Nov 10, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Yes we had this data from TGA FOI 2289 back last year but the issues were dismissed and nobody cared that there were only 22 rats. In addition the miscarriage rate is significantly higher at P<0.05 which should have prompted more studies. But nobody who should have been able to insist on this cared.
You’re right, I never read the study and settled for headlines … still even at that level the deformities of ribs were much higher incidence in the vaccine arm. But I thought I read the termination rate in pregnancy was extreme high in that trial? Again I hope to avoid actually reading the bloody thing myself. Even perfect results should be invalidated by the study size. How could we go from 22 rats to hundreds of millions of young women? SABOTAGE OF THE HUMAN RACE!
I remember reading an analysis of this study, showing major flaws in its conclusion as to why there were less stillbirths in the jabbed women. It may have had something to do with more spontaneous abortions/miscarriages in the jabbed women to begin with, in their first trimester.
You make an excellent point. This contractor for Pfizer set up a control group but then did not use it for comparison. Why not? Instead, the authors continuously refer vaguely to "historical" control data. It appears that they use only once reference for that data in their study. This one:
Kuwagata et al. Historical control data on developmental toxicity studies in rats.
Congenital Anomalies. 2018 59, 125-131.
I tried to access it, but it was not free (naturally). Does anybody have access and the ability to post the relevant results from this study here?
Nov 10, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
If you use a faulty enough rat, ALL is “incidental” ... what the actual hell? This is so outside caution it boggles the mind ... in a normal trial, these findings (which can be explained away each as “incidental”) would warrant (nay DAMAND) a second study with many more rats!! The study was already so underpowered, all of these incidentals more than justified a second study. Obvs
Nov 11, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
One has to wonder if this “within historical ranges” is another “Turtles All the Way Down” type situation (ref to the vax book by that name).
In other words, were historical ranges derived from typical, unmediated, un-anything rats being fed normal rat diet with normal opportunities for normal behaviors? Or are these values derived from rats undergoing experimental studies of some sort?
And, if the ranges are so normal, how come they are so vastly different from the control group? I get that it’s just 44 rats. But nobody in his right mind would want to take a product that doubled rates of fetal/neonatal deaths and birth defects. Seriously.
Nov 10, 2022·edited Nov 10, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Right. Which may be the case? I have experience with reproductive rodents and understand there are certain weaknesses inherent there (mass production does not favor quality ...). But ... only one of these negative events was qualified with “similar results in control group” ... in my mind only that one is not an open question to be tested further. Clearly, the other events could not be explained away by that reasoning so makes me wonder if all of these “incidents” were isolated in the active arms?!?! Just sloppy sloppy sloppy. And possibly evil
And never-ending trust too. And if I have any future health issues to deal with. I have a good idea of who and what to stay away from. What's not to get? Either a substance belongs in the body or it doesn't.
Nov 11, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Wait, they have all these horrid abnormalities happening in a sample of 22 rats, but say they are normal because they have happened to the lab rats in the past? At the same time, within one experiment? And none in the actual control group? And they call this "all good, nothing to see here, move along"?
Similar explanations for Fizers new RS V shot they wanna give to pregnant women. Bunch of side effects in the babies... not all but many of which could be considered not unusual, except NONE of them in the control group. None.
Nov 11, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Just incidentally noting that rats are very much like cats; they're intelligent and affectionate and we really ought to be at a point of technological sophistication as to have stopped experimentation on live animals unable to consent to torture. [Also noting for the record that I'm an unregenerate meat and dairy eater.]
Nov 11, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Here is the story back from March 2021 when the TGA were first asked to produce this document. They refused for months. They eventually released the document later in 2021 by which time worker mandates had ensured that a huge proportion of the pregnant and pre-pregnant population had been coerced into taking these therapies.
Nov 10, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Please watch tonight’s episode of the Highwire. A nurse whistleblower and an OB/GYN discuss the incidence of foetal demise due to vaxxed mothers. It is horrific.
Nov 10, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
You are very moderated in your response Naked Emperor; letting us evaluate the results ourselves.
Unlike the lying researchers; you don't need to spell out the obvious. "within normal historic incidences"; the only obvious thing about their conclusion is the obvious lie.
Over time, my outrage has waned and is now replaced by cold anger at all of those on the research, creation, marketing and mandating of the vaxx.
And just so all of the personel from three letter agencies who read these posts, I have not advocated for, nor will I ever wish or advocate for violence against these provaxx murders. BTW spooks, hug your kids, pretty sure you shot them full of poison, real parent-of-the-year stuff right there. I would think you guys would be angry at Fauci, et al., not lovers of freedom.
Seems to me that people have been well trained to dispose the wrong people. The Real enemies of humanity are master's at re-directing attention away from themselves. With them. It's always someone or something else that causes all the problems in the world.
Nov 10, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
All (insert effect ) "within historical range" are considered incidental.
Fab find tyvm.. what horrible, terrible, evil blank check! The contracting loophole of "substantial equivalents" fully integrated into in the studies means another K-Street lobbyist got his island.
Nov 11, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Episode 293 of the Highwire, last night, presented Dr. James Thorpe, and a whistleblower RN. Dr.Thorpe is an OB/GYN. He and the nurse discussed the adverse events in pregnant women who have taken the vaxx and the foetal demise when vaxx is given to pregnant women in the third trimester. It was a disturbing program to watch and listen to. As Dr. Thorpe asked, where are the other 25,000 OB/GYN (in the USA) doctors witnessing the same thing he is seeing in his vaxxed pts.
Nov 11, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
I am no fan of mice or rats by any means. I do believe that even they deserve better treatment than to be injected with toxic substances, and Biological weapons that are capable of damaging and destroying every organ and every system in the body.
Yes we had this data from TGA FOI 2289 back last year but the issues were dismissed and nobody cared that there were only 22 rats. In addition the miscarriage rate is significantly higher at P<0.05 which should have prompted more studies. But nobody who should have been able to insist on this cared.
You’re right, I never read the study and settled for headlines … still even at that level the deformities of ribs were much higher incidence in the vaccine arm. But I thought I read the termination rate in pregnancy was extreme high in that trial? Again I hope to avoid actually reading the bloody thing myself. Even perfect results should be invalidated by the study size. How could we go from 22 rats to hundreds of millions of young women? SABOTAGE OF THE HUMAN RACE!
Had they used 8 mice, though, ... which seems to be the gold standard for waving things through
And there was this recent gem from Australia
https://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(22)00882-1/pdf
Comparing different demographics plus interesting author associations.
I remember reading an analysis of this study, showing major flaws in its conclusion as to why there were less stillbirths in the jabbed women. It may have had something to do with more spontaneous abortions/miscarriages in the jabbed women to begin with, in their first trimester.
49 pages of ridiculousness.
If they are only comparing the test group abnormalities to "within normal historic incidences" why do they even have a control group?
You make an excellent point. This contractor for Pfizer set up a control group but then did not use it for comparison. Why not? Instead, the authors continuously refer vaguely to "historical" control data. It appears that they use only once reference for that data in their study. This one:
Kuwagata et al. Historical control data on developmental toxicity studies in rats.
Congenital Anomalies. 2018 59, 125-131.
I tried to access it, but it was not free (naturally). Does anybody have access and the ability to post the relevant results from this study here?
The historically normal range has just been expanded. The Wistar strain has become yet more unlucky.
Indeed! 🙄
And why use Wistar rats at all, if they are so defect-prone to begin with? Shouldn't that make them unsuitable for *any* medical research??
I smell a (two-legged) rat!
If you use a faulty enough rat, ALL is “incidental” ... what the actual hell? This is so outside caution it boggles the mind ... in a normal trial, these findings (which can be explained away each as “incidental”) would warrant (nay DAMAND) a second study with many more rats!! The study was already so underpowered, all of these incidentals more than justified a second study. Obvs
One has to wonder if this “within historical ranges” is another “Turtles All the Way Down” type situation (ref to the vax book by that name).
In other words, were historical ranges derived from typical, unmediated, un-anything rats being fed normal rat diet with normal opportunities for normal behaviors? Or are these values derived from rats undergoing experimental studies of some sort?
And, if the ranges are so normal, how come they are so vastly different from the control group? I get that it’s just 44 rats. But nobody in his right mind would want to take a product that doubled rates of fetal/neonatal deaths and birth defects. Seriously.
That's what they thought too, therefore they sought to hide those results...
so ALL aspects were deviant, but declared to be within the range of normality.
move on , nothing to see here....
Right. Which may be the case? I have experience with reproductive rodents and understand there are certain weaknesses inherent there (mass production does not favor quality ...). But ... only one of these negative events was qualified with “similar results in control group” ... in my mind only that one is not an open question to be tested further. Clearly, the other events could not be explained away by that reasoning so makes me wonder if all of these “incidents” were isolated in the active arms?!?! Just sloppy sloppy sloppy. And possibly evil
I'm trying really hard not to be cynical but, fuck it, they deserve any cynicism they receive.
And never-ending trust too. And if I have any future health issues to deal with. I have a good idea of who and what to stay away from. What's not to get? Either a substance belongs in the body or it doesn't.
Wait, they have all these horrid abnormalities happening in a sample of 22 rats, but say they are normal because they have happened to the lab rats in the past? At the same time, within one experiment? And none in the actual control group? And they call this "all good, nothing to see here, move along"?
Similar explanations for Fizers new RS V shot they wanna give to pregnant women. Bunch of side effects in the babies... not all but many of which could be considered not unusual, except NONE of them in the control group. None.
I don’t even have words for this anymore.
Turtles. It’s turtles, all the way down.
Just incidentally noting that rats are very much like cats; they're intelligent and affectionate and we really ought to be at a point of technological sophistication as to have stopped experimentation on live animals unable to consent to torture. [Also noting for the record that I'm an unregenerate meat and dairy eater.]
I so agree! Rats are incredibly loving and intelligent. They deserve so much better from humans!
Here is the story back from March 2021 when the TGA were first asked to produce this document. They refused for months. They eventually released the document later in 2021 by which time worker mandates had ensured that a huge proportion of the pregnant and pre-pregnant population had been coerced into taking these therapies.
https://doctors4covidethics.org/pfizer-vaccine-rubber-stamped-data-sight-unseen/
Please watch tonight’s episode of the Highwire. A nurse whistleblower and an OB/GYN discuss the incidence of foetal demise due to vaxxed mothers. It is horrific.
You are very moderated in your response Naked Emperor; letting us evaluate the results ourselves.
Unlike the lying researchers; you don't need to spell out the obvious. "within normal historic incidences"; the only obvious thing about their conclusion is the obvious lie.
Over time, my outrage has waned and is now replaced by cold anger at all of those on the research, creation, marketing and mandating of the vaxx.
And just so all of the personel from three letter agencies who read these posts, I have not advocated for, nor will I ever wish or advocate for violence against these provaxx murders. BTW spooks, hug your kids, pretty sure you shot them full of poison, real parent-of-the-year stuff right there. I would think you guys would be angry at Fauci, et al., not lovers of freedom.
Seems to me that people have been well trained to dispose the wrong people. The Real enemies of humanity are master's at re-directing attention away from themselves. With them. It's always someone or something else that causes all the problems in the world.
All (insert effect ) "within historical range" are considered incidental.
Fab find tyvm.. what horrible, terrible, evil blank check! The contracting loophole of "substantial equivalents" fully integrated into in the studies means another K-Street lobbyist got his island.
Episode 293 of the Highwire, last night, presented Dr. James Thorpe, and a whistleblower RN. Dr.Thorpe is an OB/GYN. He and the nurse discussed the adverse events in pregnant women who have taken the vaxx and the foetal demise when vaxx is given to pregnant women in the third trimester. It was a disturbing program to watch and listen to. As Dr. Thorpe asked, where are the other 25,000 OB/GYN (in the USA) doctors witnessing the same thing he is seeing in his vaxxed pts.
And no study using vaccinated males?
I am no fan of mice or rats by any means. I do believe that even they deserve better treatment than to be injected with toxic substances, and Biological weapons that are capable of damaging and destroying every organ and every system in the body.