76 Comments
User's avatar
Rob P's avatar

Plexiglass barriers at check outs in stores and supermarkets is anti science.

Expand full comment
NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter's avatar

This is a particular favourite of mine (in a bad way). On TV in the UK we have University Challenge quiz show, supposedly the crème de la crème of intelligence, but they still have plexiglass barriers between contestants.

Expand full comment
Rob P's avatar

Had to get my car fixed in June 2020.

Had to sign the invoice and then went to give the pen back.

Them: “No… We can’t take that it’s been contaminated…”

Me: “Cool, free pen.”

Them: “Can we have your keys now sir?”

Me: Smile… “Ya sure, do you want the pen back now too?”

Them: Stared back blankly… “Huh?”

Me: Chuckling “Never mind…”

Expand full comment
Cindi's avatar

F’ing morons

Expand full comment
Cindi's avatar

What about the dopes who wore clear face shields open on the sides & below????

Expand full comment
JMJ's avatar

I still see that sometimes

Expand full comment
April Smith's avatar

lol! I bought some of those because you can breathe freely in them. I opted not to wear them or the masks though. Both are stupid.

Expand full comment
Cindi's avatar

Early on I had some too because smothering myself was not going to happen. But they looked as stupid & like you, I never wore either

Expand full comment
Rob P's avatar

Yay… Team $cience….

Expand full comment
AngrySenior's avatar

Sadly, I think the UK subjects have been lied to as much as citizens in the US.

My friends in the Lancashire area (Northern England) had not heard of Klaus Schwab's

WEF or the UN agendas.

Expand full comment
Cindi's avatar

It’s global deceit & lies, not just UK or US

Expand full comment
AngrySenior's avatar

Yes, I know. But the author is British and I'm typing in the US.

Expand full comment
Cindi's avatar

Me too

Expand full comment
CaliforniaLost's avatar

My favorite is that everyone leans around the barriers to talk.

Expand full comment
Neil Pryke's avatar

The most frightening thing I've read today is True North's item about "vaccine hesitancy". The Ontario College of Physicians is recommending that it be treated with drugs and psychotherapy, presumably administered by appropriately-qualified physicians and psychotherapists. Scary - Canada today, tomorrow zer vorld...!

Expand full comment
Anon38901932047's avatar

Not to worry. The solution is simple: become drug and psychotherapy hesitant.

Expand full comment
TRM's avatar

LMAO. Now that is creative thinking. I like it.

Expand full comment
AngrySenior's avatar

Here in California, only "approved" truths by the State of California are allowed. Doctors will lose their license if they don't follow the "approved" narrative. Lawsuit already filed - it'll fall.

Expand full comment
BHerr's avatar

Holy shit. What's happening in Canada? Voluntary euthanasia simply by feeling "bummed out" and so many other crazy, evil things.

Expand full comment
Blackwater River's avatar

And if you are declared as having a mental illness, then you can rest assured of being sent an Advanced Directive so NHS can quickly DNAR you (sent out by Mental Health Minister) whatever your age.

While in Belgium, PTSD is treated with …euthanasia. I only used a form of CBT on my Anxiety patients. But sure, killing them is an entirely successful and permanent treatment for PTSD.

Like the 23 year old Belgian woman who suffered from PTSD following a terror attack six years ago. They T4’d her!

Also in UK check out their DNAR protocols to refuse providing Life saving treatment:

Frailty Score (suggested to be used by Social workers to identify the frail too).

Level of disability (help required for heavy household chores =5).

+

Years over 60 in bands

+

NUMBER not severity or factors implying life limiting, of ANY and ALL illnesses. Depression Anxiety and PTSD gets 3. Incontinence. High BP or cholesterol. Asthma. Allergies. As well as biggies like Heart failure and Cancer (1 point each).

Over 5’s during Spring ‘emergency’ are DNAR’d without patient or their families knowledge.

It’s usually an 8. They won’t save you but will ‘make you comfortable’. Just like they cured that Belgium woman of PTSD

Expand full comment
Tareq I. Albaho, PhD's avatar

It is actually already happening elsewhere. Dr Thomas Binder in Switzerland and, right now, Dr Meryl Nass in the USA is being suggested she needs psychiatric evaluation because she prescribed HCQ to a patient. (Funny that ... the doctors who gave Donald Trump HCQ at Walter Reed Army hospital were not attacked this way ...)

Calling your political oponents "mad" and locking them up in asylums was established practice in some regimes. Lobotomies and electric shocks next.

Expand full comment
Anon38901932047's avatar

Nice. How was the public able to find out that Trump was actually given HCQ at Walter Reed? I haven't heard about that.

Expand full comment
Tareq I. Albaho, PhD's avatar

I believe he said so at the time. That was actually the start of the anti-HCO campaign. Because Trump took it, then it must be bad etc. Nobody ever dared going after the doctors who advised it. It was just more cheap politics with zero regard to medicine or objective truth.

Expand full comment
AngrySenior's avatar

I remember Trump saying that.

In all the bad-mouthing of Ivermectin, lefties seem to forget that Jimmy Carter promoted the use of Ivermectin in 11 poor countries - over 160 million doses. It's still up on YT.

Here's the link, IF you can't find it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8PxzZnxlBw

Must have been video'd by a Democrat, because it has "angelic" music and the Carters are surrounded by little brown people. /sarc

Expand full comment
TRM's avatar

Here's the link if you want to read it:

https://tnc.news/2022/10/11/treat-vaccine-hesitancy/

How low can you go "doctors"? "Mengele School of Medicine" MSM

Expand full comment
Vxi7's avatar

What have I just read!?

Expand full comment
PamelaDrew's avatar

How rude to ignore the fact that "Fauci is Science" and your list doesn't show reverence for him! Obviously this list is from the radical minority who doubt the benevolence of government & big pharma when all we need is blind faith and persecution of heretic non-believers!

Expand full comment
Cindi's avatar

Telling people not to come to the hospital until they couldn’t breathe, refusing to treat w/ cheap & actually effective meds, refusing to tell people about vitamins & being out in the fresh air, losing some weight - all anti-science.

Expand full comment
Jen's avatar

THIS! So agree... since when do we EVER “not” provide early treatment for anything?? Off to get my mammogram bc you know... early detection!

Expand full comment
Josie Caradoc's avatar

Sorry, I may have to stop myself going crazy with this but..

Taking down all but one swing in the playground so that children (or their adults) are not swinging/pushing next to each other - whilst leaving the climbing equipment free for unlimited numbers of children, plus a queue to form for the remaining blummin swing.... - is anti science.

Expand full comment
NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter's avatar

So many playground examples! It was the perfect excuse for jobsworths to let loose

Expand full comment
TRM's avatar

My favorite was the skateboard park they filled in with sand to prevent use. The boarders manually cleaned it up. You have a backhoe and I have a hundred young people with shovels and brooms. Game on!

Expand full comment
The Beach Is My Bliss's avatar

Along with arresting surfers

Expand full comment
Stuffysays's avatar

It's not just all anti-science. It's anti civilisation society. Anti good manners. Anti humane behaviour. Anti kindness. Anti thoughtfulness. Anti logic. Anti caring. Anti everything that makes humans human.

Expand full comment
UK refugee's avatar

That's the MO and motive right there.

Expand full comment
Josie Caradoc's avatar

"One way" systems round shops and supermarkets etc, where people pass each other constantly anyway, is anti-science.

Closing entrances and exits such that many more people are forced together through a narrower space - but, heaven forbid, don't actually "cross" each other - is anti science.

Expand full comment
Josie Caradoc's avatar

Our local hospital has a stretch of six doorways and it shut all bar two, forcing queues both in and out.

It also maintained a one way system whereby, on leaving the outpatient clinics you could not walk the 50ft to the nearest door. Instead, you had to walk 3+ minutes through the hospital and past two acute care wards (one respiratory) and the ITU. THAT is anti science - and from a hospital no less.

Expand full comment
FoolsGold's avatar

Bravo.

Expand full comment
David JOS's avatar

outstanding...the list will grow...

Expand full comment
MotW's avatar

Anyone using the phrase "the science is settled" is incurious and anti-science.

Expand full comment
Josie Caradoc's avatar

Refusing a medical exemption in circumstances where someone has had a severe and/or prolonged adverse reaction to their first injection, on the basis that there is no evidence they would have a similarly adverse reaction to a different type of MRNA vaccine - is anti science.

Point blank refusal to consider highly relevant past medical history e.g. Bell's Palsy, Grave's, severe eczema, blood clotting in the granting of a medical exemption - especially for someone who has already had the infection - is anti science.

Right, I'll stop now ! It is, indeed, infinite..

Expand full comment
Josie Caradoc's avatar

P.S. That is how the Green Book works. I don't think many people realise how incredibly limited the scope for obtaining an exemption has been.

Expand full comment
TRM's avatar

And if you want to know who is behind it, here's a nice start to a list we should all be keeping:

https://expose-news.com/2022/10/12/names-face-bilderbergers-controlled-covid-response/

Expand full comment
Jen's avatar

Haven’t read all the comments but... changing the definition of “vaccine” is not science! (Make up a new word like “gene altering shot”, oh wait... you want folks to THINK it does what a “vaccine“ used to do/mean?! Gotcha!!)

Expand full comment
NatteringNaybob's avatar

Anti Science Genocide: Forcing everyone to wait ONE YEAR in lockdown by disallowing any and all alternative treatment to accommodate an EUA for poorly tested and unproven "vaccines".

Expand full comment
Just_Henry's avatar

Willbellum

just now

So if a loved one does develop the unthinkable -cancer - from the covid vaccinations fenbendazole a safe, inexpensive, OTC, effective treatment is available see this new Substack https://fenbendazole.substack.com/?r=oh1g6&utm_campaign=pub&utm_medium=web

Expand full comment
Ms. P's avatar

Declaring, "The Science is settled" is anti-science.

Calling those asking questions, "Anti-vaxxers" is anti-science.

Ignoring the adverse events occurring within days/minutes of receiving the mRNA shots is anti-science.

Calling the mRNA gene therapies "vaccines" is anti-science.

Expand full comment