7 Comments
Dec 3, 2022·edited Dec 3, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com

If you click the Pfizer tweet to view it on Twitter, you'll see that only people that Pfizer mentions (references via the "@[username]" function), will be able to reply. They definitely know they'd get eviscerated in the comments. What pathetic cowards peddling their poison in their little safe space. They spend millions upon millions buying media and academic/pro shills, but they're still so afraid of being called out by the little guy. I think they know their hold on things is more tenuous than they let on. Bill Gates did the exact same strategy last year on Twitter when people were posting 100 hate comments per minute in his Instagram.

Expand full comment

Seems like Fauci's new job is similar to his old job, chief propagandist for Pharma. I bet he's worth 100mil by this time next year.

Expand full comment
Dec 3, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com

Re, The Real Reason behind China’s Covid Policy, while I agree with the reasons that are not behind the CCPs lockdown measures(eg, it’s not about the virus), I find the reasons stated for the extreme lockdown measures uncompelling, although I won’t claim I can do better. There is a first principle behind everything of a significant nature coming from the CCP: the motivation is political. I suspect the measures may be about an attempt by Xi to distract and occupy CCP opposition leadership and keep them “hunkered down” managing Covid and the protests. Perhaps he is seeking to flush out disloyal party leadership. In other words the lockdowns are about managing dissent within the CCP. China has many problems and Xi has powerful enemies inside China.

The argument against this theory is it is high risk, as evidenced by the growing protests. The risks to Xi may be greater that any strategic political gain he may be after.

Expand full comment
Dec 3, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com

"IAEA Head: Ukraine And Russia Close To Zaporizhzhya Safety Zone Deal." Ha ha, good one. Has the IAEA figured out who's shelling the plant yet?

No way Russia gives up such a strategic location and no way Ukraine abides by any agreement to not further attack the plant.

Expand full comment