6 Comments

The Navy pilot one was interesting, if its true i wonder if the navy will change its tune as its been very on board with the jab. a sensible commander would insist on a no flight period for the recently jabbed

Expand full comment

Thank you for your time.

Expand full comment

Required reading should include Jonas Salk's "Survival of the Wisest." These people are SICK! and have not hidden their views of humanity.

Expand full comment

These guys have been writing to each other (no one else would read them) for decades. I would normally not recommend Bertrand Russell for much of anything, but in this he was prescient (if not prophetic).

Below are excerpts from his book “The Impact of Science on Technology” from the 50s. If unaware, he is one of the most influential philosophers in the cabal of folks like HG Wells and Aldous Huxley and Jonas Salk (more recently people like Bill Gates) who believed we should be come a society like Plato’s Republic and led by a “Priestly King” class (people like him) ruling over the machine of society.

These people really are sick and are still running our major universities and think tanks.

A few quotes… the book (among others by these freaks) are full of this hopeful slop (if it weren’t so dangerous and influential in the upper echelons of Yale and Harvard and Oxford and the Rand Corporation and the like, it would be mockable). This is exactly the sort of thing coming out of World Economic Forum today (Davos) – such as their founder, Klaus Schwabb and the Great Reset.

-------------------------

It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fichte laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. But in his day this was an unattainable ideal: what he regarded as the best system in existence produced Karl Marx. In future such failures are not likely to occur where there is dictatorship. Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves happy, because the government will tell them that they are so.

***

I think the subject which will be of most importance polit­ically is mass psychology. Mass psychology is, scientifically speaking, not a very advanced study, and so far its professors have not been in universities: they have been advertisers, politicians, and, above all, dictators. This study is immensely useful to practical men, whether they wish to become rich or to acquire the government. It is, of course, as a science, founded upon individual psychology, but hitherto it has employed rule-of-thumb methods which were based upon a kind of intuitive common sense. Its importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda. Of these the most influential is what is called "education." Religion plays a part, though a diminishing one; the press, the cinema, and the radio play an increasing part. What is essential in mass psychology is the art of per­suasion. If you compare a speech of Hitler's with a speech of (say) Edmund Burke, you will see what strides have been made in the art since the eighteenth century. What went wrong formerly was that people had read in books that man is a rational animal, and framed their arguments on this hypothesis. We now know that limelight and a brass band do more to persuade than can be done by the most elegant train of syllogisms. It may be hoped that in time anybody will be able to persuade anybody of anything if he can catch the patient young and is provided by the State with money and equipment.

This subject will make great strides when it is taken up by scientists under a scientific dictatorship. Anaxagoras maintained that snow is black, but no one believed him. The social psychologists of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black. Various results will soon be arrived at. First, that the influence of home is obstructive. Second, that not much can be done unless indoctrination begins before the age of ten. Third, that verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective. Fourth, that the opinion that snow is white must be held to show a morbid taste for eccentricity. But I anticipate. It is for future scientists to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black, and how much less it would cost to make them believe it is dark gray. Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen. As yet there is only one country which has succeeded in creating this politician's paradise.

***

The nations which at present increase rapidly should be encouraged to adopt the methods by which, in the West, the increase of population has been checked. Educational propaganda, with government help, could achieve this result in a generation. There are, however, two powerful forces opposed to such a policy: one is religion, the other is nationalism. I think it is the duty of all who are capable of facing facts to realize, and to proclaim, that opposition to the spread of birth con­trol, if successful, must inflict upon mankind the most ap­palling depth of misery and degradation, and that within another fifty years or so.

I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing. There are others, which, one must suppose, opponents of birth control would prefer. War, as I remarked a moment ago, has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove more effective. If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full. There would be nothing in this to offend the consciences of the devout or to restrain the ambitions of national­ists. The state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of that? Really high-minded people are indifferent to happiness, especially other people's.

***

Any nation which adopts this practice will, within a generation, secure great military advantages. The system, one may surmise, will be something like this: except possibly in the governing aristocracy, all but 5 per cent of males and 30 per cent of females will be sterilized. The 30 per cent of females will be expected to spend the years from eighteen to forty in reproduction, in order to secure adequate cannon fodder. As a rule, artificial insemination will be preferred to the natural method. The unsterilized, if they desire the pleasures of love, will usually have to seek them with sterilized partners.

Expand full comment

The HART letter is as amazing as the rest of their work to date

Expand full comment

I have had a quick look at the reports of the F35 crash. Almost an occupational hazard, they have rescue helicopters on standby.

"Twitter" reports are very difficult to assess, they are often posted by "Twits" and are hard to distinguish from rumours, disinformation, and reposted urban legends. In the era of Covid lies I am hesitant to believe anything I hear or see without credible confirmation (unless it conforms to my prejudices) and a search for original sources. One of the main concerns was not the people, 1 pilot and 7 crew injured, but to prevent the Chinese from salvaging the $110 million jet! The pilot lived, so did not volunteer for an autopsy to examine his heart for damage, and the trauma of the crash would make assessment a bit more difficult than depicted on CSI.

Expand full comment