Probably not. Because the lie of safety has been so firmly fixed in their minds, they truly cannot possibly see any possible problem being associated with it.
Doctors have been well trained to not question the vacksine safety - they all are studied quite carefully and fully before being released (of course WE know otherwise), and this one was no different.
Many kind, caring doctors truly have been made blind to this. 😭
You know, english is funny. "Baffle" has had me thinking for quite a while now. In swedish, we'd say "Experter är förvånade" (Experts are surprised) because that's how the verb baffle would translate; the noun would depend on what exactly is being baffled and with what.
So true to form, I looked up the etymology of "baffled" and it's once again a case of the word's original meaning being poetically and ironically correct:
"baffle (v.)
1540s, "to disgrace," of uncertain origin..."
Well now, isn't that darned fitting? "Experts are baffled", indeed!
Love it! And the word "etymology" has its root in the word "etymos", which means "true", and as Shakespeare said, "Truth will out."
Of course the original meaning of baffle--to deflect or stop the flow of air, light, or sound by means of a device (a baffle)--also takes us to the truth, as these so-called experts have had the truth kept from themselves by censorship (generally by their own choice to bar hearing or seeing it or any facts that might reveal it). Even the willfully blind and conscious propagandists find themselves telling the truth despite themselves through the wondrous power of language.
Sounds eerily, stomach-churningly, infanticidally and demolish-these-institutions-immediately similar to the same avoidance of mothers’ vaccination status in Scotland when they couldn’t explain all the baby deaths in January...
“Any link to Covid vaccines has been ruled out on the basis of international evidence demonstrating their safety in pregnancy, but PHS confirmed that it had not checked the vaccination status of any of the mothers affected.
It stressed that there was no public health basis to do, and that such an analysis "whilst being uninformative for public health decision making, had the potential to be used to harm vaccine confidence".
"ruled out on the basis of international evidence demonstrating their safety in pregnancy"
Citing evidence provided by the International Unicorn Imaginary Gold (i.e. turd) Standard Drug Testing Service located in the fevered dreams of Big Pharma executives, incompetent 100% corrupt bureaucrats and politicians.
Actually, even those utterly despicable creatures had to admit, right from the beginning, when asked, that there was absolutely no evidence whatsoever for such safety. And as soon as they were forced to reveal their actual documents, it was immediately clear they were the complete opposite of safe.
How can whoever is responsible for that statement possibly live with him/her/themselves? Unfortunately for them, they will have to throughout eternity.
" ...it would be sensible to look at the vaccination status of the mothers. However, I can pretty much guarantee this won’t be done as the vaccines were safe and effective. "
🎯 THIS!!
"sensible" went out the window, along with "science".
OF COURSE it would make sense to learn the vax status of all mothers who have lost children in this manner. The SEARCH FOR THE ROOT CAUSE always always ALWAYS includes exploring EVERY possible connection.
Therefore? We surmise that they simply choose to NOT ask the questions whose answers they do not want to know.
Brian Mowrey has been following the IGG4 conversion issue closely. His last post was on a paper that found maternal transfer of IGG4 via cord blood. Conversion takes some time to occur, so being vaccinated a long time before pregnancy would still potentially lead to this outcome. I wonder if maternal transfer of immune suppression could be a possible factor in this?
It's interesting to note that in late 2020, before the COVID mRNA vax campaign began, some media outlets were citing a high risk of heart damage from COVID. Fast forward to mid 2022 and a large study out of Israel found no increase in heart damage post COVID. Ironically, a late 2021 study found that "...myocarditis was the most commonly reported adverse cardiac event associated with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines."
Yes, I remember this. The number of medical conditions and side effects that were given as being high risk due to Covid was huge! Given that I suffer from some of these, I did some online research in order to make an informed decision about getting the vax. Then I realised there simply wasn't enough time for anyone to make such statements with any degree of confidence never mind do any research worth anything. I believe now that these are actually side effects of the vax.
I wonder if anyone’s gone back and studied the accuracy of covid information and papers put out by experts over time like the guys over at Sensible Medicine have done for Twitter posts during Monkeypox.
Yes, preparing the ground for the terminally dim to believe that COVID, a.k.a. the 'flu before re-barnding is a killer disease, a distraction for the vaccine weapons to be deployed.
How disturbing. And how horrific the British health agency withheld this information from the public. How exactly are people able to sign an informed consent when information is withheld? It makes no sense and May cost lives.
I just read the full link which was posted up again on May 17th after small adjustments to the numbers. This quote at the end is very ominous in the light of the pending WHO power grab to override national sovereignty regarding pandemic control measures (and any other public health measures of their choosing):
“In certain situations, it may be advisable to close child-care facilities and schools to reduce the intensity of transmission.
WHO does not recommend any travel and/or trade restrictions to United Kingdom based on the information available for this event.”
So, this time around the WHO recommending no action. Next time, with full powers in place, it could be mandating (not recommending) lockdowns in Wales and the Southwest at the stroke of a pen.
...and in fact I misread the quote: the WHO are in fact recommending that we at least look into the possibility of school and childcare facility closures. That’s a recommendation and next year it will be a mandate overriding the sovereignty of our government to act in the way it sees fit (let alone the local health authorities who have the best handle on the situation on the ground).
Regarding UK informing WHO and not UK people first, well to me, it feels like UK are already implementing new proposed but not yet signed off updated IHR policies, doesn't it? I wonder if WHO will fly in a crack team to hunt down cause?
‘WHO does not recommend any travel and/or trade restrictions to the United Kingdom based on the information available for this event.’
…and there we have it. It’s obvious that in the quest for world dominance, the WHO will usurp any form of sovereignty by any country by using tools to penalise/ punish them and will impose travel and trade restrictions. Play ball with the controlling WHO - or else…
Seeing as the WHO listened to China on their crazy lockdown strategies and regurgitated it all to the West, I wouldn’t put it past the EU (another quasi-communist entity) to badger the WHO, behind closed doors, to mandate trade restrictions on naughty Brexit Britain. They can find the flimsiest of pretexts on public health grounds and the WHO will do their bidding. This is just so dystopian- and we already know it’s in the wrong hands, we’re already past that way marker to Doomsday.
I'd appreciate knowing not only the vax status of Moms...but also about the feeding of their babies. Breast IS best...but we've a history of contaminates in baby formula...so😑😵😭
Wasn’t it convenient that baby food was hard to find in America just as pregnant women were getting jabbed? The factory stayed closed for quite awhile and no one seemed interested in getting it opened ASAP. I really hate being this cynical, but just too many things don’t add up in this timeline.
The only time they haven't been baffled in recent years is when they've been pimping/pushing poisons and doing their part of The Agenda.
For a normal person the causality isn't hard to establish. Many have done so, conclusively, and put it out there for the world to pull apart and examine. The exact opposite of every single thing that Power has been doing, providing Doom P0rn without the workings.
Thankfully for Myocarditis in babies, Big (P)harma will soon have an MRNA jab made to order [probably].
That whacky business model. Create the demand, sell the cure. Forever. Almost...criminal.
Really weird - I just followed your way back machine link and there was no page found, I got the 'Hrm.... Wayback Machine has not archived that URL'. However, when I followed your WHO link the info was there on the WHO pages, first published 16 May and updated today 17 May 2023.
Makes interesting reading regardless, so thanks for the heads up.
"Experts remain baffled" while people with brains still in their heads can see the cause plain as day.
"baffled" ....... I wonder if they secretly lay there at night and worry that somebody is going to notice?
Probably not. Because the lie of safety has been so firmly fixed in their minds, they truly cannot possibly see any possible problem being associated with it.
Doctors have been well trained to not question the vacksine safety - they all are studied quite carefully and fully before being released (of course WE know otherwise), and this one was no different.
Many kind, caring doctors truly have been made blind to this. 😭
You know, english is funny. "Baffle" has had me thinking for quite a while now. In swedish, we'd say "Experter är förvånade" (Experts are surprised) because that's how the verb baffle would translate; the noun would depend on what exactly is being baffled and with what.
So true to form, I looked up the etymology of "baffled" and it's once again a case of the word's original meaning being poetically and ironically correct:
"baffle (v.)
1540s, "to disgrace," of uncertain origin..."
Well now, isn't that darned fitting? "Experts are baffled", indeed!
Love it! And the word "etymology" has its root in the word "etymos", which means "true", and as Shakespeare said, "Truth will out."
Of course the original meaning of baffle--to deflect or stop the flow of air, light, or sound by means of a device (a baffle)--also takes us to the truth, as these so-called experts have had the truth kept from themselves by censorship (generally by their own choice to bar hearing or seeing it or any facts that might reveal it). Even the willfully blind and conscious propagandists find themselves telling the truth despite themselves through the wondrous power of language.
Which is why we are fighting this baffle (sic) of COVID. :)
Try and get blacks law dictionary I’m sure it’s meaning will change again.
Ethical Sceptic has many answers Patriots
https://twitter.com/EthicalSkeptic/status/1659010788974002177?s=20
Information on Geoengineering
https://gtr.ukri.org/
http://www.geoengineering.ox.ac.uk/www.geoengineering.ox.ac.uk/index.html
The language fraud committed on us all
https://justiniandeception.wordpress.com/
And how about this? An anagram of is 'affable Dr experiments'. Or these.
expendables Fermi fart
Fax feeblemind praters
The BMA was baffled by Long COVID back in January this year. A lady from Dorset made a wry comment on her rural GP's intelligence on my post.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/uk-update-saturday-5th-august-2023
Sounds eerily, stomach-churningly, infanticidally and demolish-these-institutions-immediately similar to the same avoidance of mothers’ vaccination status in Scotland when they couldn’t explain all the baby deaths in January...
https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/23259523.expert-review-mystery-spike-scots-baby-deaths-begins/
“Any link to Covid vaccines has been ruled out on the basis of international evidence demonstrating their safety in pregnancy, but PHS confirmed that it had not checked the vaccination status of any of the mothers affected.
It stressed that there was no public health basis to do, and that such an analysis "whilst being uninformative for public health decision making, had the potential to be used to harm vaccine confidence".
"ruled out on the basis of international evidence demonstrating their safety in pregnancy"
Citing evidence provided by the International Unicorn Imaginary Gold (i.e. turd) Standard Drug Testing Service located in the fevered dreams of Big Pharma executives, incompetent 100% corrupt bureaucrats and politicians.
Actually, even those utterly despicable creatures had to admit, right from the beginning, when asked, that there was absolutely no evidence whatsoever for such safety. And as soon as they were forced to reveal their actual documents, it was immediately clear they were the complete opposite of safe.
How can whoever is responsible for that statement possibly live with him/her/themselves? Unfortunately for them, they will have to throughout eternity.
Would really like to see that "international evidence demonstrating their safety in pregnancy"
They have no conscience. They are fine with murder for money and depopulation. They could care less.
Yes, now. When they stand in final judgment (and they will), I wonder how their current values will look to them.
I’m sure Naomi Wolf has a thing or two to say about this!
Could you make a freedom of information request to get a copy of the "international evidence" used to make the decision?
Well, surely something that drives policy so definitively would be easily available, maybe even published or referenced somewhere...
#AnythingButVaccines.
Watch for immediate deployment of a vaxxx for enterovirus.
UN EFFING BELIEVABLE! They will NEVER admit to anything. I have no more walls left to punch.
I know a vaccinated teacher who’s baby was born on Mother’s Day last week and the baby was rushed for open heart surgery today
The silence on this is evil
" ...it would be sensible to look at the vaccination status of the mothers. However, I can pretty much guarantee this won’t be done as the vaccines were safe and effective. "
🎯 THIS!!
"sensible" went out the window, along with "science".
OF COURSE it would make sense to learn the vax status of all mothers who have lost children in this manner. The SEARCH FOR THE ROOT CAUSE always always ALWAYS includes exploring EVERY possible connection.
Therefore? We surmise that they simply choose to NOT ask the questions whose answers they do not want to know.
Sherlock Holmes not needed, here.
Brian Mowrey has been following the IGG4 conversion issue closely. His last post was on a paper that found maternal transfer of IGG4 via cord blood. Conversion takes some time to occur, so being vaccinated a long time before pregnancy would still potentially lead to this outcome. I wonder if maternal transfer of immune suppression could be a possible factor in this?
It's interesting to note that in late 2020, before the COVID mRNA vax campaign began, some media outlets were citing a high risk of heart damage from COVID. Fast forward to mid 2022 and a large study out of Israel found no increase in heart damage post COVID. Ironically, a late 2021 study found that "...myocarditis was the most commonly reported adverse cardiac event associated with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines."
I wrote about this here including source links:
https://open.substack.com/pub/crowdsourcingthetruth/p/things-that-make-you-go-hmmm?r=z7a89&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Yes, I remember this. The number of medical conditions and side effects that were given as being high risk due to Covid was huge! Given that I suffer from some of these, I did some online research in order to make an informed decision about getting the vax. Then I realised there simply wasn't enough time for anyone to make such statements with any degree of confidence never mind do any research worth anything. I believe now that these are actually side effects of the vax.
I think they may be side effects of both but then the question becomes which has the more severe/higher incidence of these side effects?
I wonder if anyone’s gone back and studied the accuracy of covid information and papers put out by experts over time like the guys over at Sensible Medicine have done for Twitter posts during Monkeypox.
https://sensiblemed.substack.com/p/public-health-experts-went-on-twitter?
Yes, preparing the ground for the terminally dim to believe that COVID, a.k.a. the 'flu before re-barnding is a killer disease, a distraction for the vaccine weapons to be deployed.
How disturbing. And how horrific the British health agency withheld this information from the public. How exactly are people able to sign an informed consent when information is withheld? It makes no sense and May cost lives.
I just read the full link which was posted up again on May 17th after small adjustments to the numbers. This quote at the end is very ominous in the light of the pending WHO power grab to override national sovereignty regarding pandemic control measures (and any other public health measures of their choosing):
“In certain situations, it may be advisable to close child-care facilities and schools to reduce the intensity of transmission.
WHO does not recommend any travel and/or trade restrictions to United Kingdom based on the information available for this event.”
So, this time around the WHO recommending no action. Next time, with full powers in place, it could be mandating (not recommending) lockdowns in Wales and the Southwest at the stroke of a pen.
...and in fact I misread the quote: the WHO are in fact recommending that we at least look into the possibility of school and childcare facility closures. That’s a recommendation and next year it will be a mandate overriding the sovereignty of our government to act in the way it sees fit (let alone the local health authorities who have the best handle on the situation on the ground).
Regarding UK informing WHO and not UK people first, well to me, it feels like UK are already implementing new proposed but not yet signed off updated IHR policies, doesn't it? I wonder if WHO will fly in a crack team to hunt down cause?
‘WHO does not recommend any travel and/or trade restrictions to the United Kingdom based on the information available for this event.’
…and there we have it. It’s obvious that in the quest for world dominance, the WHO will usurp any form of sovereignty by any country by using tools to penalise/ punish them and will impose travel and trade restrictions. Play ball with the controlling WHO - or else…
Seeing as the WHO listened to China on their crazy lockdown strategies and regurgitated it all to the West, I wouldn’t put it past the EU (another quasi-communist entity) to badger the WHO, behind closed doors, to mandate trade restrictions on naughty Brexit Britain. They can find the flimsiest of pretexts on public health grounds and the WHO will do their bidding. This is just so dystopian- and we already know it’s in the wrong hands, we’re already past that way marker to Doomsday.
Just kick the WHO's balls instead.
I'd appreciate knowing not only the vax status of Moms...but also about the feeding of their babies. Breast IS best...but we've a history of contaminates in baby formula...so😑😵😭
Wasn’t it convenient that baby food was hard to find in America just as pregnant women were getting jabbed? The factory stayed closed for quite awhile and no one seemed interested in getting it opened ASAP. I really hate being this cynical, but just too many things don’t add up in this timeline.
"Experts are baffled"
The only time they haven't been baffled in recent years is when they've been pimping/pushing poisons and doing their part of The Agenda.
For a normal person the causality isn't hard to establish. Many have done so, conclusively, and put it out there for the world to pull apart and examine. The exact opposite of every single thing that Power has been doing, providing Doom P0rn without the workings.
Thankfully for Myocarditis in babies, Big (P)harma will soon have an MRNA jab made to order [probably].
That whacky business model. Create the demand, sell the cure. Forever. Almost...criminal.
Peace.
'Fax feeblemind praters' is just one good anagram phrase from "Experts are baffled".
Really weird - I just followed your way back machine link and there was no page found, I got the 'Hrm.... Wayback Machine has not archived that URL'. However, when I followed your WHO link the info was there on the WHO pages, first published 16 May and updated today 17 May 2023.
Makes interesting reading regardless, so thanks for the heads up.