Apr 1, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Considering numbers we see in VAERS, and an under reporting factor of somewhere betweent 31 and 100, I have to wonder whether the death counts are accurate. However, let's assume they are and make a comparison to flying on a commercial jet. According to this website: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/by_the_numbers/ there are 45,000 commercial airline flights per day in the US. (That's a staggering number, I had no idea there were so many!). If we assume an average of 100 passengers per flight, then we have 4.5 million passengers flying every day. If the commercial airline industry had the same death rate as the PFE jab--10 deaths per million--then one commercial plane would be crashing every two or three days, killing all 100 people on board. I wonder how people would feel about flying if we had a crash every 2 or 3 days that killed all passengers on board.
World-wide, that's about right. And when one aircraft type crashes twice within a year, the whole fleet of that type gets grounded, despite the fact that competent pilots should have been able to deal with the malfunction in question.
FWIW, flying in the US is much safer than in the 3rd world, where most of these accidents happen. Think about it, when was the last time we had an aviation accident here in the US that killed 100 or more people?
I think the chances of both of them dying of a vaccident on the same flight are negligible.
That said, they're all flying in direct contradiction to the FAA regulations which prohibit being issued an airman's medical certificate if taking any medication that at least 12 months past full FDA approval. Obviously, none of the injections meet that criteria.
steal away! I have a slight error. My estimate of 100 passengers per plane was a little too high. That website says 2.9 million passengers per day. So if we had the same fatality rate on commercial airlines as we have with the covid experimental injections, we would be seeing one commercial airline flight crashing every 3 1/2 days killing all 100 passengers/crew on board.
(And of course we're leaving out the serious injuries, so what would that mean? In addition to the fatal crashes every 3 1/2 days, we'd have other crashes every day where everyone survives but they all sustain life changing injuries like broken back, broken neck, head injuries, strokes (ahem..), myocarditis (ahem...), ... you get the picture.)
Apr 1, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Shipped out is not injected. That is the issue I have with the way the governments are reporting number of vaccinated. It is based on units purchased and shipped out, not shots in arms.
It's a source of great frustration to Australian authorities that booster uptake has been so "disappointing", leading to many expired vaccine doses being thrown away.
Gullibility, herd mentality, trust in authorities exploited through deceptive marketing of the dangers of Covid vs the benefits of safe and effective vaccines and discrediting any notions of natural immunity and early treatment.
Agreed. The report includes reports received through 28 February 2021. Presumably it takes some time for a report to be written and sent to Pfizer, and also many AEs don't occur on the day of adminstration; so some which occur from adminstration prior to 28 Feb would not make it into this report.
Also, vaccines "shipped" won't necessarily make it through the local distribution chain and be actually injected for some time.
Finally, given that vaccinations were ramping up quite fast at this time, these tail effects could be quite large.
All the above may well together combine to reduce the denominator quite significantly.
This entire COVID SCANDAL is being exposed, day by day, for the FRAUD it is. I knew 20 months ago this was all a FRAUD. Future generations will look at this and wonder "how did they fall for this?"
No, I never took any of these COVID "vaccines". Too much didn't add up. The coronaviruses have been studied for over 50 years and no human vaccine had been successfully developed for any of them, but the vax pushers were insisting in just a few months, these barely tested things would be THE ANSWER to COVID. I knew right then that this was a FRAUD.
Apr 1, 2022·edited Apr 1, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Also, we need clear caveats with this kind of information at least acknowledging that many adverse reactions and deaths go unreported or unlinked to the vaccinations. Please let us know how they actually even get the numbers of deaths and adverse reactions you are citing.
Apr 1, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
wow! great article, thanks for posting. Numbers are horrific. The CDC know VAERS is grossly under utilized, so they release an under reporting factor every year that attempts to give a true picture of the numbers. But they won't release a URF for 2021!! So 4 different analysts used methods CDC has used in the past and came up with 31, 41, 44, and 100. Look at what's in VAERS, choose one of the URF's and do the math. It's ugly! openvaers.com
My own little anecdotal sample jibes with these horrific numbers. I know about 50 people who've taken the jab. Out of those 50, 2 died, 2 more have permanent heart damage and are now on blood pressure meds probably for the rest of their now-shortened lives, and one got shingles. So one person out of ten had a serious or deadly reaction to the jabs. These things are poison.
Apr 2, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Anecdotally, it’s likely much worse than anyone can imagine. If pseudotumor cerebri usually occurs in .3 per 100,000 how is it that I personally know three women ( in colorado) diagnosed with this after extensive work up ( including spinal tap)? I’m quite sure NONE of them reported this new diagnosis to VAERS because none of them can fathom a correlation to the jab. Two women are in their early 30s and one woman is 17 years old. I imagine most jab effects are severely under reported. The health insurance companies have the data. Physicians have to “code” for diagnosis when submitting bills. Indeed the insurance companies must know what is going on for many many diagnoses.
Apr 2, 2022·edited Apr 2, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Out of the 5 serious or deadly reactions to the jabs that I know about, NONE of these were reported to VAERS. ZERO! So for sure, VAERS is under utilized. Doctors hate it because it take at least 30 minutes to report one reaction. Many doctors don't even know about it. Leave it up to the patients and how many of those will report it. I suspect the URF of 100 (only 1 in 100 get reported) is closer to the truth, maybe even higher.
Up to 40% more life insurance claims in the last year for all death causes reported by multiple insurance companies. What was the big common event in the last year? Taking the COVID"vaccines". They KNOW what is going on, they receive the claims EVERY DAY.
Apr 1, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Credible vaccine death counts in the US from sources I trust range between 200,000 and 450,000 deaths. The wide range is due to the confounding factors like VAERS underreporting and deliberate obfuscation of the data set by official sources. Many vaccine deaths have been counted as Covid deaths in the past 14 months, and many more vaccine deaths have been overlooked where death certificates merely state the proximate cause of death, eg heart failure.
We will never have an accurate count, but we can be confident that it is much, much higher than the official number.
Apr 1, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
This matches the numbers from Sweden very well. 16 108 438 doses administered/300 dead from Comirnaty, 3 707 818 doses administered/41 dead from Spikevax, and 1 337 640 doses administered/47 dead from Vaxzevria. And 824 doses Nuvaxovid, no ae reports.
Unfortunately, one cannot see in the public data the ratios for 1, 2, 3+ shots/person, so any such numer would have to be guesswork based on population numbers and demographics. Most older than 65 have had three shots, virtually no one under 5 has had even one, and we have close to 100 000 illegals in the country, not to mention a huge problem with tens of thousands, possibly hundreds of thousands fake identities (migrants applying for asylum multiple times at different offices, having "lost" their passports in transit, this is done to defraud the welfare system to th tune of billions and billions of dollars).
But 388 dead out of 11 000 000, compared to 18 000 dead from Covid (as confirmed post mortem). Still, 388 is more than all the other vaccines put together for more than 70 years.
I have to wonder why the data seems worse the more a country used coercive methods - are our data gathering systems and metrics that different between western nations?
Apr 1, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
You can't compare vax deaths to COVID deaths, apples to apples. COVID deaths are almost entirely in the very aged and infirm, and even then, only because life-saving early treatments are still being withheld. Vax deaths are just as likely to be the healthiest, most athletic, and youthful as to be older folks, and just as likely to have already survived COVID; in other words, people at zero risk from the disease.
Apr 2, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
funny, I said nearly the same thing in another comment. But I would also add that the number of covid deaths could have been much much lower if they hadn't suppressed safe effective early treatments like HCQ or IVM. Early treatment would have reduced the number of deaths by as much as 80% and we would have been done with covid by mid-to-late 2020!
Yes, I know. Our national statistics make that very clear. Both casualties and cases are 80%+ among elderly/people with certain comorbidities. For AEs, about 3/4 of reported events come from the 35-64 age brackets (including death), with men being much more affected both in frequency and severity.
Since it is well established (here) that men are less likely to report or to seek medical attention, one must wonder what the real number is, and why men is so much more affected.
I suspect the issue of vaccine deaths and injuries is being investigated, but very discreetly. Partly as to not scare people of the normal regimen (remember, we only vaccinate for the most dangerous diseases and it's fully optional - no mass vaccinations against the common flu f.e.) and partly because as I stated above "...388 is more than all the other vaccines put together for more than 70 years."
Also, in september we have elections. And the socialist party, though riding a nationalist wave due to Ukraine right now, is in real trouble. The last thing they want is (one more) vaccine scandal on their watch.
Apr 2, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
The rates of adverse events are certainly much higher. In this small, retrospective study of vaccinated high school athletes, all suffered long-term adverse events, as reported to their coaches, compared to none of the unvaccinated. Choice of vaccination had previously been made by the athletes and their families.
Apr 1, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
What a sham. No excuse for not giving number of doses actually administered. One of the hundred reasons I no longer pay any attention to statistics. They’re all fake and thus meaningless.
Apr 2, 2022·edited Apr 2, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
I don't believe the reported numbers. The entire medical establishment has neem trained over the years to blame something other than injections (vaccination as a word is an unmentionable).
The number is way higher in my view and this event is ongoing with delayed reactions racking up people suffering and deaths.
Apr 2, 2022·edited Apr 2, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
VAERS shows an unadjusted death rate of 21.6/Mill.doses in the US, about twice as much as the 9.69/Mill.doses using the newly revealed figures from the Pfizer report. Based on the NVICP report showing the dosage numbers from 2006-2019 for the other vaxxes, combined with the VAERS deaths over the same period, the death rates for all other vaxxes are far lower, no higher than 4 deaths/Mill.doses, and usually much less. Flu vax is one of the lower ones at around 0.35 deaths/Mill.doses.
Apr 1, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
We know what other vaccines do. COVID vaxxes have killed 10 times as many people as all previous vaxxes combined over the last 30 years, and yes, hundreds of millions of people get vaccinated every year in the US, so it is fair to compare those two things. The vax for the original SARs was stopped after, I believe, 25 deaths.
Apr 2, 2022·edited Apr 2, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
it was swine flu vaccine in 1976 or 77. they pulled it after 25 deaths. VAERS now shows 26 THOUSAND deaths and we know VAERS is grossly under utilized. Under reporting factors of 31, 41, 44, and 100 have been calculated. If it's 31, then the actual number is deaths is 806,000 in the US! If the correct URF is 100, then we're looking at 2.6 million deaths from the jabs. Even if the lower URF is correct, the jabs have killed more than TWICE the number covid has killed since the jabs were rolled out. (Jabs began in 2021, covid deaths in US in 2021 were 386,000) If the higher URF is correct, then jabs have killed 7 times as many as covid has killed since they were rolled out. This is complete insanity!
Also underreported because many have been told by their Healthcare provider that their "shingles" or "cardiomyopathy" or "loss of vision", etc that occurred after the covid shot is not from the covid shot. So these adverse events are not reported by the Healthcare provider or the injured individual. I read the comment sections on many blogs and I'm amazed by the number of accounts from those that experienced adverse events or have a relative or friend that has experienced adverse effects from the shot (many stories of death after shot) and they state no report was made.
And you're also correct about the site difficulty. I convinced one of my friends that got shingles after the covid shot to submit a VAERS report herself (even though her doctor told her it wasn't from the shot, the shot doesn't cause shingles) but everytime she has tried she gets timed out, etc and has been unable to submit. I believe she's so frustrated by it she won't try again.
In Australia, we suddenly had ads for shingles vaccination appear on television in the third quarter of last year when the rollout really got underway with the outbreak of the Delta strain. Just as suddenly, the shingles ads stopped when adult vaccination (shamefully) hit 90%.
Then in late January, when the failure of the vaccines with the Omicron strain was undeniable (they managed to gas light the Delta breakthroughs), the shingles ads reappeared.
And we're seeing more ads (spoiler alerts?) here in the USA about HIV. I've also read that Prince Harry is encouraging everyone to get tested. I heard that he said it was your "responsibility, duty" to get tested. One of the same lines used by the pharmaceutical companies to guilt people into taking a covid shot.
Know your status and get an HIV test, says Prince Harry - BBC News
Apr 2, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
No, they present an absolute upper limit just as the report numbers for adverse events can be considered a lower limit since the underreporting factor would be far greater than that for misreported events
Considering numbers we see in VAERS, and an under reporting factor of somewhere betweent 31 and 100, I have to wonder whether the death counts are accurate. However, let's assume they are and make a comparison to flying on a commercial jet. According to this website: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/by_the_numbers/ there are 45,000 commercial airline flights per day in the US. (That's a staggering number, I had no idea there were so many!). If we assume an average of 100 passengers per flight, then we have 4.5 million passengers flying every day. If the commercial airline industry had the same death rate as the PFE jab--10 deaths per million--then one commercial plane would be crashing every two or three days, killing all 100 people on board. I wonder how people would feel about flying if we had a crash every 2 or 3 days that killed all passengers on board.
Great analogy! That's a really relatable way to explain it.
Shoot, even a crash once a week would have everyone up in arms!
We have usually 1-2 major air accident/year (100+ people) and it is always a big news!!
World-wide, that's about right. And when one aircraft type crashes twice within a year, the whole fleet of that type gets grounded, despite the fact that competent pilots should have been able to deal with the malfunction in question.
FWIW, flying in the US is much safer than in the 3rd world, where most of these accidents happen. Think about it, when was the last time we had an aviation accident here in the US that killed 100 or more people?
I think the chances of both of them dying of a vaccident on the same flight are negligible.
That said, they're all flying in direct contradiction to the FAA regulations which prohibit being issued an airman's medical certificate if taking any medication that at least 12 months past full FDA approval. Obviously, none of the injections meet that criteria.
Awesome analogy ( consider it stolen ) 👍🏻
steal away! I have a slight error. My estimate of 100 passengers per plane was a little too high. That website says 2.9 million passengers per day. So if we had the same fatality rate on commercial airlines as we have with the covid experimental injections, we would be seeing one commercial airline flight crashing every 3 1/2 days killing all 100 passengers/crew on board.
(And of course we're leaving out the serious injuries, so what would that mean? In addition to the fatal crashes every 3 1/2 days, we'd have other crashes every day where everyone survives but they all sustain life changing injuries like broken back, broken neck, head injuries, strokes (ahem..), myocarditis (ahem...), ... you get the picture.)
Really? 4 x F35s? How many usually go down?
Shipped out is not injected. That is the issue I have with the way the governments are reporting number of vaccinated. It is based on units purchased and shipped out, not shots in arms.
And aren’t there many that have been reported unused (ready for dumping)?
It's a source of great frustration to Australian authorities that booster uptake has been so "disappointing", leading to many expired vaccine doses being thrown away.
Oh dear, how sad, never mind.
Gullibility, herd mentality, trust in authorities exploited through deceptive marketing of the dangers of Covid vs the benefits of safe and effective vaccines and discrediting any notions of natural immunity and early treatment.
Agreed. The report includes reports received through 28 February 2021. Presumably it takes some time for a report to be written and sent to Pfizer, and also many AEs don't occur on the day of adminstration; so some which occur from adminstration prior to 28 Feb would not make it into this report.
Also, vaccines "shipped" won't necessarily make it through the local distribution chain and be actually injected for some time.
Finally, given that vaccinations were ramping up quite fast at this time, these tail effects could be quite large.
All the above may well together combine to reduce the denominator quite significantly.
I'm eager, yet cringing, to see the rest of the documents.
This entire COVID SCANDAL is being exposed, day by day, for the FRAUD it is. I knew 20 months ago this was all a FRAUD. Future generations will look at this and wonder "how did they fall for this?"
No, I never took any of these COVID "vaccines". Too much didn't add up. The coronaviruses have been studied for over 50 years and no human vaccine had been successfully developed for any of them, but the vax pushers were insisting in just a few months, these barely tested things would be THE ANSWER to COVID. I knew right then that this was a FRAUD.
Also, we need clear caveats with this kind of information at least acknowledging that many adverse reactions and deaths go unreported or unlinked to the vaccinations. Please let us know how they actually even get the numbers of deaths and adverse reactions you are citing.
another thought regarding the death rate from the jabs. It's apples to oranges to compare that to the death rate from covid for a number of reasons:
1) the vast majority of deaths occur in the very old (over 80) or people with severe health issues.
2) at least 80 percent of the deaths could have been prevented if they hadn't suppressed and even prohibited safe early treatments
wow! great article, thanks for posting. Numbers are horrific. The CDC know VAERS is grossly under utilized, so they release an under reporting factor every year that attempts to give a true picture of the numbers. But they won't release a URF for 2021!! So 4 different analysts used methods CDC has used in the past and came up with 31, 41, 44, and 100. Look at what's in VAERS, choose one of the URF's and do the math. It's ugly! openvaers.com
My own little anecdotal sample jibes with these horrific numbers. I know about 50 people who've taken the jab. Out of those 50, 2 died, 2 more have permanent heart damage and are now on blood pressure meds probably for the rest of their now-shortened lives, and one got shingles. So one person out of ten had a serious or deadly reaction to the jabs. These things are poison.
Anecdotally, it’s likely much worse than anyone can imagine. If pseudotumor cerebri usually occurs in .3 per 100,000 how is it that I personally know three women ( in colorado) diagnosed with this after extensive work up ( including spinal tap)? I’m quite sure NONE of them reported this new diagnosis to VAERS because none of them can fathom a correlation to the jab. Two women are in their early 30s and one woman is 17 years old. I imagine most jab effects are severely under reported. The health insurance companies have the data. Physicians have to “code” for diagnosis when submitting bills. Indeed the insurance companies must know what is going on for many many diagnoses.
Out of the 5 serious or deadly reactions to the jabs that I know about, NONE of these were reported to VAERS. ZERO! So for sure, VAERS is under utilized. Doctors hate it because it take at least 30 minutes to report one reaction. Many doctors don't even know about it. Leave it up to the patients and how many of those will report it. I suspect the URF of 100 (only 1 in 100 get reported) is closer to the truth, maybe even higher.
Up to 40% more life insurance claims in the last year for all death causes reported by multiple insurance companies. What was the big common event in the last year? Taking the COVID"vaccines". They KNOW what is going on, they receive the claims EVERY DAY.
Credible vaccine death counts in the US from sources I trust range between 200,000 and 450,000 deaths. The wide range is due to the confounding factors like VAERS underreporting and deliberate obfuscation of the data set by official sources. Many vaccine deaths have been counted as Covid deaths in the past 14 months, and many more vaccine deaths have been overlooked where death certificates merely state the proximate cause of death, eg heart failure.
We will never have an accurate count, but we can be confident that it is much, much higher than the official number.
This matches the numbers from Sweden very well. 16 108 438 doses administered/300 dead from Comirnaty, 3 707 818 doses administered/41 dead from Spikevax, and 1 337 640 doses administered/47 dead from Vaxzevria. And 824 doses Nuvaxovid, no ae reports.
Unfortunately, one cannot see in the public data the ratios for 1, 2, 3+ shots/person, so any such numer would have to be guesswork based on population numbers and demographics. Most older than 65 have had three shots, virtually no one under 5 has had even one, and we have close to 100 000 illegals in the country, not to mention a huge problem with tens of thousands, possibly hundreds of thousands fake identities (migrants applying for asylum multiple times at different offices, having "lost" their passports in transit, this is done to defraud the welfare system to th tune of billions and billions of dollars).
But 388 dead out of 11 000 000, compared to 18 000 dead from Covid (as confirmed post mortem). Still, 388 is more than all the other vaccines put together for more than 70 years.
I have to wonder why the data seems worse the more a country used coercive methods - are our data gathering systems and metrics that different between western nations?
You can't compare vax deaths to COVID deaths, apples to apples. COVID deaths are almost entirely in the very aged and infirm, and even then, only because life-saving early treatments are still being withheld. Vax deaths are just as likely to be the healthiest, most athletic, and youthful as to be older folks, and just as likely to have already survived COVID; in other words, people at zero risk from the disease.
funny, I said nearly the same thing in another comment. But I would also add that the number of covid deaths could have been much much lower if they hadn't suppressed safe effective early treatments like HCQ or IVM. Early treatment would have reduced the number of deaths by as much as 80% and we would have been done with covid by mid-to-late 2020!
Yes, I know. Our national statistics make that very clear. Both casualties and cases are 80%+ among elderly/people with certain comorbidities. For AEs, about 3/4 of reported events come from the 35-64 age brackets (including death), with men being much more affected both in frequency and severity.
Since it is well established (here) that men are less likely to report or to seek medical attention, one must wonder what the real number is, and why men is so much more affected.
I suspect the issue of vaccine deaths and injuries is being investigated, but very discreetly. Partly as to not scare people of the normal regimen (remember, we only vaccinate for the most dangerous diseases and it's fully optional - no mass vaccinations against the common flu f.e.) and partly because as I stated above "...388 is more than all the other vaccines put together for more than 70 years."
Also, in september we have elections. And the socialist party, though riding a nationalist wave due to Ukraine right now, is in real trouble. The last thing they want is (one more) vaccine scandal on their watch.
Ridiculous that The Science is so incompetent at maintaining accurate data.
The Science is about politics, not science. Given this, it's not incompetence that the figures are misleading/incomplete.
Can you estimate how many people have actually been vaccinated vs. what the govt. claims?
no because this is worldwide
In the US, about 65% had at least two shots, so that's about 200 million.
Africa is not a country.
The rates of adverse events are certainly much higher. In this small, retrospective study of vaccinated high school athletes, all suffered long-term adverse events, as reported to their coaches, compared to none of the unvaccinated. Choice of vaccination had previously been made by the athletes and their families.
https://colleenhuber.substack.com/p/vaccinated-athletes-perform-worse
What a sham. No excuse for not giving number of doses actually administered. One of the hundred reasons I no longer pay any attention to statistics. They’re all fake and thus meaningless.
I don't believe the reported numbers. The entire medical establishment has neem trained over the years to blame something other than injections (vaccination as a word is an unmentionable).
The number is way higher in my view and this event is ongoing with delayed reactions racking up people suffering and deaths.
VAERS shows an unadjusted death rate of 21.6/Mill.doses in the US, about twice as much as the 9.69/Mill.doses using the newly revealed figures from the Pfizer report. Based on the NVICP report showing the dosage numbers from 2006-2019 for the other vaxxes, combined with the VAERS deaths over the same period, the death rates for all other vaxxes are far lower, no higher than 4 deaths/Mill.doses, and usually much less. Flu vax is one of the lower ones at around 0.35 deaths/Mill.doses.
see page 4: https://vaersanalysis.info/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/VAERS-Summary-03252022-1.pdf
Thanks.
Will we ever get that number of doses administered in the timeframe these Pfizer reports document? Or will it all be up to guesswork?
Ok. Let’s assume 10 deaths per million.
What do other vaccines do?
What number was the limit? I guess none. 10 per million, ok. 200 per million, ok.
More people have died from the bioweapon injections than ALL OTHER VACCINES COMBINED EVER.
This may well have to be on a T-shirt for my next flight.
"More people have died from mRNA spike protein injections than from all vaccines ever combined."
We know what other vaccines do. COVID vaxxes have killed 10 times as many people as all previous vaxxes combined over the last 30 years, and yes, hundreds of millions of people get vaccinated every year in the US, so it is fair to compare those two things. The vax for the original SARs was stopped after, I believe, 25 deaths.
it was swine flu vaccine in 1976 or 77. they pulled it after 25 deaths. VAERS now shows 26 THOUSAND deaths and we know VAERS is grossly under utilized. Under reporting factors of 31, 41, 44, and 100 have been calculated. If it's 31, then the actual number is deaths is 806,000 in the US! If the correct URF is 100, then we're looking at 2.6 million deaths from the jabs. Even if the lower URF is correct, the jabs have killed more than TWICE the number covid has killed since the jabs were rolled out. (Jabs began in 2021, covid deaths in US in 2021 were 386,000) If the higher URF is correct, then jabs have killed 7 times as many as covid has killed since they were rolled out. This is complete insanity!
Swine flu
https://rumble.com/vm4p8h-1976-swine-flu-scandal-the-cdcs-history-of-lying-about-vaccine-dangers-and-.html
I think that 25 was from the swine flu vaccine back in the 70s
Do you know how many SARS shots resulted in the 25 deaths?
NE: On the Adverse Events calculation, are you using adverse events world-wide ? I was only aware of VAERS.
These are worldwide adverse events that Pfizer was tracking. I'd imagine VAERS was one part of this.
There is a backlog of one year ~ SMH. I didn't realize it was THAT bad. I believe you, but do you have a link to document that fact?
I too would like to see the source document(s).
Also underreported because many have been told by their Healthcare provider that their "shingles" or "cardiomyopathy" or "loss of vision", etc that occurred after the covid shot is not from the covid shot. So these adverse events are not reported by the Healthcare provider or the injured individual. I read the comment sections on many blogs and I'm amazed by the number of accounts from those that experienced adverse events or have a relative or friend that has experienced adverse effects from the shot (many stories of death after shot) and they state no report was made.
And you're also correct about the site difficulty. I convinced one of my friends that got shingles after the covid shot to submit a VAERS report herself (even though her doctor told her it wasn't from the shot, the shot doesn't cause shingles) but everytime she has tried she gets timed out, etc and has been unable to submit. I believe she's so frustrated by it she won't try again.
In Australia, we suddenly had ads for shingles vaccination appear on television in the third quarter of last year when the rollout really got underway with the outbreak of the Delta strain. Just as suddenly, the shingles ads stopped when adult vaccination (shamefully) hit 90%.
Then in late January, when the failure of the vaccines with the Omicron strain was undeniable (they managed to gas light the Delta breakthroughs), the shingles ads reappeared.
Someone here is trying to front run the signal
And we're seeing more ads (spoiler alerts?) here in the USA about HIV. I've also read that Prince Harry is encouraging everyone to get tested. I heard that he said it was your "responsibility, duty" to get tested. One of the same lines used by the pharmaceutical companies to guilt people into taking a covid shot.
Know your status and get an HIV test, says Prince Harry - BBC News
https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-60323907
HIV and shingles ads on TV and radio in the Washington DC area also. Quite odd, eh?
I guess our government trying to normalize it.
This is a story that has gotten little press. Tennis players dropping out of the Miami Open, mid match.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/au.sports.yahoo.com/amphtml/tennis-2022-viewers-shocked-bizarre-miami-open-carnage-004007552.html
If this is doses shipped, not administered, then your calculations are useless, no?
No, they present an absolute upper limit just as the report numbers for adverse events can be considered a lower limit since the underreporting factor would be far greater than that for misreported events
Yes, but they probably make the shots look far safer too.