26 Comments

Isn’t it telling that a journalise says that a debate on the cause of excess death will not find that the vaccines are causing it. For a journalist, who has no science background and obviously hasn’t read the papers to make that statement tells you everything you need to know. Spiked need to fire this guy now.

Expand full comment

Don't we want people to change their minds on this most wretched of subjects? I know I do, and I'm pleased with the stand Andrew Bridgen is making. It can't be easy for him. I'm appalled at Spiked, it's not just Myers who takes this stance, Brendan O'Neil and other do too. It's Spiked who seem suspicious to me in all of this, not Andrew Bridgen.

Expand full comment

Andrew Bridgen MP changed his mind about the experimental untested GMO, DNA-gene-altering, gene-therapy Jabs because he himself suffered vaccine injury. He was interviewed on stage at The Conservative Woman event which premièred the film "Died Suddenly" in Westminster in February 2023

At that event Andrew Bridgen disclosed to the audience that he was "vaccine"-injured. It appears that Andrew Bridgen's vaccine injury alerted him to the dangers of the experimental gene therapy Jabs. Like so many others, Andrew Bridgen was duped by the false narrative strenuously peddled by the government and its scientific officers that the experimental gene therapy Jabs were "safe and effective".....

Andrew Bridge MP is now a warrior for Truth and for justice for the "vaccine"-injured and the "vaccine"-bereaved. He can continue to be a powerful advocate for Truth and Justice and hopefully will continue to do so. Andrew Bridgen should be applauded for having the courage to speak out when, albeit belatedly, he became aware of the dangers and risks of the experimental gene therapy Jabs. Better the sinner repenteth.

Expand full comment

Fraser Myers is the delusional one here. Spiked online should hang their heads in shame for their lamentable journalism.

Expand full comment

“Conspiratorial thinking corrodes reason, democracy and humanism”.

The exact opposite is true. Unquestioning acceptance of the constant monsoon of fake science that flows from the powers that be are the danger to reason, democracy, and humanism. This blind faith causes reason to atrophy past the point of reclamation. Reason must be exercised, often and rigorously, to remain strong. This blind faith results in concentration of power in unelected bureaucrats, and eliminates opposition. Opposition is required for the continuation of freedom through the marketplace of ideas. This blind faith requires individuals to submit themselves as inferior to the state, and reject their individual worth. Without belief in the primacy and worth of the individual, humanism ceases to exist.

These words - reason, democracy, and humanism - do not mean what Fraser Myers believes that they mean. And is ignorance of these words, and willingness to carelessly misinform his readers about them, leads to the abolition of man (CS Lewis). Perhaps that is his true objective.

Expand full comment

Why do they keep saying “these are conspiracy theories”? What’s wrong with a conspiracy theory, isn’t that the same as scientific theories, a postulation that should be proven or disproven. Simply trashing people who propose a theory is not disproving it, why can’t they disprove it...

Expand full comment

Fraser M should have hung out with me in the hospital to see the stillbirths , abruptions and miscarriages . What a fool.

Expand full comment

NE asks for clarification on why Andrew Bridgen changed his stance on the ‘jabs’. I recently watched another interview where AB said he was previously uneasy with most of the jab program and mandates, but changed his mind to full opposition when the decision was made to recommend the jabs to children.. He has children of his own and felt the need to step up and protect them.

Good for him, there aren’t that many brave MPs in the Uk parliament standing up to be counted- and shame on them!

Expand full comment

Andrew Bridgen stated on an interview with James Delingpole that he is vaccine harmed after taking the 2nd shot. He now takes antihistamine x2 per day to combat swelling around his mouth and other areas. He stated also that once the covid shots were going to be rolled out to children, something that was originally NEVER going to happen, he decided to take action. He has had previous form and tenacity, having supported the staff who suffered and are still suffering at the hands of Post Office Horizon scandal.

Expand full comment
founding

Just to let everyone know, James Roguski has a full section dedicated to Andrew Bridgen on his Substack. It is in the Archives here - https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/andrew-bridgen

MP Bridgen has done an excellent interview with the host of UKColumn and explains his position for his change of heart regarding the "vaccines". The interview is posted on the page I have given you.

Expand full comment
founding

The bottom line is this - It is Unconstitutional in all Western Democracies to force or coerce anyone to submit to any medical procedure of any kind, be it taking vitamin C or anything else, without informed consent. We were told you either take the vaccine or you are fired from your job, will be unable to travel and you will be shunned by society, and possibly quarantined against your will. We do not even have to get into "the science" of it in order to say our Constitutional Rights have been manifestly violated. The Canadian Govt was asked in a COURT OF LAW to present "the science" that justified the mandate to forbid all the "unvaccinated" from travel. The Judge declared the Case "moot" because the Govt could not present any "science" to justify their mandate. Since the "vaccines" do NOT PREVENT TRANSMISSION, the unvaccinated present like the vaccinated, so the discrimination has no basis in "safety" whatsoever - https://www.thefp.com/p/court-documents-reveal-canadas-travel

Expand full comment

I'm interested in a deep dive investigative report or source for the Pfizer/Indian government negotiations that resulted in Pfizer deciding not to market their mRNA c19 product there.

Expand full comment

He doesn't do his own tweets? What exactly does "access to the code" mean? Is he signalling that he is controlled? These are questions I ask myself, along with am I reading too much into everything these days? I don't trust the man and he's on a growing list of chaos agents subverting the search for truth.

Bridgen and his ilk are a distraction. Nothing is going to be done and their plans will proceed. That doesn't have too be a counsel of despair, because knowing that gives us time to prepare as best we can.

Expand full comment

I hope the sudden change of the position of Bridgen is not an attempt for controlled opposition.

Expand full comment

Tweets aside you can’t fake his fervour and time spent on the right side of history for granted. When all of them retreated it was just him on that hill alone fighting for all of us.

Just him.

Never forget that

Never forget the craven rats that skulked out of the chamber when he spoke up for all of us

Regardless of what you think he has single-handedly brought the important issues into the public consciousness and kicked open the overton window which is more that most have ever done 💪🏻

Expand full comment

I watched about 13 minutes of this on Twitter...Andrew "won" hands down. The other chap simply accused Andrew of being down rabbit holes = not an argument. I think that many people changed their minds...some just won't admit it.

Expand full comment

Plain as day controlled op. Same bunch as Campbell, and Malhotra.

Expand full comment

I complained to my own Conservative MP about the expulsion of Andrew Bridgen from the Conservative Party. Here is her response:

“Firstly, no one is supressing any information about the vaccine. Members of the House of Commons frequently raise their concerns about the vaccine and there have been several debates over the recent weeks/months over vaccine safety, including to name just a few examples: Vaccine Damage Payments Act 1979 debate on 24 March; Universal Credit: Vaccine Damage Payment Awards debate on 23 January and Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme: Covid 19 in September last year.

“I could not disagree with you in stronger terms on Mr Bridgen’s behaviour. It was the right decision for Mr Bridgen to be expelled from the Conservative Party. His antisemitic comments were utterly unacceptable and have no place in our society. It is unacceptable to make linkages and use the language that he used. We are determined to eradicate the scourge of antisemitism in our society.”

Andrew Bridgen is not perfect, but he does seem to realise that the Covid19 measures were, as well as medically disastrous, an all-out assault on our civil liberties.

Expand full comment

Fraser Myers needs to be up to date with the Boosters!!!

Expand full comment

I watched the debate on Sunday. I found it fascinating to observe Myers' cognitive dissonance in action: Bridgen offered up statements of fact and Myers' head literally wobbled at times. He could only refuse to listen without offering a single opposing fact to refute Bridgen. Fascinating.

Expand full comment