Dec 28, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
What kind of worthless shyster lawyer or benighted judge doesn't understand what duress means? Get the jab or lose your job is arm twisting. Blatant "under duress" situation.
Dec 28, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
The Bad Guys own
1. The labs that made the virus
2. The patents for the vaccine
3. The media that pushed the vaxx
4. The laws that allowed the pushing of the vaxx
5. The judges who defend the "mandate"
6. The companies that push "mandates"
7. The cops with the guns
8. The jails
9. Your tax dollars (pounds, whatever fiat you use)
10. The schools where they indoctrinate your kids
And the best part, the vaxx never stopped transmission. Ever.
They will NEVER admit fault. That was never going to happen. Here in the US, it doesn't even matter if they did, there is no liability for Pharma and even if fraud is proven, finding a judge to enforce our Constitution is almost impossible.
And if I write the way to fix this, I am a terrorist and face rendition to a 3rd world hell hole to be tortured by petty criminals.
The only way now is to watch their house of cards collapse on itself through early death of a large amount of young citizens.
I wonder if they'll start issuing Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine to stop the rampant colds/fluels/covid that will kill a lot of people over the next 3 years without a viable treatment.
Dec 28, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
“the ruling highlighted that the law also permits difficult but essential decisions to be taken where these rights interfere in order to protect others’ inviolable rights – specifically the right to life.” Have I got this right - others’ inviolable right to life supersedes my inviolable right to life when I choose not to be jabbed with the equivalent of dubious pharmaceutical slurry in a syringe?
Dec 28, 2022·edited Dec 28, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
I do not see how an employer is permitted to expose an employee to a known risk of death. In fact, they have a duty to protect employees from such hazards, under COSHH regulations.
"There have been nine (medically certified) deaths in Scotland in which the underlying cause of death was due to the adverse effects of vaccination against COVID-19, and four further deaths where an adverse effect was mentioned on the death certificate. "
There may well be many other deaths that went undetected, given that excess mortality (non-covid) is 10% higher than usual.
Dec 28, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
If only the Nuremberg Code had used the term ‘Medical Treatment’ instead of ‘Medical Experiment’. But the adjudicators of the Doctors Trial never dreamed that anyone could be worse than the Nazis.
That said, I believe the case remains solid that these “vaccines” were and remain experimental. The were only authorized under an EUA, largely because of the use of the new technology and the rushed clinical trials. Sounds like Experimental to me. If the legal case could be established that the vaccines are indeed experimental, then the very first of the Ten Points of the Nuremberg Code clearly prohibits any kind of coercion in their use or administration. In my opinion this is still the most solid legal case to be made without any data whatsoever. Of course the data is damning in itself, but the deniers won’t acknowledge it.
Dec 28, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Then let's make 2023 the year of holding people to account. If anyone makes a claim, in law, they must prove it. So, if anyone makes a claim to you, no matter how small, no matter how big, make them prove it or be quiet.
Dec 28, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Are these people still operating under the delusion that these (and other) vaccines reduce your ability to infect others?
The opposite appears to be true with these mRNAs -- the more shots, the higher your rate of COVID infection.
So, wouldn't it make more sense for this judge to rule that people who got the shots can be terminated? Or, is this just another case with Leftist thought where intentions matter far more than outcomes?
Dec 28, 2022·edited Dec 28, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
It appears that once one becomes "educated" in the law, one has the tendency to lose the sense of what is right. They can't see nuance, nor can they understand logic. (Edited due to comment)
The judgement is in direct violation of the Convention. I do hope they can appeal.
What kind of worthless shyster lawyer or benighted judge doesn't understand what duress means? Get the jab or lose your job is arm twisting. Blatant "under duress" situation.
The Bad Guys own
1. The labs that made the virus
2. The patents for the vaccine
3. The media that pushed the vaxx
4. The laws that allowed the pushing of the vaxx
5. The judges who defend the "mandate"
6. The companies that push "mandates"
7. The cops with the guns
8. The jails
9. Your tax dollars (pounds, whatever fiat you use)
10. The schools where they indoctrinate your kids
And the best part, the vaxx never stopped transmission. Ever.
They will NEVER admit fault. That was never going to happen. Here in the US, it doesn't even matter if they did, there is no liability for Pharma and even if fraud is proven, finding a judge to enforce our Constitution is almost impossible.
And if I write the way to fix this, I am a terrorist and face rendition to a 3rd world hell hole to be tortured by petty criminals.
The only way now is to watch their house of cards collapse on itself through early death of a large amount of young citizens.
I wonder if they'll start issuing Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine to stop the rampant colds/fluels/covid that will kill a lot of people over the next 3 years without a viable treatment.
People didn't die from covid, they died from malpractice because they were denied early treatment.
“the ruling highlighted that the law also permits difficult but essential decisions to be taken where these rights interfere in order to protect others’ inviolable rights – specifically the right to life.” Have I got this right - others’ inviolable right to life supersedes my inviolable right to life when I choose not to be jabbed with the equivalent of dubious pharmaceutical slurry in a syringe?
I do not see how an employer is permitted to expose an employee to a known risk of death. In fact, they have a duty to protect employees from such hazards, under COSHH regulations.
https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/news/2022/deaths-involving-covid-19-monthly-analysis-for-november-2022
"There have been nine (medically certified) deaths in Scotland in which the underlying cause of death was due to the adverse effects of vaccination against COVID-19, and four further deaths where an adverse effect was mentioned on the death certificate. "
There may well be many other deaths that went undetected, given that excess mortality (non-covid) is 10% higher than usual.
In America these scumbags played the same legal wordsmithing mumbojumo.
At first it was a $100 check to get vaccinated.
Then it was “You can’t leave the job site for any reason if your unvaccinated, so you don’t bring the disease back in.”
Then it was “No jab no job.”
Real email exchange.
“If you don’t take the vaccine, you’re voluntarily quitting.”
“No, I’m not quitting, I want to work for you, I just don’t want to take the vaccine.”
“We’ll consider this your resignation.”
“I’m not resigning, I’m refusing the vaccine.”
“We will process your resignation paperwork.”
If only the Nuremberg Code had used the term ‘Medical Treatment’ instead of ‘Medical Experiment’. But the adjudicators of the Doctors Trial never dreamed that anyone could be worse than the Nazis.
That said, I believe the case remains solid that these “vaccines” were and remain experimental. The were only authorized under an EUA, largely because of the use of the new technology and the rushed clinical trials. Sounds like Experimental to me. If the legal case could be established that the vaccines are indeed experimental, then the very first of the Ten Points of the Nuremberg Code clearly prohibits any kind of coercion in their use or administration. In my opinion this is still the most solid legal case to be made without any data whatsoever. Of course the data is damning in itself, but the deniers won’t acknowledge it.
Then let's make 2023 the year of holding people to account. If anyone makes a claim, in law, they must prove it. So, if anyone makes a claim to you, no matter how small, no matter how big, make them prove it or be quiet.
Yes, it's the same old "done in good faith" argument that gets the abuser off the legal hook. Canada's judges are doing the same.
Knew in May2020 when the hospitality industry law cases were thrown out that we've lost the judges and law courts as an institution we can rely on.
Onto the heap with the rest of the institutions that seemed to create a foundation of commonsense, ethics, and morality in my young life.
Hence my username.
Are these people still operating under the delusion that these (and other) vaccines reduce your ability to infect others?
The opposite appears to be true with these mRNAs -- the more shots, the higher your rate of COVID infection.
So, wouldn't it make more sense for this judge to rule that people who got the shots can be terminated? Or, is this just another case with Leftist thought where intentions matter far more than outcomes?
Here in the good old USA… mandating COVID 19 shots in 2021 for all government employees, contractors, healthcare workers, etc…
But wait…. Members of Congress and their staff are EXEMPT from this MANDATE? We must never forget!
I rest my case..
https://www.newsweek.com/members-congress-staff-exempt-biden-covid-vaccine-mandate-1627859
This ruling seems extremely strange when you simply tweak the parameters a little bit:
Of course you have to sleep with the boss to keep your job! If you don't like it, find a new job!
How many government lawyers are comfortable making that case? At least the dick comes out.
This is extremely worrying.
It appears that once one becomes "educated" in the law, one has the tendency to lose the sense of what is right. They can't see nuance, nor can they understand logic. (Edited due to comment)