Aug 25, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
You are too generous with this statement: "The headline might be shocking, e.g. ‘90% of deaths occurring in the vaccinated’ but if 90% of the population are vaccinated then that is to be expected." In periods of Covid mortality, the % of deaths occurring in the vaccinated should be demonstrably lower. That's the bar they set themselves and the one that has to be met. It's not enough just to be safe. And yet, even there they failed. They would have been better off giving saline. Unless, they had another agenda, of course... or, perhaps its just hubris?
How does UK define "vaccine"? Did they follow US and change the definition so that it more or less means "got_the_jab_means_nothing_more"? Or are they still arguing that it's what Webster's would define as a vaccine? Prehaps redefine it to mean "causes excess deaths" - see, it works!
Aug 25, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
"Instead the NHS is launching a £50,000 probe to uncover why NHS staff aren’t getting Covid and flu jabs. Probably because they can see the data presented above with their own eyes."
-------------
The fact that nurses were on the front lines of covid and balked at the jabs nearly immediately (because they also saw the side effects of the people who got them first) should have given people pause.
Aug 25, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
Graphically, it would be a massive improvement if you used very different colors and differently shaped markers for the graphs. Since the graphs deviate via the age group differentiation, the colors and shapes would dramatically improve visual recognition. Why choose a subtle color difference and the same markers? Please revise for posterity- A great data set that deserves improved presentation. Pretty please.
Aug 26, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
🥲🥲🥲in just a few weeks, I have witnessed three friends develop fainting, blood pressure issues and sudden heart issues (tachycardia) and severe fatigue. Two of them had covid recently. They have all taken at least four covid jabs. None of them are connecting dots. Nor will they.
None of them offered cardiac testing, one put on a beta blocker. They are all over 75. One GP put the symptoms down to stress and anxiety.
Aug 26, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
Now do the same for new disability claims if the data exists. We experienced a surge in disabilities among the working population in the US. Ed Dowd probably has the data that shows clear relationship between vaccination status and disability claims.
Aug 26, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
No, they don’t publish these data by vaccination status. The data Ed is using is number of PIP claims (it’s a benefit long term disabled can claim in the UK). These have skyrocketed since vaccine roll-out. But you can only draw a temporal correlation. The only breakdown given is by cause of the claim (eg cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease etc)
Ed's claim is the sharp increase in the past 2 years occurred in the highly vaccinated working population. Outside of the working population, which is less vaccinated, we do not see similar increase. He also noted that the working population is generally healthier than the non-working population so the increase in disability makes little sense.
Aug 26, 2023·edited Aug 26, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
"For example if 90% of the country is vaccinated but 95% of deaths are in the vaccinated then perhaps the vaccine is causing the additional 5% of deaths."
If you are good at math, the "additional 5%" is actually a lot worse - like 50% more likely to die than the unvaccinated group in the example.
So they are basically killing vast excess number of those above 80 through "vaccination."
I think it is even worse than that. If 95% of deaths out of 90% of the population for the vaccinated is compared with 5% of deaths out of 10% of the population for the unvaxxed, then the ratio of incidence of deaths is (95%/90%) / (5%/10%), which is 95/90 * 10/5. That equals 19/9, which is greater than 2, which is more than double, or more than a 100% increase.
Aug 26, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
Presumably if you did this for all ages combined, it would be far higher overall in the vaccinated, given most deaths in the older age groups.
Curious about the 50-59s. But these data have been ropey from the start - though in a way that favours the vaccinations. Even that can’t be hidden now, the excess death is so high.
Aug 26, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
Yes, we can only work with what they allow us to see. This analysis is a good way to look at the data because it eliminates one of the basic probelms with all ONS data - the number of unvaccinated is obtained by subtracting the number vaccinated from the "total population" - which in sone data sets is badly understated. That menas that deaths/100K are overstatedrstated in the unvaccinated cohort.
But the other problem still remains with us : the definition of "unvaccinated", especially in the earlier data. but ongoing in some respects!
Kudos for explaining the issues surrounding percentages in a clrear and simple way that anyone can understand.
Aug 26, 2023Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
In the first graph, Dark green is "Vaccination percentage". In the others, Light green is "vaccination percentage". Why did you flip the definitions of light and dark green?
Why isn't anyone addressing the FACT that no virus has ever been isolated ever so whilst people talk about dangerous experimental jabs mRNA, LNPs, the truth needs to be revealed and it's not about scary invisible germs but about what they put in our food chain, chemtrail us with and in meds, including "vaccines" for nonexistent viruses?
You are too generous with this statement: "The headline might be shocking, e.g. ‘90% of deaths occurring in the vaccinated’ but if 90% of the population are vaccinated then that is to be expected." In periods of Covid mortality, the % of deaths occurring in the vaccinated should be demonstrably lower. That's the bar they set themselves and the one that has to be met. It's not enough just to be safe. And yet, even there they failed. They would have been better off giving saline. Unless, they had another agenda, of course... or, perhaps its just hubris?
I try to be generous but yes you’re correct
Yes, that's what they presented us with
How does UK define "vaccine"? Did they follow US and change the definition so that it more or less means "got_the_jab_means_nothing_more"? Or are they still arguing that it's what Webster's would define as a vaccine? Prehaps redefine it to mean "causes excess deaths" - see, it works!
I would like it broken down by number of injections (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, etc).
" Perhaps redefine it to mean "causes excess deaths" - LOL. Hey, stop giving them ideas!
"Instead the NHS is launching a £50,000 probe to uncover why NHS staff aren’t getting Covid and flu jabs. Probably because they can see the data presented above with their own eyes."
-------------
The fact that nurses were on the front lines of covid and balked at the jabs nearly immediately (because they also saw the side effects of the people who got them first) should have given people pause.
Instead we fired the nurses. Clown world.
It's not just about deaths. Count up the number of severe vax injuries, on top of the deaths. The covid vax "gives" in many ways!
Graphically, it would be a massive improvement if you used very different colors and differently shaped markers for the graphs. Since the graphs deviate via the age group differentiation, the colors and shapes would dramatically improve visual recognition. Why choose a subtle color difference and the same markers? Please revise for posterity- A great data set that deserves improved presentation. Pretty please.
And when does one become quote/unquote “vaccinated”?? Is that one of two weeks after the actual inoculation??
Is that accounted for in the data?
They say it is immediately after vaccination but who knows.
🥲🥲🥲in just a few weeks, I have witnessed three friends develop fainting, blood pressure issues and sudden heart issues (tachycardia) and severe fatigue. Two of them had covid recently. They have all taken at least four covid jabs. None of them are connecting dots. Nor will they.
None of them offered cardiac testing, one put on a beta blocker. They are all over 75. One GP put the symptoms down to stress and anxiety.
Now do the same for new disability claims if the data exists. We experienced a surge in disabilities among the working population in the US. Ed Dowd probably has the data that shows clear relationship between vaccination status and disability claims.
No, they don’t publish these data by vaccination status. The data Ed is using is number of PIP claims (it’s a benefit long term disabled can claim in the UK). These have skyrocketed since vaccine roll-out. But you can only draw a temporal correlation. The only breakdown given is by cause of the claim (eg cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease etc)
Ed's claim is the sharp increase in the past 2 years occurred in the highly vaccinated working population. Outside of the working population, which is less vaccinated, we do not see similar increase. He also noted that the working population is generally healthier than the non-working population so the increase in disability makes little sense.
"For example if 90% of the country is vaccinated but 95% of deaths are in the vaccinated then perhaps the vaccine is causing the additional 5% of deaths."
If you are good at math, the "additional 5%" is actually a lot worse - like 50% more likely to die than the unvaccinated group in the example.
So they are basically killing vast excess number of those above 80 through "vaccination."
I think it is even worse than that. If 95% of deaths out of 90% of the population for the vaccinated is compared with 5% of deaths out of 10% of the population for the unvaxxed, then the ratio of incidence of deaths is (95%/90%) / (5%/10%), which is 95/90 * 10/5. That equals 19/9, which is greater than 2, which is more than double, or more than a 100% increase.
Yes, you are correct. I meant to say 50% of the deaths are the 'excess' deaths. They are in the vaccinated group.
Presumably if you did this for all ages combined, it would be far higher overall in the vaccinated, given most deaths in the older age groups.
Curious about the 50-59s. But these data have been ropey from the start - though in a way that favours the vaccinations. Even that can’t be hidden now, the excess death is so high.
Just gobsmacking. Well done, and thank you.
Yes, we can only work with what they allow us to see. This analysis is a good way to look at the data because it eliminates one of the basic probelms with all ONS data - the number of unvaccinated is obtained by subtracting the number vaccinated from the "total population" - which in sone data sets is badly understated. That menas that deaths/100K are overstatedrstated in the unvaccinated cohort.
But the other problem still remains with us : the definition of "unvaccinated", especially in the earlier data. but ongoing in some respects!
Kudos for explaining the issues surrounding percentages in a clrear and simple way that anyone can understand.
In the first graph, Dark green is "Vaccination percentage". In the others, Light green is "vaccination percentage". Why did you flip the definitions of light and dark green?
To check you were paying close enough attention lol!
Ha ha you scoundrel! You don't have to worry about that with me, NE.
I wish The NE used two different colors altogether, like red and green, so that it was easier to read.
He’s using the ONS format. Blame them.
Unless you are colorblind like me :). I prefer blue and yellow, or black and gray.
FYI the final image in this post reads as "image not found."
Thanks!
Why isn't anyone addressing the FACT that no virus has ever been isolated ever so whilst people talk about dangerous experimental jabs mRNA, LNPs, the truth needs to be revealed and it's not about scary invisible germs but about what they put in our food chain, chemtrail us with and in meds, including "vaccines" for nonexistent viruses?
Seriously? You’re wondering if vaccines are safe and effective?
It isn’t that hard to find out they are NOT
Here’s a fantastic primer on the history of that barbaric and criminal act. It’s been a fraud from the get go.
https://officialbrendanmurphy.substack.com/p/5-huge-historical-vaccine-frauds
What does "ever vaccinated" mean?
The opposite of unvaccinated
Meaning that you got some kind of vaccine sometime in your life but not Covid vax?
No, meaning you had at least 1 dose of a Covid vaccine, regardless of further doses.
ah, thank you. That's me, regretfully.
One or more covid injections.