CO2 doesn't cause climate change. Human CO2 emissions do not influence atmospheric CO2 levels. American CO2 emissions do not influence global emissions.
Definitely, they're Malthusians, and reducing food supply is an effective way to reduce population, as well as deadly vaccines and engineered bioweapons.
But the big climate push is to remind you that it's YOUR FAULT, and you need to DO BETTER. Once they get that wedge into place, it will be simple to ramp up the climate 'requirements' and control everything you do. (And if you don't go along, zap goes your bank account!)
They are pushing vehicles to EVs for one reason and one reason only. That is to ensure most of the serf class will be unable to buy vehicles as they continue to steal our wealth. We will all be confined to living in our high rent pods in our 15min ghettos, where travel will be by walking or bicycling. Their penultimate goal is to get rid of most of us. The ruling class expects that they will own everything, including our water resources. I wouldn't be surprised if they don't claim ownership of the atmosphere. So you will have to rent even the air you breath. Total Control. The Malthusian Totalitarian techno-Feudal System.
And they are quite open about this. The good news is they cannot reduce CO2, none of this matters at all. The bad news is they will reduce us to misery.
I agree with this piece in general but not the premise of the piece. It does not take a massive brain or a complex mathematical model to discover the Achilles heal in chief for EV, which is that there isn’t enough copper or any of the other key metals and minerals needed to make all the EV cars the world would need to replace the current cars, never mind the expansion of demand. Therefore the purpose of pushing EV is NOT to convert everyone to cars but to limit cars to,the elites. Everyone else must revert to public transport, which cannot meet the capacity requirements, hence 15 min cities (AKA ghettos).
Now for the premise issue. This and most other factually correct pieces are still carbon captured (pun intended...). If you listen to REAL climate scientists, true genius level truth seekers like add Richard Linzen (check out Tom Nelson channel on YouTube for many, many great pieces that blow apart the mainstream narrative) you will discover that CO2 could not possible be the single control knob for climate. In fact the earths atmosphere and associated weather and oceanic physics are the most complex interrelated system we know of outside the entire universe itself. It is logical, nay common sensical, to acknowledge that such a complex system could not possible be controlled by one single factor and indeed CO2 is not even the most important factor. CO2 is the source of all life on Earth. The more we have the more life we get. That is ecology. And they want to remove CO2 why? Control. This is politics and not science. They came up with the single control knob to simplify that which is so complex even the experts don’t understand it. The chose CO2 instead of, say, water vapour because they cannot beat you up about water vapour. Instead they beat you up for breathing! (Remember this it is important). So it starts with attacking fossil fuel because they want to control energy. Anyone in Europe last winter know how this works out... And we are already seeing pieces about population control. How long before they put these two together and connect population levels and the rate of CO2 release from humans exhaling...
So first CO2 is not the problem, to the extent that there is a problem and to the extent that we are smart enough or have the tech to do anything about it. Second it is not about climate and saving the planet it is about alarmism to panic people into willingly give up freedoms and be controlled.
The NWO knows all this. Once the gas powered cars are gone, and the gas production grid and the factories dismantled, they will unplug your cars for all these reasons. You and your children are the carbon they want to reduce.
You seem to accept the premise that human activity creates “climate change”. It does, but the effects are local (e.g. land use changes). Fear of “carbon emissions” is equivalent to fear of ghosts: for children and intellectual children.
They could care less about climate change. They happily blow up pipelines and push us to global nuclear war. While blockading the one energy source that can replace fossil, nuclear energy. This is just another crisis they invented and are milking in order to create their Malthusian Totalitarian Feudal Tyranny.
Oil, gas and coal aren’t they are not fossil fuels. I repeat they are not fossil fuels do a little research it’s all lies so they can tell you were running out, but it’s all bullshit nuclear power is the cleanest energy ever wake up people fuck these rich fuckers
"The Nevada Lithium America mining project would suck more than 4 million gallons of fresh water per day, up to 3,250 gallons per minute)."
And yet I’m being shamed for having a green lawn? And in addition to the massive amounts of carbon emissions there are the military jets that fly for hours every day from Air Force bases in America and from the 800 bases around the world. A jet flying for 1 hour uses as much gas as a family of 4 uses in a month. Plus there is all the other environmental damages that our military causes. I’m told to recycle my garbage to help with climate change and….shall I go on or do I need to?
Great write up but please provide references for the stats on private jets, as they sound unbelievable?
Regards EVs, the commies know how bad they are, and once they have transitioned they will suddenly be shocked, shocked I tell ya, and use the same things you mentioned as reasons to ban or restrict them.
New, fully electric cars are much easier to control remotely, such as geo-restrictions, speed, times you're allowed to travel etc.
Their ultimate aim is to force us to order a slow speed shared e-pod that stinks of piss, and will not take you out of your local area without their permission.
There's no proof that EV manufacturing impacts weather in any significant way, just like all human activity. It does, however create greater shortages scarce materials resources, encourages mining and manufacturing practices that produce toxic pollution and puts heavy stress on a deliberately crippled electric grid. Modern combustion engines remain the most clean and efficient power source for transportation. CO2 is plant food. And oil is not a fossil.
Electrification of most Diesel fueled transport with battery tech should be the #1 by far-and-away use of batteries. Forget Solar & Wind storage, that will use far more batteries than BEVs would use. A big waste of a massive amount of batteries. Light vehicles are also a huge waste of batteries, which replaces gasoline, of which there will be big surpluses if we don't replace diesel. Our economy runs on heavy distillates (diesel, jet fuel, kerosene, bunker oil, lubricating oils). If you replace gasoline with electricity you still will need all the petroleum for diesel fuel.
BEVs in heavy diesel applications are 6X more economical. Light vehicles only drive an avg of 30 miles/day, that is a piss poor application for precious batteries. i.e for a Tesla with a 300mile range, that's using 10% of capacity per day. A heavy truck will use 200% of capacity in one day.
The only places you would use heavy fuels would be for jet fuel, rocket fuel, medium distance shipping (long distance can be nuclear powered) and trucking in isolated regions.
And gas vehicles can be directly operated on Methanol, at a much lower cost. Methanol can be made low carbon from biomass. It is a simple distillation process.
Other than methanol, the only viable low carbon replacements for fossil fuel are Nuclear & Hydro. Hydro being severely limited by geography. Fortunately we have enough Nuclear fission fuel, uranium & thorium, on the Earth's land surface to fuel our civilization for 100Myrs. And that's with negligible emissions.
Very good article, thank you. My neighbour has one. I made the point o him about the resources it uses. It is built like a tank, quite a bit bigger than my petrol Honda Jazz. He said the environmental payback was about 5 years. Mmm...
They are great for local population but lousy for the environment as a whole. I said to him it was ultimately a con.
When we run low on things or things become popular, so demand goes up compared to supply, the price goes up and automatically limits demand.
We really don't have actual free markets, but so far government 'action' has done far more damage than good, and is set to do even more and even worse damage in the near future.
Why do those people try to reduce CO2? It makes the crops grow.
Maybe I answered my own question.
CO2 doesn't cause climate change. Human CO2 emissions do not influence atmospheric CO2 levels. American CO2 emissions do not influence global emissions.
Definitely, they're Malthusians, and reducing food supply is an effective way to reduce population, as well as deadly vaccines and engineered bioweapons.
EV batteries have blighted and ignited on ships and in residential areas.
--------------------------
This just happened recently!
https://interestingengineering.com/transportation/cargo-ship-carrying-3000-vehicles-caught-fire-ev-batteries-suspected
But the big climate push is to remind you that it's YOUR FAULT, and you need to DO BETTER. Once they get that wedge into place, it will be simple to ramp up the climate 'requirements' and control everything you do. (And if you don't go along, zap goes your bank account!)
They are pushing vehicles to EVs for one reason and one reason only. That is to ensure most of the serf class will be unable to buy vehicles as they continue to steal our wealth. We will all be confined to living in our high rent pods in our 15min ghettos, where travel will be by walking or bicycling. Their penultimate goal is to get rid of most of us. The ruling class expects that they will own everything, including our water resources. I wouldn't be surprised if they don't claim ownership of the atmosphere. So you will have to rent even the air you breath. Total Control. The Malthusian Totalitarian techno-Feudal System.
And they are quite open about this. The good news is they cannot reduce CO2, none of this matters at all. The bad news is they will reduce us to misery.
I agree with this piece in general but not the premise of the piece. It does not take a massive brain or a complex mathematical model to discover the Achilles heal in chief for EV, which is that there isn’t enough copper or any of the other key metals and minerals needed to make all the EV cars the world would need to replace the current cars, never mind the expansion of demand. Therefore the purpose of pushing EV is NOT to convert everyone to cars but to limit cars to,the elites. Everyone else must revert to public transport, which cannot meet the capacity requirements, hence 15 min cities (AKA ghettos).
Now for the premise issue. This and most other factually correct pieces are still carbon captured (pun intended...). If you listen to REAL climate scientists, true genius level truth seekers like add Richard Linzen (check out Tom Nelson channel on YouTube for many, many great pieces that blow apart the mainstream narrative) you will discover that CO2 could not possible be the single control knob for climate. In fact the earths atmosphere and associated weather and oceanic physics are the most complex interrelated system we know of outside the entire universe itself. It is logical, nay common sensical, to acknowledge that such a complex system could not possible be controlled by one single factor and indeed CO2 is not even the most important factor. CO2 is the source of all life on Earth. The more we have the more life we get. That is ecology. And they want to remove CO2 why? Control. This is politics and not science. They came up with the single control knob to simplify that which is so complex even the experts don’t understand it. The chose CO2 instead of, say, water vapour because they cannot beat you up about water vapour. Instead they beat you up for breathing! (Remember this it is important). So it starts with attacking fossil fuel because they want to control energy. Anyone in Europe last winter know how this works out... And we are already seeing pieces about population control. How long before they put these two together and connect population levels and the rate of CO2 release from humans exhaling...
So first CO2 is not the problem, to the extent that there is a problem and to the extent that we are smart enough or have the tech to do anything about it. Second it is not about climate and saving the planet it is about alarmism to panic people into willingly give up freedoms and be controlled.
Exactly so...✊👍
Yes and yes…
The NWO knows all this. Once the gas powered cars are gone, and the gas production grid and the factories dismantled, they will unplug your cars for all these reasons. You and your children are the carbon they want to reduce.
You seem to accept the premise that human activity creates “climate change”. It does, but the effects are local (e.g. land use changes). Fear of “carbon emissions” is equivalent to fear of ghosts: for children and intellectual children.
They could care less about climate change. They happily blow up pipelines and push us to global nuclear war. While blockading the one energy source that can replace fossil, nuclear energy. This is just another crisis they invented and are milking in order to create their Malthusian Totalitarian Feudal Tyranny.
Oil, gas and coal aren’t they are not fossil fuels. I repeat they are not fossil fuels do a little research it’s all lies so they can tell you were running out, but it’s all bullshit nuclear power is the cleanest energy ever wake up people fuck these rich fuckers
"The Nevada Lithium America mining project would suck more than 4 million gallons of fresh water per day, up to 3,250 gallons per minute)."
And yet I’m being shamed for having a green lawn? And in addition to the massive amounts of carbon emissions there are the military jets that fly for hours every day from Air Force bases in America and from the 800 bases around the world. A jet flying for 1 hour uses as much gas as a family of 4 uses in a month. Plus there is all the other environmental damages that our military causes. I’m told to recycle my garbage to help with climate change and….shall I go on or do I need to?
Yes, they are evil monsters, do nothing they say, never comply……keep the world green and alive…enjoy your green where ever you can get it, or make it.
Great write up but please provide references for the stats on private jets, as they sound unbelievable?
Regards EVs, the commies know how bad they are, and once they have transitioned they will suddenly be shocked, shocked I tell ya, and use the same things you mentioned as reasons to ban or restrict them.
New, fully electric cars are much easier to control remotely, such as geo-restrictions, speed, times you're allowed to travel etc.
Their ultimate aim is to force us to order a slow speed shared e-pod that stinks of piss, and will not take you out of your local area without their permission.
Fight back with everything you have.
There's no proof that EV manufacturing impacts weather in any significant way, just like all human activity. It does, however create greater shortages scarce materials resources, encourages mining and manufacturing practices that produce toxic pollution and puts heavy stress on a deliberately crippled electric grid. Modern combustion engines remain the most clean and efficient power source for transportation. CO2 is plant food. And oil is not a fossil.
Excellent article! Thanks.
Electrification of most Diesel fueled transport with battery tech should be the #1 by far-and-away use of batteries. Forget Solar & Wind storage, that will use far more batteries than BEVs would use. A big waste of a massive amount of batteries. Light vehicles are also a huge waste of batteries, which replaces gasoline, of which there will be big surpluses if we don't replace diesel. Our economy runs on heavy distillates (diesel, jet fuel, kerosene, bunker oil, lubricating oils). If you replace gasoline with electricity you still will need all the petroleum for diesel fuel.
BEVs in heavy diesel applications are 6X more economical. Light vehicles only drive an avg of 30 miles/day, that is a piss poor application for precious batteries. i.e for a Tesla with a 300mile range, that's using 10% of capacity per day. A heavy truck will use 200% of capacity in one day.
The only places you would use heavy fuels would be for jet fuel, rocket fuel, medium distance shipping (long distance can be nuclear powered) and trucking in isolated regions.
And gas vehicles can be directly operated on Methanol, at a much lower cost. Methanol can be made low carbon from biomass. It is a simple distillation process.
Other than methanol, the only viable low carbon replacements for fossil fuel are Nuclear & Hydro. Hydro being severely limited by geography. Fortunately we have enough Nuclear fission fuel, uranium & thorium, on the Earth's land surface to fuel our civilization for 100Myrs. And that's with negligible emissions.
Very good article, thank you. My neighbour has one. I made the point o him about the resources it uses. It is built like a tank, quite a bit bigger than my petrol Honda Jazz. He said the environmental payback was about 5 years. Mmm...
They are great for local population but lousy for the environment as a whole. I said to him it was ultimately a con.
So many layers, so many problems.
I think the term 'hydro fluidic acid' is probably meant to read 'hydrofluoric acid'.
Thank you
is it not Self-Evident
that consumerism is not sustainable ?
No, it isn't.
that is Not "not sustainable"
or Not "Self-Evident"
?
It's not self-evident.
When we run low on things or things become popular, so demand goes up compared to supply, the price goes up and automatically limits demand.
We really don't have actual free markets, but so far government 'action' has done far more damage than good, and is set to do even more and even worse damage in the near future.
I can dig it . . .
Absolutely
I haven't finished reading this yet, but, WOW.
Shame upon the pontificating bastards.