There is a possible explanation for the incidence of unvaccinated injuries and deaths. I have heard a number of medical scientists say that these vaccines result in spike protein shedding amongst the vaccinated, particularly in the first 4 to 8 weeks after vaccination. The implications of this are obvious: the vaccinated are spreading the spike protein(not the entire coronavirus but rather its’ pathogenic component(s) only) and thereby inducing the same vaccine injuries in the unvaccinated. What I don’t know, and perhaps no one does, is whether the Lipid Nanoparticles shed as well, as these are being increasingly implicated in vaccine side effects and injuries.
Same for the mRNA itself. I do not believe that the above has been proven, but I do know that respected immunologists and vaccinologists believe it to be a strong possibility(eg, Gaert Vanden Bosche, Robert Malone)
The possibility that every single ingredient in these vaccines is seriously pathogenic is a chilling spectre, as is the possibility that the vaccines are self replicating.
Do you have any resource where Malone or Bossche says that spike protein shedding is possible? I follow both since early days and I can't recall any of them said it.
Although the direct contact described above concerns meaningful, a different environmental transmission source with the virus now recognized is the indirect contact through the infected people's stool and urine (Chen et al., 2020, Xiao et al., 2020, Jones et al., 2020). Unconventional studies support this notion by reporting positive SARS-CoV-2 viral titers in domestic sewages (Pandey et al., 2021, Elsamadony et al., 2021, Polo et al., 2020). So far, Sars-Cov-2 has been detected in several countries’ wastewaters of the American, European, and Asian continents, suggesting as mandatory the monitoring of the secondary transmission of the new coronavirus via wastewater
What you are describing has been known for quite some time. Cities throughout the US have been testing for covid in sewage since the beginning of this. Thus,anal swab testing better than nasal swab. Note in the link, biospraying of human waste in US counties directly correlating with deer infections of covid. High rise apartments in large cities with vast networks of connected plumbing showing widespread spread.
If the virus a/o the mRNA injection are contributing factors (or the factor, period) to this, discounting differences in reporting of course, shouldn't we see the same in other physically taxing sports?
Crosscountry skiing, especially biathlon for instance. High pace and high pressure over a prolonged period of time. Or long distance skating, ice hockey, triathlon, "Iron man"-style competitions, running the real marathon in Greece and other extreme lenght running and skiing competitions.
Or tennis, table tennis, badminton, volleyball and track&field - where there isn't endurance so much as explosive exertion?
Is it just football? Is it in all countries or just some? Is it evenly distributed across leagues? There are more questions to be asked, and as long as other sports aren't affected the same way it is more reasonable to assume that it is due to skewed reporting - perhaps the question 'Who thinks this is something to shine the light on, and why now' is something to consider.
Does the journalists/publications involved have something more in common, such as who ultimately owns them? Who would benefit from fomenting suspicion and disbelief in our societal and political systems, if we take it that far.
I think many high level clubs injected their high profile players with saline... Do you believe that a Nadal or a CR7 will inject an experimental medical inoculation?
“Which I know can’t be used as evidence….” No, anecdotal evidence is evidence. It’s just that, by itself, it’s not very high on the evidence hierarchy. It certainly falls far short of proof. Yet enough anecdotes taken together constitute data, which is a higher form of evidence, if still not proof. But incontrovertible proof of anything is exceedingly rare. Most arguments are based on a preponderance of the evidence. This data, taken along with other data (like that coming out of the DOD), makes for a fairly compelling argument. (See Wayne Root’s piece on Gateway Pundit today.)
For most things we take for granted, anecdotal evidence is the only evidence we have, and we consider it obviously sufficient.
The "Ig Nobel Prize" (sometimes overzealously) ridicules scientists when they spend money doubting anecdotal evidence in situations where it's obviously sufficient.
So you see, some guy in Italy had already confirmed that he was unvaccinated and there was no need for the Danish coach or doctor to answer the question. It was a totally convincing denial and if they didn't answer directly it was only to save the time it would have taken for them to say: "no, he is not vaccinated" As a busy person I appreciate they didn't want to waste my time.
And the fact that days before Eriksen's collapse that same Danish coach had been publicly complaining that players were not vaccinated, and that this was putting the whole competition at risk, is mere coincidence, how could it be otherwise?
A proper scientist should conduct a study on the increase of coincidences since late 2019. It seems to me that they are proliferating, but that, of course, is probably a coincidence.
Sorry, it was an attempt at sarcasm... I think that on the whole these events are connected to the vaccines rather than to COVID. If you check the links I posted I hope you'll agree that there are enough unanswered questions about Eriksen's vaccination status that any honest journalist (an extinct species, it seems) should have done some serious digging.
Of course to suggest that Eriksen et al may be lying about this is a serious accusation. But if they are telling the truth all I can say is that they have a natural gift for acting guilty.
Another thing that I find quite interesting about Eriksen's case is how from day one he has been trying to resume his career. If I had dropped dead from a previously unnoticed heart condition that could strike again at any moment, I think I'd be a bit more hesitant about re-starting the same activity that very nearly killed me - unless I knew that it was a one-off event caused by an external intervention. But maybe that's just me.
Yes... Brentford FC, but only for six months. My guess is that they are testing him out to see if he can still play before he goes back to one of the big teams. If you dig around there are some hilarious interviews with Hjulmand were he sounds like he is appeasing Eriksen, who may have been getting impatient about whatever they promised him if he kept his mouth shut (allegedly).
Nothing to see here... move along folks... we have everything under control.
There is a possible explanation for the incidence of unvaccinated injuries and deaths. I have heard a number of medical scientists say that these vaccines result in spike protein shedding amongst the vaccinated, particularly in the first 4 to 8 weeks after vaccination. The implications of this are obvious: the vaccinated are spreading the spike protein(not the entire coronavirus but rather its’ pathogenic component(s) only) and thereby inducing the same vaccine injuries in the unvaccinated. What I don’t know, and perhaps no one does, is whether the Lipid Nanoparticles shed as well, as these are being increasingly implicated in vaccine side effects and injuries.
Same for the mRNA itself. I do not believe that the above has been proven, but I do know that respected immunologists and vaccinologists believe it to be a strong possibility(eg, Gaert Vanden Bosche, Robert Malone)
The possibility that every single ingredient in these vaccines is seriously pathogenic is a chilling spectre, as is the possibility that the vaccines are self replicating.
Do you have any resource where Malone or Bossche says that spike protein shedding is possible? I follow both since early days and I can't recall any of them said it.
https://odysee.com/@WhatIsTruth_WasIstWahrheit_2:f/''SHEDDING''-SPIKE-PROTEIN---DR.-PETER-MCCULLOUGH:e
Ok this makes sense he speaks about sweat and breastfeed transfer. I don't like when people suggest spike protein shedding is possible via air.
How they will hide when soldier drop like flies ? Also I had a site that I lost it which listed athletes deaths. 400 in a few months.
Yes I’ve seen that but was just focussing on football players and fans today
Allegedly the F35 crashing in SE Chinese sea was a post booster complication? (posted by R Malone if I remember correctly)
Read an article about three player at the Aus Open that had their games stopped due to heart and breathing issues. Will find the link.
https://freewestmedia.com/2022/01/10/three-players-drop-out-of-australian-open-with-chest-issues-while-djokovic-awaits-his-fate/
"perhaps its the vaccines or perhaps its the spike protein whichever way it gets into your body (wild lab created virus or lab created vaccine)."
I'm pretty certain it's the vaxx but I do wonder what is happening with all those spike proteins in the water table, and consequently, tap water.
😳🥺😶
Although the direct contact described above concerns meaningful, a different environmental transmission source with the virus now recognized is the indirect contact through the infected people's stool and urine (Chen et al., 2020, Xiao et al., 2020, Jones et al., 2020). Unconventional studies support this notion by reporting positive SARS-CoV-2 viral titers in domestic sewages (Pandey et al., 2021, Elsamadony et al., 2021, Polo et al., 2020). So far, Sars-Cov-2 has been detected in several countries’ wastewaters of the American, European, and Asian continents, suggesting as mandatory the monitoring of the secondary transmission of the new coronavirus via wastewater
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8226002/
if this applies to the virus, it applies to the "vaccines". For me, this is nightmare fuel.
What you are describing has been known for quite some time. Cities throughout the US have been testing for covid in sewage since the beginning of this. Thus,anal swab testing better than nasal swab. Note in the link, biospraying of human waste in US counties directly correlating with deer infections of covid. High rise apartments in large cities with vast networks of connected plumbing showing widespread spread.
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2021/11/15/chinas-ccp-concealed-sars-cov-2-presence-in-china-as-far-back-as-march-2018/
But you’ve probably already have seen this...
wasn't there a german game where a player from each side collapsed?
Thinking out loud:
If the virus a/o the mRNA injection are contributing factors (or the factor, period) to this, discounting differences in reporting of course, shouldn't we see the same in other physically taxing sports?
Crosscountry skiing, especially biathlon for instance. High pace and high pressure over a prolonged period of time. Or long distance skating, ice hockey, triathlon, "Iron man"-style competitions, running the real marathon in Greece and other extreme lenght running and skiing competitions.
Or tennis, table tennis, badminton, volleyball and track&field - where there isn't endurance so much as explosive exertion?
Is it just football? Is it in all countries or just some? Is it evenly distributed across leagues? There are more questions to be asked, and as long as other sports aren't affected the same way it is more reasonable to assume that it is due to skewed reporting - perhaps the question 'Who thinks this is something to shine the light on, and why now' is something to consider.
Does the journalists/publications involved have something more in common, such as who ultimately owns them? Who would benefit from fomenting suspicion and disbelief in our societal and political systems, if we take it that far.
I think many high level clubs injected their high profile players with saline... Do you believe that a Nadal or a CR7 will inject an experimental medical inoculation?
“Which I know can’t be used as evidence….” No, anecdotal evidence is evidence. It’s just that, by itself, it’s not very high on the evidence hierarchy. It certainly falls far short of proof. Yet enough anecdotes taken together constitute data, which is a higher form of evidence, if still not proof. But incontrovertible proof of anything is exceedingly rare. Most arguments are based on a preponderance of the evidence. This data, taken along with other data (like that coming out of the DOD), makes for a fairly compelling argument. (See Wayne Root’s piece on Gateway Pundit today.)
For most things we take for granted, anecdotal evidence is the only evidence we have, and we consider it obviously sufficient.
The "Ig Nobel Prize" (sometimes overzealously) ridicules scientists when they spend money doubting anecdotal evidence in situations where it's obviously sufficient.
Not getting old yet... https://www.bitchute.com/video/sqTd8LtViqI0/
Were they playing soccer in 2020?
They stopped for a few months
yepp, dropping like FAUXflies, which is a "sub variant" of mayflies: de-populization on the playing field! ^^
https://rumble.com/vt5gzv-sweetest-injection-ft.-magamode.html
The players worship fame
Why do you include Christian Eriksen in the list? It was made abundantly clear that he was unvaccinated. Listen from 01:30 on:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwcysmP-iDw
So you see, some guy in Italy had already confirmed that he was unvaccinated and there was no need for the Danish coach or doctor to answer the question. It was a totally convincing denial and if they didn't answer directly it was only to save the time it would have taken for them to say: "no, he is not vaccinated" As a busy person I appreciate they didn't want to waste my time.
And the fact that days before Eriksen's collapse that same Danish coach had been publicly complaining that players were not vaccinated, and that this was putting the whole competition at risk, is mere coincidence, how could it be otherwise?
https://sportsfinding.com/the-danish-coach-criticizes-that-uefa-has-not-vaccinated-all-the-teams/100250/
A proper scientist should conduct a study on the increase of coincidences since late 2019. It seems to me that they are proliferating, but that, of course, is probably a coincidence.
Because I never said it was due to vaccines, I said that is one possible explanation but so is Covid.
Sorry, it was an attempt at sarcasm... I think that on the whole these events are connected to the vaccines rather than to COVID. If you check the links I posted I hope you'll agree that there are enough unanswered questions about Eriksen's vaccination status that any honest journalist (an extinct species, it seems) should have done some serious digging.
Of course to suggest that Eriksen et al may be lying about this is a serious accusation. But if they are telling the truth all I can say is that they have a natural gift for acting guilty.
Another thing that I find quite interesting about Eriksen's case is how from day one he has been trying to resume his career. If I had dropped dead from a previously unnoticed heart condition that could strike again at any moment, I think I'd be a bit more hesitant about re-starting the same activity that very nearly killed me - unless I knew that it was a one-off event caused by an external intervention. But maybe that's just me.
Oh ok, I thought maybe you were but can't always tell!
Yes, that's weird, I've heard he's just started up again in an English club because he can't play in Italy with his condition.
Yes... Brentford FC, but only for six months. My guess is that they are testing him out to see if he can still play before he goes back to one of the big teams. If you dig around there are some hilarious interviews with Hjulmand were he sounds like he is appeasing Eriksen, who may have been getting impatient about whatever they promised him if he kept his mouth shut (allegedly).