Covid Smoking Gun

SARS-CoV-2 Blueprint

In 2022, I wrote an article called Fingerprints of the Labs - New Pre-print indicated Synthetic Origin of Covid. It was published by Alex Washburne, Antonius VanDongen and Valentin Bruttel.

They reported that genomic patterns they have observed in SARS-CoV-2 are most likely to have occurred due to synthetic genome assembly rather than natural evolution. The conclusion was that the patterns were consistent with previously engineered viruses and are unlikely to have evolved from other coronaviruses. Furthermore, there was a high likelihood that SARS-CoV-2 may have originated as an infectious clone assembled in vitro.

I have pinched a better explanation from Jan Hommel, translated from Dutch.

“In October 2022 [the authors] published a preprint, in which they described a number of striking features of SARSCoV2. There were a number of cutting sites in the virus's genome that ensured that the virus could be cut into pieces making it possible to easily exchange them with another gene, as if it were a module.

Moreover, these cutting sites were much more regularly distributed across the genome than in comparable viruses such as BANAL52 and RaTG13.

This would fit well with a 'reverse genetics' system, which allows one to quickly and easily create an artificial virus. Because you could easily exchange each of those six pieces for another piece from a different virus. Including the part containing the receptor-binding domain and the furin cleavage site. The latter is unique to SARSCoV2 and does not occur in any other sarbecovirus.

They had the entire clan of the zoonati thrown at them, with the utmost nonsense, but the conclusions still stood. The entire makeup of SARSCoV2 could very well fit a 'reverse genetics system'.

One point of criticism was why the trio focused on only two of those molecular scissors, while there are many more. This was due to the fact that Ralph Baric published an article in 2017 using those scissors, thus writing a manual, as it were, for this reverse genetics system.”

Earlier today, one of those authors, Valentin Bruttel, published a long thread on X/Twitter. He subsequently removed it and it has been disappearing all day but here is the archived version of it.

It is a long 16 minute read and follows the release of the entire DEFUSE proposal after a Freedom of Information request from US Right To Know. They actually received the full document last month but only uploaded a portion of it whilst they worked their way through it. Researchers from DRASTIC also had a copy but were waiting for US Right To Know to finish writing their report.

For those that don’t know, DEFUSE was the application to the American defence organisation DARPA, made by EcoHealth Alliance, headed by Peter Daszak. Bruttel explains that DEFUSE was not funded but researchers sometime start projects before the funding is approved and very similar research projects at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) were funded by US and Chinese institutions.

Although this DEFUSE application was turned down, it is very feasible that funding for it was obtained through other means or merged with other projects. In fact, this 2018 proposal matches SARS-CoV-2 so closely that Bruttel says that in his opinion is is a precise blueprint for how SARS2 came into existence.

Read his whole thread for the long explanation or better still read the whole proposal (1412 pages) but you may be gone for a few weeks!

Instead I will once again steal Hommel’s excellent layman’s summary.

“Now we go to DEFUSE, the application to the American defense organization DARPA by EcoHealthNYC.

It was proposed to incorporate a furin cleavage site into coronaviruses. What now turns out? The DEFUSE application proposes to be able to cut artificial viruses into SIX parts.

And which molecular scissors did they order for that? That's right: the two pairs of scissors that the trio of VanDongen, Bruttel and Washburne discussed.

In other words, not only did DEFUSE propose building a furin cleavage site into coronaviruses, they also described exactly how they wanted to do this and using which molecular scissors. And exactly that method fits seamlessly with what SARSCoV2 looks like.

This is the gun. With the fingerprints. Literally.

Apparently something has happened, and Bruttel has shown something that was not yet intended to be published. Emily Kopp's account from the USRightToKnow has strangely disappeared. We'll see how this turns out. But this is 'pretty much case closed'.”

Bruttel concludes that SARS2 was assembled from 6 fragments using various enzymes. BsmBI for the main body of the virus and BsaI for furin cleavage site and receptor binding domain. Exactly how EcoAlliance planned it in the DEFUSE document.

American molecular biologist, Richard Ebright says that “an order line for BsmBI in a draft of EcoHealth’s 2018 DARPA proposal is the equivalent of a smoking gun.

There is no-zero-remaining room for reasonable doubt that EcoHealth and its associates caused the pandemic.”