Jun 22, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
I think you need to re-word your survey.
I believe that the climate CHANGES (not that it is warming) and that it is entirely naturally caused and there is no need for panic - ever. Unless, as I also beleive, we are going into a cooling period (the SUNspot theory, by that Russian professor and John Casey. And if so, and we are running out of oil that is economically feasible to source, THEN we might want to move SOUTH.
I beleive more CO2 in the atsmosphere is good, but has no effect on the climate.
Yup. The term "fossil fuels" has everyone brainwashed. Oil is made through a geological process deep inside the earth. As it rises to the surface it picks up organic contaminants which is one of the reasons people think it has organic origins. It is a renewable resource and old wells have been found to be no longer "dry".
Just do the math. How preposterous is it to think that ALL of the oil that has been consumed to date came from a condensed collection of plants and dinosaurs to make that oil? Ridiculous!
The Russians have known all of this for a loooong time.
The Deep Hot Biosphere: The Myth Of Fossil Fuels by Thomas Gold and Freeman Dyson
My biggest concern that I should believe organic material sinks so deep below surface. I just doubt it as other organisms would consume the material way before it has time to sink.
The owners of the sand don't sit on top of oil that can be pumped but wish to benefit from their bountiful and accessible oil sands. Saves on drilling and pumping.
I can't Fast Eddy...although my sister sold some old oil wells three years ago that belonged to my father, even though they were supposedly dry....to some guys who were going to drill in them. She got about 800 for them. I thought it weird at the time, but then again thought maybe it was for the land.
I agree. I think the changes in temperature are normal and naturally caused so I voted for that in the survey. However, I also believe that the current response - we are all doomed blah blah is a total crock.
I have not seen any evidence of satellites influencing climate. Ever thought about how much energy you would need? The sun, on the other hand, can wipe out all satellites and electricity with one solar flare. The sun also influences the climate.
The things that produce huge amounts of energy are the only ones that can influence the weather. The weather contains lots of energy. That is why we can use wind, sun and rain-water for a lot of energy production. You need at least a comparable amount to influence the weather.
Jun 22, 2023·edited Jun 22, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
Thanks for giving the summary of ES theory. I started his essay on that a few times, but quickly felt imposter syndrome :-).
It's hard to take CAGW theory seriously, not just because of how the elites behave (e.g., buying beachfront properties), but because even if you accept all The Science, it's an impossible geo-political problem: the West could go completely carbon neutral tomorrow and it wouldn't even be measurable in the temperature in a 100 years *according to their own theory*. China and India are by far the main drivers of CO2 going forward. Unless your CAGW plan includes invading them and forcing them to shutdown industry, it's pointless.
It's also hard to take people seriously when they behave like Covidians: censor/other critics, ignore their own failed predictions, claim they're The Science, mobilize propaganda, etc., etc., etc. I'm starting to believe one of the most important questions we should ask our politicians, gov't scientists, experts, etc., is, "how will you know if you're wrong?". With covid and ACGW, they don't even accept the premise they could be wrong.
Jun 22, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
I agree re the wording. Climate change is real, some slight warming (and cooling obviously) is normal. We are in the middle of millennial changes that we'll never see the end of. The scam is the attempt to say it is man-made and that CO2 is bad. If the sill fecks want us all to be veggies we'll need a lot more CO2 to feed the plants. The Antarctic this is different, that is the warm-up for the next Alien vs Predator...
Jun 22, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
The exothermal dynamics is only one part. There's two other parts I'd like to highlight, though there are more that should be mentioned. First: The sun does fluctuate in power output, both in the short and long term. That would be right there with exothermal dynamics. Then there is the science of meteorology itself. I'm talking about the measuring equipment- the environmental changes around a station, for example- and the mathematics... it is evolving and changing; the models are interesting at best, usually designed for more grants and to manipulate/psyOps, and evil at worst; the scientists in the field, influenced by money, ego, and greed.
This the first comment that gets close to what is happening. Ben Davidson over at https://suspicious0bservers.org has been doing a lot of work on the effect of the Sun, the poles shifting, magnetic changes and shown historically that they flip every 12k years and we go through micronovas of a plasma sun.
Historically, during these periods the world goes crazy and change happens and then settles down (more or less) for another 12K. I look forward to another great cleansing and then we emerge from under ground and we try it again.
You know, I re-read the exothermic core theory....and I can beleive that maybe the core moves/rotates....because of the maps showing the heat coming all from the shale oil spots...and then I thought about the magnetic pole which has been wandering...and one of our layers in the core is iron???...and I think a pole shift might be coming. Maybe it is both the sun and the core.
I am not sure what happens with a pole shift...would the ice melt?
What I am really hoping is that there will be a Black Swan event that can dislodge this digital serfdom WEFER great reset plans....
Jun 22, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
Ignore these crackpot theories and go with the historical.
Sooner (likely) or later (less likely) it's going to get colder. Ice Age cold, and I'm not talking 43,000 years. more like 500 to 1500 years. By some measures it's already over due, by others right on time, but, it is coming and there is nothing anyone can do about it.
We are entering a solar minimum and some say this is the one, they may be right because the climate optimum was 8500 years ago.
Either way, historians in their ice age bunkers will be critical of the global warming nutters of this time.
Jun 22, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
I think it's a better hypothesis than those based on computer models that attempt to calculate and simulate every cubic km of the earth based on a bunch of assumptions.
I can't imagine in any world that is going to successfully predict anything going on here in a complex system.
Personally I’d like to know more about Younger Dryas impact theory. In the 1990’s we discovered that a cataclysmic impact event probably wiped out most of the dinosaurs. Within the last 20 years it’s become evident that the last major extinction event probably happened very quickly wiping out 25% of life on Earth, causing great global flooding, and raising ocean levels 400ft around 12,000 years ago. The timeline exactly corresponds to the timing of the constellations found within Gobekle Tepe AND Plato’s timing of when he claimed Atlantis was lost based on history passed down in ancient Egypt. If our understanding of the Earth’s geological history is even remotely in the ballpark of what’s actually happened to the Earth, well beyond the two events I mentioned, the real threat to humanity/ the climate/ life on Earth is a large Earth impact, or multiple impacts, and we are ignoring warnings from our past about the actual threats to life on Earth (granted we also have no clue if the next impact will be in 7 years, 7,000 years, 700,000 years).
Meanwhile ... the thing is ... you cannot cure inflation with higher interest rates... when the inflation is being caused by the depletion of affordable energy ...
With a dangerous wage-price spiral emerging, JP Morgan’s Karen Ward, who sits on Hunt’s economic advisory council, says the Bank has to “create a recession”. This has been implied for some time, with the Chancellor recently insisting he would support “whatever it takes” to reduce the pace of price rises. But the cat is now well and truly out of the bag.
The Treasury would no doubt argue that the whole point of raising interest rates is to make us all poorer, but there’s a stark difference between taking some of the heat out of the economy and throwing it into the deep freeze by impoverishing a generation of homeowners – or worse leaving them without a home at all.
It is yet another reminder of how woefully both the Bank and the Government have failed in their efforts to curb the menace of a 40-year high inflation rate, and it means another of Sunak’s key pledges – to grow the economy – may soon be dead and buried too.
The latest figures are arguably the most concerning yet because they show that inflation has gone from coming down more slowly than anticipated to not coming down at all, having remained at 8.7pc, the same rate as in April.
More worrying still, core inflation – which strips out food, energy, alcohol and tobacco – is actually heading in the wrong direction. It jumped from 6.8pc to 7.1pc month-on-month. Not only is that higher than expected, it’s a 31-year high.
The spike in services inflation from 6.9pc to 7.4pc is perhaps the most alarming of all because as Grant Fitzner, chief economist at the ONS, points out, it is probably being driven at least partly by rising wages, which suggests inflation is becoming embedded in the system.
After 18 months of trying to dampen the inflation inferno, and 12 interest rate rises later, these numbers will come as a terrible shock to the Bank and the Government. It means further interest rate rises are a certainty but it also raises the likelihood of an acceleration in monetary tightening, as well as rates staying higher for even longer.
This is global... and there is no way out of this ... cutting rates and chucking more $$$ onto the bonfire will result in near immediate hyperinflation (and collapse) ... that worked for the past 20 years but that game is over.
Increasing interest rates even further will not tame inflation ... it will at best hold back the raging hyperinflationary beast that is pound on the door. And higher rates cause all sorts of negative feedback loops -- the masses are loaded with ever higher interest payments on the staggering debt loads they are carrying ... this impacts auto sales... home sales... it impacts everything ... people have less $$$ to spend... which will at some point result in massive defaults and an extreme deflationary death spiral >>>> and collapse.
The Men Who Run the World are aware of this ... they understand that they are fast running out of options. They are aware of the imminent collapse of civilization.
Option One - continue to apply palliative measures until the global economy collapses and allow 8 billion very angry predators to pour onto the streets in the dark ... without food... and let them tear each other to pieces (see murder - rape - cannibalism)....
Jun 23, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
The fact is climate change has been a constant aspect of Earth's dynamic systems throughout its long history. Part of the problem is that as humans we only live 60-90 years, so our perspective is foreshortened. We have to think at least in hundreds of thousands if not millions of years, and from that perspective it has fluctuated wildly. And while I wouldn't exactly vote, "natural warming–panic," even the Little Ice Age during the medieval period did cause large crop failures, resulting in shortened lifespans and higher mortality. So yes, at times, climate change can be deadly. But what is the point in panicking?
The point: either these artifacts were dropped on a sheet of ice and further buried by failing snow, or there was no FREAKING ICE there and we went through a GLOBAL COOLING period that may or may not be coming back again.
It's that simple. Climate alarmists deserve only contempt.
Jun 23, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
I actually wanted to tick 2 of your survey options: that climate change is natural (just look at the historic data, duh, AND that it is a scam (not climate change (obvs) but the hysteria. And just like Covid 19, and the related pandemic, and the Woke ideology cancer the climate hysteria is entirely man made, where as the climate change itself is not. Oh the irony,,,
Let’s take just one factoid (not a real fact), that 97% of scientists agree with the climate crazies! It is more like 0.3%, a bit like the Covid vax is 95% effective when the clinical trials actually say it is 0.8% (Absolute Risk Reduction, which is the only metric that matters in the case of a vaccine and borne out by real real world data). And on that data point actual real climate scientists and meteorologists consistently fine no data to support he climate crazies models, funny that, bad models again eh!
If you want to explore this topic with real scientists and see beyond the veil of elites lies and nudge psychology then check out Tom Nelson’s eponymous pod cast on YouTube (amazingly not censored because of the heavyweight scientist he gives a platform to, some of the very top people in the world). Just listen to them and see their data and ask yourself why THEY would lie or seek to gaslight? Then ask the same question of the AOCs and Thunbergs and Gores and Gates,s of this world... Same people who manufactured Covid hysteria manufactured climate hysteria and promote awoke cancer.
I think you need to re-word your survey.
I believe that the climate CHANGES (not that it is warming) and that it is entirely naturally caused and there is no need for panic - ever. Unless, as I also beleive, we are going into a cooling period (the SUNspot theory, by that Russian professor and John Casey. And if so, and we are running out of oil that is economically feasible to source, THEN we might want to move SOUTH.
I beleive more CO2 in the atsmosphere is good, but has no effect on the climate.
i think oil is renewable and the earth makes it, if it wasnt we would have run out years a go.
Yup. The term "fossil fuels" has everyone brainwashed. Oil is made through a geological process deep inside the earth. As it rises to the surface it picks up organic contaminants which is one of the reasons people think it has organic origins. It is a renewable resource and old wells have been found to be no longer "dry".
Just do the math. How preposterous is it to think that ALL of the oil that has been consumed to date came from a condensed collection of plants and dinosaurs to make that oil? Ridiculous!
The Russians have known all of this for a loooong time.
The Deep Hot Biosphere: The Myth Of Fossil Fuels by Thomas Gold and Freeman Dyson
https://www.amazon.com/Deep-Hot-Biosphere-Fossil-Fuels/dp/0387952535/ref=sr_1_1?crid=1Y1KY875NEHMJ&keywords=deep+hot+biosphere&qid=1687544585&sprefix=the+deep+biospher%2Caps%2C580&sr=8-1
My biggest concern that I should believe organic material sinks so deep below surface. I just doubt it as other organisms would consume the material way before it has time to sink.
Any idea why we are steaming oil out of sand in Alberta if the earth is pumping out more easy to access stuff?
Can you point me to an annual report from an oil major that shows their fields are refilling?
oh yes they just put that in the report and let everyone know. thats how government and the rich behave, honestly.
heres a quick google search, nyt from 95 https://www.nytimes.com/1995/09/26/science/geochemist-says-oil-fieldsmay-be-refilled-naturally.html
Isn't that the same expert who said the Rat Juice was safe and effective?
NYT???
Maybe you could browse this document and find that part for me?
https://investor.exxonmobil.com/company-information/annual-reports-proxy
I am still wondering why we steam oil out of sand
The owners of the sand don't sit on top of oil that can be pumped but wish to benefit from their bountiful and accessible oil sands. Saves on drilling and pumping.
I can't Fast Eddy...although my sister sold some old oil wells three years ago that belonged to my father, even though they were supposedly dry....to some guys who were going to drill in them. She got about 800 for them. I thought it weird at the time, but then again thought maybe it was for the land.
Is it called the abiotic oil theory? I have heard of that...and I am praying it is true.
I agree. I think the changes in temperature are normal and naturally caused so I voted for that in the survey. However, I also believe that the current response - we are all doomed blah blah is a total crock.
Greenland was once a paradise :)
https://www.livescience.com/7331-ancient-greenland-green.html
Carbon is great for growing food -- periods of warming were wonderful for human populations ... periods of cooling not so good
What do you think of "Carbon Climate Change" scam?
They are changing the climate through satellites, balloons and ground stations:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/satattack
Also through DEW: https://www.brighteon.com/c23a45ee-8f5f-4a02-8972-30284d0d525e
Green communism sucked 200 trillion from taxpayers:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/best-scientific-sources-to-debunk
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/killing-me-softly-with-green-songs
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/carbon-reparations
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/climate-deaths
The full PLAN exposed:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-plan-revealed
16 laws we need to exit Prison Planet
Politics got us in, politics is the way out ... after prayers!
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/laws-to-exit-planet-prison
I have not seen any evidence of satellites influencing climate. Ever thought about how much energy you would need? The sun, on the other hand, can wipe out all satellites and electricity with one solar flare. The sun also influences the climate.
The things that produce huge amounts of energy are the only ones that can influence the weather. The weather contains lots of energy. That is why we can use wind, sun and rain-water for a lot of energy production. You need at least a comparable amount to influence the weather.
You don't need much energy to dissolve the clouds or create fires. Check the first 2 links
Completely agree.e
Thanks for giving the summary of ES theory. I started his essay on that a few times, but quickly felt imposter syndrome :-).
It's hard to take CAGW theory seriously, not just because of how the elites behave (e.g., buying beachfront properties), but because even if you accept all The Science, it's an impossible geo-political problem: the West could go completely carbon neutral tomorrow and it wouldn't even be measurable in the temperature in a 100 years *according to their own theory*. China and India are by far the main drivers of CO2 going forward. Unless your CAGW plan includes invading them and forcing them to shutdown industry, it's pointless.
It's also hard to take people seriously when they behave like Covidians: censor/other critics, ignore their own failed predictions, claim they're The Science, mobilize propaganda, etc., etc., etc. I'm starting to believe one of the most important questions we should ask our politicians, gov't scientists, experts, etc., is, "how will you know if you're wrong?". With covid and ACGW, they don't even accept the premise they could be wrong.
After the last several years it is clear that our “leaders” are capable of anything. Their depths have no bounds. I believe none of what they say.
I agree re the wording. Climate change is real, some slight warming (and cooling obviously) is normal. We are in the middle of millennial changes that we'll never see the end of. The scam is the attempt to say it is man-made and that CO2 is bad. If the sill fecks want us all to be veggies we'll need a lot more CO2 to feed the plants. The Antarctic this is different, that is the warm-up for the next Alien vs Predator...
The exothermal dynamics is only one part. There's two other parts I'd like to highlight, though there are more that should be mentioned. First: The sun does fluctuate in power output, both in the short and long term. That would be right there with exothermal dynamics. Then there is the science of meteorology itself. I'm talking about the measuring equipment- the environmental changes around a station, for example- and the mathematics... it is evolving and changing; the models are interesting at best, usually designed for more grants and to manipulate/psyOps, and evil at worst; the scientists in the field, influenced by money, ego, and greed.
i think this is linked to the switch of the poles, its long overdue
This the first comment that gets close to what is happening. Ben Davidson over at https://suspicious0bservers.org has been doing a lot of work on the effect of the Sun, the poles shifting, magnetic changes and shown historically that they flip every 12k years and we go through micronovas of a plasma sun.
Historically, during these periods the world goes crazy and change happens and then settles down (more or less) for another 12K. I look forward to another great cleansing and then we emerge from under ground and we try it again.
You know, I re-read the exothermic core theory....and I can beleive that maybe the core moves/rotates....because of the maps showing the heat coming all from the shale oil spots...and then I thought about the magnetic pole which has been wandering...and one of our layers in the core is iron???...and I think a pole shift might be coming. Maybe it is both the sun and the core.
I am not sure what happens with a pole shift...would the ice melt?
What I am really hoping is that there will be a Black Swan event that can dislodge this digital serfdom WEFER great reset plans....
it could kick the earths axis
it was tropical here in the UK a few million years a go so its likely moved before
we know Antarctica was ice free once, does that suggest pole shifting or earth axis moving
Ignore these crackpot theories and go with the historical.
Sooner (likely) or later (less likely) it's going to get colder. Ice Age cold, and I'm not talking 43,000 years. more like 500 to 1500 years. By some measures it's already over due, by others right on time, but, it is coming and there is nothing anyone can do about it.
We are entering a solar minimum and some say this is the one, they may be right because the climate optimum was 8500 years ago.
Either way, historians in their ice age bunkers will be critical of the global warming nutters of this time.
OK, that does it! I'm moving to Ecuador.
Using H2o.ai, you can build an AI model to predict temperature using a dataset from the Mauna Loa observatory. It's predictive accuracy is over 99%,
The model shows that CO2 is not a positive predictor of measured surface temperature.
When CO2 goes up - temperature goes down
When CO goes down - temperature goes up.
However, the intensity of the sun is a positive predictor of surface temperature.
awesome to know about. thanks!
I think it's a better hypothesis than those based on computer models that attempt to calculate and simulate every cubic km of the earth based on a bunch of assumptions.
I can't imagine in any world that is going to successfully predict anything going on here in a complex system.
Personally I’d like to know more about Younger Dryas impact theory. In the 1990’s we discovered that a cataclysmic impact event probably wiped out most of the dinosaurs. Within the last 20 years it’s become evident that the last major extinction event probably happened very quickly wiping out 25% of life on Earth, causing great global flooding, and raising ocean levels 400ft around 12,000 years ago. The timeline exactly corresponds to the timing of the constellations found within Gobekle Tepe AND Plato’s timing of when he claimed Atlantis was lost based on history passed down in ancient Egypt. If our understanding of the Earth’s geological history is even remotely in the ballpark of what’s actually happened to the Earth, well beyond the two events I mentioned, the real threat to humanity/ the climate/ life on Earth is a large Earth impact, or multiple impacts, and we are ignoring warnings from our past about the actual threats to life on Earth (granted we also have no clue if the next impact will be in 7 years, 7,000 years, 700,000 years).
If one reads history the climate has been changing forever...
The Fate of Rome
Climate, Disease, and the End of an Empire
by Kyle Harper
A sweeping new history of how climate change and disease helped bring down the Roman Empire
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/34427005-the-fate-of-rome
Meanwhile ... the thing is ... you cannot cure inflation with higher interest rates... when the inflation is being caused by the depletion of affordable energy ...
With a dangerous wage-price spiral emerging, JP Morgan’s Karen Ward, who sits on Hunt’s economic advisory council, says the Bank has to “create a recession”. This has been implied for some time, with the Chancellor recently insisting he would support “whatever it takes” to reduce the pace of price rises. But the cat is now well and truly out of the bag.
The Treasury would no doubt argue that the whole point of raising interest rates is to make us all poorer, but there’s a stark difference between taking some of the heat out of the economy and throwing it into the deep freeze by impoverishing a generation of homeowners – or worse leaving them without a home at all.
It is yet another reminder of how woefully both the Bank and the Government have failed in their efforts to curb the menace of a 40-year high inflation rate, and it means another of Sunak’s key pledges – to grow the economy – may soon be dead and buried too.
The latest figures are arguably the most concerning yet because they show that inflation has gone from coming down more slowly than anticipated to not coming down at all, having remained at 8.7pc, the same rate as in April.
More worrying still, core inflation – which strips out food, energy, alcohol and tobacco – is actually heading in the wrong direction. It jumped from 6.8pc to 7.1pc month-on-month. Not only is that higher than expected, it’s a 31-year high.
The spike in services inflation from 6.9pc to 7.4pc is perhaps the most alarming of all because as Grant Fitzner, chief economist at the ONS, points out, it is probably being driven at least partly by rising wages, which suggests inflation is becoming embedded in the system.
After 18 months of trying to dampen the inflation inferno, and 12 interest rate rises later, these numbers will come as a terrible shock to the Bank and the Government. It means further interest rate rises are a certainty but it also raises the likelihood of an acceleration in monetary tightening, as well as rates staying higher for even longer.
https://archive.ph/9fCZP
This is global... and there is no way out of this ... cutting rates and chucking more $$$ onto the bonfire will result in near immediate hyperinflation (and collapse) ... that worked for the past 20 years but that game is over.
Increasing interest rates even further will not tame inflation ... it will at best hold back the raging hyperinflationary beast that is pound on the door. And higher rates cause all sorts of negative feedback loops -- the masses are loaded with ever higher interest payments on the staggering debt loads they are carrying ... this impacts auto sales... home sales... it impacts everything ... people have less $$$ to spend... which will at some point result in massive defaults and an extreme deflationary death spiral >>>> and collapse.
The Men Who Run the World are aware of this ... they understand that they are fast running out of options. They are aware of the imminent collapse of civilization.
Option One - continue to apply palliative measures until the global economy collapses and allow 8 billion very angry predators to pour onto the streets in the dark ... without food... and let them tear each other to pieces (see murder - rape - cannibalism)....
Option Two - complete UEP https://www.headsupster.com/forumthread?shortId=220 (best video clip ever? https://youtu.be/oK_fsI32In4)
Step back and pretend you are one of The Men Who Run the World... which option would you vote for? There are not other options - it's either 1 or 2.
As Trudeau said in that leak -- we are NOT here to debate this -- the decision has been made - we are here to discuss how we execute this plan.
Meanwhile 8 billion humans continue to graze... totally oblivious to the cataclysm that is about to crash down on them.
This is without a doubt .... TEOTWAWKI.
I have to agree, inflation is not being caused by us spending our money on things, and it cannot be cured by the Fed raising interest rates.
They are such fools, as was our government for voting to pass the currency/money printing off to a private cartel.
The Reckoning is coming.
The dangerous carbon in our world are those that are pushing the scam
The fact is climate change has been a constant aspect of Earth's dynamic systems throughout its long history. Part of the problem is that as humans we only live 60-90 years, so our perspective is foreshortened. We have to think at least in hundreds of thousands if not millions of years, and from that perspective it has fluctuated wildly. And while I wouldn't exactly vote, "natural warming–panic," even the Little Ice Age during the medieval period did cause large crop failures, resulting in shortened lifespans and higher mortality. So yes, at times, climate change can be deadly. But what is the point in panicking?
I think this:
https://www.discovery.com/nature/ice-melts-in-norway-to-reveal-ancient-artifacts
The point: either these artifacts were dropped on a sheet of ice and further buried by failing snow, or there was no FREAKING ICE there and we went through a GLOBAL COOLING period that may or may not be coming back again.
It's that simple. Climate alarmists deserve only contempt.
I actually wanted to tick 2 of your survey options: that climate change is natural (just look at the historic data, duh, AND that it is a scam (not climate change (obvs) but the hysteria. And just like Covid 19, and the related pandemic, and the Woke ideology cancer the climate hysteria is entirely man made, where as the climate change itself is not. Oh the irony,,,
Let’s take just one factoid (not a real fact), that 97% of scientists agree with the climate crazies! It is more like 0.3%, a bit like the Covid vax is 95% effective when the clinical trials actually say it is 0.8% (Absolute Risk Reduction, which is the only metric that matters in the case of a vaccine and borne out by real real world data). And on that data point actual real climate scientists and meteorologists consistently fine no data to support he climate crazies models, funny that, bad models again eh!
If you want to explore this topic with real scientists and see beyond the veil of elites lies and nudge psychology then check out Tom Nelson’s eponymous pod cast on YouTube (amazingly not censored because of the heavyweight scientist he gives a platform to, some of the very top people in the world). Just listen to them and see their data and ask yourself why THEY would lie or seek to gaslight? Then ask the same question of the AOCs and Thunbergs and Gores and Gates,s of this world... Same people who manufactured Covid hysteria manufactured climate hysteria and promote awoke cancer.
Newish University of Michigan study theorizes Earth's core composed of carbon, not iron. Quite plausible.
Exothermic heating makes sense either way. It's not only solar warming.
Abundance of geothermal and carbon energy to be exploited for the benefit of humanity.
Cooling is the only real threat.
Yeah, if we knew the truth, we'd realize we will never run out of resources. Scare tactics are for political purposes.
It's a better hypothesis than CO2 being the cause of 'global warming' or 'climate change'. Glad it is being picked up by others for peer review.