The more you jab.. the more the virus mutates.. the less natural immunity you possess.. the problem grows beyond herd immunity.
The fact that a professor fails to grasp this concept is extremely worrying.
We are seeing huge increase in numbers with health problems because this idea to try an outwit a ever changing virus with a vaccine that is always playing catch-up fails time after time.
Go back to known therapeutics build stronger immune systems with vitamin D .. this will reduce mutation and lower mortality... we have known this for decades.. somehow this professor missed that lesson completely.
The simplest explanation: the more you jab, the more you overload people with toxic substances and the sicker they become. No constantly-mutating entity required. The whole of this 'science' is based on an unproven assumption and is patently full of holes and inconsistencies - aka, twisting oneself into a pretzel.
Sure... switching off things like CD cells and bombarding the body with fragments of dna and strange proteins is a disastrous concept.
Nothing about mRNA technology seems safe nor intelligent... but it’s also making any virus or pathogen grow without responses from natural immune pathways.. because they are disabled by design... the world needs to stop letting the experts control what God gave us.
Whether these people fail to grasp the impact of their 'vaccines' on natural and herd immunity or whether they're incentivised to create ever more elaborate obfuscations to hoodwink the general public, you're correct; it's extremely worrying.
no convid jab for me. i took vitamin D from late 2020 onwards - had never bothered beforehand. and some other recommended 'supplements'. i was more often sick during the time i took these things than before. earlier this year i decided to not restock and gradually used up and completely ran out during the summer. i also cut out all grains, carbs, sugar and most veg from my diet. not been ill. plenty of illness arlund it seems, but not for me so far.
supplements are just another con, an extension of big pharma and made from artificial ingredients in factories. when you see the light, you never look back. do the opposite of everything that we are told to do by the establishment and you'll be much better off.
Keto diet it sounds like. I am currently reading optimal nutrition by jan kwasniewski, a polish doctor. Dates from the late 80s/90s. Very interesting thoughts on food. Makes much sense to me. Although i do eat vit d and some others, especially in our sunless winters.
This is a great example of how they have to pile lies on top of the lies they've already told and will have to keep on telling unless or until the whole house of cards is finally toppled. As many pointed out at the time, the universal (across the entire scientific and medical establishment) lack of an unvaccinated control group is one of the real give aways that this was an orchestrated sham from the outset.
I think i've heard it the most from Vinay Prasad - in analyzing clinical trials - doesnt the bias run the other way?
I believe I have more consistently heard Vinay and others refer to a healthy vacinee bias - meaning in observational studies - it is hard to control for confounders because those who opt to get the vaccine tend to be more proactive about health and generally are in better health than their unjabbed counterparts.
strange how that thinking goes out the window when researchers grasp at reasons the uncovid jabbed fair better with bouts of covid.
absolutely no mention of Geert van dan Bosshes IgG4 risk which he among others have highlighted
Number crunching always works when you cook books... until someone in power puts a fraud investigation into play... any adjusting leaves electronic breadcrumbs... makes it easy to prosecute.
"Setting aside the mathematical modelling factor, which more often than not is less accurate than reading tea leaves, I’m sure you have already spotted the biggest error..."
Enron accounting is a highly prized job skill not an error! *smirk*
I'm a klutz with social media -- I made a couple of comments after Glastonbury, but they were accidentally relegated a foot or so down from the original thread.
"Old news"? I call such things "historical artifacts", like clay tablets. The origin of the Glastonbury Thorn, and study of its genetic origins are also old news -- one blurb maybe ten years old, and the other a couple of thousand. Old news, indeed -- trying to piece together a cool story, I might refer to as studying history.
I write comments as I speak in real life. It's best to try to remember that when reading them. Those intonations and inflections, you can hear 'em if you try...
Maybe by picking up a hint of enthusiasm -- an effort to convey or to discern through this digital mask.
You may recall the discipline of Demosthenes, to overcome his speech impediment, he would shout his public addresses the pounding surf, all the while holding pebbles in his mouth.
I write slowly. And read very slowly. In conversation, ask anyone: just mindless prattle.
Have you ever encountered English verse worth committing to memory?
What inquiry now? The court magicians have turned straw into gold -- after that, to deceive the whole world is . . . haberdashery.
For a rabbit hole to Tolkein's ancestral landscape, you might look up the 2010 desecration of the "Glastonbury Thorn" (hawthorn). It discern from your posts that we're both Americans, so you might the tale as exotic as I have. That's not the first time the tree has been attacked.
I remember when every MSM talking head started suddenly and simultaneously talking about "vaccine hesitancy" as if that were already a known concept. Then that clone freak Walensky yammering about being "up to date," which obviously didn't catch fire, so now they've moved on to psyop nudge a group they think they can brainwash into putting more of this into their bodies, the "under-vaccinated". You know they've market tested that phrase somewhere. What else is "under"? What does that suggest to people who they still think might be convincable?
Swearing comes from the same center in the brain as alarm calls come from in the brains of vervet monkeys, and I saw a dramatized study actually proving that swearing keeps you warmer if you are out in the cold. So insert a string of expletives here. I've been getting better at using the most taboo ones since it is 20 below here with the wind chill lol.
The way this stuff gets reported in the mainstream is why there is absolutely no point in talking about any of it to the majority of the population!
The vast majority still believe the BBC tell the unbiased truth. Many people may well feel uncomfortable when thinking about all the dodgy jabs and wicked behaviour they indulged in in relation to elderly relatives being locked up, children being denied an education, screaming abuse at unmasked faces and so on, so it's nice and reassuring to read that The Science is still telling them it's all OK provided they keep taking those jabs.
The Lancet, again. Oh dear! There are no Covid vaccines; never have been. Nobody in the world has ever been vaccinated against Covid and highly unlikely before 2030 - that future has not happened yet. Millions have been injected with experimental genetic material. What could go wrong?
There are lots of these papers coming out at the moment which invariably claim that the COVID-19 vaccines saved many lives, and are accompanied by 'modelling' forecasts. But the most important section to look at is the 'Declaration of interests', and there much can be learned. Please see my latest post for another example of this: https://rowenaslope.substack.com/p/how-big-pharma-continues-to-corrupt
The more you jab.. the more the virus mutates.. the less natural immunity you possess.. the problem grows beyond herd immunity.
The fact that a professor fails to grasp this concept is extremely worrying.
We are seeing huge increase in numbers with health problems because this idea to try an outwit a ever changing virus with a vaccine that is always playing catch-up fails time after time.
Go back to known therapeutics build stronger immune systems with vitamin D .. this will reduce mutation and lower mortality... we have known this for decades.. somehow this professor missed that lesson completely.
The simplest explanation: the more you jab, the more you overload people with toxic substances and the sicker they become. No constantly-mutating entity required. The whole of this 'science' is based on an unproven assumption and is patently full of holes and inconsistencies - aka, twisting oneself into a pretzel.
Sure... switching off things like CD cells and bombarding the body with fragments of dna and strange proteins is a disastrous concept.
Nothing about mRNA technology seems safe nor intelligent... but it’s also making any virus or pathogen grow without responses from natural immune pathways.. because they are disabled by design... the world needs to stop letting the experts control what God gave us.
Clearly. But it's not just about mRNA 'vaccines.' Former 'normal' vaccines are also toxic, harmful, and based on flawed premises.
Whether these people fail to grasp the impact of their 'vaccines' on natural and herd immunity or whether they're incentivised to create ever more elaborate obfuscations to hoodwink the general public, you're correct; it's extremely worrying.
And add Quercetin, zinc, a multivitamin, activity, and you should be good. (Basically, what Dr. Zelenko prescribed when this madness started).
I've done it daily since April 2020, bo Covid, and still standing...
no convid jab for me. i took vitamin D from late 2020 onwards - had never bothered beforehand. and some other recommended 'supplements'. i was more often sick during the time i took these things than before. earlier this year i decided to not restock and gradually used up and completely ran out during the summer. i also cut out all grains, carbs, sugar and most veg from my diet. not been ill. plenty of illness arlund it seems, but not for me so far.
supplements are just another con, an extension of big pharma and made from artificial ingredients in factories. when you see the light, you never look back. do the opposite of everything that we are told to do by the establishment and you'll be much better off.
I'm unvaxxed as well.
To each his/her own.
No one will convince me to give up my pasta or Calabrese bread.
I do 95% of the cooking for my wife & I, as well as our 3 dogs. (Yes, I cook for them as well.)
We're all healthy.
And I 'm 70.
Keto diet it sounds like. I am currently reading optimal nutrition by jan kwasniewski, a polish doctor. Dates from the late 80s/90s. Very interesting thoughts on food. Makes much sense to me. Although i do eat vit d and some others, especially in our sunless winters.
Grrrrr!
Why do you need an estimate for something you can observe?
Because thinktanks only observe data from the “experts”... you do not need filtered feedback to see how bad this is turning out...
This is a great example of how they have to pile lies on top of the lies they've already told and will have to keep on telling unless or until the whole house of cards is finally toppled. As many pointed out at the time, the universal (across the entire scientific and medical establishment) lack of an unvaccinated control group is one of the real give aways that this was an orchestrated sham from the outset.
Well to be fair, the unvaccinated ARE healthier. Although they have the cause/effect backwards.
great comment.
I think i've heard it the most from Vinay Prasad - in analyzing clinical trials - doesnt the bias run the other way?
I believe I have more consistently heard Vinay and others refer to a healthy vacinee bias - meaning in observational studies - it is hard to control for confounders because those who opt to get the vaccine tend to be more proactive about health and generally are in better health than their unjabbed counterparts.
strange how that thinking goes out the window when researchers grasp at reasons the uncovid jabbed fair better with bouts of covid.
absolutely no mention of Geert van dan Bosshes IgG4 risk which he among others have highlighted
These "experts" get it. They know what's going on, hence the need to alter the data. They have an agenda to protect, after all. And so, liars lie.
Number crunching always works when you cook books... until someone in power puts a fraud investigation into play... any adjusting leaves electronic breadcrumbs... makes it easy to prosecute.
"Setting aside the mathematical modelling factor, which more often than not is less accurate than reading tea leaves, I’m sure you have already spotted the biggest error..."
Enron accounting is a highly prized job skill not an error! *smirk*
Modelling is glamorous; but it's more than a pretty fact or figure -- it's all about confidence and poise.
Well, surely this is how "the science" works as contrasted with actual scientific inquiry.
I'm a klutz with social media -- I made a couple of comments after Glastonbury, but they were accidentally relegated a foot or so down from the original thread.
"Old news"? I call such things "historical artifacts", like clay tablets. The origin of the Glastonbury Thorn, and study of its genetic origins are also old news -- one blurb maybe ten years old, and the other a couple of thousand. Old news, indeed -- trying to piece together a cool story, I might refer to as studying history.
I write comments as I speak in real life. It's best to try to remember that when reading them. Those intonations and inflections, you can hear 'em if you try...
What?
Think about it. How many ways can you say "old news" and what can you convey each way?
Maybe by picking up a hint of enthusiasm -- an effort to convey or to discern through this digital mask.
You may recall the discipline of Demosthenes, to overcome his speech impediment, he would shout his public addresses the pounding surf, all the while holding pebbles in his mouth.
I write slowly. And read very slowly. In conversation, ask anyone: just mindless prattle.
Have you ever encountered English verse worth committing to memory?
"Musee des Beaux Arts" by Auden.
What inquiry now? The court magicians have turned straw into gold -- after that, to deceive the whole world is . . . haberdashery.
For a rabbit hole to Tolkein's ancestral landscape, you might look up the 2010 desecration of the "Glastonbury Thorn" (hawthorn). It discern from your posts that we're both Americans, so you might the tale as exotic as I have. That's not the first time the tree has been attacked.
"...actual scientific inquiry" as a general principle rather than any current action.
That tree is old news. Last year they cut down the Sycamore Gap tree. (I'm unmistakeably American but I read the Daily Mail Online daily.)
They will say and do anything to avoid accountability or face the embarrassment of being wrong. This is pathetic and better known as cowardice.
They did the exact same thing with death counts. If you died within fourteen days of shot you got coded as an unvaccinated death.
It was worse than that, they logged anyone not darted within the hospital they ended up in as undarted to bump the numbers up.
Thanks for that....I’d have missed that while glancing through.
I remember when every MSM talking head started suddenly and simultaneously talking about "vaccine hesitancy" as if that were already a known concept. Then that clone freak Walensky yammering about being "up to date," which obviously didn't catch fire, so now they've moved on to psyop nudge a group they think they can brainwash into putting more of this into their bodies, the "under-vaccinated". You know they've market tested that phrase somewhere. What else is "under"? What does that suggest to people who they still think might be convincable?
Swearing comes from the same center in the brain as alarm calls come from in the brains of vervet monkeys, and I saw a dramatized study actually proving that swearing keeps you warmer if you are out in the cold. So insert a string of expletives here. I've been getting better at using the most taboo ones since it is 20 below here with the wind chill lol.
The way this stuff gets reported in the mainstream is why there is absolutely no point in talking about any of it to the majority of the population!
The vast majority still believe the BBC tell the unbiased truth. Many people may well feel uncomfortable when thinking about all the dodgy jabs and wicked behaviour they indulged in in relation to elderly relatives being locked up, children being denied an education, screaming abuse at unmasked faces and so on, so it's nice and reassuring to read that The Science is still telling them it's all OK provided they keep taking those jabs.
great analysis, thanks for sharing!!
The Lancet, again. Oh dear! There are no Covid vaccines; never have been. Nobody in the world has ever been vaccinated against Covid and highly unlikely before 2030 - that future has not happened yet. Millions have been injected with experimental genetic material. What could go wrong?
"Strictly maximum dose deficit" -- I appreciate your reading to the end of the study to find & present that little dose-deficit of language.
There are lots of these papers coming out at the moment which invariably claim that the COVID-19 vaccines saved many lives, and are accompanied by 'modelling' forecasts. But the most important section to look at is the 'Declaration of interests', and there much can be learned. Please see my latest post for another example of this: https://rowenaslope.substack.com/p/how-big-pharma-continues-to-corrupt