Andrew Bridgen is a Member of Parliament in the UK. For about a year now he has been vocal about vaccine harms and the origins of Covid.
Last week Fraser Myers, deputy editor of Spiked online, published an article called “The delusions of Andrew Bridgen - Conspiratorial thinking corrodes reason, democracy and humanism”. The article detailed a number of Andrew’s claims but, in my opinion, failed to address them using any scientific analysis.
I remain suspicious about individuals such as Bridgen who suddenly, with little explanation, change their position so dramatically. All the evidence was clear to many of us when the vaccines were rolled out in 2020. The Covid vaccines were new, untested and unnecessary for most people. For the elderly and ill people that were at risk from Covid, vaccine rollouts coincided with high mortality rates and steep increases in Covid cases and deaths.
Andrew is vaccinated himself and in 2021 tweeted a number of times about the “remarkable achievement” of the vaccine rollout. He moaned about double vaccinated Brits not being able to go on holiday and said all the evidence pointed to the success of the vaccination programme severing the link between deaths and Covid cases.
I also think he tweets and talks about things which would put off the average person in the street. If he pulled it back a little, he may get more people on his side and be able to further the cause. Instead, I feel like he says phrases which encourage his echo chamber, instead of trying to bring new people on board. I don’t know why he suddenly changed his position on vaccines, perhaps someone can enlighten me?
But, I will give him the benefit of the doubt and to be fair to the man, he is one of only a few MPs discussing the extremely important topics of Covid origins, vaccine injuries, excess deaths and our disappearing freedoms.
Fraser and Andrew met on GB News for an interesting debate the other day. The debate should have been much longer but I applaud both men for facing each other because it is easy to just criticise someone else online.
One interesting snippet at around the 8 minute mark - Andrew says that he doesn’t have the codes to his own Twitter account. His tweets are all moderated by his staff and his most controversial tweet was approved and posted by the Conservative Association Chairman.
The Naked Emperor’s Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Isn’t it telling that a journalise says that a debate on the cause of excess death will not find that the vaccines are causing it. For a journalist, who has no science background and obviously hasn’t read the papers to make that statement tells you everything you need to know. Spiked need to fire this guy now.
Don't we want people to change their minds on this most wretched of subjects? I know I do, and I'm pleased with the stand Andrew Bridgen is making. It can't be easy for him. I'm appalled at Spiked, it's not just Myers who takes this stance, Brendan O'Neil and other do too. It's Spiked who seem suspicious to me in all of this, not Andrew Bridgen.
Andrew Bridgen MP changed his mind about the experimental untested GMO, DNA-gene-altering, gene-therapy Jabs because he himself suffered vaccine injury. He was interviewed on stage at The Conservative Woman event which premièred the film "Died Suddenly" in Westminster in February 2023
At that event Andrew Bridgen disclosed to the audience that he was "vaccine"-injured. It appears that Andrew Bridgen's vaccine injury alerted him to the dangers of the experimental gene therapy Jabs. Like so many others, Andrew Bridgen was duped by the false narrative strenuously peddled by the government and its scientific officers that the experimental gene therapy Jabs were "safe and effective".....
Andrew Bridge MP is now a warrior for Truth and for justice for the "vaccine"-injured and the "vaccine"-bereaved. He can continue to be a powerful advocate for Truth and Justice and hopefully will continue to do so. Andrew Bridgen should be applauded for having the courage to speak out when, albeit belatedly, he became aware of the dangers and risks of the experimental gene therapy Jabs. Better the sinner repenteth.
“Conspiratorial thinking corrodes reason, democracy and humanism”.
The exact opposite is true. Unquestioning acceptance of the constant monsoon of fake science that flows from the powers that be are the danger to reason, democracy, and humanism. This blind faith causes reason to atrophy past the point of reclamation. Reason must be exercised, often and rigorously, to remain strong. This blind faith results in concentration of power in unelected bureaucrats, and eliminates opposition. Opposition is required for the continuation of freedom through the marketplace of ideas. This blind faith requires individuals to submit themselves as inferior to the state, and reject their individual worth. Without belief in the primacy and worth of the individual, humanism ceases to exist.
These words - reason, democracy, and humanism - do not mean what Fraser Myers believes that they mean. And is ignorance of these words, and willingness to carelessly misinform his readers about them, leads to the abolition of man (CS Lewis). Perhaps that is his true objective.
Why do they keep saying “these are conspiracy theories”? What’s wrong with a conspiracy theory, isn’t that the same as scientific theories, a postulation that should be proven or disproven. Simply trashing people who propose a theory is not disproving it, why can’t they disprove it...
NE asks for clarification on why Andrew Bridgen changed his stance on the ‘jabs’. I recently watched another interview where AB said he was previously uneasy with most of the jab program and mandates, but changed his mind to full opposition when the decision was made to recommend the jabs to children.. He has children of his own and felt the need to step up and protect them.
Good for him, there aren’t that many brave MPs in the Uk parliament standing up to be counted- and shame on them!
Andrew Bridgen stated on an interview with James Delingpole that he is vaccine harmed after taking the 2nd shot. He now takes antihistamine x2 per day to combat swelling around his mouth and other areas. He stated also that once the covid shots were going to be rolled out to children, something that was originally NEVER going to happen, he decided to take action. He has had previous form and tenacity, having supported the staff who suffered and are still suffering at the hands of Post Office Horizon scandal.
MP Bridgen has done an excellent interview with the host of UKColumn and explains his position for his change of heart regarding the "vaccines". The interview is posted on the page I have given you.
The bottom line is this - It is Unconstitutional in all Western Democracies to force or coerce anyone to submit to any medical procedure of any kind, be it taking vitamin C or anything else, without informed consent. We were told you either take the vaccine or you are fired from your job, will be unable to travel and you will be shunned by society, and possibly quarantined against your will. We do not even have to get into "the science" of it in order to say our Constitutional Rights have been manifestly violated. The Canadian Govt was asked in a COURT OF LAW to present "the science" that justified the mandate to forbid all the "unvaccinated" from travel. The Judge declared the Case "moot" because the Govt could not present any "science" to justify their mandate. Since the "vaccines" do NOT PREVENT TRANSMISSION, the unvaccinated present like the vaccinated, so the discrimination has no basis in "safety" whatsoever - https://www.thefp.com/p/court-documents-reveal-canadas-travel
I'm interested in a deep dive investigative report or source for the Pfizer/Indian government negotiations that resulted in Pfizer deciding not to market their mRNA c19 product there.
India wanted to duplicate their safety end effectiveness trial to make sure the numbers were valid. Pfizer refused and wanted blind trust, so Pfizer walked away from pursuit of the Indian population.
He doesn't do his own tweets? What exactly does "access to the code" mean? Is he signalling that he is controlled? These are questions I ask myself, along with am I reading too much into everything these days? I don't trust the man and he's on a growing list of chaos agents subverting the search for truth.
Bridgen and his ilk are a distraction. Nothing is going to be done and their plans will proceed. That doesn't have too be a counsel of despair, because knowing that gives us time to prepare as best we can.
He got his jabs at a pharmacy called Mason's. Could that be a clue? Miriaf.co.uk has thought provoking views. She's calling this, along with cardiac doc, Malpotra? not sure of spelling, another one now speaking out, as possible CO. The world is a stage - name of first man to be jabbed? William Shakespere!
Tweets aside you can’t fake his fervour and time spent on the right side of history for granted. When all of them retreated it was just him on that hill alone fighting for all of us.
Just him.
Never forget that
Never forget the craven rats that skulked out of the chamber when he spoke up for all of us
Regardless of what you think he has single-handedly brought the important issues into the public consciousness and kicked open the overton window which is more that most have ever done 💪🏻
I watched about 13 minutes of this on Twitter...Andrew "won" hands down. The other chap simply accused Andrew of being down rabbit holes = not an argument. I think that many people changed their minds...some just won't admit it.
No but I don't see any repenting going on. I would feel more comfortable if they did say "we regret telling people to get vaccinated now that we have more information" but as far as I can see they try to avoid what they said in the past, which makes me suspicious.
I complained to my own Conservative MP about the expulsion of Andrew Bridgen from the Conservative Party. Here is her response:
“Firstly, no one is supressing any information about the vaccine. Members of the House of Commons frequently raise their concerns about the vaccine and there have been several debates over the recent weeks/months over vaccine safety, including to name just a few examples: Vaccine Damage Payments Act 1979 debate on 24 March; Universal Credit: Vaccine Damage Payment Awards debate on 23 January and Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme: Covid 19 in September last year.
“I could not disagree with you in stronger terms on Mr Bridgen’s behaviour. It was the right decision for Mr Bridgen to be expelled from the Conservative Party. His antisemitic comments were utterly unacceptable and have no place in our society. It is unacceptable to make linkages and use the language that he used. We are determined to eradicate the scourge of antisemitism in our society.”
Andrew Bridgen is not perfect, but he does seem to realise that the Covid19 measures were, as well as medically disastrous, an all-out assault on our civil liberties.
I watched the debate on Sunday. I found it fascinating to observe Myers' cognitive dissonance in action: Bridgen offered up statements of fact and Myers' head literally wobbled at times. He could only refuse to listen without offering a single opposing fact to refute Bridgen. Fascinating.
Isn’t it telling that a journalise says that a debate on the cause of excess death will not find that the vaccines are causing it. For a journalist, who has no science background and obviously hasn’t read the papers to make that statement tells you everything you need to know. Spiked need to fire this guy now.
Don't we want people to change their minds on this most wretched of subjects? I know I do, and I'm pleased with the stand Andrew Bridgen is making. It can't be easy for him. I'm appalled at Spiked, it's not just Myers who takes this stance, Brendan O'Neil and other do too. It's Spiked who seem suspicious to me in all of this, not Andrew Bridgen.
Andrew Bridgen MP changed his mind about the experimental untested GMO, DNA-gene-altering, gene-therapy Jabs because he himself suffered vaccine injury. He was interviewed on stage at The Conservative Woman event which premièred the film "Died Suddenly" in Westminster in February 2023
At that event Andrew Bridgen disclosed to the audience that he was "vaccine"-injured. It appears that Andrew Bridgen's vaccine injury alerted him to the dangers of the experimental gene therapy Jabs. Like so many others, Andrew Bridgen was duped by the false narrative strenuously peddled by the government and its scientific officers that the experimental gene therapy Jabs were "safe and effective".....
Andrew Bridge MP is now a warrior for Truth and for justice for the "vaccine"-injured and the "vaccine"-bereaved. He can continue to be a powerful advocate for Truth and Justice and hopefully will continue to do so. Andrew Bridgen should be applauded for having the courage to speak out when, albeit belatedly, he became aware of the dangers and risks of the experimental gene therapy Jabs. Better the sinner repenteth.
Fraser Myers is the delusional one here. Spiked online should hang their heads in shame for their lamentable journalism.
“Conspiratorial thinking corrodes reason, democracy and humanism”.
The exact opposite is true. Unquestioning acceptance of the constant monsoon of fake science that flows from the powers that be are the danger to reason, democracy, and humanism. This blind faith causes reason to atrophy past the point of reclamation. Reason must be exercised, often and rigorously, to remain strong. This blind faith results in concentration of power in unelected bureaucrats, and eliminates opposition. Opposition is required for the continuation of freedom through the marketplace of ideas. This blind faith requires individuals to submit themselves as inferior to the state, and reject their individual worth. Without belief in the primacy and worth of the individual, humanism ceases to exist.
These words - reason, democracy, and humanism - do not mean what Fraser Myers believes that they mean. And is ignorance of these words, and willingness to carelessly misinform his readers about them, leads to the abolition of man (CS Lewis). Perhaps that is his true objective.
Why do they keep saying “these are conspiracy theories”? What’s wrong with a conspiracy theory, isn’t that the same as scientific theories, a postulation that should be proven or disproven. Simply trashing people who propose a theory is not disproving it, why can’t they disprove it...
Richard Feynman famously wrote "Science is the Belief in the Ignorance of the Experts".
Fraser M should have hung out with me in the hospital to see the stillbirths , abruptions and miscarriages . What a fool.
Your comment makes me so sad - for you and for the poor babies and parents. I'm so sorry you have to witness this and they have to suffer it.
NE asks for clarification on why Andrew Bridgen changed his stance on the ‘jabs’. I recently watched another interview where AB said he was previously uneasy with most of the jab program and mandates, but changed his mind to full opposition when the decision was made to recommend the jabs to children.. He has children of his own and felt the need to step up and protect them.
Good for him, there aren’t that many brave MPs in the Uk parliament standing up to be counted- and shame on them!
Andrew Bridgen stated on an interview with James Delingpole that he is vaccine harmed after taking the 2nd shot. He now takes antihistamine x2 per day to combat swelling around his mouth and other areas. He stated also that once the covid shots were going to be rolled out to children, something that was originally NEVER going to happen, he decided to take action. He has had previous form and tenacity, having supported the staff who suffered and are still suffering at the hands of Post Office Horizon scandal.
Just to let everyone know, James Roguski has a full section dedicated to Andrew Bridgen on his Substack. It is in the Archives here - https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/andrew-bridgen
MP Bridgen has done an excellent interview with the host of UKColumn and explains his position for his change of heart regarding the "vaccines". The interview is posted on the page I have given you.
The bottom line is this - It is Unconstitutional in all Western Democracies to force or coerce anyone to submit to any medical procedure of any kind, be it taking vitamin C or anything else, without informed consent. We were told you either take the vaccine or you are fired from your job, will be unable to travel and you will be shunned by society, and possibly quarantined against your will. We do not even have to get into "the science" of it in order to say our Constitutional Rights have been manifestly violated. The Canadian Govt was asked in a COURT OF LAW to present "the science" that justified the mandate to forbid all the "unvaccinated" from travel. The Judge declared the Case "moot" because the Govt could not present any "science" to justify their mandate. Since the "vaccines" do NOT PREVENT TRANSMISSION, the unvaccinated present like the vaccinated, so the discrimination has no basis in "safety" whatsoever - https://www.thefp.com/p/court-documents-reveal-canadas-travel
I'm interested in a deep dive investigative report or source for the Pfizer/Indian government negotiations that resulted in Pfizer deciding not to market their mRNA c19 product there.
India wanted to duplicate their safety end effectiveness trial to make sure the numbers were valid. Pfizer refused and wanted blind trust, so Pfizer walked away from pursuit of the Indian population.
He doesn't do his own tweets? What exactly does "access to the code" mean? Is he signalling that he is controlled? These are questions I ask myself, along with am I reading too much into everything these days? I don't trust the man and he's on a growing list of chaos agents subverting the search for truth.
Bridgen and his ilk are a distraction. Nothing is going to be done and their plans will proceed. That doesn't have too be a counsel of despair, because knowing that gives us time to prepare as best we can.
I hope the sudden change of the position of Bridgen is not an attempt for controlled opposition.
He got his jabs at a pharmacy called Mason's. Could that be a clue? Miriaf.co.uk has thought provoking views. She's calling this, along with cardiac doc, Malpotra? not sure of spelling, another one now speaking out, as possible CO. The world is a stage - name of first man to be jabbed? William Shakespere!
Tweets aside you can’t fake his fervour and time spent on the right side of history for granted. When all of them retreated it was just him on that hill alone fighting for all of us.
Just him.
Never forget that
Never forget the craven rats that skulked out of the chamber when he spoke up for all of us
Regardless of what you think he has single-handedly brought the important issues into the public consciousness and kicked open the overton window which is more that most have ever done 💪🏻
I watched about 13 minutes of this on Twitter...Andrew "won" hands down. The other chap simply accused Andrew of being down rabbit holes = not an argument. I think that many people changed their minds...some just won't admit it.
Plain as day controlled op. Same bunch as Campbell, and Malhotra.
Do you discount someone’s ability to repent and grow in the light of new information?
No but I don't see any repenting going on. I would feel more comfortable if they did say "we regret telling people to get vaccinated now that we have more information" but as far as I can see they try to avoid what they said in the past, which makes me suspicious.
I complained to my own Conservative MP about the expulsion of Andrew Bridgen from the Conservative Party. Here is her response:
“Firstly, no one is supressing any information about the vaccine. Members of the House of Commons frequently raise their concerns about the vaccine and there have been several debates over the recent weeks/months over vaccine safety, including to name just a few examples: Vaccine Damage Payments Act 1979 debate on 24 March; Universal Credit: Vaccine Damage Payment Awards debate on 23 January and Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme: Covid 19 in September last year.
“I could not disagree with you in stronger terms on Mr Bridgen’s behaviour. It was the right decision for Mr Bridgen to be expelled from the Conservative Party. His antisemitic comments were utterly unacceptable and have no place in our society. It is unacceptable to make linkages and use the language that he used. We are determined to eradicate the scourge of antisemitism in our society.”
Andrew Bridgen is not perfect, but he does seem to realise that the Covid19 measures were, as well as medically disastrous, an all-out assault on our civil liberties.
Fraser Myers needs to be up to date with the Boosters!!!
I watched the debate on Sunday. I found it fascinating to observe Myers' cognitive dissonance in action: Bridgen offered up statements of fact and Myers' head literally wobbled at times. He could only refuse to listen without offering a single opposing fact to refute Bridgen. Fascinating.