May 18, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
This backs up the Alberta data that was suppressed last year, 47% of Covid deaths in vaccinated people happened within the first two weeks. This could be either immune suppression or the vaccine itself- spike protein induced cytokine storm. They’ve had this data for up to a year, just releasing it now when it doesn’t make a difference.
May 18, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Here is an explanation for the 3 week surge in deaths post-vaccination: Recall that all Covid deaths inside the 21 day post-vaccination(2 jabs) window are counted as “un-vaccinated”.
Could it be that the books have been cooked to manipulate the death statistics to show higher death counts for the unvaccinated relative to the vaccinated, or rather to suppress the vaccinated death count? Could hospital protocols have resulted in death being ‘front loaded’ in hospital stays to deliberately keep official vaccinated death counts low? The true cause of death, whether vaccine or Covid or hospital protocol, will never be known. A combination of deadly hospital protocols for older patients during early treatment and some manipulation of death statistics could be behind these graphs.
May 18, 2022·edited May 18, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Very interesting data. Particularly when the CDC has said that you aren't considered "vaccinated" until 2-weeks AFTER injection. I happen to think they said that because there are a large number of deaths that immediately follow injections, and this way they can avoid putting a death in the "vaccinated" column.
But at this point, it's known that the vaccines are formulated for the original "alpha" or "wuhan" variant, and the Pfizer CEO said the vaccine didn't work with this omicron variant.
So there's another motive here. I happen to believe some of this is to help relieve the financial burden of countries with all the post-WWII births (boomers) and older who are retiring/retired and need health care. And with recent revelations that China owns the BioNTech and Moderna core component patents, I think there's likely to be a bioweapon component in it as well, to weaken us militarily and to gain access to our natural resources, since we won't need as much. And likely take over various work industries/supply lines with deaths of workers.
I think there's a racial component as well. Well concocted to affect darker skinned people who cannot get vitamin D from the sun as easily.
May 18, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Don't you guys see it by now? They are spreading the virus with the vaccines to propagate it more efficiently when cases are back down. Every time there is a campaign to get the booster, the case numbers skyrocket. It builds the fear leverage and more people get the booster and further propagate the virus. They pick a new age group to boost every time cases are low to keep this going, perfectly spaced time period between each group. First the double shots for 50+, then the double shot for 12-50, then the 3rd booster for 50+, then the 3rd booster for 12-50, then double shots for 5-11, then 4th booster for 50+, now back to 3rd booster for 5-11, and my future prediction, 4th booster for 12-50 + 5th booster for 50+ by fall time.
May 18, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Pretty sure they didn't intend for this insight to be revealed when they released that data! Still waiting for them to respect my FOI for all causes deaths days after vaccination. Been at internal review for weeks now. They are still scrambling for an excuse not to share the data.
May 18, 2022·edited May 18, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Just a thought: the ONS don't consider someone 'vaccinated' during the first two weeks following the jab date, (incredibly!). So the figures they're putting out for Covid deaths amongst the 'vaccinated' probably dont account for the most dangerous period for the vaccinees, those two weeks after the jab, when any deaths would be categorised as being amongst the 'unvaccinated' population. Which might confuse the picture given in the above graphical data. Of course they no doubt do it that way so as not to highlight how dangerous the jabs are in that first couple of weeks especially
May 18, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
El Gato Malo started writing about this some time back. He referred to the first two weeks post vax as the "worry window". There seemed to be a correlation between the vax rollout and rates of (overall) death by about 2 weeks. This pattern played out in Israel, the UK, and several other countries during initial vax rollouts.
May 18, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
This is convincing and rational. If only most people were. But it makes me feel good about my highly controversial decision not to get vaccinated. Though it did turn me into a person with 'unacceptable views' and I can't get on a plane, even now. This is Canada today.
May 18, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Hypothesis:
We know that in the first 14 days (2 weeks) after the shot the immune system is suppressed which may open an elderly people to oprtunistic diseases which may be deadly to an elderly fragile person. There are also the adverse side effects to consider post jab.
“ Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., describes a mechanism of the COVID shots that results in the suppression of your innate immune system. It does this by inhibiting the type-1 interferon pathway” (How Covid Shots Suppress your immune system).
If week three is when we get the immune surge in response to the shot, it may possibly answer the question why there are higher death rates for elderly people during this time period.
According to aforementioned article, “....the antibody response you get from the COVID shot is exponentially higher than what you get from natural infection, and research has shown that the level of antibody response rises with disease severity.” A severe immune response in an elderly person whose health may not be that great may be deadly to them. This same antibody surge in a younger person who is in better health may not be as severe compared to an older person.
(I wonder if a younger person would respond the same way to this antibody surge if they have preexisting health conditions or co-morbidity.)
Another element to this is also the fact that different people were given different dosages of the vaxes. Just another possible variable.
May 18, 2022·edited May 18, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
My initial instinct is that you should not vaccinate people during periods of high transmission because the immune system does take a hit and leave one susceptible. The same phenomenon is seen in people who believe that the Influenza vaccine 'gave' them the infection because they fell ill shortly after taking the injection. It is absurd that any health agency thought it was a good idea to inject the masses during wide spread transmission. So, that would help explain the post-jab spike in cases that is seen in highly 'vaccinated' countries. However, I am curious as to whether the inflammatory inducing nature of the spike protein and the body's reaction is causing deaths among persons who might have only suffered mild symptoms had they not been injected. A body that is preoccupied with reacting to and clearing out a toxic spike protein is suddenly exposed to additional spike protein in a different package. Overreaction and increased inflammation, leading to a cytokine storm, results in hospitalization and ultimately death (particularly because the allowable treatment plans did not involve sufficient amounts of steroids, if any at all).
I do also agree that some portion of these deaths could be 'vaccine' injuries labeled as Covid-19 deaths. The incentive structure is there. I'm not confident we will ever be told the truth, as the data isn't pure.
May 19, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
This is very strange because as far as I know (which is not very far) this kind of peak does not show up in any Scandinavian country (anyone knowing more please correct me if wrong!).
And I don't think we did it that much differently?
May 19, 2022·edited May 19, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
"Perhaps the vaccination centres gave people COVID-19 and they then died three weeks later?"
In Victoria, Australia, we saw a variation of this when the vaccines were first rolled out in early 2020. CoviD cases (PCR confirmed) spiked in aged care centers shortly after roving vaccination teams visited them to "protect" the residents. No explanation has ever been provided for this (not that the MSM nor health authorities ever investigated this anomaly).
Personally, I think that the cause was suppression of the immune systems of the vaccinated residents along with members of the vaccination teams being lightly infected and passing on the infection (despite the mandatory vaccination of the team members which we know does not affect peak viral loads). This could also apply to the elderly visiting vaccination centers in the UK.
This backs up the Alberta data that was suppressed last year, 47% of Covid deaths in vaccinated people happened within the first two weeks. This could be either immune suppression or the vaccine itself- spike protein induced cytokine storm. They’ve had this data for up to a year, just releasing it now when it doesn’t make a difference.
Vaccination centres or countries with testing lines couldn't have contributed. Everyone there was masked.
Here is an explanation for the 3 week surge in deaths post-vaccination: Recall that all Covid deaths inside the 21 day post-vaccination(2 jabs) window are counted as “un-vaccinated”.
Could it be that the books have been cooked to manipulate the death statistics to show higher death counts for the unvaccinated relative to the vaccinated, or rather to suppress the vaccinated death count? Could hospital protocols have resulted in death being ‘front loaded’ in hospital stays to deliberately keep official vaccinated death counts low? The true cause of death, whether vaccine or Covid or hospital protocol, will never be known. A combination of deadly hospital protocols for older patients during early treatment and some manipulation of death statistics could be behind these graphs.
Very interesting data. Particularly when the CDC has said that you aren't considered "vaccinated" until 2-weeks AFTER injection. I happen to think they said that because there are a large number of deaths that immediately follow injections, and this way they can avoid putting a death in the "vaccinated" column.
But at this point, it's known that the vaccines are formulated for the original "alpha" or "wuhan" variant, and the Pfizer CEO said the vaccine didn't work with this omicron variant.
So there's another motive here. I happen to believe some of this is to help relieve the financial burden of countries with all the post-WWII births (boomers) and older who are retiring/retired and need health care. And with recent revelations that China owns the BioNTech and Moderna core component patents, I think there's likely to be a bioweapon component in it as well, to weaken us militarily and to gain access to our natural resources, since we won't need as much. And likely take over various work industries/supply lines with deaths of workers.
I think there's a racial component as well. Well concocted to affect darker skinned people who cannot get vitamin D from the sun as easily.
Don't you guys see it by now? They are spreading the virus with the vaccines to propagate it more efficiently when cases are back down. Every time there is a campaign to get the booster, the case numbers skyrocket. It builds the fear leverage and more people get the booster and further propagate the virus. They pick a new age group to boost every time cases are low to keep this going, perfectly spaced time period between each group. First the double shots for 50+, then the double shot for 12-50, then the 3rd booster for 50+, then the 3rd booster for 12-50, then double shots for 5-11, then 4th booster for 50+, now back to 3rd booster for 5-11, and my future prediction, 4th booster for 12-50 + 5th booster for 50+ by fall time.
Pretty sure they didn't intend for this insight to be revealed when they released that data! Still waiting for them to respect my FOI for all causes deaths days after vaccination. Been at internal review for weeks now. They are still scrambling for an excuse not to share the data.
Just a thought: the ONS don't consider someone 'vaccinated' during the first two weeks following the jab date, (incredibly!). So the figures they're putting out for Covid deaths amongst the 'vaccinated' probably dont account for the most dangerous period for the vaccinees, those two weeks after the jab, when any deaths would be categorised as being amongst the 'unvaccinated' population. Which might confuse the picture given in the above graphical data. Of course they no doubt do it that way so as not to highlight how dangerous the jabs are in that first couple of weeks especially
This is the type of thing I imagine Jessica Rose would be interested in.
https://jessicar.substack.com/
El Gato Malo started writing about this some time back. He referred to the first two weeks post vax as the "worry window". There seemed to be a correlation between the vax rollout and rates of (overall) death by about 2 weeks. This pattern played out in Israel, the UK, and several other countries during initial vax rollouts.
This is convincing and rational. If only most people were. But it makes me feel good about my highly controversial decision not to get vaccinated. Though it did turn me into a person with 'unacceptable views' and I can't get on a plane, even now. This is Canada today.
Hypothesis:
We know that in the first 14 days (2 weeks) after the shot the immune system is suppressed which may open an elderly people to oprtunistic diseases which may be deadly to an elderly fragile person. There are also the adverse side effects to consider post jab.
“ Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., describes a mechanism of the COVID shots that results in the suppression of your innate immune system. It does this by inhibiting the type-1 interferon pathway” (How Covid Shots Suppress your immune system).
If week three is when we get the immune surge in response to the shot, it may possibly answer the question why there are higher death rates for elderly people during this time period.
According to aforementioned article, “....the antibody response you get from the COVID shot is exponentially higher than what you get from natural infection, and research has shown that the level of antibody response rises with disease severity.” A severe immune response in an elderly person whose health may not be that great may be deadly to them. This same antibody surge in a younger person who is in better health may not be as severe compared to an older person.
(I wonder if a younger person would respond the same way to this antibody surge if they have preexisting health conditions or co-morbidity.)
Another element to this is also the fact that different people were given different dosages of the vaxes. Just another possible variable.
How Covid Shots Suppress Your Immune System
https://bwcentral.org/2022/02/how-covid-shots-suppress-your-immune-system/
My initial instinct is that you should not vaccinate people during periods of high transmission because the immune system does take a hit and leave one susceptible. The same phenomenon is seen in people who believe that the Influenza vaccine 'gave' them the infection because they fell ill shortly after taking the injection. It is absurd that any health agency thought it was a good idea to inject the masses during wide spread transmission. So, that would help explain the post-jab spike in cases that is seen in highly 'vaccinated' countries. However, I am curious as to whether the inflammatory inducing nature of the spike protein and the body's reaction is causing deaths among persons who might have only suffered mild symptoms had they not been injected. A body that is preoccupied with reacting to and clearing out a toxic spike protein is suddenly exposed to additional spike protein in a different package. Overreaction and increased inflammation, leading to a cytokine storm, results in hospitalization and ultimately death (particularly because the allowable treatment plans did not involve sufficient amounts of steroids, if any at all).
I do also agree that some portion of these deaths could be 'vaccine' injuries labeled as Covid-19 deaths. The incentive structure is there. I'm not confident we will ever be told the truth, as the data isn't pure.
This is very strange because as far as I know (which is not very far) this kind of peak does not show up in any Scandinavian country (anyone knowing more please correct me if wrong!).
And I don't think we did it that much differently?
"Perhaps the vaccination centres gave people COVID-19 and they then died three weeks later?"
In Victoria, Australia, we saw a variation of this when the vaccines were first rolled out in early 2020. CoviD cases (PCR confirmed) spiked in aged care centers shortly after roving vaccination teams visited them to "protect" the residents. No explanation has ever been provided for this (not that the MSM nor health authorities ever investigated this anomaly).
Personally, I think that the cause was suppression of the immune systems of the vaccinated residents along with members of the vaccination teams being lightly infected and passing on the infection (despite the mandatory vaccination of the team members which we know does not affect peak viral loads). This could also apply to the elderly visiting vaccination centers in the UK.
Looks pretty convincing to me, and as you say, hard to come to any other conclusion.
These are all Covid-19 deaths, right?
What do you reckon are the absolute numbers of extra deaths caused, both Covid-19 and all causes?
I got this sent to me in email this morning - https://3speak.tv/embed?v=rairfoundation/fwqctpnc
I'd think that if leaders are getting a kickback for pushing the vaccines, that would be a motive for them to not back down.