I wonder if this is a part of the strategy of walking back on the narrative. Instead of a comprehensive analysis of what went wrong, we will get a series of limited hangouts, blaming a few puppets for "errors" or blaming inadequacies of "warp speed" development which resulted in "contamination" and other "errors". Like with all other engineered events, we will get more lies and all efforts for real investigations will be effectively blocked.
You absolutely beat me to it. This is just seems like a too nice excuse for the vaccines. So then how the other vaccines are also causing adverse events? Also contaminated by proteins? A "bad" lots...
The question would come down to which people did the research, whether they have pure motives. I hope they are honest motives, because the study is interesting.
I found it rather astonishing that after the warnings and danger about the AZ jab came out many governments, businesses, health care facilities and schools continued to allow them to be injected into anyone. And all this after numerous countries had discontinued them. What we are watching is the rapid decay of our civilization in total synch with Einstein’ definition of insanity.
The Yellow Card Database on the website from UK (well, it's not a database, just a huge list of PDF sheets which one has to scroll through) is very minimally completed with no batch numbers, no ages, no gender, no comments as to what happened to the person receiving the jabs, i.e. if an immediate reaction or something that occurred days or weeks after. I think they are deliberately keeping this information from the public. I know of various people who have suffered clots and heart attacks as well as eye problems, infections but are not relating them to the possible jabs as they have happened months later. So I believe there are many, many more serious adverse reactions that are not reported at all.
UK Column have done their own version of the data from the UK Yellow Card Database which you may find more helpful instead of just scrolling through a 'huge list of PDF sheets'.
Yes, thanks, I do know it but it still only has the information that is given from the government website as that's the source they use. I wrote to the government asking them to include more information on the website, with the additional entities to be included, but still awaiting a reply!
When something is inherently dangerous and has negative efficacy, worrying about minor contaminants seems futile and is likely a deliberate distraction.
“Contaminated batches” will be a defense at Nuremberg 2.0. The plan has always been to make everything so hopelessly complex and convoluted that no prosecution or jury could sort it out and no Judge could take any decision other than to declare a mistrial. Easy work
Are the "host cell proteins" parts of the fetal cell lines that were used to develop and/or produce the abominable shots? In other words are these batches loaded with excess baby bits?
The regulators and producers have figured out by now, that actually the vaccine recipients usually don’t read their data, but vaccine sceptics do. Public reply serves “vaccine hesitancy”. Therefore they don’t reply.
it seems now that "warp speed" simply meant a different set of regulations were applied to the development of these Covid jabs than are normally applied to true, genuine vaccines.
in other words, it's becoming clear to the public now that because "we were in an emergency," true safety testing of these Covid jabs was never performed. the HHS secretary was operating under a different set of laws which were designed to handle a disastrous pandemic, as opposed to providing routine perennial childhood vaccinations. this disaster law allowed all kinds of shortcuts. drug safety testing was not a priority.
but they kept repeating the deception that these jabs were "safe and effective vaccines." it was all word play.
I think we need to stop using the phrase "vaccine hesitancy" and start using "vaccine resistance!" I stopped taking these kinds of shots a few years ago as I was suspicious of their dangers. Over the last couple of years and considerable reading I will never take another. They all have questionable efficacy and most represent significant danger of potential life-long effects. "Dissolving Illusions" by Suzanne Humphries should be required reading in all medical schools. Instead, most have little shrines with a syringe where they burn incense and chant, "safe and effective, safe and effective,...".
I've never been hesitant about taking a series of experimental gene therapy injections for a disease with an IFR of 0.3 (original, current is half that). I've been and continue to be flat out REFUSNIK.
"four out of four (4/4) lots contained significantly higher than expected levels of host cell proteins (HCPs) and free viral proteins..."
Don't you just know shills for the drug kingpins are already churning out talking points about how the sample size is so small it's anecdotal.. ignore odds of 4/4 from sample total as a red flag.. just kill the messenger distort the message.. delay, deny, destroy & buy are their only plays often in combination.
Traditional vaccines ONLY contain RNA fragments and proteins found in humans or the (often abnormal monkey kidney) cells used in culture, or the shock proteins produced by culture. 'The sequences of RNA fragments never shown to come from a virus are added to b) the genetic codes for proteins never shown to come from a virus and are fed into a computer. The computer generates thousands of hypothetical genomes. One is picked, added to and rearranged so that it resembles other hypothetical genomes. Sometimes slightly different ones are arranged and denoted as variants. None of the genomes have been shown to code for actual entities let alone be transmissible or pathogenic.' https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/x-ray-crystallography-and-3d-computer. Doesn't mean the mRNA ones are any less toxic
I wonder if this is a part of the strategy of walking back on the narrative. Instead of a comprehensive analysis of what went wrong, we will get a series of limited hangouts, blaming a few puppets for "errors" or blaming inadequacies of "warp speed" development which resulted in "contamination" and other "errors". Like with all other engineered events, we will get more lies and all efforts for real investigations will be effectively blocked.
Harmfulness of all these jabs is not a bug, but a feature.
Intended, indeed!
You absolutely beat me to it. This is just seems like a too nice excuse for the vaccines. So then how the other vaccines are also causing adverse events? Also contaminated by proteins? A "bad" lots...
Otherwise the vaccine is safe and effective!
Yes that was my thought too.
That was my gut instinct too.
The question would come down to which people did the research, whether they have pure motives. I hope they are honest motives, because the study is interesting.
I found it rather astonishing that after the warnings and danger about the AZ jab came out many governments, businesses, health care facilities and schools continued to allow them to be injected into anyone. And all this after numerous countries had discontinued them. What we are watching is the rapid decay of our civilization in total synch with Einstein’ definition of insanity.
ALL batches are contaminated.
The Yellow Card Database on the website from UK (well, it's not a database, just a huge list of PDF sheets which one has to scroll through) is very minimally completed with no batch numbers, no ages, no gender, no comments as to what happened to the person receiving the jabs, i.e. if an immediate reaction or something that occurred days or weeks after. I think they are deliberately keeping this information from the public. I know of various people who have suffered clots and heart attacks as well as eye problems, infections but are not relating them to the possible jabs as they have happened months later. So I believe there are many, many more serious adverse reactions that are not reported at all.
UK Column have done their own version of the data from the UK Yellow Card Database which you may find more helpful instead of just scrolling through a 'huge list of PDF sheets'.
https://yellowcard.ukcolumn.org/yellow-card-reports
Yes, thanks, I do know it but it still only has the information that is given from the government website as that's the source they use. I wrote to the government asking them to include more information on the website, with the additional entities to be included, but still awaiting a reply!
When something is inherently dangerous and has negative efficacy, worrying about minor contaminants seems futile and is likely a deliberate distraction.
“Contaminated batches” will be a defense at Nuremberg 2.0. The plan has always been to make everything so hopelessly complex and convoluted that no prosecution or jury could sort it out and no Judge could take any decision other than to declare a mistrial. Easy work
Are the "host cell proteins" parts of the fetal cell lines that were used to develop and/or produce the abominable shots? In other words are these batches loaded with excess baby bits?
I want to know more about this too.
The escape from liability from putting a dangerous jab on the market is that somehow ... beyond their control... contamination happened.
Nice try.
The regulators and producers have figured out by now, that actually the vaccine recipients usually don’t read their data, but vaccine sceptics do. Public reply serves “vaccine hesitancy”. Therefore they don’t reply.
it seems now that "warp speed" simply meant a different set of regulations were applied to the development of these Covid jabs than are normally applied to true, genuine vaccines.
in other words, it's becoming clear to the public now that because "we were in an emergency," true safety testing of these Covid jabs was never performed. the HHS secretary was operating under a different set of laws which were designed to handle a disastrous pandemic, as opposed to providing routine perennial childhood vaccinations. this disaster law allowed all kinds of shortcuts. drug safety testing was not a priority.
but they kept repeating the deception that these jabs were "safe and effective vaccines." it was all word play.
I think we need to stop using the phrase "vaccine hesitancy" and start using "vaccine resistance!" I stopped taking these kinds of shots a few years ago as I was suspicious of their dangers. Over the last couple of years and considerable reading I will never take another. They all have questionable efficacy and most represent significant danger of potential life-long effects. "Dissolving Illusions" by Suzanne Humphries should be required reading in all medical schools. Instead, most have little shrines with a syringe where they burn incense and chant, "safe and effective, safe and effective,...".
And in the case of this jab, don’t call the poison a “vaccine” @ all
I've never been hesitant about taking a series of experimental gene therapy injections for a disease with an IFR of 0.3 (original, current is half that). I've been and continue to be flat out REFUSNIK.
"four out of four (4/4) lots contained significantly higher than expected levels of host cell proteins (HCPs) and free viral proteins..."
Don't you just know shills for the drug kingpins are already churning out talking points about how the sample size is so small it's anecdotal.. ignore odds of 4/4 from sample total as a red flag.. just kill the messenger distort the message.. delay, deny, destroy & buy are their only plays often in combination.
Hiya
Traditional vaccines ONLY contain RNA fragments and proteins found in humans or the (often abnormal monkey kidney) cells used in culture, or the shock proteins produced by culture. 'The sequences of RNA fragments never shown to come from a virus are added to b) the genetic codes for proteins never shown to come from a virus and are fed into a computer. The computer generates thousands of hypothetical genomes. One is picked, added to and rearranged so that it resembles other hypothetical genomes. Sometimes slightly different ones are arranged and denoted as variants. None of the genomes have been shown to code for actual entities let alone be transmissible or pathogenic.' https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/x-ray-crystallography-and-3d-computer. Doesn't mean the mRNA ones are any less toxic
Jo
Of course, it's not about public health. So, I would not call for a more careful planning of this cull.
Pease listen to this great interview; my research leads to the same: http://shows.zbsradio.com/20220820/a82b8e97904e4ba.mp3 https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/my-interview-on-the-tom-quinn-show/comments
It’s the revenge of the Foetus! ( HEK293 )
This also raises more ethical questions of cannibalism surely?
Remember them saying that there were definitely no aborted foetus cells in the actual vaccine when everyone was up in arms about it?
Yet another disgusting lie to add to the pile of satanic shit 💉👺
Maybe a competitor contaminated it, and tipped off someone to look into it.