I know right!!! Has everyone lost their collective minds?!?! I know the Mass Formation theory is controversial but I don't know what else explains this on such a vast scale.
It is in fact very common for expert physicians and scientists to “sell” their expertise to pharmaceutical companies. Unfortunately, neither the physicians nor the pharmaceutical companies seem to recognize the conflict of interest. To most of the doctors, they truly believe that they are just experts providing a service to the pharmaceutical companies. They honestly do not see the potential for even the subconscious influence of the potential loss of their speaker fees and so on, should they begin speaking about the hazards of drug company x’s therapy (for asthma, arthritis, diabetes, the common cold, etc, etc) or about the benefits and efficacy of non-pharmaceutical therapies over and above drug company x’s manufactured product.
I know. It’s mind boggling. But, it truly, truly is a blindness. And not always willful. It’s pretty much the way drs are trained and brought up. It’s how the “speaker fees” are presented: not as bribes for promoting a product, but as a way of paying for someone’s time and expertise. It is assumed that the physician is already an expert and would not be promoting drug x, if drug x was not actually safe and effective.
Dec 17, 2022·edited Dec 17, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
SHOULD BE shocking, in a 'normal' world - but not very shocking at all, in this crazy, elitist, NWO iatrocide-driven world we find ourselves.
"First do no harm" has become "First line my pockets".
Keep plugging away Aaron Siri, and ICAN !
SOME day, many will shake the sand out of their hair, and begin to see just how morally corrupted things have become - been so for a long time, but THIS? Beyond belief.
It is in fact very common for expert physicians and scientists to “sell” their expertise to pharmaceutical companies. Unfortunately, neither the physicians nor the pharmaceutical companies seem to recognize the conflict of interest. To most of the doctors, they truly believe that they are just experts providing a service to the pharmaceutical companies. They honestly do not see the potential for even the subconscious influence of the potential loss of their speaker fees and so on, should they begin speaking about the hazards of drug company x’s therapy (for asthma, arthritis, diabetes, the common cold, etc, etc) or about the benefits and efficacy of non-pharmaceutical therapies over and above drug company x’s manufactured product.
I know. It’s mind boggling. But, it truly, truly is a blindness. And not always willful. It’s pretty much the way drs are trained and brought up. It’s how the “speaker fees” are presented: not as bribes for promoting a product, but as a way of paying for someone’s time and expertise. It is assumed that the physician is already an expert and would not be promoting drug x, if drug x was not actually safe and effective.
Dec 17, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
This is disgusting...
She uses the slang .."on the dole" ...and doesn't even realize what she is saying.
ON THE DOLE.....ON THE PAYROLL...GETTING YOUR CHECK FROM THEM... WTF
All "independent"in her mind means is that she's not a employee....WTF
Oh..so this "DR" doesn't understand that a independent contractor is working FOR THE COMPANY TO GIVE THEM WHAT THEY WANT....and instead of being payroll taxed....she's 1099'd
Dec 17, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
It just confirms the absolute denial of reality for an entire class of would be experts and gov officials. They are encouraged by the apathy and credulity of the public they claim to serve.
Dec 17, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
Where do the reports go from the "independent " advisor Siri just deposed?? If only to Pfizer then that's a problem. He needs to cross exam Pfizer about what they do with those reports. All big corps are supposed to have internal controls to mitigate risks. Did they accept the risks? Why? Did DoD BARDA tell them to? Did they assume risk for Pfizer??
Typically, The DMC meets routinely to review data provided by the study sponsor (here, Pfizer). The committee has a chairperson who is responsible for minutes of the meeting and reporting decisions back to the sponsor. It is the responsibility of the sponsor to convey safety concerns to the FDA, EMA, etc.
Then that committee chairperson needs to be subpoenaed to testify. The question remains for what the sponsor did with it. That said, I already know the answer because the FDA doesn't actually have real authority in this whole situation.
I believe the FDA does have authority (legally for sure) but has been captured by the very large pharma (and food) companies such that they are not acting in an unbiased way for some products. This corruption appears to me to be at the top levels of the FDA, not at the level of the scientist/medical reviewers. The reviewers can roll into pharma when they leave the FDA, yes, but they're not the ones able to snag the multimillion dollar positions. That's people at the Center director level and above. And appointed positions like the Commissioner. There have been a number of cases now where someone at a high level has overruled non-approval decisions by the review team and this is led to resignations of those on the review team. So that tells me that among the reviewers there are good people.
Sorry but you are way off base on this particular circumstance. The contracts to produce the vaxx are held by thr DOD under Other Transactional Authorities or OTA. This was authorized by BARDA / HHS. The vaxxes are cited in the contract as Prototype Countermeasures not pharmaceuticals.
Dec 17, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
What is sad is that this really is nothing new.
It is in fact very common for expert physicians and scientists to “sell” their expertise to pharmaceutical companies. Unfortunately, neither the physicians nor the pharmaceutical companies seem to recognize the conflict of interest. To most of the doctors, they truly believe that they are just experts providing a service to the pharmaceutical companies. They honestly do not see the potential for even the subconscious influence of the potential loss of their speaker fees and so on, should they begin speaking about the hazards of drug company x’s therapy (for asthma, arthritis, diabetes, the common cold, etc, etc) or about the benefits and efficacy of non-pharmaceutical therapies over and above drug company x’s manufactured product.
I know. It’s mind boggling. But, it truly, truly is a blindness. And not always willful. It’s pretty much the way drs are trained and brought up. It’s how the “speaker fees” are presented: not as bribes for promoting a product, but as a way of paying for someone’s time and expertise. It is assumed that the physician is already an expert and would not be promoting drug x, if drug x was not actually safe and effective.
This shit is getting normalised! Such revelations are simply shrug off with no consequences. The prosecutors do not want to look unsciency I guess, and the media takes care that most of the peasants don't even get the memo.
This corruption begins at the very top and the people below just wait for orders, or at least a head nod, from above to do their jobs. Look, the Israel government lost the agreement with pfizer and nobody seems to bother too much. It was proven they hid dangerous side effects and kept pushing their citizens to take the jabs and there are no trials no nothing. It's bizarre
I’m halfway through reading ‘Bad Pharma’ by Ben Goldacre, revised edition published 2013. All the tricks of the trade being used now had already been detailed by Dr. Goldacre. Recommended reading for anyone who is interested in the arsenal of dirty tricks Big pHarma has up their sleeves.
And I'm sure her independence earned her a healthy salary.
Aaron Siri is a hero. His ability to wring the truth out this web of deception is a blessing for us all!
Crony science advisors. Mutual back-scratchers
Looks like someone needs to redefine “independent”...
I know right!!! Has everyone lost their collective minds?!?! I know the Mass Formation theory is controversial but I don't know what else explains this on such a vast scale.
What is sad is that this really is nothing new.
It is in fact very common for expert physicians and scientists to “sell” their expertise to pharmaceutical companies. Unfortunately, neither the physicians nor the pharmaceutical companies seem to recognize the conflict of interest. To most of the doctors, they truly believe that they are just experts providing a service to the pharmaceutical companies. They honestly do not see the potential for even the subconscious influence of the potential loss of their speaker fees and so on, should they begin speaking about the hazards of drug company x’s therapy (for asthma, arthritis, diabetes, the common cold, etc, etc) or about the benefits and efficacy of non-pharmaceutical therapies over and above drug company x’s manufactured product.
I know. It’s mind boggling. But, it truly, truly is a blindness. And not always willful. It’s pretty much the way drs are trained and brought up. It’s how the “speaker fees” are presented: not as bribes for promoting a product, but as a way of paying for someone’s time and expertise. It is assumed that the physician is already an expert and would not be promoting drug x, if drug x was not actually safe and effective.
This is NOT a new blindness or phenomenon.
"I’ve been working very, very closely with Pfizer, particularly with their Covid vaccines and going over lots of reactions and adverse events."
I'm sure she's been VERY BUSY going over lots of reactions and adverse events. She still believes the Pfizer covid shot is safe and effective.
Very very busy creating redactions would be more like it.
SHOULD BE shocking, in a 'normal' world - but not very shocking at all, in this crazy, elitist, NWO iatrocide-driven world we find ourselves.
"First do no harm" has become "First line my pockets".
Keep plugging away Aaron Siri, and ICAN !
SOME day, many will shake the sand out of their hair, and begin to see just how morally corrupted things have become - been so for a long time, but THIS? Beyond belief.
What is sad is that this really is nothing new.
It is in fact very common for expert physicians and scientists to “sell” their expertise to pharmaceutical companies. Unfortunately, neither the physicians nor the pharmaceutical companies seem to recognize the conflict of interest. To most of the doctors, they truly believe that they are just experts providing a service to the pharmaceutical companies. They honestly do not see the potential for even the subconscious influence of the potential loss of their speaker fees and so on, should they begin speaking about the hazards of drug company x’s therapy (for asthma, arthritis, diabetes, the common cold, etc, etc) or about the benefits and efficacy of non-pharmaceutical therapies over and above drug company x’s manufactured product.
I know. It’s mind boggling. But, it truly, truly is a blindness. And not always willful. It’s pretty much the way drs are trained and brought up. It’s how the “speaker fees” are presented: not as bribes for promoting a product, but as a way of paying for someone’s time and expertise. It is assumed that the physician is already an expert and would not be promoting drug x, if drug x was not actually safe and effective.
This is NOT a new blindness or phenomenon.
This is disgusting...
She uses the slang .."on the dole" ...and doesn't even realize what she is saying.
ON THE DOLE.....ON THE PAYROLL...GETTING YOUR CHECK FROM THEM... WTF
All "independent"in her mind means is that she's not a employee....WTF
Oh..so this "DR" doesn't understand that a independent contractor is working FOR THE COMPANY TO GIVE THEM WHAT THEY WANT....and instead of being payroll taxed....she's 1099'd
AGAIN WTF.....
I'm shocked, shocked I tell you
It just confirms the absolute denial of reality for an entire class of would be experts and gov officials. They are encouraged by the apathy and credulity of the public they claim to serve.
Require a liar? For hire - Pfizer advisor, please enquire.
Where do the reports go from the "independent " advisor Siri just deposed?? If only to Pfizer then that's a problem. He needs to cross exam Pfizer about what they do with those reports. All big corps are supposed to have internal controls to mitigate risks. Did they accept the risks? Why? Did DoD BARDA tell them to? Did they assume risk for Pfizer??
Typically, The DMC meets routinely to review data provided by the study sponsor (here, Pfizer). The committee has a chairperson who is responsible for minutes of the meeting and reporting decisions back to the sponsor. It is the responsibility of the sponsor to convey safety concerns to the FDA, EMA, etc.
Then that committee chairperson needs to be subpoenaed to testify. The question remains for what the sponsor did with it. That said, I already know the answer because the FDA doesn't actually have real authority in this whole situation.
I believe the FDA does have authority (legally for sure) but has been captured by the very large pharma (and food) companies such that they are not acting in an unbiased way for some products. This corruption appears to me to be at the top levels of the FDA, not at the level of the scientist/medical reviewers. The reviewers can roll into pharma when they leave the FDA, yes, but they're not the ones able to snag the multimillion dollar positions. That's people at the Center director level and above. And appointed positions like the Commissioner. There have been a number of cases now where someone at a high level has overruled non-approval decisions by the review team and this is led to resignations of those on the review team. So that tells me that among the reviewers there are good people.
Sorry but you are way off base on this particular circumstance. The contracts to produce the vaxx are held by thr DOD under Other Transactional Authorities or OTA. This was authorized by BARDA / HHS. The vaxxes are cited in the contract as Prototype Countermeasures not pharmaceuticals.
And if you don't think so, I suggest you review the following very carefully:
https://open.substack.com/pub/bailiwicknews/p/biomedical-security-state-and-state?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android
How could I summarize it better:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sp67K_Sqd-8
What is sad is that this really is nothing new.
It is in fact very common for expert physicians and scientists to “sell” their expertise to pharmaceutical companies. Unfortunately, neither the physicians nor the pharmaceutical companies seem to recognize the conflict of interest. To most of the doctors, they truly believe that they are just experts providing a service to the pharmaceutical companies. They honestly do not see the potential for even the subconscious influence of the potential loss of their speaker fees and so on, should they begin speaking about the hazards of drug company x’s therapy (for asthma, arthritis, diabetes, the common cold, etc, etc) or about the benefits and efficacy of non-pharmaceutical therapies over and above drug company x’s manufactured product.
I know. It’s mind boggling. But, it truly, truly is a blindness. And not always willful. It’s pretty much the way drs are trained and brought up. It’s how the “speaker fees” are presented: not as bribes for promoting a product, but as a way of paying for someone’s time and expertise. It is assumed that the physician is already an expert and would not be promoting drug x, if drug x was not actually safe and effective.
This is NOT a new blindness or phenomenon.
She needs to be stripped of her "DR" title... so dumb.
But this is what we have allowed in this world 🌎...a bunch of dummies
We have solutions to these problems if we want them. Transparency. Decentralization. And all of us collaborating back as problem solvers. https://joshketry.substack.com/p/worried-about-voter-fraud-lets-build
This shit is getting normalised! Such revelations are simply shrug off with no consequences. The prosecutors do not want to look unsciency I guess, and the media takes care that most of the peasants don't even get the memo.
This corruption begins at the very top and the people below just wait for orders, or at least a head nod, from above to do their jobs. Look, the Israel government lost the agreement with pfizer and nobody seems to bother too much. It was proven they hid dangerous side effects and kept pushing their citizens to take the jabs and there are no trials no nothing. It's bizarre
I’m halfway through reading ‘Bad Pharma’ by Ben Goldacre, revised edition published 2013. All the tricks of the trade being used now had already been detailed by Dr. Goldacre. Recommended reading for anyone who is interested in the arsenal of dirty tricks Big pHarma has up their sleeves.