Jan 14, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
How do we distinguish between Covid deaths and vaccine deaths? Hospitals and doctors are for all practical purposes prevented from putting the word vaccine on any death certificate, either as the primary or underlying cause of death. The VAERS data base indicates over 20,000 “suspected” deaths from the vaccines, a number which has almost certainly been underreported and which interestingly has plateaued in the past few months. There are credible analyses from data scientists and medical experts in the US that put 2021 US vaccine deaths somewhere between 150,000 and 300,000. These same researchers claim the vaccine death number has been higher than the “from Covid” death number for some time, and that the gap is only increasing with omicron and the excessive vaccine boosting. Just another reason why we can’t trust the data.
Jan 14, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
I note that in covid waves in the UK since summer 2021 we've seen a delay between infections/hospitalisations/deaths in the unvaccinated and vaccinated by about 2-3 weeks or so. This was very visible by the scare tactics re hospitalisations -- at the start of each wave the authorities would scream about how the hospitals were filling with the unvaccinated, but they'd go strangely silent on the matter a few weeks later when the data no longer supported their needs.
It isn't clear why this should be the case, but it has been suggested that it is due to immune suppression in the vaccinated -- their immune system 'knows' how to deal with covid because of vaccination, but unfortunately it thinks it is a infection of whole-body and thus produces IgG antibodies in very high quantities. As there's relatively little in the way of IgA response, and there appears to be a suppression of innate/cellular immune mechanisms, this allows the infection to take hold in the lungs without much in the way of symptoms (as they're caused by the immune response, not the virus itself). After a period of time (seems to be 2-3 weeks) the infection is either cleared (recovery) or the person develops their delayed covid infection with a possible but rare risk of severe covid.
The above explains some increased death rate in SA (as they've got a low vaccination rate), but if true could result in problems in the UK in the weeks to come.
I guess we'll have to wait and see what happens next.
Jan 15, 2022·edited Jan 15, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
For the Omicron-infected patients being admitted to hospitals, do we *which* symptoms were severe enough for them to be admitted? I've seen nothing written about this anywhere, and with the differences between Delta and Omicron I'm curious
Jan 15, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Just speculating here, but it seems the infectivity of Omicron has made it widespread in hospitals, far more than previous variants. If you are in hospital for whatever reason you are almost certain to get infected - this may account in part for this very different pattern. A pattern which may be further confounded by a wave of vaccine injury following the booster campaign, a wave which becomes Omicron positive as soon as it is brought into a hospital. Impossible to know without separating incidental infections.
Why we keep talking about death 'with or from' Covid, I can't imagine - we should be looking at deaths from SARS. We seem to have forgotten that this was meant to be a SARS pandemic - and now it seems clear that Omicron is not a SARS-causing virus, even if it may still kill some people (like the flu). Whatever else may be going on, the SARS pandemic is over.
As to why governments are behaving differently, I think politics and the economy are no doubt factors, but I get the sense that the real data on vaccine injury (and the real reason behind those levels of hospitalisations and deaths) has finally reached the rulers of our destinies (Van-Tam steps down...)and they are trying to put an end to this debacle while still somehow declaring the whole thing a great victory.
Jan 15, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Lack of lockdown talk... Maybe your PM has his hands full with the No10 shenanigans during previous lockdowns and he knows calling for one now might result in outright revolt. Also, it draws attention to the fact the promises made re vaccination were lies.
Jan 15, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
The attitude of the politicians and press appear to be distracted by the "parties" and in particular the timing of the parties. It turns out that rather than turning us all into Reavers from the film Serenity the whole episode was more like the final film in a trilogy of Now You See Me. Aside from the individual family sacrifices in terms of family restrictions. The man on the street would appear to be slowly forming the idea that between personal sacrifices and the restrictions, it is clear that the whole episode appears to be an elaborate grift by corporations who have "captured" sovereign states. So the timing of these "parties" begs the question. What did they know about the virus that we didn't? Bojo and his government appear to take their ministerial responsibilities as seriously as an episode of Blott on the Landscape and will be paying the pied piper of credibility for some time. It will make interesting watching as he scrambles to implement the social credit system while spiraling from one balls up to another. Now how would one get employed as a CCTV operator for Downing Street?
Is this what we should expect from incidental transmission through a population of hospitalized/dying patients suffering from 'other' ailments... The same number of people (roughly) are being hospitalized/dying as we might expect given underlying population demographics and time of year, but more are being 'labeled' COVID because a very transmissible variant is spreading through everyone?
Without rigorous with/from auditing, all these charts tell us very little with any certainty.
How do we distinguish between Covid deaths and vaccine deaths? Hospitals and doctors are for all practical purposes prevented from putting the word vaccine on any death certificate, either as the primary or underlying cause of death. The VAERS data base indicates over 20,000 “suspected” deaths from the vaccines, a number which has almost certainly been underreported and which interestingly has plateaued in the past few months. There are credible analyses from data scientists and medical experts in the US that put 2021 US vaccine deaths somewhere between 150,000 and 300,000. These same researchers claim the vaccine death number has been higher than the “from Covid” death number for some time, and that the gap is only increasing with omicron and the excessive vaccine boosting. Just another reason why we can’t trust the data.
I think a significant number of people won't tolerate any more lockdowns of healthy people, and governments know this.
I note that in covid waves in the UK since summer 2021 we've seen a delay between infections/hospitalisations/deaths in the unvaccinated and vaccinated by about 2-3 weeks or so. This was very visible by the scare tactics re hospitalisations -- at the start of each wave the authorities would scream about how the hospitals were filling with the unvaccinated, but they'd go strangely silent on the matter a few weeks later when the data no longer supported their needs.
It isn't clear why this should be the case, but it has been suggested that it is due to immune suppression in the vaccinated -- their immune system 'knows' how to deal with covid because of vaccination, but unfortunately it thinks it is a infection of whole-body and thus produces IgG antibodies in very high quantities. As there's relatively little in the way of IgA response, and there appears to be a suppression of innate/cellular immune mechanisms, this allows the infection to take hold in the lungs without much in the way of symptoms (as they're caused by the immune response, not the virus itself). After a period of time (seems to be 2-3 weeks) the infection is either cleared (recovery) or the person develops their delayed covid infection with a possible but rare risk of severe covid.
The above explains some increased death rate in SA (as they've got a low vaccination rate), but if true could result in problems in the UK in the weeks to come.
I guess we'll have to wait and see what happens next.
For the Omicron-infected patients being admitted to hospitals, do we *which* symptoms were severe enough for them to be admitted? I've seen nothing written about this anywhere, and with the differences between Delta and Omicron I'm curious
Just speculating here, but it seems the infectivity of Omicron has made it widespread in hospitals, far more than previous variants. If you are in hospital for whatever reason you are almost certain to get infected - this may account in part for this very different pattern. A pattern which may be further confounded by a wave of vaccine injury following the booster campaign, a wave which becomes Omicron positive as soon as it is brought into a hospital. Impossible to know without separating incidental infections.
Why we keep talking about death 'with or from' Covid, I can't imagine - we should be looking at deaths from SARS. We seem to have forgotten that this was meant to be a SARS pandemic - and now it seems clear that Omicron is not a SARS-causing virus, even if it may still kill some people (like the flu). Whatever else may be going on, the SARS pandemic is over.
As to why governments are behaving differently, I think politics and the economy are no doubt factors, but I get the sense that the real data on vaccine injury (and the real reason behind those levels of hospitalisations and deaths) has finally reached the rulers of our destinies (Van-Tam steps down...)and they are trying to put an end to this debacle while still somehow declaring the whole thing a great victory.
Lack of lockdown talk... Maybe your PM has his hands full with the No10 shenanigans during previous lockdowns and he knows calling for one now might result in outright revolt. Also, it draws attention to the fact the promises made re vaccination were lies.
The attitude of the politicians and press appear to be distracted by the "parties" and in particular the timing of the parties. It turns out that rather than turning us all into Reavers from the film Serenity the whole episode was more like the final film in a trilogy of Now You See Me. Aside from the individual family sacrifices in terms of family restrictions. The man on the street would appear to be slowly forming the idea that between personal sacrifices and the restrictions, it is clear that the whole episode appears to be an elaborate grift by corporations who have "captured" sovereign states. So the timing of these "parties" begs the question. What did they know about the virus that we didn't? Bojo and his government appear to take their ministerial responsibilities as seriously as an episode of Blott on the Landscape and will be paying the pied piper of credibility for some time. It will make interesting watching as he scrambles to implement the social credit system while spiraling from one balls up to another. Now how would one get employed as a CCTV operator for Downing Street?
Is this what we should expect from incidental transmission through a population of hospitalized/dying patients suffering from 'other' ailments... The same number of people (roughly) are being hospitalized/dying as we might expect given underlying population demographics and time of year, but more are being 'labeled' COVID because a very transmissible variant is spreading through everyone?
Without rigorous with/from auditing, all these charts tell us very little with any certainty.