The more you jab.. the more the virus mutates.. the less natural immunity you possess.. the problem grows beyond herd immunity.
The fact that a professor fails to grasp this concept is extremely worrying.
We are seeing huge increase in numbers with health problems because this idea to try an outwit a ever changing virus with a vaccine that is always playing catch-up fails time after time.
Go back to known therapeutics build stronger immune systems with vitamin D .. this will reduce mutation and lower mortality... we have known this for decades.. somehow this professor missed that lesson completely.
This is a great example of how they have to pile lies on top of the lies they've already told and will have to keep on telling unless or until the whole house of cards is finally toppled. As many pointed out at the time, the universal (across the entire scientific and medical establishment) lack of an unvaccinated control group is one of the real give aways that this was an orchestrated sham from the outset.
"Setting aside the mathematical modelling factor, which more often than not is less accurate than reading tea leaves, I’m sure you have already spotted the biggest error..."
Enron accounting is a highly prized job skill not an error! *smirk*
I remember when every MSM talking head started suddenly and simultaneously talking about "vaccine hesitancy" as if that were already a known concept. Then that clone freak Walensky yammering about being "up to date," which obviously didn't catch fire, so now they've moved on to psyop nudge a group they think they can brainwash into putting more of this into their bodies, the "under-vaccinated". You know they've market tested that phrase somewhere. What else is "under"? What does that suggest to people who they still think might be convincable?
Swearing comes from the same center in the brain as alarm calls come from in the brains of vervet monkeys, and I saw a dramatized study actually proving that swearing keeps you warmer if you are out in the cold. So insert a string of expletives here. I've been getting better at using the most taboo ones since it is 20 below here with the wind chill lol.
The way this stuff gets reported in the mainstream is why there is absolutely no point in talking about any of it to the majority of the population!
The vast majority still believe the BBC tell the unbiased truth. Many people may well feel uncomfortable when thinking about all the dodgy jabs and wicked behaviour they indulged in in relation to elderly relatives being locked up, children being denied an education, screaming abuse at unmasked faces and so on, so it's nice and reassuring to read that The Science is still telling them it's all OK provided they keep taking those jabs.
The Lancet, again. Oh dear! There are no Covid vaccines; never have been. Nobody in the world has ever been vaccinated against Covid and highly unlikely before 2030 - that future has not happened yet. Millions have been injected with experimental genetic material. What could go wrong?
There are lots of these papers coming out at the moment which invariably claim that the COVID-19 vaccines saved many lives, and are accompanied by 'modelling' forecasts. But the most important section to look at is the 'Declaration of interests', and there much can be learned. Please see my latest post for another example of this: https://rowenaslope.substack.com/p/how-big-pharma-continues-to-corrupt
The more you jab.. the more the virus mutates.. the less natural immunity you possess.. the problem grows beyond herd immunity.
The fact that a professor fails to grasp this concept is extremely worrying.
We are seeing huge increase in numbers with health problems because this idea to try an outwit a ever changing virus with a vaccine that is always playing catch-up fails time after time.
Go back to known therapeutics build stronger immune systems with vitamin D .. this will reduce mutation and lower mortality... we have known this for decades.. somehow this professor missed that lesson completely.
Grrrrr!
Why do you need an estimate for something you can observe?
This is a great example of how they have to pile lies on top of the lies they've already told and will have to keep on telling unless or until the whole house of cards is finally toppled. As many pointed out at the time, the universal (across the entire scientific and medical establishment) lack of an unvaccinated control group is one of the real give aways that this was an orchestrated sham from the outset.
Well to be fair, the unvaccinated ARE healthier. Although they have the cause/effect backwards.
These "experts" get it. They know what's going on, hence the need to alter the data. They have an agenda to protect, after all. And so, liars lie.
"Setting aside the mathematical modelling factor, which more often than not is less accurate than reading tea leaves, I’m sure you have already spotted the biggest error..."
Enron accounting is a highly prized job skill not an error! *smirk*
Well, surely this is how "the science" works as contrasted with actual scientific inquiry.
They will say and do anything to avoid accountability or face the embarrassment of being wrong. This is pathetic and better known as cowardice.
They did the exact same thing with death counts. If you died within fourteen days of shot you got coded as an unvaccinated death.
Thanks for that....I’d have missed that while glancing through.
I remember when every MSM talking head started suddenly and simultaneously talking about "vaccine hesitancy" as if that were already a known concept. Then that clone freak Walensky yammering about being "up to date," which obviously didn't catch fire, so now they've moved on to psyop nudge a group they think they can brainwash into putting more of this into their bodies, the "under-vaccinated". You know they've market tested that phrase somewhere. What else is "under"? What does that suggest to people who they still think might be convincable?
Swearing comes from the same center in the brain as alarm calls come from in the brains of vervet monkeys, and I saw a dramatized study actually proving that swearing keeps you warmer if you are out in the cold. So insert a string of expletives here. I've been getting better at using the most taboo ones since it is 20 below here with the wind chill lol.
The way this stuff gets reported in the mainstream is why there is absolutely no point in talking about any of it to the majority of the population!
The vast majority still believe the BBC tell the unbiased truth. Many people may well feel uncomfortable when thinking about all the dodgy jabs and wicked behaviour they indulged in in relation to elderly relatives being locked up, children being denied an education, screaming abuse at unmasked faces and so on, so it's nice and reassuring to read that The Science is still telling them it's all OK provided they keep taking those jabs.
great analysis, thanks for sharing!!
The Lancet, again. Oh dear! There are no Covid vaccines; never have been. Nobody in the world has ever been vaccinated against Covid and highly unlikely before 2030 - that future has not happened yet. Millions have been injected with experimental genetic material. What could go wrong?
"Strictly maximum dose deficit" -- I appreciate your reading to the end of the study to find & present that little dose-deficit of language.
There are lots of these papers coming out at the moment which invariably claim that the COVID-19 vaccines saved many lives, and are accompanied by 'modelling' forecasts. But the most important section to look at is the 'Declaration of interests', and there much can be learned. Please see my latest post for another example of this: https://rowenaslope.substack.com/p/how-big-pharma-continues-to-corrupt