Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dr Ah Kahn Syed's avatar

Yes we had this data from TGA FOI 2289 back last year but the issues were dismissed and nobody cared that there were only 22 rats. In addition the miscarriage rate is significantly higher at P<0.05 which should have prompted more studies. But nobody who should have been able to insist on this cared.

Expand full comment
Sida's avatar

If they are only comparing the test group abnormalities to "within normal historic incidences" why do they even have a control group?

Expand full comment
44 more comments...

No posts