Jan 19, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
The leaders and promoters of this Genocide are obvious…..but many more were involved for it to be kept in play.
It needs to be fully exposed and all involved need to pay the price for wholesale murder of millions and for those that still may be harmed and die. The damage done to the World and humanity is beyond description.
Who are THEY… obviously those that promoted, manufactured, financed, and profited from this heinous act of genocide, whether it be from greed, impassivity, or madness.
Government agencies involved should be eliminated or reorganized, and Corporations dissolved. Personal wealth gained and Illegal profits of Corporations, with proven involvement, should be taken and distributed to those harmed…..individuals and small businesses.
When genocide is committed, it must be seen. People must look at it with open eyes, not minimize its impact.
The World needs cleansing and closure….which we may never see in our life time.
Regrettably, to make this happen in a meaningful way, we would need to turn to the very corrupt officials who are in charge to bring these people to justice. We won't be able to use the corrupt system to fix the corrupt system, and there aren't enough good people outside or inside these systems to make much of a difference. Pessimistic? Perhaps. Realistic? Definitely.
Jan 19, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
I would like to believe SARsCoV2 was an accidental lab leak, but won't put all my money on it. Dr Fauci was a big proponent of GOF research. During the 1012-2014 debates he wrote a number of editorials in support of GOF. Once President Obama placed a funding ban the NIH was able to get around that by laundering money thru EcoHealth and other grantees. Another area that needs looking into is the secret NIH committee that judged whether research was GOF or not. No one knows who served on that committee.
Jan 19, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
It speaks volumes that the concern was because military forces are deployed all over the globe- but the thought of NOT deploying military forces all over the globe never entered their minds.
Jan 19, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
Does not the fact that the unvaccinated are not the ones clogging up the hospitals suggest strongly, very strongly, that the method of transmission of Covid is via a needle?
Jan 19, 2022·edited Jan 19, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
what is Murphy's basis for saying NIH/NIAID funded the rejected proposal? that is the big question, for me. I fear he doesn't have any direct information, and as elsewhere in the memo, he is speculating in the same way that we are.
if that is the case, it would've been a separate proposal, not written for DARPA, not structured around military/defence requirements.
if i’m reading it right, that’s a 600k grant for some bat sampling and virus sequencing research, nothing like the the 14 million-dollar DARPA proposal.
Yes, I agree a lot of it sounds like speculation. However, it is knowledgeable speculation. There is plenty of evidence that NIH funded something similar, whether it was the same proposal or not that is another question.
Jan 20, 2022·edited Jan 20, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
Does not Ecohealth receive $2M+ annually from NIH? Just because they didn't receive the $14M bonanza request doesn't mean they did their research without NIH money. Also there appears to be some misgivings about Ecohealth not maintaining accurate records of a $3M grant.
Jan 20, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
nobody disputes EcoHealth receives NIH funding. the question is whether this specific proposal was funded by NIH/NIAID after DARPA rejected it, which is what Murphy seems to be saying.
Whether they were following the exact same proposal or something very similar is irrelevant if the same gain-of-function/ dual use research of concern outcomes occurred. They were undertaking in vitro and in vivo infection experiments and analysis of receptor binding for NIH. The only bit which is unclear is whether they actually made live attenuated vaccines and gave them to bats.
Jan 21, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
yes, we know that NIH directed at least nominal funding to EcoHealth GoF research. that's not what I'm asking.
my question is about sources, and how we assess murphy's memo – does he add any information, or is he simply looking at the same documents we are and drawing conclusions in the same way we are? I think the latter. but I think there's also a decent chance Murphy himself leaked the memo to DRASTIC, after his memo failed to get traction. in which case, we're just looking at two different sides of the same leak here.
but also, this specific proposal and its fate do matter, given that known NIH funding of EcoHealth alliance involves relatively small amounts of money, whereas the DARPA proposal is a fairly big 14 million dollar request.
The leaders and promoters of this Genocide are obvious…..but many more were involved for it to be kept in play.
It needs to be fully exposed and all involved need to pay the price for wholesale murder of millions and for those that still may be harmed and die. The damage done to the World and humanity is beyond description.
Who are THEY… obviously those that promoted, manufactured, financed, and profited from this heinous act of genocide, whether it be from greed, impassivity, or madness.
Government agencies involved should be eliminated or reorganized, and Corporations dissolved. Personal wealth gained and Illegal profits of Corporations, with proven involvement, should be taken and distributed to those harmed…..individuals and small businesses.
When genocide is committed, it must be seen. People must look at it with open eyes, not minimize its impact.
The World needs cleansing and closure….which we may never see in our life time.
When genocide is pre-planed and committed 'that' must be seen and those responsible prosecuted.
Covid Origins - Leaked documents show attempts to prevent Disease X may have CAUSED SARS-CoV-2
https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/covid-origins-leaked-documents-show?r=bm3n6&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email
Regrettably, to make this happen in a meaningful way, we would need to turn to the very corrupt officials who are in charge to bring these people to justice. We won't be able to use the corrupt system to fix the corrupt system, and there aren't enough good people outside or inside these systems to make much of a difference. Pessimistic? Perhaps. Realistic? Definitely.
I would like to believe SARsCoV2 was an accidental lab leak, but won't put all my money on it. Dr Fauci was a big proponent of GOF research. During the 1012-2014 debates he wrote a number of editorials in support of GOF. Once President Obama placed a funding ban the NIH was able to get around that by laundering money thru EcoHealth and other grantees. Another area that needs looking into is the secret NIH committee that judged whether research was GOF or not. No one knows who served on that committee.
It speaks volumes that the concern was because military forces are deployed all over the globe- but the thought of NOT deploying military forces all over the globe never entered their minds.
Does not the fact that the unvaccinated are not the ones clogging up the hospitals suggest strongly, very strongly, that the method of transmission of Covid is via a needle?
what is Murphy's basis for saying NIH/NIAID funded the rejected proposal? that is the big question, for me. I fear he doesn't have any direct information, and as elsewhere in the memo, he is speculating in the same way that we are.
if that is the case, it would've been a separate proposal, not written for DARPA, not structured around military/defence requirements.
This sounds a lot like it - https://reporter.nih.gov/search/xQW6UJmWfUuOV01ntGvLwQ/project-details/9819304#details
if i’m reading it right, that’s a 600k grant for some bat sampling and virus sequencing research, nothing like the the 14 million-dollar DARPA proposal.
Yes, I agree a lot of it sounds like speculation. However, it is knowledgeable speculation. There is plenty of evidence that NIH funded something similar, whether it was the same proposal or not that is another question.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02473-4
Does not Ecohealth receive $2M+ annually from NIH? Just because they didn't receive the $14M bonanza request doesn't mean they did their research without NIH money. Also there appears to be some misgivings about Ecohealth not maintaining accurate records of a $3M grant.
nobody disputes EcoHealth receives NIH funding. the question is whether this specific proposal was funded by NIH/NIAID after DARPA rejected it, which is what Murphy seems to be saying.
Whether they were following the exact same proposal or something very similar is irrelevant if the same gain-of-function/ dual use research of concern outcomes occurred. They were undertaking in vitro and in vivo infection experiments and analysis of receptor binding for NIH. The only bit which is unclear is whether they actually made live attenuated vaccines and gave them to bats.
yes, we know that NIH directed at least nominal funding to EcoHealth GoF research. that's not what I'm asking.
my question is about sources, and how we assess murphy's memo – does he add any information, or is he simply looking at the same documents we are and drawing conclusions in the same way we are? I think the latter. but I think there's also a decent chance Murphy himself leaked the memo to DRASTIC, after his memo failed to get traction. in which case, we're just looking at two different sides of the same leak here.
I suspect you're right.
but also, this specific proposal and its fate do matter, given that known NIH funding of EcoHealth alliance involves relatively small amounts of money, whereas the DARPA proposal is a fairly big 14 million dollar request.
What kind of tests?