No, I do not think Dr. McCullough is controlled opposition. I don't think he is in it for the money. He is old world, old school professor of medicine. You cannot expect the old (I am one) to change their entire world view, although I think he is getting there.
It is almost impossible for most people to comprehend the extent of the EVIL that is being perptrated on us by our own governments...who have been effectively captured.
The question of who planned this (this was a long conceived plan that tech now makes possible) to turn us into a controlled and ID'd and CBDC managed population after the cull...is still up in the air.
The question we need to be asking is what can we do about it?
I agree with you on McCullough. Another consideration, I think, is that you can’t, or shouldn’t, outrun those you’re trying to lead to truth. Too far too fast and you’d lose them.
What should we do about it? I think we all instinctively know, but for the most part, the instincts for self preservation have about been bred out of humanity.
Agreed. I have followed him closely since March 2021, most of his weekly podcast since then and he has definitely grown since that time. I won't defend against these accusations but will state he has been public since he testified in front of the Texas Senate in March 2021. He is even questioning all childhood vaccines now because of how government and pharma have handled this gene therapy. At one point he spoke positively of the NOVAVAX shot because the data looked good but he eventually said the risks were the same for heart problems compared to the other vaccines.
It is so difficult for most of the older doctors to realize they are now infiltrated by corporations sniffing after Government money from Medicare and billing codes...Amazon and a lot of other see the free govt money and are giving up Echo dot and google home and going after the easy pickings...the endless stream of printed currency our government has diahreared out for the past three years.
“controlled opposition “ is the slur du jour used against anyone and everyone who isn’t in 100% agreement with wherever the accuser stands at any particular moment
Dr McCullough comes across as a old fashioned, careful, thoughtful scientist in the old school tradition. He doesn’t Leap on Twitter to endorse the latest fad without carefully considering all possibilities. So yes he can sometimes be seen as a Johnny come lately to the movement but he has given up a very prominent career to speak out against the butchery that is going on and to call him controlled opposition is absolutely crazy.
When someone starts saying 'controlled op', I scrutinize the accuser as much as the accused. Sometimes this reflects more poorly on the one trying to kite the accusation. There's more than one way to be a 'controlled op'.
Kind of like psyop and false flag, controlled op is now as meaningless as antivax. Just slurs thrown by those wanting to appear superior or more in the know on esoteric matters. Seems to me.
Jan 9, 2023·edited Jan 9, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
I've been following P McCulough and sure he could be now and again wrong. He probably is slightly full of himself (no more than me probably though). But to claim that he's "controlled opposition" is ludicrous. Of course he changed his mind in 2021 (and not 2022). Very courageous of him. The literature he has produced since (notably with Jessica Rose) is outstanding. Why can't people criticize or disagree with someone without retorting to insults and defamation.
I'm wondering who is the real control opposition there.
Jan 9, 2023·edited Jan 9, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
So Peter McCullough got rich by losing his job and credentials at a major university hospital where he no doubt made hundreds of thousands of dollars a year, so he could speak out at Senate hearings and eventually elsewhere about the life-saving benefits of a handful of vitamins, and old anti-parasitic drug, and an old anti-malarial drug? Tell me how that worked, exactly.
You’ve got to be kidding.
(Not you personally, NE, but people pushing this ridiculousness.)
I have no idea what Dr McCullough’s views on lockdowns were.
Not every person is going to have gotten every thing right from Day One. Shoot, FLCCC recommended the useless genetic injections initially. This lack of getting every single thing right doesn’t make someone controlled opposition.
Take what the person gets right and be thankful. Dr. McCullough and others gave us early treatment protocols that have saved lives. Stop blaming him for not doing more. He, like most of us, probably had NO IDEA in the beginning what was really going on re lockdowns and tyranny. (Again, not you personally, NE, but the naysayers.). I’m not saying to not ask questions (many of us thought FLCCC’s initial inclusion of the injection in their recommendations was ludicrous, and still we used their early treatment protocol). But seriously.
We need to stay focused on main things. Early treatment. Medical freedom. The sacred nature of the dr-pt relationship. The harms and fraud of the useless genetic poison.
I’m kinda tired of hearing all these medical heroes who have lost credentials and licenses and jobs being tossed into the nebulous “controlled opposition” basket. What are the accusers hoping to do, exactly? What do THEY have to gain with these accusations, I wonder? Divide and conquer, perhaps? 🤔. We need to remain vigilant and focused. Early treatment. Freedom. Personal responsibility. Local engagement. Accountability for those who perpetrated the harms. Stop the injections. Freedom. Freedom. Freedom.
I don’t deny that ‘controlled opposition’ is a thing; just look at Foxnews. But, the term is being thrown around too loosely these days. People are different and all have their own quirks and blind spots.
Thank you. That’s a balanced take, which is much needed. Free people will never be in complete agreement on every point about anything. And it’s those we are battling who insist on a carbon copy mentality on all points and want to push the world into a lockstep dystopia. Why would we ever support that?
Similar to Alex Berrenson and his anti-ivermectin spews. I still check out their stuff from time to time and agree on some things but I'm suspicious of their positions on others.
Yep, Alex, supposedly a journalist, hasn't taken the opportunity to interview any doctor who supports the use of Ivermectin. I guarantee Dr Kory or McCullough would take the time to sit down and answer questions.
Jan 9, 2023·edited Jan 9, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
Not controlled opposition at all, in my opinion. He published articles showing the dangers of the jabs and promoted effective early treatment, meaning he effectively saved lives.
I would be very happy if he earned a living in that process. The other side made a killing literally and figuratively. I want independent doctors and journalists to be able to earn well, because I value my own freedom and well being. It is that simple.
The term controlled opposition is pretty much like the term "conspiracy theory": it serves a purpose to fracture the opposition by pointing out that it is not a monolithic, single statement one. Yes, the opposition is diverse, it has plenty of ideas and topics, as opposed to the single statement vaxx-vaxx-vaxx narrative of the elites, and this is also our strength. We are flexible to allow for different opinions and are hence empowered to adjust as we go. Including the opinion that controlled opposition is a thing ...
Not controlled opposition at all. In fact, I'm at the point now that any time I hear someone saying "controlled opposition", it makes me look at the accuser extra closely. What better way to destroy a group than to have them turn on their own heroes?
No, I don’t buy the controlled opposition. Basically Dr. Mc had his professional existence stripped away due to his vocal opposition. Why would he have given that away for any other reason than true belief in what he was saying?
He has been wrong at times too, saying that you get covid once and you’re done with it. Saying that wasn’t exactly a sales pitch for needing mRNA shots. I pointed out in comments on twitter at that time that I disagreed with him on the “once and done” because there were already reports of people getting second infections, and of course I got blasted for the disagreement.
His appearance on Rogan, and the reach that had, would have never been allowed by the opposition.
And, notably, he retracted his “once and done” statement when he saw evidence to the contrary.
No doctor is going to ever be right about everything. Ever.
We should use our own God-given common sense and thought.
And we ought not be surprised when new information comes to light, resulting in changes to what is known and not known. That is the nature of scientific inquiry.
Dr McCullough at least admitted he was wrong. Unlike our C D C and others who change their advice without ever even hinting that they were wrong.
His opinion was that the original would be one and done. After the variants mutated too far your immune system wouldn't recognize it and he changed his position.
Jan 9, 2023·edited Jan 9, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
Let's turn the question the other way shall we? What would be controlled opposition in this actual context?
RFK Jr (yes yes!), Desmet, Malone, Senator Johnson, Raoult and now McCullough have been branded as such... Why? because they've often taken a conservative approach to problems. They have waited for sufficient data. They didn't jump to conclusion. They tried to remain soft spoken not insulting people (not Raoult though but he's from Marseille :-D) etc.
Basically they all did a great job. McCullough and Malone actually made history at the Joe Rogan Experience. It was a real turning point. There was a real power shift there.
But what would look like a real controlled opposition? My guess is that such a control opposition would be pretty much like the FBI agents infiltrated on 01.06. Agents provocateurs. Big mouthed idiots claiming they've seen squids or nanotechnology in the vaccine. Making thus a good job to discredit the real opposition...
Maybe. But If so he isn't doing much damage to the "cause" with his weird ideas on Malone, Ivermectin and such, while he did produce some very sound work too. Above all he is not advocating for the injections nor for the non-pharmaceutical interventions. To me that's a reasonable shibolet. He seems to me to be what he is: a liberal investigative journalist who did swallow the red pill at some point but not quite fully. He still believes in some MSM nonsense. But there's nothing to stop you disagreeing with him. He's not pushing any weird agenda in the meantime.
To me agents provocateurs (willing or unwilling) are the main problem. Just like with 9/11 BTW (the atomic bomb theory etc.)...
Agree, could be just sincere difference of opinion. Not everyone who sees through the covid BS should automatically love Trump and have a gun arsenal in their basement.
Absolutely (not to mention Trump pushed for the injections!). It is very striking to me that as a matter of fact the panel of people seeing through the CoViD nonsense is quite diverse fortunately. To be sure the Left was deliberately targeted to consent to the Great Covidian Reset (as I argue here https://winteroak.org.uk/2022/11/12/why-and-how-does-the-global-governance-weaponize-the-left/) and the Right (along with non partisan people like me) was a little more resilient. But Steve Kirsh, Naomi Wolf, RFK Jr etc come from the Left!
I feel like many of those on the left were more likely to fall prey as it was promoted by "their" side, same way as those on the "right" were not trusting CNNs of the world to begin with for all sorts of other reasons. It actually is heart-breaking and disgusting how the leftist elites are targeting their loyal followers first and foremost. There really is no upside to be on the "left" any more unless you belong to the "elites".
I don't think the present day elites are on any side. They are not "Left leaning" nor "woke" nor "inclusive", nor "Green"… It's just a branding to create a feedback loop with their followers. It's just marketing. To sell ESGs, personal carbon permits, vaccine passports, digital identity, CBDCs, etc as if they were all "woke" items.
The elite are no more "Left wing" than Bernays was a feminist when he sold cigarettes to women pretending it was in the name of women's lib (cf. Torches of Freedom)...
The elites are nor right nor left wing, they stand in the midst of the triangle than runs from Wall Street to the Pentagon/Langley/Fort Meade, to the Silicon Valley.
Jan 9, 2023·edited Jan 9, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
What's with Malone suing the Breggins et al. for $25 million? That reeks of controlled oppo. Not to mention that essentially every red pill celebrity refuses to discuss non-biologics in the vaxxxes like graphene oxide, 5G-triggered bioweapons or the DARPA/DOD civilian extermination plans. It is quite clear that whether they are controlled oppo or not, they are beholden to their reader subscription lists.
a) It is documented that the impurities, quality control in manufacture and distribution of these vaxxxes is extremely variable and follows none of the Good Manufacturing Processes for drugs or medical products as discussed by Sasha Latypova. https://sashalatypova.substack.com/
b) the graphene oxide nanoparticles in the vaxxxes grow from nothing to visibility under an ordinary microscope in a matter of days and appear to be 5G triggered bioweapons. This happens both in vitro and in vaxxxed humans. https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/
c) The US military design, patents and legal basis for these bioweapons is fully explicated in the public domain as a war on the civilian population under Public Emergency Authorization by the DOD.
Baalone is also suing single mom Karen Kingston. Karen has been one of the most diligent at following the patent trails. Just as Martin has done. However unlike Martin, or Malone, she’s not making Money from being outspoken.
As for Malone, he has self identified as a leader for the truth movement, and has been telling us all about his international trips as a leader
Breggin and Kingston are just continuing on as they have been over the last 2 years. Yeah Breggin wrote a book. Breggin has written many books over his 40 year career criticising main stream medicine and Pharma.
Where was Malone? Making millions in contract negotiations under DoD (Barda?)
Malone gets my vote for CO. Kingston and Breggin do not.
That is because Dr. Ryan Cole and some lab in Europe showed that lots of different vials of vaccines from different companies had no graphene oxide in them using advanced equipment. That is why they don't talk about it.
Hesitant to call Dr Peter McCullough controlled opposition. I feel uncomfortable when our side starts faltering, and begins to bully one or two people. Dr Robert Malone currently involved in a dispute with Dr. Breggin and his wife. Now this. I don’t like it and I do not agree with it. Everyone has a right to their own opinion but to go public with comments suggesting negativity about a doctor, who up to now has been a covid warrior, IMO is wrong.
I keep hearing that term every time someone doesn't agree with someone else's approach. And I've heard it about just about everyone at one time or another. The other side isn't the only side to have crazies.
When people jump to believe theories before there is ample evidence to support it, and someone else doesn't go along, they slap them with that name. Dr. M is a careful professional, who doesn't engage in wild theories. He is cautious, studious, and knowledgeable. He is also effective and believable, and that makes him a target.
What better way to target someone than to get people to distrust them and cause them to lose confidence in him? Any time I hear that term now, I scrutinize the accuser very carefully. Are they right, are they someone who just jumps on the latest thing, or are they themself CO?
I think it's very simple: you will know them by their fruits. If Dr. M is CO, then he's a giant failure at it, because he has done a tremendous job at red pilling people, pushing early treatment, and getting the message out.
Controlled oppo generally provide an association hook to discredit a group or movement. I've not seen that hook with McCullough - he has changed his mind when the evidence presents itself. The difference being he assumed it was correct until proven not to be and some people don't like this approach as it counters their own information handling biases.
Malone strikes me as more of a limited hangout type. I don't get the controlled opposition vibes from McCullough like I do from that Stew Peter's character and his questionable "Died Suddenly," which has certainly had an effect on searching for those words.
I just tried searching on Google and only 7/50 are references to the “documentary.” 3/7 where just factual links it’s wiki, IMDb and YouTube. 4 were commentary/fact checks/debunking and the rest were MSN news stories about actual people that had died suddenly.
If anything it looks like it’s being suppressed given it’s claimed to have 30M views.
Nope. Not for me anyway. Totally suppressed from my Google search for at least 3 days, except for a few debunking articles.
It was funny to watch YouTube and read comments as their moderators were scrambling to take it down, they just couldn’t keep up with the shear number of people uploading the video. It was like a game of whack-a-mole.
No, I do not think Dr. McCullough is controlled opposition. I don't think he is in it for the money. He is old world, old school professor of medicine. You cannot expect the old (I am one) to change their entire world view, although I think he is getting there.
It is almost impossible for most people to comprehend the extent of the EVIL that is being perptrated on us by our own governments...who have been effectively captured.
The question of who planned this (this was a long conceived plan that tech now makes possible) to turn us into a controlled and ID'd and CBDC managed population after the cull...is still up in the air.
The question we need to be asking is what can we do about it?
I agree with you on McCullough. Another consideration, I think, is that you can’t, or shouldn’t, outrun those you’re trying to lead to truth. Too far too fast and you’d lose them.
What should we do about it? I think we all instinctively know, but for the most part, the instincts for self preservation have about been bred out of humanity.
Not here! Where do I sign up????!!!!🤬
Agreed. I have followed him closely since March 2021, most of his weekly podcast since then and he has definitely grown since that time. I won't defend against these accusations but will state he has been public since he testified in front of the Texas Senate in March 2021. He is even questioning all childhood vaccines now because of how government and pharma have handled this gene therapy. At one point he spoke positively of the NOVAVAX shot because the data looked good but he eventually said the risks were the same for heart problems compared to the other vaccines.
It is so difficult for most of the older doctors to realize they are now infiltrated by corporations sniffing after Government money from Medicare and billing codes...Amazon and a lot of other see the free govt money and are giving up Echo dot and google home and going after the easy pickings...the endless stream of printed currency our government has diahreared out for the past three years.
💯%
Totally agree. Dr. Maccullaugh is a dedicated professional and his only concern is for the welfare of his patients.
“controlled opposition “ is the slur du jour used against anyone and everyone who isn’t in 100% agreement with wherever the accuser stands at any particular moment
Dr McCullough comes across as a old fashioned, careful, thoughtful scientist in the old school tradition. He doesn’t Leap on Twitter to endorse the latest fad without carefully considering all possibilities. So yes he can sometimes be seen as a Johnny come lately to the movement but he has given up a very prominent career to speak out against the butchery that is going on and to call him controlled opposition is absolutely crazy.
When someone starts saying 'controlled op', I scrutinize the accuser as much as the accused. Sometimes this reflects more poorly on the one trying to kite the accusation. There's more than one way to be a 'controlled op'.
I agree!
Kind of like psyop and false flag, controlled op is now as meaningless as antivax. Just slurs thrown by those wanting to appear superior or more in the know on esoteric matters. Seems to me.
You forgot “conspiracy theory”...I guess that’s passé now since all the conspiracy theories (aka: truth) have become truth.
Well, same here JL.
I've been following P McCulough and sure he could be now and again wrong. He probably is slightly full of himself (no more than me probably though). But to claim that he's "controlled opposition" is ludicrous. Of course he changed his mind in 2021 (and not 2022). Very courageous of him. The literature he has produced since (notably with Jessica Rose) is outstanding. Why can't people criticize or disagree with someone without retorting to insults and defamation.
I'm wondering who is the real control opposition there.
So Peter McCullough got rich by losing his job and credentials at a major university hospital where he no doubt made hundreds of thousands of dollars a year, so he could speak out at Senate hearings and eventually elsewhere about the life-saving benefits of a handful of vitamins, and old anti-parasitic drug, and an old anti-malarial drug? Tell me how that worked, exactly.
You’ve got to be kidding.
(Not you personally, NE, but people pushing this ridiculousness.)
I have no idea what Dr McCullough’s views on lockdowns were.
Not every person is going to have gotten every thing right from Day One. Shoot, FLCCC recommended the useless genetic injections initially. This lack of getting every single thing right doesn’t make someone controlled opposition.
Take what the person gets right and be thankful. Dr. McCullough and others gave us early treatment protocols that have saved lives. Stop blaming him for not doing more. He, like most of us, probably had NO IDEA in the beginning what was really going on re lockdowns and tyranny. (Again, not you personally, NE, but the naysayers.). I’m not saying to not ask questions (many of us thought FLCCC’s initial inclusion of the injection in their recommendations was ludicrous, and still we used their early treatment protocol). But seriously.
We need to stay focused on main things. Early treatment. Medical freedom. The sacred nature of the dr-pt relationship. The harms and fraud of the useless genetic poison.
I’m kinda tired of hearing all these medical heroes who have lost credentials and licenses and jobs being tossed into the nebulous “controlled opposition” basket. What are the accusers hoping to do, exactly? What do THEY have to gain with these accusations, I wonder? Divide and conquer, perhaps? 🤔. We need to remain vigilant and focused. Early treatment. Freedom. Personal responsibility. Local engagement. Accountability for those who perpetrated the harms. Stop the injections. Freedom. Freedom. Freedom.
YES!
Perfectly said!! thank you.
Bravo!
Well said Copernicus, well said.
I don’t deny that ‘controlled opposition’ is a thing; just look at Foxnews. But, the term is being thrown around too loosely these days. People are different and all have their own quirks and blind spots.
Thank you. That’s a balanced take, which is much needed. Free people will never be in complete agreement on every point about anything. And it’s those we are battling who insist on a carbon copy mentality on all points and want to push the world into a lockstep dystopia. Why would we ever support that?
Man I liked Senger but now I’m suspicious of him, because I really wouldn’t peg McCulough as controller opposition.
Similar to Alex Berrenson and his anti-ivermectin spews. I still check out their stuff from time to time and agree on some things but I'm suspicious of their positions on others.
Yep, Alex, supposedly a journalist, hasn't taken the opportunity to interview any doctor who supports the use of Ivermectin. I guarantee Dr Kory or McCullough would take the time to sit down and answer questions.
Not controlled opposition at all, in my opinion. He published articles showing the dangers of the jabs and promoted effective early treatment, meaning he effectively saved lives.
I would be very happy if he earned a living in that process. The other side made a killing literally and figuratively. I want independent doctors and journalists to be able to earn well, because I value my own freedom and well being. It is that simple.
The term controlled opposition is pretty much like the term "conspiracy theory": it serves a purpose to fracture the opposition by pointing out that it is not a monolithic, single statement one. Yes, the opposition is diverse, it has plenty of ideas and topics, as opposed to the single statement vaxx-vaxx-vaxx narrative of the elites, and this is also our strength. We are flexible to allow for different opinions and are hence empowered to adjust as we go. Including the opinion that controlled opposition is a thing ...
Well said!
Bravo!
Not controlled opposition at all. In fact, I'm at the point now that any time I hear someone saying "controlled opposition", it makes me look at the accuser extra closely. What better way to destroy a group than to have them turn on their own heroes?
No, I don’t buy the controlled opposition. Basically Dr. Mc had his professional existence stripped away due to his vocal opposition. Why would he have given that away for any other reason than true belief in what he was saying?
He has been wrong at times too, saying that you get covid once and you’re done with it. Saying that wasn’t exactly a sales pitch for needing mRNA shots. I pointed out in comments on twitter at that time that I disagreed with him on the “once and done” because there were already reports of people getting second infections, and of course I got blasted for the disagreement.
His appearance on Rogan, and the reach that had, would have never been allowed by the opposition.
And, notably, he retracted his “once and done” statement when he saw evidence to the contrary.
No doctor is going to ever be right about everything. Ever.
We should use our own God-given common sense and thought.
And we ought not be surprised when new information comes to light, resulting in changes to what is known and not known. That is the nature of scientific inquiry.
Dr McCullough at least admitted he was wrong. Unlike our C D C and others who change their advice without ever even hinting that they were wrong.
His opinion was that the original would be one and done. After the variants mutated too far your immune system wouldn't recognize it and he changed his position.
Let's turn the question the other way shall we? What would be controlled opposition in this actual context?
RFK Jr (yes yes!), Desmet, Malone, Senator Johnson, Raoult and now McCullough have been branded as such... Why? because they've often taken a conservative approach to problems. They have waited for sufficient data. They didn't jump to conclusion. They tried to remain soft spoken not insulting people (not Raoult though but he's from Marseille :-D) etc.
Basically they all did a great job. McCullough and Malone actually made history at the Joe Rogan Experience. It was a real turning point. There was a real power shift there.
But what would look like a real controlled opposition? My guess is that such a control opposition would be pretty much like the FBI agents infiltrated on 01.06. Agents provocateurs. Big mouthed idiots claiming they've seen squids or nanotechnology in the vaccine. Making thus a good job to discredit the real opposition...
Just saying.
Alex Berenson seems to be a more likely candidate for a controlled opposition. But, again, no easy way to tell.
Maybe. But If so he isn't doing much damage to the "cause" with his weird ideas on Malone, Ivermectin and such, while he did produce some very sound work too. Above all he is not advocating for the injections nor for the non-pharmaceutical interventions. To me that's a reasonable shibolet. He seems to me to be what he is: a liberal investigative journalist who did swallow the red pill at some point but not quite fully. He still believes in some MSM nonsense. But there's nothing to stop you disagreeing with him. He's not pushing any weird agenda in the meantime.
To me agents provocateurs (willing or unwilling) are the main problem. Just like with 9/11 BTW (the atomic bomb theory etc.)...
Agree, could be just sincere difference of opinion. Not everyone who sees through the covid BS should automatically love Trump and have a gun arsenal in their basement.
Absolutely (not to mention Trump pushed for the injections!). It is very striking to me that as a matter of fact the panel of people seeing through the CoViD nonsense is quite diverse fortunately. To be sure the Left was deliberately targeted to consent to the Great Covidian Reset (as I argue here https://winteroak.org.uk/2022/11/12/why-and-how-does-the-global-governance-weaponize-the-left/) and the Right (along with non partisan people like me) was a little more resilient. But Steve Kirsh, Naomi Wolf, RFK Jr etc come from the Left!
I feel like many of those on the left were more likely to fall prey as it was promoted by "their" side, same way as those on the "right" were not trusting CNNs of the world to begin with for all sorts of other reasons. It actually is heart-breaking and disgusting how the leftist elites are targeting their loyal followers first and foremost. There really is no upside to be on the "left" any more unless you belong to the "elites".
I don't think the present day elites are on any side. They are not "Left leaning" nor "woke" nor "inclusive", nor "Green"… It's just a branding to create a feedback loop with their followers. It's just marketing. To sell ESGs, personal carbon permits, vaccine passports, digital identity, CBDCs, etc as if they were all "woke" items.
The elite are no more "Left wing" than Bernays was a feminist when he sold cigarettes to women pretending it was in the name of women's lib (cf. Torches of Freedom)...
The elites are nor right nor left wing, they stand in the midst of the triangle than runs from Wall Street to the Pentagon/Langley/Fort Meade, to the Silicon Valley.
What's with Malone suing the Breggins et al. for $25 million? That reeks of controlled oppo. Not to mention that essentially every red pill celebrity refuses to discuss non-biologics in the vaxxxes like graphene oxide, 5G-triggered bioweapons or the DARPA/DOD civilian extermination plans. It is quite clear that whether they are controlled oppo or not, they are beholden to their reader subscription lists.
a) It is documented that the impurities, quality control in manufacture and distribution of these vaxxxes is extremely variable and follows none of the Good Manufacturing Processes for drugs or medical products as discussed by Sasha Latypova. https://sashalatypova.substack.com/
b) the graphene oxide nanoparticles in the vaxxxes grow from nothing to visibility under an ordinary microscope in a matter of days and appear to be 5G triggered bioweapons. This happens both in vitro and in vaxxxed humans. https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/
c) The US military design, patents and legal basis for these bioweapons is fully explicated in the public domain as a war on the civilian population under Public Emergency Authorization by the DOD.
https://substack.com/profile/8540123-katherine-watt https://karenkingston.substack.com/
https://armedforces.press/2023/01/05/breaking-dod-controlled-covid-vaccines-from-the-start-under-national-security-program-lied-the-entire-time-were-never-safe-and-effective/
Baalone is also suing single mom Karen Kingston. Karen has been one of the most diligent at following the patent trails. Just as Martin has done. However unlike Martin, or Malone, she’s not making Money from being outspoken.
As for Malone, he has self identified as a leader for the truth movement, and has been telling us all about his international trips as a leader
Breggin and Kingston are just continuing on as they have been over the last 2 years. Yeah Breggin wrote a book. Breggin has written many books over his 40 year career criticising main stream medicine and Pharma.
Where was Malone? Making millions in contract negotiations under DoD (Barda?)
Malone gets my vote for CO. Kingston and Breggin do not.
I agree with you. I caught on to Malone last year. It was just too obvious
What’s with him suing them? He didn’t want them to keep defaming him. I like his takes on what has been happening with the vaccines.
That is because Dr. Ryan Cole and some lab in Europe showed that lots of different vials of vaccines from different companies had no graphene oxide in them using advanced equipment. That is why they don't talk about it.
Not finding something in your sample is not proof of anything. I'm not seeing any tigers in my house. Doesn't mean they don't exist.
Look at Dr. Norm Nixon's work and the international collaboration described by Dr. Mihalcea.
Looking for controlled opposition everywhere is a good way to make a movement collapse in on itself.
Hesitant to call Dr Peter McCullough controlled opposition. I feel uncomfortable when our side starts faltering, and begins to bully one or two people. Dr Robert Malone currently involved in a dispute with Dr. Breggin and his wife. Now this. I don’t like it and I do not agree with it. Everyone has a right to their own opinion but to go public with comments suggesting negativity about a doctor, who up to now has been a covid warrior, IMO is wrong.
I keep hearing that term every time someone doesn't agree with someone else's approach. And I've heard it about just about everyone at one time or another. The other side isn't the only side to have crazies.
When people jump to believe theories before there is ample evidence to support it, and someone else doesn't go along, they slap them with that name. Dr. M is a careful professional, who doesn't engage in wild theories. He is cautious, studious, and knowledgeable. He is also effective and believable, and that makes him a target.
What better way to target someone than to get people to distrust them and cause them to lose confidence in him? Any time I hear that term now, I scrutinize the accuser very carefully. Are they right, are they someone who just jumps on the latest thing, or are they themself CO?
I think it's very simple: you will know them by their fruits. If Dr. M is CO, then he's a giant failure at it, because he has done a tremendous job at red pilling people, pushing early treatment, and getting the message out.
Controlled oppo generally provide an association hook to discredit a group or movement. I've not seen that hook with McCullough - he has changed his mind when the evidence presents itself. The difference being he assumed it was correct until proven not to be and some people don't like this approach as it counters their own information handling biases.
Malone strikes me as more of a limited hangout type. I don't get the controlled opposition vibes from McCullough like I do from that Stew Peter's character and his questionable "Died Suddenly," which has certainly had an effect on searching for those words.
Interesting, that’s not the case for me.
I just tried searching on Google and only 7/50 are references to the “documentary.” 3/7 where just factual links it’s wiki, IMDb and YouTube. 4 were commentary/fact checks/debunking and the rest were MSN news stories about actual people that had died suddenly.
If anything it looks like it’s being suppressed given it’s claimed to have 30M views.
Might of been more of case closer to it's release.
Nope. Not for me anyway. Totally suppressed from my Google search for at least 3 days, except for a few debunking articles.
It was funny to watch YouTube and read comments as their moderators were scrambling to take it down, they just couldn’t keep up with the shear number of people uploading the video. It was like a game of whack-a-mole.
You mean Dr. Huff n Stuff?