I have discovered, as I’m sure most unvaccinated people have, that the overwhelming majority of the vaccinated don’t want to hear about the jab in any negative context whatsoever. This is understandable. This behavior is driven by some combination of Confirmation Bias, Denial and the team sport phenomenon that politics has always been. I see this among friends and family, even ones who share my political views but elected(often early on) to take the vaccine. Some now regret that decision but tend to avoid the subject.
This psychology is so strong that I believe it adds power to the censorship of the news and data which show the truth and reality behind these vaccines. We are told that 70%+ of the world have been vaccinated. No one wants to believe they made a giant mistake, or were duped, or that(perhaps most of all) the other side was right all along. These emotions are among the most powerful in the human psyche. We may wonder at the motivation behind censorship regarding some topics. This one, not so much.
My unvaxxed family of 5 is currently getting over our first CoVid infections. We each had one bad day. Mine was first and consisted of a pretty bad migraine and body aches. My husband had an exacerbation of underlying neuro issues. Kids (9, 13, 16) all had one day of high fevers (102-104) where they napped off and on all day and seemed sick and other than that day, they played and entertained themselves normally. We didn’t seek medical care and managed at home with IVM and a supplement stack. Hopefully no long haul issues linger though three of us have lost sense of smell as of right now and my oldest has sore eyes.
Substack is rapidly becoming the tech version of that heroic man in Mali saving an entire culture's worth of written knowledge from ISIS ravagement.
When The Plague first hit here, and the reports coming out of NY were apocalyptic, and I, fortunately living far away from there and with the luxury of being able to stay home and have a loved one provision me as necessary, had plenty of time to just watch and think, was extremely baffled by the authoritative medical advice to the afflicted to stay home and do nothing at all until they needed to be rushed to the ICUs.
I mean, since when do you do absolutely nothing for any respiratory viral infection? No Vitamin C? No ginger tea? In those days I was still supportive of the mask-up advice, so I can't claim any great wisdom, but the way the relevant authorities were advising complete helpless surrender before a hitherto unknown pathogen was just completely astounding to me.
And here we are. They've made it easy to believe that any level of evil up to exponentially infinitive numbers is completely plausible.
I am a member of this control group and submitted my data each month to the website. To be honest I was surprised that the information about this survey even made it into the MSM, however briefly. Unfortunately it does not fit the narrative that you could be unvaccinated and still alive, let alone healthy despite these ‘vaccines’ obviously failing in front of our eyes. It has been - and remains - so important to have a control group as the drug companies seem to have disposed of theirs. How long this group’s members will be allowed to exist I am unsure. On the positive side I think that more of the vaccinated are beginning to wonder what they got themselves into and why and have now decided that enough is enough.
As always, invaluable information to keep in my safe place for references. As someone elderly , who appreciates alternative choices , my husband and I have managed not to be gene edited and so far still alive even after a doubled doubled family member living with us was terribly sick for quite sometime. Would suspect our early treatment regimes were instrumental in keeping us well- not according to main stream information.
The Covid vaccine media arguments never made any sense - by June 2021 Israel and UK made it clear the the stupid things didn’t work. Gibraltar in December 2020 showed it would enhance spread and kill people. The Covid for kids shots never made any sense at any level, even if the stupid vaccines had worked, why does a 5 year old need a vaccine to protect grandma if her vaccine actually protects her?
In any event I’m fine with adult Covidians jabbing themselves as many time as it takes to finally join the Covid victimhood group claiming they have “long Covid” that would be “worse” without those 7 vaccines.
I’m not sure how their getting endless jabs protected my entire unvaccinated family, and well over over 1 billion others who are also unvaccinated and Covid recovered, from severe Covid, but if they want to keep it up, go for it.
I’m going to continue to pass personally. I was really really tired for 6 hours with Covid. My kids got short headaches. My husband even ran a fever a couple hours. All when we got Covid once and intentionally by having a Covid party. The “normal” side effects of the jab seem to be much worse. My husband and I had zero side effects from the ivermectin we took, wether or not it actually helped.
Unvaxxed and had Delta in June of 2021 - it was rough, bad cough, exhaustion and accelerated taste and smell. However, used z-pack, prednisone, vitamin d, c and zinc and recovered back to 100%.
2x Pfizered wife caught Omnicron in Jan 2022. I slept next to her for 4 days and was fine. I know of several triple vaccinated who caught Omnicron in Dec / Jan. I only know of 4 people who are
Multi-vaxxed and still Covid free to date, and one lives at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Jun 17, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
That article went viral on US Freedom Flyer social media- for good reason. So many people got the link because they wanted to show their injected friends that they weren’t crazy for abstaining. And now, 2 days later, the article AND the study is gone. You know nobody is going to open that link except reluctantly a few days later. So not only does it make us look crazy, but we’re being gaslit as well.
I find that questioning the decision by the FDA and its followers (including the NHS) about the rationale to only treat hospitalized patients with hydroxychloroquine tends to cause them to shut off the conversation. Likely because it's incredibly obvious once you go through the rationale that the rationale is bogus even to a non-medical person. So this looks like an effective way to plant seeds of doubt about the FDA and NHS narratives.
Here's the argument:
FDA: "Hospitalized patients were likely to have greater prospect of benefit (compared to ambulatory
So, supposedly, hospitalized patients would be expected to benefit more from HCQ than ambulatory patients with mild illness, according to the FDA. But didn't hospitalized patients go through a phase of covid where they were ambulatory with mild illness? So, isn't it important to prevent covid from progressing from mild to moderate illness in high-risk patients, who then end up hospitalized? Wasn't there a great deal of concern expressed about potentially overloading hospitals with covid patients? So, why wasn't the FDA interested in reducing covid progression in high-risk patients?
Doesn't everyone see a problem with the FDA's rationale?
There are no negative studies of truly early treatment with hydroxychloroquine (within 72 hours of symptom onset), although a few neutral studies look to be underpowered.
The Accinelli study in Nov. 2021 showing time to treat being the key variable in mortality should be promoted heavily. In that study, patients were treated with HCQ. Out of 1265 patients, including 500 with at least one comorbidity, no patients treated within 72 hours of symptom onset died.
Within the 72 hour window, HCQ looks to work successfully in almost every case.
Jun 17, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Caution on this.
When I came across this article I applied the same relentless skepticism I do to everything I read, indeed - when I find something that seems to agree with my bias (in this case, supporting my choice to skip the vaccine) I am even more critical - I would hate to succumb to the same nonsense as the Covid Hysterics - uncritically passing on garbage "research" like the Kansas Mask "study".
My first red flag was looking up each of the authors. Given their background I felt there was near zero chance any of them would be applying a "disinterested" approach to this topic.
Kat Lindley is a Twitter banned vocal critic of the vaccine, you can read her blog and views here: https://www.drkats.co.za/about/ I'm unclear if she actively practices medicine (says based in Texas), but as a spouse to a DO, I am aware that whenever someone puts the FACOFP designation in their title, it tends to mean they want to impress you with letters. This title in fact is simply purchasable once you complete your medical degree and means nothing (I have been a to a few of the "awarding" ceremonies for this "designation)
Cristophe Plothe is another DO who appears to focus on the part of Osteopathic Medicine most DOs shy away from over the last 30 years - the Osteopathy part (it's basically quackery). Again, given his background I suspect there is zero chance if you were to give this guy a massive set of data he could drudge through he would find anything OTHER than a negative vaccine outcome. https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/our-team/do-christof-plothe/
We also have Dr. Naseeba Kathrada aka "Dr Kats" who is a weight loss professional and hawks "Diet in a box" for ~$100 USD. Can read more about her: https://www.drkats.co.za/about/
It would be interesting to reach out to him and find out what happened to his article if you get the time: rob@anhinternational.org
All four set off my pseudoscience alarms immediately (for reference, pre Covid I have always been vocally critically of the granola GMO/Organic/Gwyneth Paltrow quackery). While that shouldn't give cause to dismiss their claims entirely, the fact they are using the lowest form of evidence (self reported survey results) with a massive sample set lead me to be extremely wary that anything in this paper would be of value.
It's interested it got pulled, as even if it was junk science the answer is a rebuttal not a removal (retracted papers should stay up to learn from the mistakes - they don't get removed).
Makes me extra happy of joining the Control Group knowing the data has been used to show we are not dropping like flies and vitamins are more popular than Pfizer with far more than me.
Almost as critical as the control group are the Wayback captures because info disappears and critical info disappears faster. This is a problem everyone can help to solve by getting a Wayback toolbar button and check for archive copies or save on the fly. Even better it will redirect 404 Not Found Error to archive copies IF someone saved it. See something Save Something..
I have never bothered to test myself so have no idea if I've had the virus. It isn't, in my opinion, worthy of all the panic and hysteria of the last 2 years. It certainly isn't worth getting an injection of some stuff with no long term safety data which doesn't stop you getting it! I have had 2 colds, one probably was Covid because my cousin had a cold which turned out to be an exciting positive Covid when tested. I look after our own health. I don't test for things I don't have which wouldn't hurt me anyway. How is it that nobody remembers what having the flu is like? This is a storm in a teacup over a cold virus. All these reports rely on mass testing of people to see if they have a cold or not.
I have discovered, as I’m sure most unvaccinated people have, that the overwhelming majority of the vaccinated don’t want to hear about the jab in any negative context whatsoever. This is understandable. This behavior is driven by some combination of Confirmation Bias, Denial and the team sport phenomenon that politics has always been. I see this among friends and family, even ones who share my political views but elected(often early on) to take the vaccine. Some now regret that decision but tend to avoid the subject.
This psychology is so strong that I believe it adds power to the censorship of the news and data which show the truth and reality behind these vaccines. We are told that 70%+ of the world have been vaccinated. No one wants to believe they made a giant mistake, or were duped, or that(perhaps most of all) the other side was right all along. These emotions are among the most powerful in the human psyche. We may wonder at the motivation behind censorship regarding some topics. This one, not so much.
The study can’t be anymore biased than the FDA and CDC.
My unvaxxed family of 5 is currently getting over our first CoVid infections. We each had one bad day. Mine was first and consisted of a pretty bad migraine and body aches. My husband had an exacerbation of underlying neuro issues. Kids (9, 13, 16) all had one day of high fevers (102-104) where they napped off and on all day and seemed sick and other than that day, they played and entertained themselves normally. We didn’t seek medical care and managed at home with IVM and a supplement stack. Hopefully no long haul issues linger though three of us have lost sense of smell as of right now and my oldest has sore eyes.
Substack is rapidly becoming the tech version of that heroic man in Mali saving an entire culture's worth of written knowledge from ISIS ravagement.
When The Plague first hit here, and the reports coming out of NY were apocalyptic, and I, fortunately living far away from there and with the luxury of being able to stay home and have a loved one provision me as necessary, had plenty of time to just watch and think, was extremely baffled by the authoritative medical advice to the afflicted to stay home and do nothing at all until they needed to be rushed to the ICUs.
I mean, since when do you do absolutely nothing for any respiratory viral infection? No Vitamin C? No ginger tea? In those days I was still supportive of the mask-up advice, so I can't claim any great wisdom, but the way the relevant authorities were advising complete helpless surrender before a hitherto unknown pathogen was just completely astounding to me.
And here we are. They've made it easy to believe that any level of evil up to exponentially infinitive numbers is completely plausible.
I am a member of this control group and submitted my data each month to the website. To be honest I was surprised that the information about this survey even made it into the MSM, however briefly. Unfortunately it does not fit the narrative that you could be unvaccinated and still alive, let alone healthy despite these ‘vaccines’ obviously failing in front of our eyes. It has been - and remains - so important to have a control group as the drug companies seem to have disposed of theirs. How long this group’s members will be allowed to exist I am unsure. On the positive side I think that more of the vaccinated are beginning to wonder what they got themselves into and why and have now decided that enough is enough.
As always, invaluable information to keep in my safe place for references. As someone elderly , who appreciates alternative choices , my husband and I have managed not to be gene edited and so far still alive even after a doubled doubled family member living with us was terribly sick for quite sometime. Would suspect our early treatment regimes were instrumental in keeping us well- not according to main stream information.
The Covid vaccine media arguments never made any sense - by June 2021 Israel and UK made it clear the the stupid things didn’t work. Gibraltar in December 2020 showed it would enhance spread and kill people. The Covid for kids shots never made any sense at any level, even if the stupid vaccines had worked, why does a 5 year old need a vaccine to protect grandma if her vaccine actually protects her?
In any event I’m fine with adult Covidians jabbing themselves as many time as it takes to finally join the Covid victimhood group claiming they have “long Covid” that would be “worse” without those 7 vaccines.
I’m not sure how their getting endless jabs protected my entire unvaccinated family, and well over over 1 billion others who are also unvaccinated and Covid recovered, from severe Covid, but if they want to keep it up, go for it.
I’m going to continue to pass personally. I was really really tired for 6 hours with Covid. My kids got short headaches. My husband even ran a fever a couple hours. All when we got Covid once and intentionally by having a Covid party. The “normal” side effects of the jab seem to be much worse. My husband and I had zero side effects from the ivermectin we took, wether or not it actually helped.
Unvaxxed and had Delta in June of 2021 - it was rough, bad cough, exhaustion and accelerated taste and smell. However, used z-pack, prednisone, vitamin d, c and zinc and recovered back to 100%.
2x Pfizered wife caught Omnicron in Jan 2022. I slept next to her for 4 days and was fine. I know of several triple vaccinated who caught Omnicron in Dec / Jan. I only know of 4 people who are
Multi-vaxxed and still Covid free to date, and one lives at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
That article went viral on US Freedom Flyer social media- for good reason. So many people got the link because they wanted to show their injected friends that they weren’t crazy for abstaining. And now, 2 days later, the article AND the study is gone. You know nobody is going to open that link except reluctantly a few days later. So not only does it make us look crazy, but we’re being gaslit as well.
I find that questioning the decision by the FDA and its followers (including the NHS) about the rationale to only treat hospitalized patients with hydroxychloroquine tends to cause them to shut off the conversation. Likely because it's incredibly obvious once you go through the rationale that the rationale is bogus even to a non-medical person. So this looks like an effective way to plant seeds of doubt about the FDA and NHS narratives.
Here's the argument:
FDA: "Hospitalized patients were likely to have greater prospect of benefit (compared to ambulatory
patients with mild illness)...."
https://www.fda.gov/media/138945/download
So, supposedly, hospitalized patients would be expected to benefit more from HCQ than ambulatory patients with mild illness, according to the FDA. But didn't hospitalized patients go through a phase of covid where they were ambulatory with mild illness? So, isn't it important to prevent covid from progressing from mild to moderate illness in high-risk patients, who then end up hospitalized? Wasn't there a great deal of concern expressed about potentially overloading hospitals with covid patients? So, why wasn't the FDA interested in reducing covid progression in high-risk patients?
Doesn't everyone see a problem with the FDA's rationale?
There are no negative studies of truly early treatment with hydroxychloroquine (within 72 hours of symptom onset), although a few neutral studies look to be underpowered.
The Accinelli study in Nov. 2021 showing time to treat being the key variable in mortality should be promoted heavily. In that study, patients were treated with HCQ. Out of 1265 patients, including 500 with at least one comorbidity, no patients treated within 72 hours of symptom onset died.
Within the 72 hour window, HCQ looks to work successfully in almost every case.
Caution on this.
When I came across this article I applied the same relentless skepticism I do to everything I read, indeed - when I find something that seems to agree with my bias (in this case, supporting my choice to skip the vaccine) I am even more critical - I would hate to succumb to the same nonsense as the Covid Hysterics - uncritically passing on garbage "research" like the Kansas Mask "study".
My first red flag was looking up each of the authors. Given their background I felt there was near zero chance any of them would be applying a "disinterested" approach to this topic.
Kat Lindley is a Twitter banned vocal critic of the vaccine, you can read her blog and views here: https://www.drkats.co.za/about/ I'm unclear if she actively practices medicine (says based in Texas), but as a spouse to a DO, I am aware that whenever someone puts the FACOFP designation in their title, it tends to mean they want to impress you with letters. This title in fact is simply purchasable once you complete your medical degree and means nothing (I have been a to a few of the "awarding" ceremonies for this "designation)
Cristophe Plothe is another DO who appears to focus on the part of Osteopathic Medicine most DOs shy away from over the last 30 years - the Osteopathy part (it's basically quackery). Again, given his background I suspect there is zero chance if you were to give this guy a massive set of data he could drudge through he would find anything OTHER than a negative vaccine outcome. https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/our-team/do-christof-plothe/
We also have Dr. Naseeba Kathrada aka "Dr Kats" who is a weight loss professional and hawks "Diet in a box" for ~$100 USD. Can read more about her: https://www.drkats.co.za/about/
That leaves the lead author, Rob Verkerk who has focused on everything from Organic Food Sourcing, Keto Control, to Termite infestations. https://www.anhinternational.org/rob-verkerk-phd-cv/
It would be interesting to reach out to him and find out what happened to his article if you get the time: rob@anhinternational.org
All four set off my pseudoscience alarms immediately (for reference, pre Covid I have always been vocally critically of the granola GMO/Organic/Gwyneth Paltrow quackery). While that shouldn't give cause to dismiss their claims entirely, the fact they are using the lowest form of evidence (self reported survey results) with a massive sample set lead me to be extremely wary that anything in this paper would be of value.
It's interested it got pulled, as even if it was junk science the answer is a rebuttal not a removal (retracted papers should stay up to learn from the mistakes - they don't get removed).
the article was also archived on archive.ph (at
https://archive.ph/Fnp7U) before being censored, it'll last longer than Google caching. Google sucks government <censored.>
Makes me extra happy of joining the Control Group knowing the data has been used to show we are not dropping like flies and vitamins are more popular than Pfizer with far more than me.
Almost as critical as the control group are the Wayback captures because info disappears and critical info disappears faster. This is a problem everyone can help to solve by getting a Wayback toolbar button and check for archive copies or save on the fly. Even better it will redirect 404 Not Found Error to archive copies IF someone saved it. See something Save Something..
https://blog.archive.org/2017/01/25/see-something-save-something/
I have just joined this website you talk about at the end of April!
You can still join and submit your own observations at: https://www.vaxcontrolgroup.com/
I have never bothered to test myself so have no idea if I've had the virus. It isn't, in my opinion, worthy of all the panic and hysteria of the last 2 years. It certainly isn't worth getting an injection of some stuff with no long term safety data which doesn't stop you getting it! I have had 2 colds, one probably was Covid because my cousin had a cold which turned out to be an exciting positive Covid when tested. I look after our own health. I don't test for things I don't have which wouldn't hurt me anyway. How is it that nobody remembers what having the flu is like? This is a storm in a teacup over a cold virus. All these reports rely on mass testing of people to see if they have a cold or not.
I am part of the control group in this survey along with my family, its a great study and factual, we fill it out every month.