Still waiting for the surviving victims to demand transparency and accountability.
The pharmaceutical manufacturers, government employees, and all the low level stooges (physicians, nurses, and pharmacists who administered the shots) have immunity so there will be no consequences.
You're probably right. The believers in these clowns and the fake medicines will probably continue to believe that healthy people who don't take the rat poison are the blame for them being sick and diseased, as they're being told by the WHO, and other liars who only promote toxic chemicals in their so-called fight against diseases. In reality their war is against good human health. That is for everyone except themselves.
You gotta love the MSMs one-directional assessment of scientific studies.
An RCT on Ivermectin which shows moderate potential benefit, suddenly journalists care about replication, P-values, the impact factor of the journal, sample sizes, etc.
But 2 hairdressers wearing cloth masks in Missouri who didn't spread Covid to the people who answered a survey call from the CDC? Science!
Exactly. All under the pretext of caring about somebody besides themselves living in good human health. And they still have people convinced that toxic chemicals can save then from physical suffering, diseases and even death itself. Glad I didn't have to experience sickness or a premature death to see the medical scams for what they truly are. I knew enough people who died before 2020 to start believing in the medical corruption this late in the day.
"Since when has ‘believe’ been a scientific way of analysing things? "
Since 1994 when FDA rubber stamped the Rockefeller-Gates population wide feeding study with genetically modified foods using Monsanto believes.
Much like the Covid mRNA genetic therapy it used legal loopholes to side-step testing by creating a novel category called "substantial equivalent" where similar elements are compared while differences are ignored. Close enough for government work!
FDA Biotechnology Consultation Memorandum of Conference BNF No. 000001
September 19, 1994
Wholesomeness Studies
Monsanto described the results of wholesomeness studies they carried out in rats, chickens, catfish, dairy cattle, and bobwhite quail. On the basis of their consideration of the totality of these studies, Monsanto has concluded that there is no significant difference in the wholesomeness of glyphosate-tolerant and traditional soybean varieties, as expected from their compositional analysis. These data are summarized on page 49 of Monsanto's September 2 submission.
Conclusions
Monsanto has concluded, in essence, that the glyphosate-tolerant soybean variety they have developed is not significantly altered within the meaning of 21 CFR 170.30(f)(2) when compared to soybean varieties with a history of safe use. At this time, based on Monsanto's description of its data and analysis, the agency considers Monsanto's consultation on this product to be complete.
Covid and its Doctrines is the new religion. If you are a believer facts are irrelevant. Furthermore, just as it is a sacrilege to question religiious beliefs, so is it a sacrilege to question injection and masking beliefs. Have you ever had the discussion with a Hindu about Christ being the son of the only God. If so, you will understand how the discussion will go with covid injection believers. It's just not worth the effort and the only thing that will happen is that you will exhaust yourself.
Quote: As a result, they won’t be taking any regulatory actions based on these signals, because they are still under investigation and require more robust study. So in the meantime, keep taking your boosters and we’ll let you know in maybe another two years that yes the blood clots in your lungs were from the vaccine. But we still BELIEVE your blood clots were better than your Covid infection, which you still got five times anyway - Amen.UNQUOTE.
Sarcastic and dammning. Best paragraph of the day.
They looked at non COVID mortality in vaccinated and unvaccinated people in the 10 health systems that VSD follows. The study period was December 14, 2020 to August 31, 2021, so very early on in the vaccination rollout. Their conclusion was no increased mortality in the vaccinated group. They even suggested lower mortality, but did admit the vaccinated were more likely to mask etc. The paper was submitted to the journal Vaccine in October 2022 and published late December 2022. VSD is supposed to give us real-time data on 10% of the population. Like this FDA study, there is nothing real-time about it.
Why did they end this study well over a year before submitting it for publication? The statistics are not complex and complicated to run.
Why not include up to August 2022? The excess mortality data some people are looking at begins rising epi weeks 28-30, which is the end of July 2021. So this study stopped before the reported excess mortality observation began.
As to the FDA surveillance study of Medicare beneficiaries this is claims made data study which is fraught with all kinds of inaccuracy including diagnostic coding. The study period was December 11, 2020 through Jan 15, 2022, so this data is a year old. The 4 signals were reviewed by "clinical subject matter experts" by looking at claims-based diagnoses and procedures for selected patients. How about getting medical records? We have mandated Electronic Health Records in this country. But unfortunately they don't talk to each other.
So much is utterly wrong about the way we collect, evaluate and report safety data.
This collection of safety studies that end at least a year before publication makes me think there is something brewing.
My friend died of lung clots in 2021 shortly after Vax was available to our age group. He was a tiger blood Charlie Sheen type and my friends blamed his lifestyle, but he was in good shape literally and metaphorically. They won't believe it was the jabs.
Yet Moderna is a larger dose... not sure I believe a study that says they found no signals for Moderna.
Was wondering the same.
Moderna started this project in2015. They knew just what 5hey were doing!
the project actually started in around 2001.....if not before.
I finally found out that FDA actually means Fuck Da Study….silly me
Okay, laughng out loud.
Still waiting for the surviving victims to demand transparency and accountability.
The pharmaceutical manufacturers, government employees, and all the low level stooges (physicians, nurses, and pharmacists who administered the shots) have immunity so there will be no consequences.
You're probably right. The believers in these clowns and the fake medicines will probably continue to believe that healthy people who don't take the rat poison are the blame for them being sick and diseased, as they're being told by the WHO, and other liars who only promote toxic chemicals in their so-called fight against diseases. In reality their war is against good human health. That is for everyone except themselves.
"I wonder which MSM outlets will report on the FDAs own study?"
Lets see....
https://plu.mx/plum/a/news?doi=10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.11.069&theme=plum-sciencedirect-theme&hideUsage=true
Fact Check! Fact Check! Fact Check! Fact Check!
FDA says it's good. Case closed.
https://today.rtl.lu/news/fact-check/a/2011492.html
Fact Check: False because it needs more study.
New study confirms same results.
Fact Check: False because new study needs more study.
To infinity.
You gotta love the MSMs one-directional assessment of scientific studies.
An RCT on Ivermectin which shows moderate potential benefit, suddenly journalists care about replication, P-values, the impact factor of the journal, sample sizes, etc.
But 2 hairdressers wearing cloth masks in Missouri who didn't spread Covid to the people who answered a survey call from the CDC? Science!
They simply didn't have Covid to spread. Simple. Call it science if you want, I call it everyday thinking.
The usual fact checking way:
"yes it's true they found a signal but this means nothing because we tell you so."
Brilliant
Please define robust... With almost 31mil observations.
Will it be robust when the safety signal is gone?
exactly!
Murdering psychopaths
Exactly. All under the pretext of caring about somebody besides themselves living in good human health. And they still have people convinced that toxic chemicals can save then from physical suffering, diseases and even death itself. Glad I didn't have to experience sickness or a premature death to see the medical scams for what they truly are. I knew enough people who died before 2020 to start believing in the medical corruption this late in the day.
Nothing is being done because the DOD has protection. Your own government is trying to murder you. Get it now????
TPTB are making big, big profit off you and your loved ones. Our entire government, ESPECIALLY CONGRESS is part of this!
This came out, with proof, from Katherine and Watt and Sasha Latypova.
THE CONSTITUTION IS NULL AND VOID. Only the HHS can stop this, and Beccera is part of this.
"Since when has ‘believe’ been a scientific way of analysing things? "
Since 1994 when FDA rubber stamped the Rockefeller-Gates population wide feeding study with genetically modified foods using Monsanto believes.
Much like the Covid mRNA genetic therapy it used legal loopholes to side-step testing by creating a novel category called "substantial equivalent" where similar elements are compared while differences are ignored. Close enough for government work!
FDA Biotechnology Consultation Memorandum of Conference BNF No. 000001
September 19, 1994
Wholesomeness Studies
Monsanto described the results of wholesomeness studies they carried out in rats, chickens, catfish, dairy cattle, and bobwhite quail. On the basis of their consideration of the totality of these studies, Monsanto has concluded that there is no significant difference in the wholesomeness of glyphosate-tolerant and traditional soybean varieties, as expected from their compositional analysis. These data are summarized on page 49 of Monsanto's September 2 submission.
Conclusions
Monsanto has concluded, in essence, that the glyphosate-tolerant soybean variety they have developed is not significantly altered within the meaning of 21 CFR 170.30(f)(2) when compared to soybean varieties with a history of safe use. At this time, based on Monsanto's description of its data and analysis, the agency considers Monsanto's consultation on this product to be complete.
F. Owen Fields, Ph.D.
https://web.archive.org/web/20101122021318/www.fda.gov/Food/Biotechnology/Submissions/ucm161130.htm
Covid and its Doctrines is the new religion. If you are a believer facts are irrelevant. Furthermore, just as it is a sacrilege to question religiious beliefs, so is it a sacrilege to question injection and masking beliefs. Have you ever had the discussion with a Hindu about Christ being the son of the only God. If so, you will understand how the discussion will go with covid injection believers. It's just not worth the effort and the only thing that will happen is that you will exhaust yourself.
Quote: As a result, they won’t be taking any regulatory actions based on these signals, because they are still under investigation and require more robust study. So in the meantime, keep taking your boosters and we’ll let you know in maybe another two years that yes the blood clots in your lungs were from the vaccine. But we still BELIEVE your blood clots were better than your Covid infection, which you still got five times anyway - Amen.UNQUOTE.
Sarcastic and dammning. Best paragraph of the day.
This is the second recent vaccine safety report from the Federal Vaccine Safety Surveillance System. Also published in Vaccine was a study the VSD did. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X22015614?via%3Dihub
They looked at non COVID mortality in vaccinated and unvaccinated people in the 10 health systems that VSD follows. The study period was December 14, 2020 to August 31, 2021, so very early on in the vaccination rollout. Their conclusion was no increased mortality in the vaccinated group. They even suggested lower mortality, but did admit the vaccinated were more likely to mask etc. The paper was submitted to the journal Vaccine in October 2022 and published late December 2022. VSD is supposed to give us real-time data on 10% of the population. Like this FDA study, there is nothing real-time about it.
Why did they end this study well over a year before submitting it for publication? The statistics are not complex and complicated to run.
Why not include up to August 2022? The excess mortality data some people are looking at begins rising epi weeks 28-30, which is the end of July 2021. So this study stopped before the reported excess mortality observation began.
As to the FDA surveillance study of Medicare beneficiaries this is claims made data study which is fraught with all kinds of inaccuracy including diagnostic coding. The study period was December 11, 2020 through Jan 15, 2022, so this data is a year old. The 4 signals were reviewed by "clinical subject matter experts" by looking at claims-based diagnoses and procedures for selected patients. How about getting medical records? We have mandated Electronic Health Records in this country. But unfortunately they don't talk to each other.
So much is utterly wrong about the way we collect, evaluate and report safety data.
This collection of safety studies that end at least a year before publication makes me think there is something brewing.
2022, you mean when the midterms ended? EVERYTHING IS CONNECTED. Soon they'll try another psyop, but this time we'll be able to recognize it.
My friend died of lung clots in 2021 shortly after Vax was available to our age group. He was a tiger blood Charlie Sheen type and my friends blamed his lifestyle, but he was in good shape literally and metaphorically. They won't believe it was the jabs.
I'm in no doubt this is true. The only remaining question is how many more have to suffer and even die before the poison is forever banned?
Gee I wonder if they believe in big foot too.
No MSM will tell the truth. It's much more lucartive to lie.