The mental midgets actively seeking destruction of the planet (& humanity) wouldn’t want anything that would improve or actually address any of this or make life better. Just like there is no desire to “cure” anything, just lifelong “treatment” & enrichment
"But there are reasons to be sceptical. Similar claims have been made in the past, which have ended up being withdrawn."
The thing is, so many really do work but inventors are given that *tap* on the shoulder by (insert your interpretation/version of "They"), and are never to be heard from again.
You DO NOT want quantum AI to become common. There were two quantum AI super computers [NSA-Military & CIA-Google] and they battled to destroy each other. The NSAs system eventually won and at that point WW3 was effectively over. Everything we're watching now is nation building and reconstruction. We can't afford quantum AI.
It will not be discovered and developed until it can also be figured out in advance how to prevent it from unbalancing current power-hierarchies.
The capitalists have learned not to let technological development roam free. Look at the past: if the industrialists had realised that car equals independence (or modern firearms, or domestic-scale energy production, or public internet or...) they'd never have allowed those things to be so available.
So for our foreseeable future, no newtechnology which might upset the hierarchies of power will be allowed to be spread.
Heck, just look at mRNA-jabs vs Ivermektin: one, owned by the major capitalists, needs high-tech labs for production - not something that can easily and quickly be set up in any nation. The secpon one is dirt cheap, safe to use and can easily and cheaply be made with very low investments in high tech.
That's capitalism co-operating with itself on a global scale for you: same freedom as under communism.
So don't expect this, even if it's true, to actually change anything for the better.
I saw WW2 German soldiers on old video who looked like they were testing some levitation craft. Man was standing in what looked like a dustbin or trash can which was low chest height. His hands holding on to rim. All of a sudden it took off from the ground and whizzed around about 8 to 12 feet, 3-4 metres for a few seconds, before landing. The site had info with pics in Antartica showing Germans holding ancient relics portraying from hot, desert area. One never knows if genuine but so much hidden such as giant skeletons unearthed and many pics of extremely tall people!
Neural implants made of superconductors for interface of AI and communications didn't make the list? Someone tweet X. X has fact checkers from the gov that will verify superconductors will never exist. Ask Tesla.
That sample piece wasn't exactly levitating, but I'm not sure how one could get a piece of magnet to behave that way, either. Its heavy (thicker) end was still making contact with the base. If the material itself were "levitating", would a thicker section have even a stronger tendency to levitate??? Or is something like the inverse square of the mass vs. gravity in operation? (Physics is NOT my forté!)
Stopped listening to the video after a few seconds when I realized the annoying “voice” narrating was AI. Too bad because I wanted to understand what I was looking at, as it just looks (to someone who isn’t an expert in physics) like a misshapen piece of metal being partially repelled by magnets.
Seriously, is it REALLY necessary to have robots instead of humans reading scripts for us?? Is there something “wrong” with the human voice, now? Are we really gaining something by voluntarily replacing ourselves with AI? Or are we doing it “just because we can”? What’s the point in that?
As an electrical engineer, until something is as cheap and well-known at scale as copper comes along we will be using copper for a very long time. If silver wasn’t so expensive we would have made all conductors out of it since it has inherent less resistance than copper. The middle ground at this point in time is plating mating surfaces of copper conductors with metals of lower resistance.
And in terms of transmission lines, until a conductor is as rigid as steel we won’t be using it for transmission. Pure copper does not have the strength of steel to be stretched between poles so a steel-aluminum alloy is what you see on overhead transmission. It has a higher resistance than copper (more losses) but has the strength to stay in place for decades.
I also like this breakthrough if it holds up. And if it does we won’t see it at a large scale until prices come way down.
The mental midgets actively seeking destruction of the planet (& humanity) wouldn’t want anything that would improve or actually address any of this or make life better. Just like there is no desire to “cure” anything, just lifelong “treatment” & enrichment
"But there are reasons to be sceptical. Similar claims have been made in the past, which have ended up being withdrawn."
The thing is, so many really do work but inventors are given that *tap* on the shoulder by (insert your interpretation/version of "They"), and are never to be heard from again.
Good point. I wonder about Fleischer and Pons to this day. And why is the world not running on Tesla coils?
Cuz there's no money in free energy 😔
Good balanced report. We can always count on your newsletter!
I'll take one superconducting hoverboard.
🤣😂👏👏👏👏👍
Nice list of applications. I'm glad there are no military uses.
🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂😂🤣😂😂😂😂😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣🤔😐
You DO NOT want quantum AI to become common. There were two quantum AI super computers [NSA-Military & CIA-Google] and they battled to destroy each other. The NSAs system eventually won and at that point WW3 was effectively over. Everything we're watching now is nation building and reconstruction. We can't afford quantum AI.
It will not be discovered and developed until it can also be figured out in advance how to prevent it from unbalancing current power-hierarchies.
The capitalists have learned not to let technological development roam free. Look at the past: if the industrialists had realised that car equals independence (or modern firearms, or domestic-scale energy production, or public internet or...) they'd never have allowed those things to be so available.
So for our foreseeable future, no newtechnology which might upset the hierarchies of power will be allowed to be spread.
Heck, just look at mRNA-jabs vs Ivermektin: one, owned by the major capitalists, needs high-tech labs for production - not something that can easily and quickly be set up in any nation. The secpon one is dirt cheap, safe to use and can easily and cheaply be made with very low investments in high tech.
That's capitalism co-operating with itself on a global scale for you: same freedom as under communism.
So don't expect this, even if it's true, to actually change anything for the better.
NE, that sounds a lot like the false promises of cold fusion. lets hope it works.
What would you bet that they discovered this knowledge from an alien spacecraft and testified to be true by some government whistleblower?
I saw WW2 German soldiers on old video who looked like they were testing some levitation craft. Man was standing in what looked like a dustbin or trash can which was low chest height. His hands holding on to rim. All of a sudden it took off from the ground and whizzed around about 8 to 12 feet, 3-4 metres for a few seconds, before landing. The site had info with pics in Antartica showing Germans holding ancient relics portraying from hot, desert area. One never knows if genuine but so much hidden such as giant skeletons unearthed and many pics of extremely tall people!
What if some entity created DARPA & Skunk Works to reverse engineer and repair THEIR broken equipment 🤔
Neural implants made of superconductors for interface of AI and communications didn't make the list? Someone tweet X. X has fact checkers from the gov that will verify superconductors will never exist. Ask Tesla.
That sample piece wasn't exactly levitating, but I'm not sure how one could get a piece of magnet to behave that way, either. Its heavy (thicker) end was still making contact with the base. If the material itself were "levitating", would a thicker section have even a stronger tendency to levitate??? Or is something like the inverse square of the mass vs. gravity in operation? (Physics is NOT my forté!)
If it is real, great. Also, the stated materials, lead, oxygen, sulphur and phosphorous, are plentiful.
What a about the Lanakite crystal or whatever MAINLY in Scotland😉
Sounds great! I hope more discoveries come soon. This what freedom and liberty can deliver.
What do you think of this information about magnets?
Here is the archive link YouTube deleted original
"!! This Guy Destroys Physics Gravity Newton Einstein, All At Once - And The System Destroys His Life"
https://web.archive.org/web/20210922204220/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wymfYp18720
Stopped listening to the video after a few seconds when I realized the annoying “voice” narrating was AI. Too bad because I wanted to understand what I was looking at, as it just looks (to someone who isn’t an expert in physics) like a misshapen piece of metal being partially repelled by magnets.
Seriously, is it REALLY necessary to have robots instead of humans reading scripts for us?? Is there something “wrong” with the human voice, now? Are we really gaining something by voluntarily replacing ourselves with AI? Or are we doing it “just because we can”? What’s the point in that?
As an electrical engineer, until something is as cheap and well-known at scale as copper comes along we will be using copper for a very long time. If silver wasn’t so expensive we would have made all conductors out of it since it has inherent less resistance than copper. The middle ground at this point in time is plating mating surfaces of copper conductors with metals of lower resistance.
And in terms of transmission lines, until a conductor is as rigid as steel we won’t be using it for transmission. Pure copper does not have the strength of steel to be stretched between poles so a steel-aluminum alloy is what you see on overhead transmission. It has a higher resistance than copper (more losses) but has the strength to stay in place for decades.
I also like this breakthrough if it holds up. And if it does we won’t see it at a large scale until prices come way down.
Thanks for the great articles as always.