Small cardiologist conference in Austria, the doctors have been keeping stats and estimated a one-in-six rate for damage to the male heart. Female damage was unknown because the tests we have come back negative, and they're not sure why. They estimate their counted rate to be lower than reality, because the majority of people will feel tired climbing up stairs and won't go to the doctor about it.
Also, the reporting method to get that info to PEI is frustrating and difficult. Doctors have been asking the helplines if it were designed to discourage them being able to report their patients' outcomes.
Symptoms such as 'tired / headache' can indicate brain damage but there is no way to diagnose fine-tuned molecular changes in the brain. Once a patient reaches heavy enough neurodegeneration, we can ask them to draw a clock. As science currently stands, we're pretty sure that one-time immunological or inflammatory incidents in the brain can become chronic neurodegenerative issues.
Jul 20, 2022·edited Jul 20, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Interestingly, none of these charts included COVID-19 as an adverse effect of the vaccine which, as I understand it, is actually the most common side effect, due to negative vaccine efficacy.
Imagine what this ratio would be if "breakthrough" cases and repeated infections were actually tracked as "adverse events"?
A Japanese cardiologist suspects some of the long covid cases are related to vaccine induced reactions. Also, one can test positive four months after being sick and tested positive for Covid. So the more people test, there's sure to be a surge in numbers, would it not?
However, many people who have long COVID have *never* been vaxxed.
More testing will obviously produce a surge in numbers. The problem is people who have been vaxxed are getting sick again and again after having (apparently) recovered. In fact, one nurse in the UK reported the turn-around time on these reinfections can now be as short as 28-days!
Jul 20, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Fewer people went back for a second helpings, and then the rate of boosters plummets. The death rate assuming underreporting and all the same people who rolled the dice on the first went back for seconds and thirds implies the probability for death from any one shot is hundreds of times greater in anyone under 65 who is relatively healthy than from infection with the sniffles "virus", if one even exists. The greatest scam ever perpetrated on humanity since "new" coke.
Jul 20, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Keep in mind that much of the data and communication coming from the perps is now aimed at plausible deniability. They are all engaged in a massive coverup while trying to protect themselves in the event of future litigation that becomes criminal and goes beyond institutions to individuals. That day is coming, it’s just a matter of when. It could be years away, or sooner. They are all thinking about how they would mount their defense, and about how they would demonstrate what they knew and didn’t know. Much of what we are hearing from them this year has this calculus baked in.
Meanwhile in Spain - 'Spanish friends received notification from Santander bank that he and his wife must supply their Jab Certificates before 1st August to continue their mortgage and obligatory mortgage protection insurance and their overdraft facility... As they are unjabbed this is impossible.....'
OMG THIS IS HORRIFYINGLY RIDICULOUS....Mortgage protection insurance is a racket anyway. They can just sign over their life insurance policies maybe? I am stunned and speechless right now.
Jul 20, 2022·edited Jul 20, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Yes, informed consent is key but to frame this as an "either or" choice is incorrect, isn't it? Since these gene-based products do not prevent infection, transmission or symptomatic disease it's not a question of choosing to risk an adverse event from the "vaccine" OR one from Covid-19. One risks an adverse event from BOTH if one chooses the injectables. Plus we have absolutely no data on long-term side effects for these jabs.
Of course. My comment was in response to these sentences: "Once these statistics have been presented to an individual, it should be up to them to decide whether vaccination is appropriate for them. They alone should decide whether they want to risk an adverse reaction from a vaccine or a serious outcome from Covid." One of the facts presented to individuals should be that these products are non-sterilizing...
THAT should be explained as well! You would run the risk not only of catching it, but possibly having a worse infection and possibly being more vulnerable to other infections. And possibly cancer.
Jul 20, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
What sorta, you know, baffled me was any medical professional not understanding the particular vulnerability of the placenta once clotting and hemorrhaging problems were recognized as potential side effects. I never thought myself to have any aptitude for science but maybe I had more than I imagined...
SCA ~ Your insightful comment reminds me of a great discussion between Bret Weinstein and Neil Oliver in Bath, England during (or soon after) the Better Way Conference.
Neil was making some self-deprecating comments about not having the science know-how of many of the medical professionals at the conference, and explained that he had just intuited something was very wrong with the aggressive, controlling narrative ~ at which point Bret explained that being cautious was actually quite scientific.
Then Bret went on to share a great gun analogy illustrating the difference between "unsafe" and "harmful".
I think you might like the flow of this whole discussion:
That whole episode is worthwhile--at one point Oliver utters the unforgettable line, (45:27), that at some point over the last two years, "I realized that the world I thought I knew had died." I talked about it a bit in a post I did about a contemporary rock song by Kevin Morby. https://pomocon.substack.com/p/carls-rock-songbook-no-129-kevin
Jul 20, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Do you live by a code? If you were a medical professional would you speak up? Have intellectual courage?
Not living by a code allowed for human travesties like Nazi Germany and Mao's China. Right now it is critical that we establish a code once again, and live by it.
Jul 21, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Your analysis states, “the takeaway from this report should be that whilst relatively rare, adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines do occur”.
I’d argue that 1:5000 jabs is far from ‘relatively rare’. Even for severe side effects, the number is bound to be under reported, and that’s per jab. If you’ve had 3 or 4, you could easily be at a cumulative risk if 1 in 1000, for a jab you most likely don’t need, and doesn’t work!
...upon rechecking the news, now I see a man has "blacked out" behind the wheel of his car and crashed into a supermarket. Tested negative for alcohol. Totally normal.
Jul 20, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
I have seen the VAERS comparisons between the COVID vaccines and any other vaccine. The comparisons in VAERS are highly unfavorable for the COVID vaccines. However, what about Germany or other places? I think it is important for context. Of course I do not actually believe these numbers anyway, but it can be useful to cite government statistics to blow up their own propaganda.
Jul 20, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Talk to Kirsch about the underreported number for VAERS, pretty sure the German system is equivalent. 0.2 in 1,000 is probably closer to 2 in 100, within the first year of the shots!!! Who knows what happens in the future?
If they admit that number. Imagine the actual one!
Small cardiologist conference in Austria, the doctors have been keeping stats and estimated a one-in-six rate for damage to the male heart. Female damage was unknown because the tests we have come back negative, and they're not sure why. They estimate their counted rate to be lower than reality, because the majority of people will feel tired climbing up stairs and won't go to the doctor about it.
Also, the reporting method to get that info to PEI is frustrating and difficult. Doctors have been asking the helplines if it were designed to discourage them being able to report their patients' outcomes.
Symptoms such as 'tired / headache' can indicate brain damage but there is no way to diagnose fine-tuned molecular changes in the brain. Once a patient reaches heavy enough neurodegeneration, we can ask them to draw a clock. As science currently stands, we're pretty sure that one-time immunological or inflammatory incidents in the brain can become chronic neurodegenerative issues.
Name
Bingo!
Interestingly, none of these charts included COVID-19 as an adverse effect of the vaccine which, as I understand it, is actually the most common side effect, due to negative vaccine efficacy.
Imagine what this ratio would be if "breakthrough" cases and repeated infections were actually tracked as "adverse events"?
Excellent point!
A really excellent point!! Smart Metta!!
Thank you both, Brien & Duchess! Your positive feedback is genuinely appreciated. :-)
Very important update:
> https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/german-ministry-of-health-one-in/comment/8047131
A Japanese cardiologist suspects some of the long covid cases are related to vaccine induced reactions. Also, one can test positive four months after being sick and tested positive for Covid. So the more people test, there's sure to be a surge in numbers, would it not?
There are certainly some similarities between long COVID and vaccine induced reactions, as I've indicated here:
> https://workflowy.com/s/beyond-covid-19/SoQPdY75WJteLUYx#/026b4e1bd888
However, many people who have long COVID have *never* been vaxxed.
More testing will obviously produce a surge in numbers. The problem is people who have been vaxxed are getting sick again and again after having (apparently) recovered. In fact, one nurse in the UK reported the turn-around time on these reinfections can now be as short as 28-days!
> https://youtu.be/wLyTAsoz6X0
Fewer people went back for a second helpings, and then the rate of boosters plummets. The death rate assuming underreporting and all the same people who rolled the dice on the first went back for seconds and thirds implies the probability for death from any one shot is hundreds of times greater in anyone under 65 who is relatively healthy than from infection with the sniffles "virus", if one even exists. The greatest scam ever perpetrated on humanity since "new" coke.
Hahhahaa
New Coke. Like Coke but new
SARS-CoV2. Like Influenza A and B but with new Nazi taste
Keep in mind that much of the data and communication coming from the perps is now aimed at plausible deniability. They are all engaged in a massive coverup while trying to protect themselves in the event of future litigation that becomes criminal and goes beyond institutions to individuals. That day is coming, it’s just a matter of when. It could be years away, or sooner. They are all thinking about how they would mount their defense, and about how they would demonstrate what they knew and didn’t know. Much of what we are hearing from them this year has this calculus baked in.
Meanwhile in Spain - 'Spanish friends received notification from Santander bank that he and his wife must supply their Jab Certificates before 1st August to continue their mortgage and obligatory mortgage protection insurance and their overdraft facility... As they are unjabbed this is impossible.....'
Do you have some evidence, this is extremely breaking news!
It was a comment left by a lady on a post about her friend. I found it extremely alarming.
I will keep an eye out for proof, this is alarming
I bet this is not true (from Spain)
Spain - where the head of their Pharmacy Industry FAKED his jab certificate . you couldn't make it up. They are beyond disgusting.
It’s happening everywhere, only these got caught.
Same here in Italy -actors/celebs etc who used fake jab cards. HHHm wonder why 😏
OMG THIS IS HORRIFYINGLY RIDICULOUS....Mortgage protection insurance is a racket anyway. They can just sign over their life insurance policies maybe? I am stunned and speechless right now.
Is that so? We live in Spain and have no news about it.
Just a comment left by the friend of the people in Spain. If true, it will come out eventually.
Wow, that is fucking mental. Though unfortunately unsurprising
Wow that’s pretty scary if true.
This is horrifyingly high....
Yes, informed consent is key but to frame this as an "either or" choice is incorrect, isn't it? Since these gene-based products do not prevent infection, transmission or symptomatic disease it's not a question of choosing to risk an adverse event from the "vaccine" OR one from Covid-19. One risks an adverse event from BOTH if one chooses the injectables. Plus we have absolutely no data on long-term side effects for these jabs.
All the facts need to be presented and then it should be a free choice whether to have it or not.
Of course. My comment was in response to these sentences: "Once these statistics have been presented to an individual, it should be up to them to decide whether vaccination is appropriate for them. They alone should decide whether they want to risk an adverse reaction from a vaccine or a serious outcome from Covid." One of the facts presented to individuals should be that these products are non-sterilizing...
THAT should be explained as well! You would run the risk not only of catching it, but possibly having a worse infection and possibly being more vulnerable to other infections. And possibly cancer.
Wait, remind me why am I taking this?!
What sorta, you know, baffled me was any medical professional not understanding the particular vulnerability of the placenta once clotting and hemorrhaging problems were recognized as potential side effects. I never thought myself to have any aptitude for science but maybe I had more than I imagined...
SCA ~ Your insightful comment reminds me of a great discussion between Bret Weinstein and Neil Oliver in Bath, England during (or soon after) the Better Way Conference.
Neil was making some self-deprecating comments about not having the science know-how of many of the medical professionals at the conference, and explained that he had just intuited something was very wrong with the aggressive, controlling narrative ~ at which point Bret explained that being cautious was actually quite scientific.
Then Bret went on to share a great gun analogy illustrating the difference between "unsafe" and "harmful".
I think you might like the flow of this whole discussion:
> https://workflowy.com/s/beyond-covid-19/SoQPdY75WJteLUYx#/v_eef865130cde_6d9c9666b198_02b0ca1b
That whole episode is worthwhile--at one point Oliver utters the unforgettable line, (45:27), that at some point over the last two years, "I realized that the world I thought I knew had died." I talked about it a bit in a post I did about a contemporary rock song by Kevin Morby. https://pomocon.substack.com/p/carls-rock-songbook-no-129-kevin
Thanks for sharing. Good insights.
Appreciate all of this comment.
Do you live by a code? If you were a medical professional would you speak up? Have intellectual courage?
Not living by a code allowed for human travesties like Nazi Germany and Mao's China. Right now it is critical that we establish a code once again, and live by it.
https://joshketry.substack.com/p/do-you-live-by-a-code?fbclid=IwAR31hwFLOceMWlXBNmogMrXN9NIHYeLWvB9mvZRk_bPCQElNwlZT9ogyMBw&fs=e&s=cl
Your analysis states, “the takeaway from this report should be that whilst relatively rare, adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines do occur”.
I’d argue that 1:5000 jabs is far from ‘relatively rare’. Even for severe side effects, the number is bound to be under reported, and that’s per jab. If you’ve had 3 or 4, you could easily be at a cumulative risk if 1 in 1000, for a jab you most likely don’t need, and doesn’t work!
The local news posts about at least one person per day "drowning" in pools and sea here in Mallorca, Spain. Never seen anything like this before.
...upon rechecking the news, now I see a man has "blacked out" behind the wheel of his car and crashed into a supermarket. Tested negative for alcohol. Totally normal.
Yes, indeed ~ There are lots of strange "medical episodes" that are dangerous to self and others!
> https://workflowy.com/s/beyond-covid-19/SoQPdY75WJteLUYx#/e44042eefb17
By any chance, Catmac, have a link to this news article? I'd like to add it into my library.
Later: Is this the crash to which you were referring?
> https://www.msn.com/en-in/video/news/on-cam-speeding-car-crashes-into-supermarket-in-chennai/vi-AATOXu5
https://www.ultimahora.es/sucesos/ultimas/2022/07/20/1760207/coche-estrella-contra-terraza-supermercado-alcudia.html
Excellent! Thank you so much for sharing.
Link has been added into my library here:
> https://workflowy.com/s/beyond-covid-19/SoQPdY75WJteLUYx#/e44042eefb17
Naked Emperor, you are keeping us grounded. What kind of clothes
can we get for you after the war is over? I'm kinda thinking you need a purple
cape with ermine trim after all of your hard work.
Thanks for posting this. Amazing admission!
ACHTUNG they deleted the tweet.
I have seen the VAERS comparisons between the COVID vaccines and any other vaccine. The comparisons in VAERS are highly unfavorable for the COVID vaccines. However, what about Germany or other places? I think it is important for context. Of course I do not actually believe these numbers anyway, but it can be useful to cite government statistics to blow up their own propaganda.
Sorry! Pharmaganda nor propaganda.
Talk to Kirsch about the underreported number for VAERS, pretty sure the German system is equivalent. 0.2 in 1,000 is probably closer to 2 in 100, within the first year of the shots!!! Who knows what happens in the future?
Yes ~ underreporting is hiding the fact that this a full-fledged humanitarian catastrophe
> https://workflowy.com/s/beyond-covid-19/SoQPdY75WJteLUYx#/e007ce5ee9ba