May 24, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
Naturally this is the case. No Covid-19 isolated and only a genomic image from a Chinese lab. Fraud. Point #1: There appear to be no isolated, purified Certified Reference Materials available for SARS-CoV-2 “covid”. I’ve seen companies that claim to be selling “isolates” containing covid viruses, but in their own description, they explain that their vials contain genetic material from “host cells” (human cells) as well as bovine serum cells, which means it’s a cocktail stew of who-knows-what. Yet it’s called an “isolate.”
Case in point: BEI Resources, which offers something they call an “isolate” of covid-19, that you can find at this link. As the description states for this covid-19 “isolate:”
…[T]his product is not suitable as a whole cell antigen preparation because the protein content is largely contributed by the host cell and the fetal bovine serum used during virus propagation.
In other words, most of the genetic material in the “isolate” is actually from human cells. So it’s not an isolate at all. The covid virus isn’t isolated. In fact, this “isolate” contains viral genetic material, human genetic material and bovine genetic material, plus whatever other viruses were present in the blood of the people and the cows. This could be millions of different nanoparticles present, each containing their own sequences of genetic material.
Point #2: If you have no isolated, certified reference materials, you can’t develop a legitimate analysis test. And this is exactly what the FDA admits in its own documents, which state that since covid-19 viruses weren’t available for the development of the PCR test, they “simulated” it by using human cells and gene bank coronavirus fragments. From the FDA’s own document:
Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA … spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.
In other words, they faked the covid virus by using gene bank cells which were deliberately and falsely labeled “covid.” This is how the PCR test was developed. The FDA admits it all. The PCR test is a fraud.
Point #3: If you don’t have a CRM isolate, you can’t calibrate instruments against a known sample. And this means the PCR tests aren’t being calibrated against anything real and physical. Instead, they’re relying on downloaded digital libraries provided by none of than the CDC, the very same Big Pharma front group that’s spearheading this covid scam.
Point #4: PCR instruments are incapable of quantitative analysis. The “positive” hits are nothing but amplified background noise. No PCR instrument can tell you how much of some genetic material was found in an original sample. It can merely detect the presence of material on a yes / no basis. In lab science, this is called a “qualitative” analysis, not a quantitative analysis.
In qualitative analysis, the key factor is the “Limit of Detection” (LOD) of the instrument. How little of the sample will still create a “hit” for the instrument? In all instruments, for the LOD to be scientifically valid, it must be something that rises above background noise, or it’s scientifically meaningless. All instruments produce background noise, which are “peaks” or “hits” that represent detector static, you might say. These exist at a background level even when you’re running nothing in the instrument.
To show you what this looks like, consider the following graphic. It shows some mass spec results across a spectrum of masses. The horizontal axis here is m/z (mass over charge), which is simplified to just “mass” for general discussion. It’s the mass of the molecules or particles being detected.
Notice the red and orange lines across the bottom of each chart. That’s largely “background” noise across all the masses. Then notice the very tall orange peak which rises above the background. This is the mass of the molecule they’re looking for. It might be a pesticide, or a contaminant, or a nutrient, etc.
May 24, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
They do like to keep the fear going. To have us believe that they could tinker around with these invisible killer dots they call viruses. Dr. Sam Bailey's excellent video on gain-of-function gaslighting: https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/gain-of-function-gaslighting:8
May 24, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
This article is more technical than I can follow. Nevertheless it is informative and worth the price of an annual subscription. First class journalism Naked Emperor! Thank you.
May 24, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
I'm curious, if we pretend a genuine zoonotic event, why it happened now and not at any other time in the past? Same with the smallpox "exercise" they're talking about. Are we pretending a leopard has never bitten a human being before?
I think I know why - to pretend zoonotic transmission isn't a semi-regular thing that never results in pandemics. It's practically gaslighting at this point.
This is a novel and a very interesting line of thinking. If I understand you correctly, it can be implied that Sars-Cov-2 was designed to cause autoimmunity, right?
It’s a deliberate insertion. It will be the same with monkey pox.
Naturally this is the case. No Covid-19 isolated and only a genomic image from a Chinese lab. Fraud. Point #1: There appear to be no isolated, purified Certified Reference Materials available for SARS-CoV-2 “covid”. I’ve seen companies that claim to be selling “isolates” containing covid viruses, but in their own description, they explain that their vials contain genetic material from “host cells” (human cells) as well as bovine serum cells, which means it’s a cocktail stew of who-knows-what. Yet it’s called an “isolate.”
Case in point: BEI Resources, which offers something they call an “isolate” of covid-19, that you can find at this link. As the description states for this covid-19 “isolate:”
…[T]his product is not suitable as a whole cell antigen preparation because the protein content is largely contributed by the host cell and the fetal bovine serum used during virus propagation.
In other words, most of the genetic material in the “isolate” is actually from human cells. So it’s not an isolate at all. The covid virus isn’t isolated. In fact, this “isolate” contains viral genetic material, human genetic material and bovine genetic material, plus whatever other viruses were present in the blood of the people and the cows. This could be millions of different nanoparticles present, each containing their own sequences of genetic material.
Point #2: If you have no isolated, certified reference materials, you can’t develop a legitimate analysis test. And this is exactly what the FDA admits in its own documents, which state that since covid-19 viruses weren’t available for the development of the PCR test, they “simulated” it by using human cells and gene bank coronavirus fragments. From the FDA’s own document:
Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA … spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.
In other words, they faked the covid virus by using gene bank cells which were deliberately and falsely labeled “covid.” This is how the PCR test was developed. The FDA admits it all. The PCR test is a fraud.
Point #3: If you don’t have a CRM isolate, you can’t calibrate instruments against a known sample. And this means the PCR tests aren’t being calibrated against anything real and physical. Instead, they’re relying on downloaded digital libraries provided by none of than the CDC, the very same Big Pharma front group that’s spearheading this covid scam.
Point #4: PCR instruments are incapable of quantitative analysis. The “positive” hits are nothing but amplified background noise. No PCR instrument can tell you how much of some genetic material was found in an original sample. It can merely detect the presence of material on a yes / no basis. In lab science, this is called a “qualitative” analysis, not a quantitative analysis.
In qualitative analysis, the key factor is the “Limit of Detection” (LOD) of the instrument. How little of the sample will still create a “hit” for the instrument? In all instruments, for the LOD to be scientifically valid, it must be something that rises above background noise, or it’s scientifically meaningless. All instruments produce background noise, which are “peaks” or “hits” that represent detector static, you might say. These exist at a background level even when you’re running nothing in the instrument.
To show you what this looks like, consider the following graphic. It shows some mass spec results across a spectrum of masses. The horizontal axis here is m/z (mass over charge), which is simplified to just “mass” for general discussion. It’s the mass of the molecules or particles being detected.
Notice the red and orange lines across the bottom of each chart. That’s largely “background” noise across all the masses. Then notice the very tall orange peak which rises above the background. This is the mass of the molecule they’re looking for. It might be a pesticide, or a contaminant, or a nutrient, etc.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-08-08-hhs-documents-admit-the-cdc-has-never-isolated-any-covid-19-virus-global-hoax.html
Thank you for the clear and straightforward explanation of immunological T-distance.
Excellent. The devil seems always to be in the dug-out details.
David Martin said the originals SARS virus was patented before it was released into the public.
Someone must have spiked that bat soup.
They do like to keep the fear going. To have us believe that they could tinker around with these invisible killer dots they call viruses. Dr. Sam Bailey's excellent video on gain-of-function gaslighting: https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/gain-of-function-gaslighting:8
This article is more technical than I can follow. Nevertheless it is informative and worth the price of an annual subscription. First class journalism Naked Emperor! Thank you.
I'm curious, if we pretend a genuine zoonotic event, why it happened now and not at any other time in the past? Same with the smallpox "exercise" they're talking about. Are we pretending a leopard has never bitten a human being before?
I think I know why - to pretend zoonotic transmission isn't a semi-regular thing that never results in pandemics. It's practically gaslighting at this point.
They found sars-cov-2 is samples going back to early 2019.
Antobodies going back to 2017.
T-cell immunity going back to 2015.
It’s not a new virus. It has been with us for many years.
It is 100% a consequence of mass hysteria.
Et tu, Emperor?
Ah.
They found sars-cov-2 is samples going back to early 2019.
Antobodies going back to 2017.
T-cell immunity going back to 2015.
It’s not a new virus. It has been with us for many years.
It is 100% a consequence of mass hysteria.
This is a novel and a very interesting line of thinking. If I understand you correctly, it can be implied that Sars-Cov-2 was designed to cause autoimmunity, right?
Hopefully, Spurinna's words will come true for the people who created this.