Mar 29, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Very interesting how they tried to hide that natural immunity number.. Without, with and without.. Definitely intentional so nobody would "get it". Luckily Team Reality has people that "get it". The guys at the FDA going through this should have got it too, but we know they're fully captured.
Mar 29, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
A recent study at University of Gothenburg, released in the Journal of European Immunology, on 156 pre-vaccine participants who were exposed to SARS-2, showed a high T-cell response IG-g and mild symptoms. However, and this is the shocker, a significant cohort exposed to SARS-2 showed no IG-g response, no t-cell response and no symptoms of the disease. How did these exposed people survive without T-cells? They had high levels of Ig-A hidden in the linings of their lungs that attacked the virus BEFORE it could get into the lungs. In other words Natural Immunity worked exactly the way it should. Wow! Imagine that!
Mar 29, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
It's gratifying that this supports what we've been seeing and saying all along, but also terrifying for those of us who would have been more comfortable being wrong. Thanks for finding this, bringing it to light, and helping explain (all along).
Mar 29, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
A big question, with respect to vaccine campaigns causing spikes in cases, is, do those people who acquire a covid infection in the week after receiving the vaccine have higher viral loads and, therefore, spread the virus more than a typical infected person?
Mar 29, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
This is such a load of horse manure.
(1) Weren’t we told that they carefully excluded people who were known to have had prior infection w SARS2?
(2) Of course, relying solely on the presence of antibodies as the definition of prior infection denies the existence of and efficacy of innate mucosal and IgA immunity, which if working well, defeats the virus before IgG antibodies are even made. Also denies the existence of T-cell mediated immunity which is the primary defense against viruses AS ALL MEDICAL DRS LEARN IN MED SCHOOL. And T-cells also don’t make antibodies. Antibodies are made to viruses only after the disease escapes all those other front line defenses.
(3) I am suspecting that perhaps ALL vaccines depress immune function temporarily after vaccination. Why have we not been told this before? This would quite easily explain why so many people who get the flu shot “complain” about getting sick w flu shortly after, and {rightly!} attributing it to the shot. Of course drs always dismiss their concerns - “the flu shot is a dead virus; you can’t get the flu from the shot.”
(4) The knowledge of even transient immune suppression post-vaccination is yet one more read they should be counting ALL vaccinated people as vaccinated - from the second after they get the shot onward! It is absolute fraud to redefine “vaccinated” as only two weeks after the second shot.
Fraud.
********
I agree with Carrie below - this is all so infuriating.
God, the righteous Judge, bring justice and bring it now.
Mar 29, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
mRNA vaccines don’t work because they’re not vaccines. The only tangential effect is as an “immune system irritant”. The mRNA irritant - the injected spike protein - mobilizes the immune system in general...not specifically to covid. This effect wanes rendering the injected victim more susceptable to the next variant. Another injection exacerbates the process and so on. Eventually the victim is debilitated or killed by previously suppressed cancers or a bug now imbued with lethality due to the vax recipients destroyed immune system☠️
Mar 29, 2022·edited Mar 29, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
There was a recent major game changer in molecular biology. Swedish study, early November 2021, regarding the spike protein of the vaccine entering the nucleus of the cells. The implications of this looked like DNA repair being down regulated with certain implications for the innate/adaptive immune system. Apart from what I saw of this back then, it has always been known that Non Sterilising out of date “vaccines”, gene therapy more like, have negative efficacy. (Vaccinology 101). Delivery of this during the height of a pandemic builds up immune pressure resulting in viral immune escape variants. Repeated negative efficacy “vaccines”/gene therapy is asking for trouble like vaccine resistance, ADE etc, etc which is not uncommon to occur in vaccine experiments/development. This is known and not just by scientists. The experiment has failed.
Mar 29, 2022·edited Mar 29, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
The same people getting away with the crimes currently, wrote the laws over the last several decades that make what they are doing entirely lawful, blocking access to almost all civil or criminal remedies for victims.
Check out Project Bioshield Act of 2005 (30 pp) and PREP Act of 2005 (last 14 pages of a supplemental DoD appropriation and Hurricane Katrina relief bill)
Those laws passed by Congress and signed by President Bush, centralized a huge amount of power into the hands of the unelected US Secretary of Health and Human Services, and rendered his or her actions unreviewable by the judicial branch.
Contractors like Pfizer are considered HHS employees for tort liability purposes, giving them sovereign immunity as government agents. All victim claims are to be funneled through federal vaccine injury compensation programs, reduced by the amount of any other compensation (i.e. from disability insurance payouts). If a victim or his/her family pursues civil suit, they must prove ‘willful misconduct’ ‘proximate’ to death or injury, which is an extremely high standard.
The meetings of HHS officials and advisors are exempt from sunshine laws.
There are specific provisions that void the Nuremberg era principle that “I was just following orders” is not a valid legal defense. (C)(4) on fifth page of 14pp PREP Act section: “Defense for Acts or Omissions Taken Pursuant to Secretary’s Declaration.” “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a program planner or qualified person shall not have engaged in ‘willful misconduct’ as a matter of law where such program planner or qualified person acted consistent with applicable directions, guidelines, or recommendations by the Secretary regarding the administration or use of a covered countermeasure that is specified in the declaration...” followed by some text providing that the legal immunity applies to the program planner or qualified person [ie nurses giving injections] if he or she gave notice of a plaintiff’s injury or death to their superiors within seven days of discovering “such information.”
Not sure how to interpret that last bit, especially since other sections explicitly put the burden of proof on plaintiffs to demonstrate the existence of willful misconduct, and the causal relationship between the misconduct and injury or death.
The ‘willful misconduct’ standard is ‘more stringent than a standard of negligence in any form or recklessness.’
Federal tort cases can also only be brought in US District Court for District of Columbia (home court for FDA, CDC, HSS), and the federal declaration and program preempts all state and tribal attempts to regulate development or use of “covered countermeasures.”
And weirdest of all, at the moment a pharmaceutical product gets EUA status (which masks, PCR tests and injections got from HHS Secretary effective Feb. 4, 2020,) the devices, diagnostics, and treatments are, by legal definition, no longer under ‘clinical investigation.’
Which is probably why the arguments that the products were ‘experimental’ and therefore couldn’t legally be mandated at least until the clinical trials finish in late 2022 or late 2023, never got any traction with courts.
See (k) on p. 25 of 30 of the Project Bioshield Act of 2004.
Mar 29, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
I would like to see a forensic investigation into the financial links, bribes, inducements, stock options handouts, nice overpaid cushy jobs given to FDA individuals by BIG Pharma sleaze balls. Given that we live in a rampant cancel-culture and big-tech censorship it is no wonder they can get away with it.
Mar 29, 2022·edited Mar 29, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Where is the news in any of this? Haven't we been privy to the "Post Marketing Experience" documentation in which all of this data resided for some time? The simple inarguable fact is that these poisons should only have been given, by request only, to people 65 or older and ONLY after ALL OF THESE DOCUMENTS HAD BEEN FULLY AVAILABLE. This Covid nonsense would have been over by now with these poisons off the market and endemicity and honest natural immunity long since established.
The fact that people haven't realized that the dodgy testing is what will forever keep US beholden to this pharma catch-22 is mind boggling to me.
SGTF surpassed SG+ in March '21! Yet people are lining up for the S-gene based poison!!! What the ever living F?
Mar 29, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
I do find it extremely interesting that so much is written and discussed in the MSM AND in the outlier sites about how people are "catching" something that has STILL never been isolated! I think very few people are aware, or it's being pretty much ignored that a) it's difficult to identify something in people that has NEVER BEEN ISOLATED (although it has apparently been PATENTED), and b) it seems that nobody is talking about how the symptoms of "Covid" are so very, very identical to the symptoms of radiation poisoning... WAH!!!!!!!!
Mar 29, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
One tiny note: Pfizer didn't say they wanted to release their "study" OVER 75 years, but AFTER 75 years... Oh, nothing odd about that!!!!!!!!!!!!! And I do believe they un-blinded the placebos after just 90 days? This is only from memory... I could well be inaccurate on that part.
Very interesting how they tried to hide that natural immunity number.. Without, with and without.. Definitely intentional so nobody would "get it". Luckily Team Reality has people that "get it". The guys at the FDA going through this should have got it too, but we know they're fully captured.
A recent study at University of Gothenburg, released in the Journal of European Immunology, on 156 pre-vaccine participants who were exposed to SARS-2, showed a high T-cell response IG-g and mild symptoms. However, and this is the shocker, a significant cohort exposed to SARS-2 showed no IG-g response, no t-cell response and no symptoms of the disease. How did these exposed people survive without T-cells? They had high levels of Ig-A hidden in the linings of their lungs that attacked the virus BEFORE it could get into the lungs. In other words Natural Immunity worked exactly the way it should. Wow! Imagine that!
Sadly the immunosuppression of the jab lasts way longer than 1 weeks against a myriad of pathologies. And cancer, as I wrote extensively about.
It's gratifying that this supports what we've been seeing and saying all along, but also terrifying for those of us who would have been more comfortable being wrong. Thanks for finding this, bringing it to light, and helping explain (all along).
A big question, with respect to vaccine campaigns causing spikes in cases, is, do those people who acquire a covid infection in the week after receiving the vaccine have higher viral loads and, therefore, spread the virus more than a typical infected person?
This is such a load of horse manure.
(1) Weren’t we told that they carefully excluded people who were known to have had prior infection w SARS2?
(2) Of course, relying solely on the presence of antibodies as the definition of prior infection denies the existence of and efficacy of innate mucosal and IgA immunity, which if working well, defeats the virus before IgG antibodies are even made. Also denies the existence of T-cell mediated immunity which is the primary defense against viruses AS ALL MEDICAL DRS LEARN IN MED SCHOOL. And T-cells also don’t make antibodies. Antibodies are made to viruses only after the disease escapes all those other front line defenses.
(3) I am suspecting that perhaps ALL vaccines depress immune function temporarily after vaccination. Why have we not been told this before? This would quite easily explain why so many people who get the flu shot “complain” about getting sick w flu shortly after, and {rightly!} attributing it to the shot. Of course drs always dismiss their concerns - “the flu shot is a dead virus; you can’t get the flu from the shot.”
(4) The knowledge of even transient immune suppression post-vaccination is yet one more read they should be counting ALL vaccinated people as vaccinated - from the second after they get the shot onward! It is absolute fraud to redefine “vaccinated” as only two weeks after the second shot.
Fraud.
********
I agree with Carrie below - this is all so infuriating.
God, the righteous Judge, bring justice and bring it now.
mRNA vaccines don’t work because they’re not vaccines. The only tangential effect is as an “immune system irritant”. The mRNA irritant - the injected spike protein - mobilizes the immune system in general...not specifically to covid. This effect wanes rendering the injected victim more susceptable to the next variant. Another injection exacerbates the process and so on. Eventually the victim is debilitated or killed by previously suppressed cancers or a bug now imbued with lethality due to the vax recipients destroyed immune system☠️
There was a recent major game changer in molecular biology. Swedish study, early November 2021, regarding the spike protein of the vaccine entering the nucleus of the cells. The implications of this looked like DNA repair being down regulated with certain implications for the innate/adaptive immune system. Apart from what I saw of this back then, it has always been known that Non Sterilising out of date “vaccines”, gene therapy more like, have negative efficacy. (Vaccinology 101). Delivery of this during the height of a pandemic builds up immune pressure resulting in viral immune escape variants. Repeated negative efficacy “vaccines”/gene therapy is asking for trouble like vaccine resistance, ADE etc, etc which is not uncommon to occur in vaccine experiments/development. This is known and not just by scientists. The experiment has failed.
Common sense isn't common
Like the Spanish "flu" which also was a fraud.
What really caused that ? Oh like today, medical garbage
https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/67902
great stuff naked emp! signed up for a subscription earlier, keep up the great work.
The same people getting away with the crimes currently, wrote the laws over the last several decades that make what they are doing entirely lawful, blocking access to almost all civil or criminal remedies for victims.
Check out Project Bioshield Act of 2005 (30 pp) and PREP Act of 2005 (last 14 pages of a supplemental DoD appropriation and Hurricane Katrina relief bill)
https://www.congress.gov/108/plaws/publ276/PLAW-108publ276.pdf
https://www.congress.gov/109/plaws/publ148/PLAW-109publ148.pdf#page=140
Those laws passed by Congress and signed by President Bush, centralized a huge amount of power into the hands of the unelected US Secretary of Health and Human Services, and rendered his or her actions unreviewable by the judicial branch.
Contractors like Pfizer are considered HHS employees for tort liability purposes, giving them sovereign immunity as government agents. All victim claims are to be funneled through federal vaccine injury compensation programs, reduced by the amount of any other compensation (i.e. from disability insurance payouts). If a victim or his/her family pursues civil suit, they must prove ‘willful misconduct’ ‘proximate’ to death or injury, which is an extremely high standard.
The meetings of HHS officials and advisors are exempt from sunshine laws.
There are specific provisions that void the Nuremberg era principle that “I was just following orders” is not a valid legal defense. (C)(4) on fifth page of 14pp PREP Act section: “Defense for Acts or Omissions Taken Pursuant to Secretary’s Declaration.” “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a program planner or qualified person shall not have engaged in ‘willful misconduct’ as a matter of law where such program planner or qualified person acted consistent with applicable directions, guidelines, or recommendations by the Secretary regarding the administration or use of a covered countermeasure that is specified in the declaration...” followed by some text providing that the legal immunity applies to the program planner or qualified person [ie nurses giving injections] if he or she gave notice of a plaintiff’s injury or death to their superiors within seven days of discovering “such information.”
Not sure how to interpret that last bit, especially since other sections explicitly put the burden of proof on plaintiffs to demonstrate the existence of willful misconduct, and the causal relationship between the misconduct and injury or death.
The ‘willful misconduct’ standard is ‘more stringent than a standard of negligence in any form or recklessness.’
Federal tort cases can also only be brought in US District Court for District of Columbia (home court for FDA, CDC, HSS), and the federal declaration and program preempts all state and tribal attempts to regulate development or use of “covered countermeasures.”
And weirdest of all, at the moment a pharmaceutical product gets EUA status (which masks, PCR tests and injections got from HHS Secretary effective Feb. 4, 2020,) the devices, diagnostics, and treatments are, by legal definition, no longer under ‘clinical investigation.’
Which is probably why the arguments that the products were ‘experimental’ and therefore couldn’t legally be mandated at least until the clinical trials finish in late 2022 or late 2023, never got any traction with courts.
See (k) on p. 25 of 30 of the Project Bioshield Act of 2004.
I would like to see a forensic investigation into the financial links, bribes, inducements, stock options handouts, nice overpaid cushy jobs given to FDA individuals by BIG Pharma sleaze balls. Given that we live in a rampant cancel-culture and big-tech censorship it is no wonder they can get away with it.
Where is the news in any of this? Haven't we been privy to the "Post Marketing Experience" documentation in which all of this data resided for some time? The simple inarguable fact is that these poisons should only have been given, by request only, to people 65 or older and ONLY after ALL OF THESE DOCUMENTS HAD BEEN FULLY AVAILABLE. This Covid nonsense would have been over by now with these poisons off the market and endemicity and honest natural immunity long since established.
The fact that people haven't realized that the dodgy testing is what will forever keep US beholden to this pharma catch-22 is mind boggling to me.
SGTF surpassed SG+ in March '21! Yet people are lining up for the S-gene based poison!!! What the ever living F?
Good catch. Didn't see this release. Sadly these are the things we were called conspiracy theorists for writing about...
I do find it extremely interesting that so much is written and discussed in the MSM AND in the outlier sites about how people are "catching" something that has STILL never been isolated! I think very few people are aware, or it's being pretty much ignored that a) it's difficult to identify something in people that has NEVER BEEN ISOLATED (although it has apparently been PATENTED), and b) it seems that nobody is talking about how the symptoms of "Covid" are so very, very identical to the symptoms of radiation poisoning... WAH!!!!!!!!
One tiny note: Pfizer didn't say they wanted to release their "study" OVER 75 years, but AFTER 75 years... Oh, nothing odd about that!!!!!!!!!!!!! And I do believe they un-blinded the placebos after just 90 days? This is only from memory... I could well be inaccurate on that part.