Apr 22, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
And it can only get worse.
Latest Stephanie Senett et al paper is very uncomfortable reading ( Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations)
Why are they still pushing it?
Because the supply agreements have clauses in them that are so ridiculously punitive that governments have to fulfil the parts they signed up to.
The health of “the people” has been traded for money, with the added bonus to the “rulers” of ensuring reduced health care and pensions budgets and lowering the need for more housing in the coming years.
Why do governments "have to" who is enforcing these clauses if not the government? Why not pass legislation the nullifies that which hurts the people? Also look up cv19 license LLNS
Only when we consent. There are still some lawmakers who care enough about their position to consider their constituents if constituents are loud enough.
They are pushing it because they want to exterminate us before the Ripping of Faces starts.
According to Rystad, the current resource replacement ratio for conventional resources is only 16 percent. Only 1 barrel out of every 6 consumed is being replaced with new resources
Shale binge has spoiled US reserves, top investor warns Financial Times.
Preface. Conventional crude oil production may have already peaked in 2008 at 69.5 million barrels per day (mb/d) according to Europe’s International Energy Agency (IEA 2018 p45). The U.S. Energy Information Agency shows global peak crude oil production at a later date in 2018 at 82.9 mb/d (EIA 2020) because they included tight oil, oil sands, and deep-sea oil. Though it will take several years of lower oil production to be sure the peak occurred. Regardless, world production has been on a plateau since 2005.
What’s saved the world from oil decline was unconventional tight “fracked” oil, which accounted for 63% of total U.S. crude oil production in 2019 and 83% of global oil growth from 2009 to 2019. So it’s a big deal if we’ve reached the peak of fracked oil, because that is also the peak of both conventional and unconventional oil and the decline of all oil in the future.
My personal belief is that we have ample resources to support a growing population. It just isn't oil. Solar patents that are efficient above a certain threshhold are kept hidden from the public, for example. There are lots of free energy technologies that we might get to have i we can choose compassion instead of warfare and show we can use them wisely.
I think the agendas simply want to control, so they are hoping to bankrupt the system in such a way that they can easily herd us into digital currency that THEY control. We won't do that.
It's a consciousness game ultimately about upleveling ours and reclaiming our divinity, our sovereignty and our sense of connection with one another in unity that is based on love and inteconnectivity of human hearts rather than coercion and digital credits etc. ESGs are the new thing. You know who has the highest ESG score? Microsoft.
While oil has many other important uses (lubrication, plastics, roadways, roofing) this section considers only its use as an energy source. The CMO is a powerful means of understanding the difficulty of replacing oil energy by other sources. SRI International chemist Ripudaman Malhotra, working with Crane and colleague Ed Kinderman, used it to describe the looming energy crisis in sobering terms.[13] Malhotra illustrates the problem of producing one CMO energy that we currently derive from oil each year from five different alternative sources. Installing capacity to produce 1 CMO per year requires long and significant development.
Allowing fifty years to develop the requisite capacity, 1 CMO of energy per year could be produced by any one of these developments:
4 Three Gorges Dams,[14] developed each year for 50 years, or
52 nuclear power plants,[15] developed each year for 50 years, or
104 coal-fired power plants,[16] developed each year for 50 years, or
32,850 wind turbines,[17][18] developed each year for 50 years, or
91,250,000 rooftop solar photovoltaic panels[19] developed each year for 50 years
The world consumes approximately 3 CMO annually from all sources. The table [10] shows the small contribution from alternative energies in 2006.
“To provide most of our power through renewables would take hundreds of times the amount of rare earth metals that we are mining today,” according to Thomas Graedel at the Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies. So renewable energy resources like windmills and solar PV can not ever replace fossil fuels, there’s not enough of many essential minerals to scale this technology up. http://energyskeptic.com/2014/high-tech-cannot-last-rare-earth-metals/
Renewable energy 'simply won't work': Top Google engineers
Two highly qualified Google engineers who have spent years studying and trying to improve renewable energy technology have stated quite bluntly that whatever the future holds, it is not a renewables-powered civilisation: such a thing is impossible.
Both men are Stanford PhDs, Ross Koningstein having trained in aerospace engineering and David Fork in applied physics. These aren't guys who fiddle about with websites or data analytics or "technology" of that sort: they are real engineers who understand difficult maths and physics, and top-bracket even among that distinguished company.
Even if one were to electrify all of transport, industry, heating and so on, so much renewable generation and balancing/storage equipment would be needed to power it that astronomical new requirements for steel, concrete, copper, glass, carbon fibre, neodymium, shipping and haulage etc etc would appear.
All these things are made using mammoth amounts of energy: far from achieving massive energy savings, which most plans for a renewables future rely on implicitly, we would wind up needing far more energy, which would mean even more vast renewables farms – and even more materials and energy to make and maintain them and so on. The scale of the building would be like nothing ever attempted by the human race.
In reality, well before any such stage was reached, energy would become horrifyingly expensive – which means that everything would become horrifyingly expensive (even the present well-under-one-per-cent renewables level in the UK has pushed up utility bills very considerably).
I respect your opinion, I just don't agree. You are quoting google and Ivy leagues. These o me are not the right sources to be looking at if you're looking for the optimism those who fund and control both don't want you to see.
Oh but I thought the MSM narrative paints a splendid future of EVS and sparkling clean energy from solar panels.
You'll never see either of the above in any MSM source - in fact you'll struggle to find them anywhere.
Cuz the PTB do not want the Sheeple to get wind of the fact that oil is past peak - and there ain't no transition to renewables.
Renewables is a head fake from the PTB - to make people believe that there is a future.
And now we are seeing what the PTB are doing about the fact that there is no future - they are exterminating us - before the power goes off and 8B are left without food -- before they start to rip faces off and eat each other.
Actually what I have posted is not an opinion - these are facts.
If you were interested, you could look up hidden patents national security. I have no need to argue. Traditional solar won't cut it, I agree. And it's owned by the same who own all the stuff that is "out there." Peace and wellbeing to you and to all.
Apr 22, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
Digital IDs, digital money, "health" passports, transhumanism and connecting humans to computer networks... all use so-called vaccination as trojan horse.
How many shots does it take to make a trans human?
And don't you think Klaus Snob looks at a Hollywood villain? Hmmm... maybe that stuff is all deflection from the real reason i.e. we are being put down.
Best to be put down before the lights go out and 8B voracious humans have no food ... we would do unthinkable things to each other.
Of course this is why every country on the planet is injecting - it's not a great outcome -- but it's better than Ripping Faces off (+ rape and cannibalism)
According to Rystad, the current resource replacement ratio for conventional resources is only 16 percent. Only 1 barrel out of every 6 consumed is being replaced with new resources
Shale binge has spoiled US reserves, top investor warns Financial Times.
Preface. Conventional crude oil production may have already peaked in 2008 at 69.5 million barrels per day (mb/d) according to Europe’s International Energy Agency (IEA 2018 p45). The U.S. Energy Information Agency shows global peak crude oil production at a later date in 2018 at 82.9 mb/d (EIA 2020) because they included tight oil, oil sands, and deep-sea oil. Though it will take several years of lower oil production to be sure the peak occurred. Regardless, world production has been on a plateau since 2005.
What’s saved the world from oil decline was unconventional tight “fracked” oil, which accounted for 63% of total U.S. crude oil production in 2019 and 83% of global oil growth from 2009 to 2019. So it’s a big deal if we’ve reached the peak of fracked oil, because that is also the peak of both conventional and unconventional oil and the decline of all oil in the future.
I feel there's an urgency behind the plandemic. Peak oil is certainly one of the biggest reasons behind it, though it may not be the only one.
However, transhumanism is one of the stated goals of the psychopaths in charge and there's no reason why the injections can't be about both population reduction and genetic experimentation.
Apr 22, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
A-Z was not available in the US, so I don't know much about it, but that one is not a CDC/FDA special. I do recall very vividly the "mix n match" devil may care attitude about changing up shots for "broader protection." I , too, found that suggestion even more alarming than the shots themselves, but it makes sense that this was in response to shortages or lack of choices available. In spite of the govt purchase agreements, it seems wiser to send the excess shots into space than to continue disposing of this poison in people's arms. We're looking at serious societal threats due to the illness, death and infertility in our future. Alarming.
Apr 22, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
"What is interesting from this study is that it seems, in many cases, the largest risk comes from having a first shot of Pfizer and then a second of Moderna.
Remember when politicians and ‘scientists’ were saying it’s fine to mix jabs, in fact it might even be better for you. I do, very well. I questioned it at the time, saying surely there should be some larger trials looking at whether this is actually safe. But no, in this time of anti-science, the more mRNA and as many different types the better."
On its face the claims of media talking heads were alarming but it fits the American regulatory model where safety is assumed and harm needs to be proved in a court of law. It has actually been a battle the Gates crowd have fought on behalf of gmo "foods" where EU regulators use the quaint idea of Precautionary Principle rather than defer to profiteers claims.
Apr 22, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
At the time I thought the reason for giving mixed supplier doses might have been to make it harder for people to take up criminal cases as they would not be able to say which product had caused the adverse effects.
Apr 22, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
Exactly, seemed obvious. Then again, given the EU contracts with the manufacturers giving them immunity that actually works, legal, that is, ... they wouldn't need it. Perhaps extra insurance, just for some unanticipated way that some liability might still be there.
Apr 22, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
Yeah, what's even saner than experimenting with yourself? Why, multiplying the unknowns with more experiments, of course!
When they said that, I thought for a while: "Ok, now all these very smart colleagues will certainly start becoming skeptical that nothing fishy is going on, right.... right?" - wrong... *sigh*
In Hungary starting in August of 2021 it was actually soft mandated to take different vaccines! To have the same as the 3rd as the first two was actually the exception!
Apr 22, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
In fact, a young girl (27 I think) a friend of my son, has been ill since last December with these problems. (she's still an outpatient and they have no idea how to treat her 😔) So it does affect females too. I'm so sorry, and so very angry too, at all the absolute lies they have spun. As for the mixing, I just could not believe they were going ahead with it, with seemingly NO IDEA of the long term effects. I'm no way educated in medicine but this just seems to be utter madness.
Apr 22, 2022·edited Apr 22, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
Yet incredibly Moderna then Pfizer is the lowest rate (other than not taking the experiment). Vinay Prasad did best summary I've seen back in December 21:
That's what I say. The people who choose shot after shot are really not the unshotted's concern anymore. The unshotted will survive whatever is coming down the pike with uncompromised immune systems. The shotted - maybe, maybe not. But it is time the world stops focusing on these poison shots. So family and people you know got shotted. Will they die? Of course, we all will die.
This poison is more than useless, it should be pulled from the market, all fascist mandates ended. Period. That's it.
Apr 22, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
Unfortunately & frighteningly, I think the “why” is obvious if one believes the depopulation theory, & I do. The mass anti-science & safety hysteria by elites & “world leaders” to literally jab every person on the planet with no concern for bad short or long term séquelae leaves no doubt in my mind.
I can't find a better explanation for why they are hell-bent on making it mandatory. Knowing that the crappy (from our perspective) design of the products makes repeated shots "necessary".
If people are trained to see it as normal that they are "on the needle" a couple times a year, and they have this mixing in some "hot", not even batches, but vials within batches, randomly spread, they basically can "dial in" the death numbers for each year, live-compensating like with a control algorithm to produce a certain slope of population decrease "as needed", keeping it moderate enough to not be obvious, but effective enough for their goals.
The idea of death lottery to "solve problems" is quite an old idea among "elites", I remember roughly.
-
ARGH. Now googling that term, it yields "Vaccine hesitant are in 'death lottery,'" (says some governor asshole).
Since those are the people who play the upside-down game all the time, the terminology might not be accidental - they're telling you what it is, but inverted.
Apr 22, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
It was no surprise in the UK they wont give you a booster of AZ even if you had it first time round, but only Pfizer boosters, simply because they had to acknowledge that AZ is particularly 'dangerous' in terms of side effects, especially clotting issues. But one other factor regarding mixing vaccine manufacturers ... it may be "pot luck" which one you receive, it has the added benefit (for Pfizer etc!) that in the event they eventually become liable for injuries, who do you blame? AZ will blame the Pfizer booster, Pfizer will blame Moderna boosters, and all will probably escape litigation saying "wait a minute, we never advised mixing them together, that was a government decision don't blame us".
Apr 22, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
The notion that anyone would consider it safe to mix and match these untested gene therapies any further in an untested toxic cocktail is peak absurdity surpassing even the astonishing idea of Joe Biden lecturing America on morality.
Apr 22, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
It’s unfortunate that it takes something like this to wake people up to the reality of the moment. Maybe, never again, might be possible after this insanity plays out.
In Germany, it's at least a recommendation, if not a must if wanting to be counted as vaxd, that you get one mRNA product as booster, no matter what else you got before, incl Novavax or what was it's name. It seems the others have been allowed to play along a little, but really, really, what everybody must get for some reason, is mRNA.
So this idea about mixing different products as recommended rather early on, maybe it is not about preventing liability by improvability what of those cause the damage.
Mixing products meant (when only mRNA and vector were there): you WILL get mRNA.
Now requiring mRNA means: You WILL get mRNA.
That means: the control group not just for some particular product, or virus spike protein, is to be eliminated.
The control group w.r.t. mRNA tech per se, is to be eliminated.
I wonder whether this might have anything to do with a lot of other mRNA products for other purposes of "treatment" being in the pipeline...
It's bad if this new tech turns out to be generally a bad idea, while this is supposedly to be the new way of doing things, eh? Because finding new products using old-fashioned pharma has become difficult, said some experts.
New nicely patentable tech which is so high tech that it will automatically leave a lot of smaller pharma competitors outside the door of where the new game is played = even more lucrative than regular pharma.
If it creates extra problems, I'm sure there will be new products to take care of those, too...
But no liability, as no-one not having received any mRNA will be there at some point. (unless THE PEOPLE rise up, ... incl the so far vaxd, getting it through their skull that stopping to get even more injections is also of value to them)
Actually what I wrote above in a different comment about soft mandate in Hungary was the same. If you haven't taken mRNA before it was basically your only option as booster or become unvaccinated... Something sinister going on.
And it can only get worse.
Latest Stephanie Senett et al paper is very uncomfortable reading ( Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations)
Why are they still pushing it?
Because the supply agreements have clauses in them that are so ridiculously punitive that governments have to fulfil the parts they signed up to.
The health of “the people” has been traded for money, with the added bonus to the “rulers” of ensuring reduced health care and pensions budgets and lowering the need for more housing in the coming years.
Why do governments "have to" who is enforcing these clauses if not the government? Why not pass legislation the nullifies that which hurts the people? Also look up cv19 license LLNS
Pass laws...pishaw. That is so 1776. Countries rule by edicts now.
Only when we consent. There are still some lawmakers who care enough about their position to consider their constituents if constituents are loud enough.
There is an interesting thread on substack's "What to read" I've made some comments about blackrock. https://www.bloombergquint.com/onweb/child-labor-in-cocoa-belt-is-norway-wealth-fund-s-moral-dilemma
They are pushing it because they want to exterminate us before the Ripping of Faces starts.
According to Rystad, the current resource replacement ratio for conventional resources is only 16 percent. Only 1 barrel out of every 6 consumed is being replaced with new resources
https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/The-Biggest-Oil-Gas-Discoveries-Of-2019.html
Shale binge has spoiled US reserves, top investor warns Financial Times.
Preface. Conventional crude oil production may have already peaked in 2008 at 69.5 million barrels per day (mb/d) according to Europe’s International Energy Agency (IEA 2018 p45). The U.S. Energy Information Agency shows global peak crude oil production at a later date in 2018 at 82.9 mb/d (EIA 2020) because they included tight oil, oil sands, and deep-sea oil. Though it will take several years of lower oil production to be sure the peak occurred. Regardless, world production has been on a plateau since 2005.
What’s saved the world from oil decline was unconventional tight “fracked” oil, which accounted for 63% of total U.S. crude oil production in 2019 and 83% of global oil growth from 2009 to 2019. So it’s a big deal if we’ve reached the peak of fracked oil, because that is also the peak of both conventional and unconventional oil and the decline of all oil in the future.
Some key points from this Financial Times article: https://energyskeptic.com/2021/the-end-of-fracked-shale-oil/
Shale boss says US has passed peak oil | Financial Times https://www.ft.com/content/320d09cb-8f51-4103-87d7-0dd164e1fd25
Our fossil fuel energy predicament, including why the correct story is rarely told https://ourfiniteworld.com/2021/11/10/our-fossil-fuel-energy-predicament-including-why-the-correct-story-is-rarely-told/
My personal belief is that we have ample resources to support a growing population. It just isn't oil. Solar patents that are efficient above a certain threshhold are kept hidden from the public, for example. There are lots of free energy technologies that we might get to have i we can choose compassion instead of warfare and show we can use them wisely.
I think the agendas simply want to control, so they are hoping to bankrupt the system in such a way that they can easily herd us into digital currency that THEY control. We won't do that.
Vanguard etc heavily invested in bitcoin, interestingly. WEF actively talking about switching to digital the world over.
It's a consciousness game ultimately about upleveling ours and reclaiming our divinity, our sovereignty and our sense of connection with one another in unity that is based on love and inteconnectivity of human hearts rather than coercion and digital credits etc. ESGs are the new thing. You know who has the highest ESG score? Microsoft.
Replacement of oil by alternative sources
While oil has many other important uses (lubrication, plastics, roadways, roofing) this section considers only its use as an energy source. The CMO is a powerful means of understanding the difficulty of replacing oil energy by other sources. SRI International chemist Ripudaman Malhotra, working with Crane and colleague Ed Kinderman, used it to describe the looming energy crisis in sobering terms.[13] Malhotra illustrates the problem of producing one CMO energy that we currently derive from oil each year from five different alternative sources. Installing capacity to produce 1 CMO per year requires long and significant development.
Allowing fifty years to develop the requisite capacity, 1 CMO of energy per year could be produced by any one of these developments:
4 Three Gorges Dams,[14] developed each year for 50 years, or
52 nuclear power plants,[15] developed each year for 50 years, or
104 coal-fired power plants,[16] developed each year for 50 years, or
32,850 wind turbines,[17][18] developed each year for 50 years, or
91,250,000 rooftop solar photovoltaic panels[19] developed each year for 50 years
The world consumes approximately 3 CMO annually from all sources. The table [10] shows the small contribution from alternative energies in 2006.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubic_mile_of_oil
“To provide most of our power through renewables would take hundreds of times the amount of rare earth metals that we are mining today,” according to Thomas Graedel at the Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies. So renewable energy resources like windmills and solar PV can not ever replace fossil fuels, there’s not enough of many essential minerals to scale this technology up. http://energyskeptic.com/2014/high-tech-cannot-last-rare-earth-metals/
Renewable energy 'simply won't work': Top Google engineers
Two highly qualified Google engineers who have spent years studying and trying to improve renewable energy technology have stated quite bluntly that whatever the future holds, it is not a renewables-powered civilisation: such a thing is impossible.
Both men are Stanford PhDs, Ross Koningstein having trained in aerospace engineering and David Fork in applied physics. These aren't guys who fiddle about with websites or data analytics or "technology" of that sort: they are real engineers who understand difficult maths and physics, and top-bracket even among that distinguished company.
Even if one were to electrify all of transport, industry, heating and so on, so much renewable generation and balancing/storage equipment would be needed to power it that astronomical new requirements for steel, concrete, copper, glass, carbon fibre, neodymium, shipping and haulage etc etc would appear.
All these things are made using mammoth amounts of energy: far from achieving massive energy savings, which most plans for a renewables future rely on implicitly, we would wind up needing far more energy, which would mean even more vast renewables farms – and even more materials and energy to make and maintain them and so on. The scale of the building would be like nothing ever attempted by the human race.
In reality, well before any such stage was reached, energy would become horrifyingly expensive – which means that everything would become horrifyingly expensive (even the present well-under-one-per-cent renewables level in the UK has pushed up utility bills very considerably).
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/11/21/renewable_energy_simply_wont_work_google_renewables_engineers/
http://techcrunch.com/2011/11/23/google-gives-up-on-green-tech-investment-initiative-rec/
I respect your opinion, I just don't agree. You are quoting google and Ivy leagues. These o me are not the right sources to be looking at if you're looking for the optimism those who fund and control both don't want you to see.
Oh but I thought the MSM narrative paints a splendid future of EVS and sparkling clean energy from solar panels.
You'll never see either of the above in any MSM source - in fact you'll struggle to find them anywhere.
Cuz the PTB do not want the Sheeple to get wind of the fact that oil is past peak - and there ain't no transition to renewables.
Renewables is a head fake from the PTB - to make people believe that there is a future.
And now we are seeing what the PTB are doing about the fact that there is no future - they are exterminating us - before the power goes off and 8B are left without food -- before they start to rip faces off and eat each other.
Actually what I have posted is not an opinion - these are facts.
Feel free to demonstrate they are incorrect.
If you were interested, you could look up hidden patents national security. I have no need to argue. Traditional solar won't cut it, I agree. And it's owned by the same who own all the stuff that is "out there." Peace and wellbeing to you and to all.
Digital IDs, digital money, "health" passports, transhumanism and connecting humans to computer networks... all use so-called vaccination as trojan horse.
That's why they're not stopping.
How many shots does it take to make a trans human?
And don't you think Klaus Snob looks at a Hollywood villain? Hmmm... maybe that stuff is all deflection from the real reason i.e. we are being put down.
Best to be put down before the lights go out and 8B voracious humans have no food ... we would do unthinkable things to each other.
Of course this is why every country on the planet is injecting - it's not a great outcome -- but it's better than Ripping Faces off (+ rape and cannibalism)
According to Rystad, the current resource replacement ratio for conventional resources is only 16 percent. Only 1 barrel out of every 6 consumed is being replaced with new resources
https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/The-Biggest-Oil-Gas-Discoveries-Of-2019.html
Shale binge has spoiled US reserves, top investor warns Financial Times.
Preface. Conventional crude oil production may have already peaked in 2008 at 69.5 million barrels per day (mb/d) according to Europe’s International Energy Agency (IEA 2018 p45). The U.S. Energy Information Agency shows global peak crude oil production at a later date in 2018 at 82.9 mb/d (EIA 2020) because they included tight oil, oil sands, and deep-sea oil. Though it will take several years of lower oil production to be sure the peak occurred. Regardless, world production has been on a plateau since 2005.
What’s saved the world from oil decline was unconventional tight “fracked” oil, which accounted for 63% of total U.S. crude oil production in 2019 and 83% of global oil growth from 2009 to 2019. So it’s a big deal if we’ve reached the peak of fracked oil, because that is also the peak of both conventional and unconventional oil and the decline of all oil in the future.
Some key points from this Financial Times article: https://energyskeptic.com/2021/the-end-of-fracked-shale-oil/
Shale boss says US has passed peak oil | Financial Times https://www.ft.com/content/320d09cb-8f51-4103-87d7-0dd164e1fd25
Our fossil fuel energy predicament, including why the correct story is rarely told https://ourfiniteworld.com/2021/11/10/our-fossil-fuel-energy-predicament-including-why-the-correct-story-is-rarely-told/
I feel there's an urgency behind the plandemic. Peak oil is certainly one of the biggest reasons behind it, though it may not be the only one.
However, transhumanism is one of the stated goals of the psychopaths in charge and there's no reason why the injections can't be about both population reduction and genetic experimentation.
Cull many, enslave the rest.
I struggle with the transhuman thing ... don't see the point... don't see how it's possible.
And when I see Klaus Snob in his various villain get-ups... I smell a fish...
A-Z was not available in the US, so I don't know much about it, but that one is not a CDC/FDA special. I do recall very vividly the "mix n match" devil may care attitude about changing up shots for "broader protection." I , too, found that suggestion even more alarming than the shots themselves, but it makes sense that this was in response to shortages or lack of choices available. In spite of the govt purchase agreements, it seems wiser to send the excess shots into space than to continue disposing of this poison in people's arms. We're looking at serious societal threats due to the illness, death and infertility in our future. Alarming.
"What is interesting from this study is that it seems, in many cases, the largest risk comes from having a first shot of Pfizer and then a second of Moderna.
Remember when politicians and ‘scientists’ were saying it’s fine to mix jabs, in fact it might even be better for you. I do, very well. I questioned it at the time, saying surely there should be some larger trials looking at whether this is actually safe. But no, in this time of anti-science, the more mRNA and as many different types the better."
On its face the claims of media talking heads were alarming but it fits the American regulatory model where safety is assumed and harm needs to be proved in a court of law. It has actually been a battle the Gates crowd have fought on behalf of gmo "foods" where EU regulators use the quaint idea of Precautionary Principle rather than defer to profiteers claims.
At the time I thought the reason for giving mixed supplier doses might have been to make it harder for people to take up criminal cases as they would not be able to say which product had caused the adverse effects.
My view is currently unchanged.
Exactly, seemed obvious. Then again, given the EU contracts with the manufacturers giving them immunity that actually works, legal, that is, ... they wouldn't need it. Perhaps extra insurance, just for some unanticipated way that some liability might still be there.
Yeah, what's even saner than experimenting with yourself? Why, multiplying the unknowns with more experiments, of course!
When they said that, I thought for a while: "Ok, now all these very smart colleagues will certainly start becoming skeptical that nothing fishy is going on, right.... right?" - wrong... *sigh*
In Hungary starting in August of 2021 it was actually soft mandated to take different vaccines! To have the same as the 3rd as the first two was actually the exception!
In fact, a young girl (27 I think) a friend of my son, has been ill since last December with these problems. (she's still an outpatient and they have no idea how to treat her 😔) So it does affect females too. I'm so sorry, and so very angry too, at all the absolute lies they have spun. As for the mixing, I just could not believe they were going ahead with it, with seemingly NO IDEA of the long term effects. I'm no way educated in medicine but this just seems to be utter madness.
Yet incredibly Moderna then Pfizer is the lowest rate (other than not taking the experiment). Vinay Prasad did best summary I've seen back in December 21:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzVoS-1TIWI&t=105s
Luckily death rates have plummeted alongside rollouts ceasing.. just need to ensure enough people resist 4 and 5.
I still can’t wrap my head around anyone w/ a brain taking #1, #2 or #3; anyone dumb enough to go for #4 or #5 & beyond deserves the Darwin award
That's what I say. The people who choose shot after shot are really not the unshotted's concern anymore. The unshotted will survive whatever is coming down the pike with uncompromised immune systems. The shotted - maybe, maybe not. But it is time the world stops focusing on these poison shots. So family and people you know got shotted. Will they die? Of course, we all will die.
This poison is more than useless, it should be pulled from the market, all fascist mandates ended. Period. That's it.
Except they won’t be, because the poison & what it is doing to people is the point
Unfortunately & frighteningly, I think the “why” is obvious if one believes the depopulation theory, & I do. The mass anti-science & safety hysteria by elites & “world leaders” to literally jab every person on the planet with no concern for bad short or long term séquelae leaves no doubt in my mind.
I can't find a better explanation for why they are hell-bent on making it mandatory. Knowing that the crappy (from our perspective) design of the products makes repeated shots "necessary".
If people are trained to see it as normal that they are "on the needle" a couple times a year, and they have this mixing in some "hot", not even batches, but vials within batches, randomly spread, they basically can "dial in" the death numbers for each year, live-compensating like with a control algorithm to produce a certain slope of population decrease "as needed", keeping it moderate enough to not be obvious, but effective enough for their goals.
The idea of death lottery to "solve problems" is quite an old idea among "elites", I remember roughly.
-
ARGH. Now googling that term, it yields "Vaccine hesitant are in 'death lottery,'" (says some governor asshole).
Since those are the people who play the upside-down game all the time, the terminology might not be accidental - they're telling you what it is, but inverted.
It was no surprise in the UK they wont give you a booster of AZ even if you had it first time round, but only Pfizer boosters, simply because they had to acknowledge that AZ is particularly 'dangerous' in terms of side effects, especially clotting issues. But one other factor regarding mixing vaccine manufacturers ... it may be "pot luck" which one you receive, it has the added benefit (for Pfizer etc!) that in the event they eventually become liable for injuries, who do you blame? AZ will blame the Pfizer booster, Pfizer will blame Moderna boosters, and all will probably escape litigation saying "wait a minute, we never advised mixing them together, that was a government decision don't blame us".
Thank you for all your writings and efforts… the nightmare keeps getting worse.
The notion that anyone would consider it safe to mix and match these untested gene therapies any further in an untested toxic cocktail is peak absurdity surpassing even the astonishing idea of Joe Biden lecturing America on morality.
No gain of function spike protien 🖕PHIZSOFF🖕
On a positive note … Happy Earth Day!
This case is being heard in the Court of Appeal May 3rd https://openjusticecourtofprotection.org/2022/02/04/cross-examining-a-gp-in-a-covid-vaccination-hearing/
Some/many of these people actually had three versions of the spike protein introduced into their body: Pfizer, Moderna and the virus itself.
It’s unfortunate that it takes something like this to wake people up to the reality of the moment. Maybe, never again, might be possible after this insanity plays out.
Just out of curiosity: what the actual F happened to Astrazeneca???
In Germany, it's at least a recommendation, if not a must if wanting to be counted as vaxd, that you get one mRNA product as booster, no matter what else you got before, incl Novavax or what was it's name. It seems the others have been allowed to play along a little, but really, really, what everybody must get for some reason, is mRNA.
So this idea about mixing different products as recommended rather early on, maybe it is not about preventing liability by improvability what of those cause the damage.
Mixing products meant (when only mRNA and vector were there): you WILL get mRNA.
Now requiring mRNA means: You WILL get mRNA.
That means: the control group not just for some particular product, or virus spike protein, is to be eliminated.
The control group w.r.t. mRNA tech per se, is to be eliminated.
I wonder whether this might have anything to do with a lot of other mRNA products for other purposes of "treatment" being in the pipeline...
It's bad if this new tech turns out to be generally a bad idea, while this is supposedly to be the new way of doing things, eh? Because finding new products using old-fashioned pharma has become difficult, said some experts.
New nicely patentable tech which is so high tech that it will automatically leave a lot of smaller pharma competitors outside the door of where the new game is played = even more lucrative than regular pharma.
If it creates extra problems, I'm sure there will be new products to take care of those, too...
But no liability, as no-one not having received any mRNA will be there at some point. (unless THE PEOPLE rise up, ... incl the so far vaxd, getting it through their skull that stopping to get even more injections is also of value to them)
Actually what I wrote above in a different comment about soft mandate in Hungary was the same. If you haven't taken mRNA before it was basically your only option as booster or become unvaccinated... Something sinister going on.