Apr 22, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
And it can only get worse.
Latest Stephanie Senett et al paper is very uncomfortable reading ( Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations)
Why are they still pushing it?
Because the supply agreements have clauses in them that are so ridiculously punitive that governments have to fulfil the parts they signed up to.
The health of “the people” has been traded for money, with the added bonus to the “rulers” of ensuring reduced health care and pensions budgets and lowering the need for more housing in the coming years.
Apr 22, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Digital IDs, digital money, "health" passports, transhumanism and connecting humans to computer networks... all use so-called vaccination as trojan horse.
Apr 22, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
A-Z was not available in the US, so I don't know much about it, but that one is not a CDC/FDA special. I do recall very vividly the "mix n match" devil may care attitude about changing up shots for "broader protection." I , too, found that suggestion even more alarming than the shots themselves, but it makes sense that this was in response to shortages or lack of choices available. In spite of the govt purchase agreements, it seems wiser to send the excess shots into space than to continue disposing of this poison in people's arms. We're looking at serious societal threats due to the illness, death and infertility in our future. Alarming.
Apr 22, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
"What is interesting from this study is that it seems, in many cases, the largest risk comes from having a first shot of Pfizer and then a second of Moderna.
Remember when politicians and ‘scientists’ were saying it’s fine to mix jabs, in fact it might even be better for you. I do, very well. I questioned it at the time, saying surely there should be some larger trials looking at whether this is actually safe. But no, in this time of anti-science, the more mRNA and as many different types the better."
On its face the claims of media talking heads were alarming but it fits the American regulatory model where safety is assumed and harm needs to be proved in a court of law. It has actually been a battle the Gates crowd have fought on behalf of gmo "foods" where EU regulators use the quaint idea of Precautionary Principle rather than defer to profiteers claims.
Apr 22, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
In fact, a young girl (27 I think) a friend of my son, has been ill since last December with these problems. (she's still an outpatient and they have no idea how to treat her 😔) So it does affect females too. I'm so sorry, and so very angry too, at all the absolute lies they have spun. As for the mixing, I just could not believe they were going ahead with it, with seemingly NO IDEA of the long term effects. I'm no way educated in medicine but this just seems to be utter madness.
Apr 22, 2022·edited Apr 22, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Yet incredibly Moderna then Pfizer is the lowest rate (other than not taking the experiment). Vinay Prasad did best summary I've seen back in December 21:
Apr 22, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Unfortunately & frighteningly, I think the “why” is obvious if one believes the depopulation theory, & I do. The mass anti-science & safety hysteria by elites & “world leaders” to literally jab every person on the planet with no concern for bad short or long term séquelae leaves no doubt in my mind.
Apr 22, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
It was no surprise in the UK they wont give you a booster of AZ even if you had it first time round, but only Pfizer boosters, simply because they had to acknowledge that AZ is particularly 'dangerous' in terms of side effects, especially clotting issues. But one other factor regarding mixing vaccine manufacturers ... it may be "pot luck" which one you receive, it has the added benefit (for Pfizer etc!) that in the event they eventually become liable for injuries, who do you blame? AZ will blame the Pfizer booster, Pfizer will blame Moderna boosters, and all will probably escape litigation saying "wait a minute, we never advised mixing them together, that was a government decision don't blame us".
Apr 22, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
The notion that anyone would consider it safe to mix and match these untested gene therapies any further in an untested toxic cocktail is peak absurdity surpassing even the astonishing idea of Joe Biden lecturing America on morality.
Apr 22, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
It’s unfortunate that it takes something like this to wake people up to the reality of the moment. Maybe, never again, might be possible after this insanity plays out.
And it can only get worse.
Latest Stephanie Senett et al paper is very uncomfortable reading ( Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations)
Why are they still pushing it?
Because the supply agreements have clauses in them that are so ridiculously punitive that governments have to fulfil the parts they signed up to.
The health of “the people” has been traded for money, with the added bonus to the “rulers” of ensuring reduced health care and pensions budgets and lowering the need for more housing in the coming years.
Digital IDs, digital money, "health" passports, transhumanism and connecting humans to computer networks... all use so-called vaccination as trojan horse.
That's why they're not stopping.
A-Z was not available in the US, so I don't know much about it, but that one is not a CDC/FDA special. I do recall very vividly the "mix n match" devil may care attitude about changing up shots for "broader protection." I , too, found that suggestion even more alarming than the shots themselves, but it makes sense that this was in response to shortages or lack of choices available. In spite of the govt purchase agreements, it seems wiser to send the excess shots into space than to continue disposing of this poison in people's arms. We're looking at serious societal threats due to the illness, death and infertility in our future. Alarming.
"What is interesting from this study is that it seems, in many cases, the largest risk comes from having a first shot of Pfizer and then a second of Moderna.
Remember when politicians and ‘scientists’ were saying it’s fine to mix jabs, in fact it might even be better for you. I do, very well. I questioned it at the time, saying surely there should be some larger trials looking at whether this is actually safe. But no, in this time of anti-science, the more mRNA and as many different types the better."
On its face the claims of media talking heads were alarming but it fits the American regulatory model where safety is assumed and harm needs to be proved in a court of law. It has actually been a battle the Gates crowd have fought on behalf of gmo "foods" where EU regulators use the quaint idea of Precautionary Principle rather than defer to profiteers claims.
In fact, a young girl (27 I think) a friend of my son, has been ill since last December with these problems. (she's still an outpatient and they have no idea how to treat her 😔) So it does affect females too. I'm so sorry, and so very angry too, at all the absolute lies they have spun. As for the mixing, I just could not believe they were going ahead with it, with seemingly NO IDEA of the long term effects. I'm no way educated in medicine but this just seems to be utter madness.
Yet incredibly Moderna then Pfizer is the lowest rate (other than not taking the experiment). Vinay Prasad did best summary I've seen back in December 21:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzVoS-1TIWI&t=105s
Luckily death rates have plummeted alongside rollouts ceasing.. just need to ensure enough people resist 4 and 5.
Unfortunately & frighteningly, I think the “why” is obvious if one believes the depopulation theory, & I do. The mass anti-science & safety hysteria by elites & “world leaders” to literally jab every person on the planet with no concern for bad short or long term séquelae leaves no doubt in my mind.
It was no surprise in the UK they wont give you a booster of AZ even if you had it first time round, but only Pfizer boosters, simply because they had to acknowledge that AZ is particularly 'dangerous' in terms of side effects, especially clotting issues. But one other factor regarding mixing vaccine manufacturers ... it may be "pot luck" which one you receive, it has the added benefit (for Pfizer etc!) that in the event they eventually become liable for injuries, who do you blame? AZ will blame the Pfizer booster, Pfizer will blame Moderna boosters, and all will probably escape litigation saying "wait a minute, we never advised mixing them together, that was a government decision don't blame us".
Thank you for all your writings and efforts… the nightmare keeps getting worse.
The notion that anyone would consider it safe to mix and match these untested gene therapies any further in an untested toxic cocktail is peak absurdity surpassing even the astonishing idea of Joe Biden lecturing America on morality.
No gain of function spike protien 🖕PHIZSOFF🖕
On a positive note … Happy Earth Day!
This case is being heard in the Court of Appeal May 3rd https://openjusticecourtofprotection.org/2022/02/04/cross-examining-a-gp-in-a-covid-vaccination-hearing/
Some/many of these people actually had three versions of the spike protein introduced into their body: Pfizer, Moderna and the virus itself.
It’s unfortunate that it takes something like this to wake people up to the reality of the moment. Maybe, never again, might be possible after this insanity plays out.
Just out of curiosity: what the actual F happened to Astrazeneca???