Oct 3, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Why did they ever think an intramuscular injection would stay at the site of injection- doctors give intramuscular injections all the time of drugs that they want disseminating round the body eg, antibiotics, antipsychotics?
Oct 3, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Dr. John Campbell has a YouTube channel.
He is pretty much convinced that failure to aspirate the syringe, before injection, is the reason for clotting and other effects. If proof of the veracity of his claim is required, the number of attacks from so-called "fact-checkers" on him might indicate so.
Oct 4, 2022·edited Oct 4, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
"Wasn't the vaccine meant to stay in the injection site?" - According to Pfizer and the FDA it was and at the time they said it publicly they knew it didn't. The court ordered FDA documents from the Corminatty case clearly shows they knew (May 01, 2022 data drop) and lied.
On top of that it has been publicly known that the lipid nanoparticles didn't stay at the injection site since May of 2021 when Dr Bridle got Pfizer's own Bio-Distribution study via FOIA in Japan.
Oct 4, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Prior to 2021 it was common knowledge that the deltoid muscle is full of blood vessels and the whole point of injecting there is to make sure it's distributed through the body faster than a subcutaneous injection but not as fast or as targeted as an intravenous injection. Live vaccines are only injected subcutaneously for this reason. I have no idea why the COVID vaccines aren't. They might not be live vaccines but they sure behave like live vaccines in the way they infect cells and produce proteins. Only live vaccines are weakened enough that they don't do that as frequently; plus they express their antigens on their surface so the immune system can identify them and kill them before they even get a chance to do that. How low does one's IQ have to be not to see why for this purpose mRNA vaccines should be classified in the "live" category?!
Oct 4, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Various sources have stated that lipid nanoparticle encapsulation was specifically developed for the purpose of delivering chemotherapeutic agents into malignant brain tumors. This was in response to the inherent difficulty in getting agents through the blood-brain barrier. I simply cannot believe anyone involved in the development of these vaccines ever thought that something designed to penetrate the blood-brain barrier would just get stuck in the deltoid muscle and travel nowhere else.
Oct 3, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
This study confirms that the spike protein from the vaccine can end up in the vascular endothelium of the brain and heart and that it got there from the vaccine, not the virus. Moreover, the spike protein from the vaccine was responsible for the inflammation of the brain (encephalitis) and heart (myocarditis).
"The vaccine will stay in the injection site" will go down as one of those infamous "Covid sayings" like "three weeks to flatten the curve", "Safe & Effective", and all the others too numerous to list. Which almost without exception have been proved to be complete drivel
My husband has Parkinson's (he's now 57) and had the first vaccine back in February 2021 (Pfizer I think)- his Parkinson's symptoms went through the roof and he was in a very bad way for about 2 weeks. It was awful to witness. He never had any subsequent vaccines.
Honest question and correct me if I’m wrong… but I’ve never heard the phrase, “He was lucky the snake only bit him in the shoulder.”
Or,
“He was lucky, the bee only stung him in the arm.”
I’ve never heard of an “intramuscular” animal bite that stayed localized to the area.
“Oh it’s fine, the rabid dog only bit him intramuscularly.”
Is this a thing?
I mean, you rub fentanyl on someone’s shoulder skin and you better have some Narcan on standby.
How in the Hell would a vaccine injected an inch into the shoulder stay there???
How sad that he had a reaction after the first, (and second), yet still got the third. Cognitive dissonance kills.
Why did they ever think an intramuscular injection would stay at the site of injection- doctors give intramuscular injections all the time of drugs that they want disseminating round the body eg, antibiotics, antipsychotics?
Yeah, but the myocarditis and brain inflammation is "mostly peaceful."
Dr. John Campbell has a YouTube channel.
He is pretty much convinced that failure to aspirate the syringe, before injection, is the reason for clotting and other effects. If proof of the veracity of his claim is required, the number of attacks from so-called "fact-checkers" on him might indicate so.
"Wasn't the vaccine meant to stay in the injection site?" - According to Pfizer and the FDA it was and at the time they said it publicly they knew it didn't. The court ordered FDA documents from the Corminatty case clearly shows they knew (May 01, 2022 data drop) and lied.
On top of that it has been publicly known that the lipid nanoparticles didn't stay at the injection site since May of 2021 when Dr Bridle got Pfizer's own Bio-Distribution study via FOIA in Japan.
I’ve said it b4: for all things WuFlu (& many other nefarious issues), “conspiracy theory” = “spoiler alert”
Thanks NE. On another note, apparently peer reviewed science is sometimes a scam and a fraud.
https://newsletter.allfactsmatter.us/p/peer-reviewed-or-pal-reviewed/comments?publication_id=472985&isFreemail=true
Prior to 2021 it was common knowledge that the deltoid muscle is full of blood vessels and the whole point of injecting there is to make sure it's distributed through the body faster than a subcutaneous injection but not as fast or as targeted as an intravenous injection. Live vaccines are only injected subcutaneously for this reason. I have no idea why the COVID vaccines aren't. They might not be live vaccines but they sure behave like live vaccines in the way they infect cells and produce proteins. Only live vaccines are weakened enough that they don't do that as frequently; plus they express their antigens on their surface so the immune system can identify them and kill them before they even get a chance to do that. How low does one's IQ have to be not to see why for this purpose mRNA vaccines should be classified in the "live" category?!
Various sources have stated that lipid nanoparticle encapsulation was specifically developed for the purpose of delivering chemotherapeutic agents into malignant brain tumors. This was in response to the inherent difficulty in getting agents through the blood-brain barrier. I simply cannot believe anyone involved in the development of these vaccines ever thought that something designed to penetrate the blood-brain barrier would just get stuck in the deltoid muscle and travel nowhere else.
I wonder how the msm will spin this?
Finally, the proof.
This study confirms that the spike protein from the vaccine can end up in the vascular endothelium of the brain and heart and that it got there from the vaccine, not the virus. Moreover, the spike protein from the vaccine was responsible for the inflammation of the brain (encephalitis) and heart (myocarditis).
Bill Northrup MD
Excellent! The oxygen of publicity!
"The vaccine will stay in the injection site" will go down as one of those infamous "Covid sayings" like "three weeks to flatten the curve", "Safe & Effective", and all the others too numerous to list. Which almost without exception have been proved to be complete drivel
My husband has Parkinson's (he's now 57) and had the first vaccine back in February 2021 (Pfizer I think)- his Parkinson's symptoms went through the roof and he was in a very bad way for about 2 weeks. It was awful to witness. He never had any subsequent vaccines.