

Expand full comment

I have read until Chapter 7. Started it a while back, but got distracted with other books. It's well-referenced and draws excellent parallels between the latest boogeyman and prior ones. As someone who was already skeptical of virology, it's a little "preaching to the choir" for me, hence why I moved on to other works. I do recommend it though.

Expand full comment

I got the book last year, and probably only got through the first 30 pages or so before hurling the book against the wall in absolute exasperation. Truly, I wanted to give the authors a chance, but it was just paragraph after paragraph of nonsense, and that was well before getting to the meat of the book - it was already that bad early on.

And btw, I purchased the book here in NZ directly from Sam Bailey. I do like her, but I couldn't read it.

Expand full comment

So in other words, you didn't make it past the introduction.

Could you provide a couple of statements that you found to be nonsense?

Expand full comment

Does Virus Mania address the existence of deadly pathogens, like rabies, for which there is little variation in symptoms?

Expand full comment

A hint: why has Ivermectin, used early, eliminated the disease of covid 19 in most users? Ivermectin is a parasite killing drug, parasites are known to be full of foreign 'viruses' which are can be disease causing vectors in humans and other hosts. Viruses are like software and are not alive.

But are viruses correctly defined in most MSM articles? Rarely.

A short course in virology will clear up alot of misconceptions. I recommend the free intro lectures at Columbia University, USA, on YOU TUBE

For insight into parasites, read on the work of Hulda Clark, who operated a clinic for many years and did much research. She also ended up healing alot of diseases with simple non-drug treatments. 'They' went after her for this, but she never made the big claims, she simply worked with her patients and got good results, not a crime.

Terrain is the most overlooked aspect of biology. Your body maintains a terrain and from that you maintain health or not. Alter the terrain the right way to facilitate health and healing.

Viruses are just instructions...and we are steeped in them and rarely notice them.

Expand full comment

Yes an absolutely fantastic book. Easy to read, very concise.

Expand full comment