21 Comments
Jun 23, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com

We know from Brook Jackson that Pfizer disqualified many clinical trial participants after dose 1 as well as after dose 2. She also observed that there were adverse events that were simply ignored and not included in the data. She was a supervisor overseeing the Pfizer trials at the 3rd party clinical trial firm hired by Pfizer at one of the largest trial sites. She kept meticulous records of everything she encountered and decided to come forward as a whistleblower. There were many problems. The reasons for the disqualifications did not appear to follow clinical trial guidelines in her opinion. It would have been very beneficial to the authors to have interviewed Ms. Jackson. Perhaps they didn’t want to muddy the waters of an ongoing litigation. Ms. Jackson is now involved in what is the largest lawsuit against Pfizer in the US, alleging malfeasance and falsification of clinical trial data.

Expand full comment
Jun 23, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com

The vaccine companies own everyone now. The idea as has been floated that govts. will have an out by suing Pfizer et al for fraud is a charming fairytale. A discovery phase will reveal so many dirty hands that everyone will need to start eating with their feet to avoid fatal infections.

Expand full comment
Jun 24, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com

Huge shout out to Peter for being on this since Jan 2021 and suffering all the nonsense he's had to put up with.

Another huge shout out to BMJ for not succumbing to the pressure to fire Peter. We may actually have one real medical journal left to rebuild medicine with.

Expand full comment
Jun 24, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com

How long can governments and the media keep up this "safe and effective" lie? What is it going to take to break the stranglehood of these sociopaths on our society?

Expand full comment
Jun 23, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com

participant level data still inaccessible is all we need to know, surely?

Just the same as 50 years or whatever it was to release documents - when required by law to do it!!

No sensible person needs to know anything else, surely?

If all that is not tacit admission of guilt almost to the point of overt I don't know what would be.

Expand full comment

"bravely sticking his neck out"

"baiting the styoopid public health bear"

fify

Doshi's purpose with this paper is to prod for raw data disclosure from Pfizer and Moderna.

Expand full comment

How long does the peer review process generally take?

Expand full comment

Thank you for this excellent report!

Expand full comment

There is no "covid," but the symptoms exist.

Who is going to investigate those, who are creating the symptoms? I'm afraid the show is following the old recipe of creating a crisis and offering to solve it, except the criminals are now occupying key positions just about everywhere.

As long as they control the worldwide money flow, things will only get worse.

They already are...

You are not alone:

https://www.theburningplatform.com/2022/05/30/globalists-have-entered-the-kill-phase-of-great-reset-remember-the-deagel-population-forecast-it-now-makes-total-sense/

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/you-are-not-alone

Expand full comment