Mar 24, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
I'm going to go out on that limb and say This isn't about solving a problem, it's about CONTROL. Just because the whole Covid scam is falling apart, it doesn't mean the ENTIRE fraud is going away.
Mar 24, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
While China, India the Middle East and Russia laugh their butts off. Nothing industrialized nations do will make the dent that a modest change would in India and China, the world's worst polluters. The US produces energy far cleaner, with far smaller environmemental impact than China, Russia and the Middle East. "Electric" is NOT renewable; strip mining to make batteries, which then leech when they're disposed of, is filthy, irreversible, and supports slavery. Meanwhile, we lose the productivity edge we do have, while driving our enemies into each others' arms. Brilliant.
Mar 24, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Just re-read the "10 Point Plan". In case I missed something. And I did. Nowhere in the plan did I see the clause that addresses the use of private jets, yachts, or chauffeured limousines.
Mar 24, 2022·edited Mar 24, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
>Reduce speed limits on highways by at least 10km/h;
My car uses more gas going 80km/h than 90km/h, which is the standard speed on most country roads here. How is that better?
>Make public transport cheaper; incentivise micro-mobility, walking and cycling;
I have 40km to the nearest major town (9 000) with any stores or markets.
>Car-free Sundays in large cities;
And the cost for enforcing this curfew is covered how?
>Work from home up to three days a week where possible;
Yes, that's going to be real easy for roofers, loggers and so on. This is class warfare, intended to herd what few people live rural into the Molok of the futurist's modern day Metropolis.
>Alternate private car use in large cities;
Ahhh, enviro-fascist communism! We tried it in the seventies, in communes. Didn't even work a week. Want to bet no-one returns such a car with anything left in the tank?
>Urge car sharing and practices that decrease fuel use;
See above.
>Promote efficient use of freight trucks and goods delivery;
Yes, and who pays freight fees? If I order a full load of construction materials, it's a $170 minimum fee. If I use our car and our trailer, I can instead spend that money on material and other stuff in town, making the merchants fatter and happier, and creating better ripple effects in our local economy.
>Hasten adoption of electric and more efficient vehicles;
So who's paying for a Tesla for me? Elon? Bueller? And can I drive it for eight hours in -25C, or on uneven bumpy roads in forested mountains? One crack in the battery casing and what happens?
>Avoid business travel when alternatives exist;
Will do as soon as NGO-reps, CEOs and politicians have done so consistently for at least five years running. Don't hold your breath.
>Prefer high-speed and night trains to planes where possible.
See above. Oh, and maybe use Amtrak to show how it's done. I'll wait.
As I always say to this kind of idiots: come live with us for a year, according to your proposed rules. I'll even throw in free matches for the heater, for when there's a power outage during snowstorms. Careful now, don't light that stove - think of your carbon footprint. Want to eat? The bike's over there, and the closest food is a meager 40km through the forest. Need to see a doctor? Well, the bus passes by down on the road twice daily, so you could bike to the bus stop. Just don't miss it on the return trip or you'll have to wait until morning for the next one.
And so on. Generally, with these Green Khmer's, they shut up when confronted with the stark reality that not everyone lives in their nations eq. of Manhattan.
Mar 24, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Yup, I'll consider that just as soon as THE DAVOS CROWD stop traveling to THEIR various meetings, sell off THEIR private jets, large and numerous houses, and fleets of vehicles. I'm just going to have to BELIEVE WHAT THEY DO - MORE THAN I BELIEVE WHAT THEY SAY!
Mar 24, 2022·edited Mar 24, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
I was a junior in high school living in Frankfurt, Germany in 1974 when they imposed a "no driving on Sunday" rule. I can't remember how long it lasted. To those who think electric vehicles are the only way to go, they are unaware of the true environmental impact of generating electricity -- along with the caveats of keeping up with demand. You only have to look to California to see what a much larger swath of the world will endure if the overlords manage to dictate an all-electric world.
Not too long ago, everyone was pushing natural gas vehicles. They burn clean fuel and there is an abundance of it in the United States. Still the shift to all-electric seems to be a "too-tempting- to-pass-up" opportunity to transfer enormous wealth by destroying the oil and gas energy sectors and putting money in the pockets of those determined to control us. Plus, they'll be sure to control the price with an iron fist. Without energy alternatives, the cost will be exhorbitant (aka unaffordable).
Mar 24, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
The IEA uses global warming as a cover to express their concerns about Peak Oil. The world peak RATE of oil production occurred in late 2018, i.e. over three years ago. The lockdowns of 2020 and 2021 reduced oil demand and kept the oil price low but as the global economy tries to open up it is finding that oil supply is restricted (because oil production RATE is now in a long-term, irreversible, geological reality-driven decline). So of course the IEA never wants its oil use reduction measures to end.
The global peak of oil production is the real game in town that nobody wants to own up to. Because it means that economic growth (i.e. real expansion of activity rather than just illusory increases in value due to money printing) is over, and developing nations will not be able to develop further. The end of growth message is terrifying to the elites because everyone intrinsically understands that, if the economy is not going to grow, then the only way one person can become wealthier/better off is at the expense of another persons impoverishment.
Look at this article (link below) about the IEA from 13 years ago. After this, the IEA began publishing oil projections where one of the scenarios was for the world taking measures to counter global warming. It turns out that that scenario was the one most likely to occur according to the academics predicting Peak Oil. Petroleum geologist Jean Laherrere's recent analysis shows that there is only sufficient ACCESSIBLE fossil fuel to permit the IPCC's RCP4.5 global warming scenario.
Mar 24, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
As a new driver during the 70s I can recount the Carter gas shortage/crisis. You could only get gas on odd or even days, that was determined by the last digit on your license plate. You sat in long lines to get the gas which imo was counter productive to trying to conserve gasoline. It was a hazard having so many vehicles blocking a traffic lane. I don't recall if there was a limit on how many gallons you could buy because I couldn't afford to fill my tank.
Today the vehicles are much more fuel efficient and actually do better at higher speeds. I don't know why they think slowing down will save fuel.
I'm going to go out on that limb and say This isn't about solving a problem, it's about CONTROL. Just because the whole Covid scam is falling apart, it doesn't mean the ENTIRE fraud is going away.
While China, India the Middle East and Russia laugh their butts off. Nothing industrialized nations do will make the dent that a modest change would in India and China, the world's worst polluters. The US produces energy far cleaner, with far smaller environmemental impact than China, Russia and the Middle East. "Electric" is NOT renewable; strip mining to make batteries, which then leech when they're disposed of, is filthy, irreversible, and supports slavery. Meanwhile, we lose the productivity edge we do have, while driving our enemies into each others' arms. Brilliant.
Just re-read the "10 Point Plan". In case I missed something. And I did. Nowhere in the plan did I see the clause that addresses the use of private jets, yachts, or chauffeured limousines.
Do I have to wear a mask?
>Reduce speed limits on highways by at least 10km/h;
My car uses more gas going 80km/h than 90km/h, which is the standard speed on most country roads here. How is that better?
>Make public transport cheaper; incentivise micro-mobility, walking and cycling;
I have 40km to the nearest major town (9 000) with any stores or markets.
>Car-free Sundays in large cities;
And the cost for enforcing this curfew is covered how?
>Work from home up to three days a week where possible;
Yes, that's going to be real easy for roofers, loggers and so on. This is class warfare, intended to herd what few people live rural into the Molok of the futurist's modern day Metropolis.
>Alternate private car use in large cities;
Ahhh, enviro-fascist communism! We tried it in the seventies, in communes. Didn't even work a week. Want to bet no-one returns such a car with anything left in the tank?
>Urge car sharing and practices that decrease fuel use;
See above.
>Promote efficient use of freight trucks and goods delivery;
Yes, and who pays freight fees? If I order a full load of construction materials, it's a $170 minimum fee. If I use our car and our trailer, I can instead spend that money on material and other stuff in town, making the merchants fatter and happier, and creating better ripple effects in our local economy.
>Hasten adoption of electric and more efficient vehicles;
So who's paying for a Tesla for me? Elon? Bueller? And can I drive it for eight hours in -25C, or on uneven bumpy roads in forested mountains? One crack in the battery casing and what happens?
>Avoid business travel when alternatives exist;
Will do as soon as NGO-reps, CEOs and politicians have done so consistently for at least five years running. Don't hold your breath.
>Prefer high-speed and night trains to planes where possible.
See above. Oh, and maybe use Amtrak to show how it's done. I'll wait.
As I always say to this kind of idiots: come live with us for a year, according to your proposed rules. I'll even throw in free matches for the heater, for when there's a power outage during snowstorms. Careful now, don't light that stove - think of your carbon footprint. Want to eat? The bike's over there, and the closest food is a meager 40km through the forest. Need to see a doctor? Well, the bus passes by down on the road twice daily, so you could bike to the bus stop. Just don't miss it on the return trip or you'll have to wait until morning for the next one.
And so on. Generally, with these Green Khmer's, they shut up when confronted with the stark reality that not everyone lives in their nations eq. of Manhattan.
Yup, I'll consider that just as soon as THE DAVOS CROWD stop traveling to THEIR various meetings, sell off THEIR private jets, large and numerous houses, and fleets of vehicles. I'm just going to have to BELIEVE WHAT THEY DO - MORE THAN I BELIEVE WHAT THEY SAY!
I was a junior in high school living in Frankfurt, Germany in 1974 when they imposed a "no driving on Sunday" rule. I can't remember how long it lasted. To those who think electric vehicles are the only way to go, they are unaware of the true environmental impact of generating electricity -- along with the caveats of keeping up with demand. You only have to look to California to see what a much larger swath of the world will endure if the overlords manage to dictate an all-electric world.
Not too long ago, everyone was pushing natural gas vehicles. They burn clean fuel and there is an abundance of it in the United States. Still the shift to all-electric seems to be a "too-tempting- to-pass-up" opportunity to transfer enormous wealth by destroying the oil and gas energy sectors and putting money in the pockets of those determined to control us. Plus, they'll be sure to control the price with an iron fist. Without energy alternatives, the cost will be exhorbitant (aka unaffordable).
Yeah,.............. not complying
Significant, isn’t it, how driving to church on Sundays is potentially verboten, but drive to work for money all week long is fine.
Reminds me how gathering for church for Easter 2020 was also verboten, yet gathering to drown one’s misery with drink was fine.
One more "nudge", that if we don't stop this in its tracks, becomes a SHOVE.
https://bherr.substack.com/p/this-is-only-a-beta-test?s=w
No.
The IEA uses global warming as a cover to express their concerns about Peak Oil. The world peak RATE of oil production occurred in late 2018, i.e. over three years ago. The lockdowns of 2020 and 2021 reduced oil demand and kept the oil price low but as the global economy tries to open up it is finding that oil supply is restricted (because oil production RATE is now in a long-term, irreversible, geological reality-driven decline). So of course the IEA never wants its oil use reduction measures to end.
The global peak of oil production is the real game in town that nobody wants to own up to. Because it means that economic growth (i.e. real expansion of activity rather than just illusory increases in value due to money printing) is over, and developing nations will not be able to develop further. The end of growth message is terrifying to the elites because everyone intrinsically understands that, if the economy is not going to grow, then the only way one person can become wealthier/better off is at the expense of another persons impoverishment.
Look at this article (link below) about the IEA from 13 years ago. After this, the IEA began publishing oil projections where one of the scenarios was for the world taking measures to counter global warming. It turns out that that scenario was the one most likely to occur according to the academics predicting Peak Oil. Petroleum geologist Jean Laherrere's recent analysis shows that there is only sufficient ACCESSIBLE fossil fuel to permit the IPCC's RCP4.5 global warming scenario.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2009/nov/09/peak-oil-international-energy-agency
As a new driver during the 70s I can recount the Carter gas shortage/crisis. You could only get gas on odd or even days, that was determined by the last digit on your license plate. You sat in long lines to get the gas which imo was counter productive to trying to conserve gasoline. It was a hazard having so many vehicles blocking a traffic lane. I don't recall if there was a limit on how many gallons you could buy because I couldn't afford to fill my tank.
Today the vehicles are much more fuel efficient and actually do better at higher speeds. I don't know why they think slowing down will save fuel.
How quaint - it was only last year that these characters released their report "Net Zero by 2050" - IEA.
This report contained the stunning analysis “no need for investment in
new fossil fuel supply in our net zero pathway”.
And still they are taken seriously ?
🤣 My brother just finished his custom Audi A5 convertible, bought for the weekends.
🤣🤣🤣
The Ukraine 'War' is all about providing cover for peak oil.
We will NEVER be told we are on the downslope - cuz that would cause panic.
Instead we invent a war (War Lite - Potemkin War) and blame that for the rationing.