Jul 20, 2022·edited Jul 20, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Interestingly, none of these charts included COVID-19 as an adverse effect of the vaccine which, as I understand it, is actually the most common side effect, due to negative vaccine efficacy.
Imagine what this ratio would be if "breakthrough" cases and repeated infections were actually tracked as "adverse events"?
Jul 20, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Fewer people went back for a second helpings, and then the rate of boosters plummets. The death rate assuming underreporting and all the same people who rolled the dice on the first went back for seconds and thirds implies the probability for death from any one shot is hundreds of times greater in anyone under 65 who is relatively healthy than from infection with the sniffles "virus", if one even exists. The greatest scam ever perpetrated on humanity since "new" coke.
Jul 20, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Keep in mind that much of the data and communication coming from the perps is now aimed at plausible deniability. They are all engaged in a massive coverup while trying to protect themselves in the event of future litigation that becomes criminal and goes beyond institutions to individuals. That day is coming, it’s just a matter of when. It could be years away, or sooner. They are all thinking about how they would mount their defense, and about how they would demonstrate what they knew and didn’t know. Much of what we are hearing from them this year has this calculus baked in.
Meanwhile in Spain - 'Spanish friends received notification from Santander bank that he and his wife must supply their Jab Certificates before 1st August to continue their mortgage and obligatory mortgage protection insurance and their overdraft facility... As they are unjabbed this is impossible.....'
Jul 20, 2022·edited Jul 20, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Yes, informed consent is key but to frame this as an "either or" choice is incorrect, isn't it? Since these gene-based products do not prevent infection, transmission or symptomatic disease it's not a question of choosing to risk an adverse event from the "vaccine" OR one from Covid-19. One risks an adverse event from BOTH if one chooses the injectables. Plus we have absolutely no data on long-term side effects for these jabs.
Jul 20, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
What sorta, you know, baffled me was any medical professional not understanding the particular vulnerability of the placenta once clotting and hemorrhaging problems were recognized as potential side effects. I never thought myself to have any aptitude for science but maybe I had more than I imagined...
Jul 20, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Do you live by a code? If you were a medical professional would you speak up? Have intellectual courage?
Not living by a code allowed for human travesties like Nazi Germany and Mao's China. Right now it is critical that we establish a code once again, and live by it.
Jul 21, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Your analysis states, “the takeaway from this report should be that whilst relatively rare, adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines do occur”.
I’d argue that 1:5000 jabs is far from ‘relatively rare’. Even for severe side effects, the number is bound to be under reported, and that’s per jab. If you’ve had 3 or 4, you could easily be at a cumulative risk if 1 in 1000, for a jab you most likely don’t need, and doesn’t work!
Jul 20, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
I have seen the VAERS comparisons between the COVID vaccines and any other vaccine. The comparisons in VAERS are highly unfavorable for the COVID vaccines. However, what about Germany or other places? I think it is important for context. Of course I do not actually believe these numbers anyway, but it can be useful to cite government statistics to blow up their own propaganda.
Jul 20, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Talk to Kirsch about the underreported number for VAERS, pretty sure the German system is equivalent. 0.2 in 1,000 is probably closer to 2 in 100, within the first year of the shots!!! Who knows what happens in the future?
If they admit that number. Imagine the actual one!
Interestingly, none of these charts included COVID-19 as an adverse effect of the vaccine which, as I understand it, is actually the most common side effect, due to negative vaccine efficacy.
Imagine what this ratio would be if "breakthrough" cases and repeated infections were actually tracked as "adverse events"?
Fewer people went back for a second helpings, and then the rate of boosters plummets. The death rate assuming underreporting and all the same people who rolled the dice on the first went back for seconds and thirds implies the probability for death from any one shot is hundreds of times greater in anyone under 65 who is relatively healthy than from infection with the sniffles "virus", if one even exists. The greatest scam ever perpetrated on humanity since "new" coke.
Keep in mind that much of the data and communication coming from the perps is now aimed at plausible deniability. They are all engaged in a massive coverup while trying to protect themselves in the event of future litigation that becomes criminal and goes beyond institutions to individuals. That day is coming, it’s just a matter of when. It could be years away, or sooner. They are all thinking about how they would mount their defense, and about how they would demonstrate what they knew and didn’t know. Much of what we are hearing from them this year has this calculus baked in.
Meanwhile in Spain - 'Spanish friends received notification from Santander bank that he and his wife must supply their Jab Certificates before 1st August to continue their mortgage and obligatory mortgage protection insurance and their overdraft facility... As they are unjabbed this is impossible.....'
This is horrifyingly high....
Yes, informed consent is key but to frame this as an "either or" choice is incorrect, isn't it? Since these gene-based products do not prevent infection, transmission or symptomatic disease it's not a question of choosing to risk an adverse event from the "vaccine" OR one from Covid-19. One risks an adverse event from BOTH if one chooses the injectables. Plus we have absolutely no data on long-term side effects for these jabs.
What sorta, you know, baffled me was any medical professional not understanding the particular vulnerability of the placenta once clotting and hemorrhaging problems were recognized as potential side effects. I never thought myself to have any aptitude for science but maybe I had more than I imagined...
Do you live by a code? If you were a medical professional would you speak up? Have intellectual courage?
Not living by a code allowed for human travesties like Nazi Germany and Mao's China. Right now it is critical that we establish a code once again, and live by it.
https://joshketry.substack.com/p/do-you-live-by-a-code?fbclid=IwAR31hwFLOceMWlXBNmogMrXN9NIHYeLWvB9mvZRk_bPCQElNwlZT9ogyMBw&fs=e&s=cl
Your analysis states, “the takeaway from this report should be that whilst relatively rare, adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines do occur”.
I’d argue that 1:5000 jabs is far from ‘relatively rare’. Even for severe side effects, the number is bound to be under reported, and that’s per jab. If you’ve had 3 or 4, you could easily be at a cumulative risk if 1 in 1000, for a jab you most likely don’t need, and doesn’t work!
The local news posts about at least one person per day "drowning" in pools and sea here in Mallorca, Spain. Never seen anything like this before.
Naked Emperor, you are keeping us grounded. What kind of clothes
can we get for you after the war is over? I'm kinda thinking you need a purple
cape with ermine trim after all of your hard work.
Thanks for posting this. Amazing admission!
ACHTUNG they deleted the tweet.
I have seen the VAERS comparisons between the COVID vaccines and any other vaccine. The comparisons in VAERS are highly unfavorable for the COVID vaccines. However, what about Germany or other places? I think it is important for context. Of course I do not actually believe these numbers anyway, but it can be useful to cite government statistics to blow up their own propaganda.
Talk to Kirsch about the underreported number for VAERS, pretty sure the German system is equivalent. 0.2 in 1,000 is probably closer to 2 in 100, within the first year of the shots!!! Who knows what happens in the future?