12 Comments

I find it quite difficult to trust what Mark Lane says about the JFK assassination, James Earl Ray, the People's Temple or anything else.

Mark (Levin) Lane was very likely a CIA operative. How can he NOT be?

Mark Lane was involved in way too many major psy-op events for it to be mere coincidence, or an achievement based on his own merit:

(1) Lane wrote the book "Rush To Judgment" (1966) on the JFK Warren Commission, 😐

(2) Lane was attorney for MLK alleged assassin James Earl Ray (!?!?!), 🤔

(3) Lane was also attorney for Jim Jones/People's Temple, 😲

(4) Lane even visited "Jonestown" on the fateful night of November 18, 1978, 😲 😲

and

(5) (even more incredible still) Mark Lane managed to escape "Jonestown" with his life!!! 🤯🤯🤯

Must be 😇 a very lucky guy 😇, LOL. Wink, wink, 😉, 😉, 😈 😈

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Lane_(author)

Expand full comment

I feel so stupid now. This never occurred to me before. Thanks!

Expand full comment

Well don't feel so bad. I also did not know ... that so many dots -- not only about Mark Lane but sooo many other major figures and events, too -- were closely connected in such strange ways.

While we're on the topic of the People's Temple Agricultural Project, allow me to add one more thing:

Just 10 days after the "Jonestown massacre" on November 27, 1978, the Moscone Milk assassinations happened in San Francisco, with the "hidden hand" paving the way for the rise of Diane Feinstein who, prior to the assassinations of Moscone/Milk, couldn't even win an election to become Mayor of San Francisco on her own ... eventually becoming a U.S. Senator serving for decades on key committees, such as the Senate foreign intelligence & judiciary committees.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Moscone#Assassination

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dianne_Feinstein

The assassinations were a clean-up operation, because Jim Jones had been politically intertwined with Moscone/Milk for many years in San Francisco politics, and many other prominent San Fran & California politicians, with Jones possibly bringing in busloads of ineligible persons to vote for Moscone/Milk.

Expand full comment

Thanks again! I've been writing about Paul McCartney and his association with Lane after he met him in London, and what happened to him shortly after, possibly as a direct result. That's why I'm so annoyed that I never thought of this possibility before. Why on earth wouldn't Lane be ops? Hardly anyone wasn't! I'm going to have to revisit that chapter now. I'll credit you!

Expand full comment

I just now listened to the song "Imitation Song" by Neil Innes. So, thank YOU!

Expand full comment

Brilliant, isn't it? "Showing me their eyes and teeth, as if I didn't know!" I got the Paul references at the time but I didn't get how relevant the entire thing would soon be... it's just how the world is now.

We saw them play shortly before Neil passed. They were amazing.

Expand full comment

Are you writing a book about Paul 1.0 and the replacement Faul/Paul 2.0?

I'm a bit sketchy on the details of the alleged meeting of biological Paul 1.0 with Mark Lane. Did that meeting actually happen? I don't know much about their association, to be honest.

Expand full comment

I am, yes - I've been at it for ten years now, on and off. I'd like to finish it for Christmas! They met in London when Lane was over here to do a BBC show - I got to know someone who was at the party where they met. Paul was very excited about JFK and really wanted to get involved with Lane's documentary. Jonestown bothered him too - he was way too interested in things like that...

Expand full comment

"Well he couldn't have done it, could he? (Also please let me write the music for the film...)"

Expand full comment

If this is true, it would be astonishing that they have, after all this time, 60 years, and to date, essentially got away with it. Can you imagine organizing this assassination? An Official motorcade, full public view, Dealey Plaza, midday, so absolutely brazen. If they pulled this off, then this would have to be the perfect crime.

I mean, 60 years on and still no definitive, iron-clad proof of who did it, apart from Oswald of course. So, are they, these nefarious, black-ops characters really that good? Nothing went wrong on the day? No surprises? Nothing unexpected to derail their crime? Everything worked for as planned?

Expand full comment

9/11 was an even bigger psyop, and then the pandemic, and many others. Just like Epstein was killed because he knew too much and he could talk, so was JFK. Deadman tell no tales.

Expand full comment

Thanks Patrick, and I think it is perfectly reasonable for people to assume a wider conspiracy with JFK's assassination, as according to polls the majority of people do. I just have a few lingering doubts that whoever the conspirators were/are could pull it off as it was done. But happy to admit that I may be wrong.

Expand full comment