Here we are in the middle of a societal and economic catastrophe that was created by the high financiers, the medical cartel and their political puppets with millions of lab rats being repeatedly injected with immune system destroying experimental toxic shit.
I guess we could call it "omicron" or ADE or whatever you want. Fact is anyone who keeps pumping this shit into their body is destined for an early death or a life of chronic disease.
Another fact is that some significant number of people, literally tens of millions, have had this garbage forced into them through various mechanisms of coercion, threats, blackmail and assorted manipulations. Those are called crimes.
Absolutely. This is the missing piece at the moment, any avenue that we will find the full truth about its origin and that those responsible will be prosecuted for their malfeasance.
“Ultimately this will hopefully end up with an indictment against the six figure heads, which we picked as future defendants, we know they’re only symbolic, but still: Dresdon, Fauci, Tedros, Gates, BlackRock and Pfizer.
“It is not so much about getting indictments against these people and institutions but rather, what we really have in mind is, to give the people the whole story. Not just pictures of the puzzle, but the whole story through a judicial proceeding, which has credibility and authority to enable them to understand that they not only have a right, but a duty to resist. Because as it will be made very clear, this is about life and death now.”
While I do think that is very poor form and should never be done I can't help but do a Nelson Muntz (The Simpsons bully kid) "Ha Ha" (complete with finger pointing) at least once per occation. If they get sick and recover I get to bug them once. I think that's fair.
Yea I'm hoping that some vaccine damage remediation protocols will get developed quickly. So many people took the damn shots and the medium term stuff is grim and the long term is completely unknown.
Really, let's hope it's all okay, and those who got jabbed and made it without vaccine injury still have a billion years worth of evolution weighing in their favour.
in some of these presentations from other the numbers are reported as absolute numbers not rates. I've seen charts and graphs of hospitalizations and deaths among vaxxed vs unvaxxed that show 50 percent of the ICU admits are vaxxed and 50 % unvaxxed . But in many places the vaxxed are a much greater proportion of the population . So the rate of ICU admission is lower among vaxxed people. This difference between nominal values and rates has been used by the universal vax proponents and mandate pushers to try to discredit those of us who are making claims like you are making here. I think its very important to publish the data with rates.
There are two points here, the ONS data is based on the population and there is still a large % of the population that are not eligible for vaccination (children)
There is also a significant amount of people who cannot have the vax due to ongoing medical issues, these are also more likely to be chronically ill and end up in hospital/ICU
The rates and raw data are all in the report, linked to above. I compared the rate of change in rates per 100,000 between the last report and this one.
Lots of money? Promises of fulfilling any debauchery they fancy? Someone has compromising photos and videos of politicians, journos, police chiefs, generals, judges, etc?
Of course it is! They are 'proud' to be injecting their child. Good remove the stupid genes before they reach breeding age https://twitter.com/i/status/1489265634957414400 The parents will be boosted so we don't have to worry about them either
Unless we take into consideration the various strata of what we call “vaccinated” to incorporate 1 jab, 2 jabs & 3 jabs then these figures are unreliable because the earlier jabs predispose the victim ( careful choice of words there ) to certain levels of immunodeficiency so I think we still have a watered down snapshot of the true situation that is biased in favour of the Covid lie 🤕
Interesting choice of words - "watered down." Dr Yeadon, former Pfizer VP, has analyzed the "vaccine" effects by batch and has surmised that many of the batches are showing to have a similar number of side effects as straight saline solution. So I add to your fine comment the fact that very likely not all people are getting the actual "vaccine" after all.
That would mean the "vaccine" I actually more dangerous than even the "watered down" results being put out there by VAERS.
4.5 billion people vaccinated globally. Considering the potential mechanisms of death in these injections, what percentage will die in the next 5 years? ADE, cancer, neurological diseases, cardio vascular diseases, blood clots, auto immune diseases - Dr. Tenpenny has documented 40 potential mechanisms of death caused from these "injections" Pick your percentage of 4.5 billion people and it will amount to MILLIONS if not a billion deaths. Check out Dr. Tenpenny here: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/QN8kAob1zRJ7/
This is going to make the Black Plague look like a Sunday picnic in the park.
Thank you for this discussion. I follow data on BTIs and I am seeing a similar shift in the data in California and in Vermont. California DPH now includes boosters as a forth category of their data. In one month all BTI cases (double vaxxed plus boosted) increased by 40%, double vaxxed increased by 26% and boosted by 85%. BTI hospitalizations in one month all BTI hospitalizations increased by 48%, double vaxxed by 41% and boosted by 81%. BTI deaths in one month all BTI deaths increased by 30%, double vaxxed by 22% and boosted by 83%. The overall percentages for boosters is small. But there are clear trends of increased BTIs in both groups. Combined boosters and double vaxxed BTI make up 64% of cases, 48% of hospitalizations and 33% of deaths for the week of 1/9-1/15.
Vermont in one month has had a 15% increase in BTI (data on booster vs double vaxxed is not seperated). The last weeks BTI case percentage was 59%. BTI hospitalizations have increased by 40% with the last week's data showing 63% of new hospitalizations for COVID were BTI.
For both states the percentage or portion of positive cases, hospitalizations and deaths that are BTI have been steadily rising. Could be more omicron, but it could be something else. I would post a few graphs but can't in a comment.
Feb 4, 2022·edited Feb 5, 2022Liked by NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter
I feel the most likely reason the unvaccinated are in better shape than the vaccinated at this point is that the unvaccinated were exposed previously, and whether they showed symptoms or not, acquired a much more durable and real immunity. The vaccines, which become less effective quickly, merely kicked the can down the road for that group, and omicron is strolling right past the Jab Guards.
Exactly, however, the problem for the vaccinated group is the inability to make durable immunity when they do get omicron or other variants as they do not make a significant N antibody response. The unvaxed who don't have previous exposure are able to gain robust immunity. The following is a nice review of recent antibody analysis in UK following omicron infection in vaccinated patients.
just curious to the sentence "had their boosters a while ago so are in the peak of their antibody production"...wondering why would that matter if those antibodies do not work on the omicron anyways right?
maybe also having a prior infection and then also being vaxcinated would also be the case. (having a prior infection but still believing in the vaccines would probably make them the same people first in line for boosters aswell right?) : from this study's logic : "A possible case of ADE was observed in a patient with a second SARS-CoV-2 infection (59). Early vaccine results show significant antibody responses by day 14 (60) which represents memory B-cell responses (i.e., original antigenic sin) with cross-reactivity antibodies from likely other coronavirus strain" : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7943455/
its difficult to deduce if vaccination after natural infection would hinder or enhance immunity to covid and immunity in general. Id wager on hinder, but it would probably most likely just come down to individual's body chemistry at the time.
Observations from UK data have been very reveiling and I really appreciate your analysis.
I would like to suggest that the immune system and immune response to both covid infections and covid vaccinations are significantly more complex than just antibody response as it pertains to infection and re-infection. Discussions about vaccine failure seem to always revolve about antibody related OAS and AED which I feel is a significant over simplification of what is occurring. Antibodies, cellular immunity, interferon response and their degradation following mRNA vaccination all play a role here. That is why I think VAED (https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/pfizers-documented-antibody-dependent)
was listed as a concern, not AED but Vaccine Associated Enhanced Disease. ( AED and OAS are subsets here). Others have referred to VAIDS or vaccine acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. So, I think it is more appropriate to attribute vaccine failures to a broader definition of immune response failure than just antibody OAS or AED.
Vaccinated and boosted people are showing increased rates of infection from not only Covid but common colds, influenza etc which implies VAED and VAIDS, not just just antibody related processes. Making ineffective or enhancing monoclonal Covid 19 spike protein antibodies has little to do being more susceptible to other respiratory viruses.
The following link is a great discussion of a more global disruption of ones immune system following mRNA injections
This does look concerning but a % change in death rate can be misleading if you don't disclose the actual differential death rates. If the booster wanes quickly, unless it overtakes the death rate of the unjabbed, it's not ADE - just reverting to the unjabbed rate?
"Recently they changed the vaccinated population they were comparing from persons with at least 2 doses to persons with at least 3 doses."
So is it the boosted vs the really unvaxxed here?
If so, how do the double vaxxed fare?
Or are the unvaccinated here really mostly double vaccinated, at least to a significant percentage (%age total double vaxxed per age group minus %age total boosted in that age group minus %age total really unvaxxed in that age group)?
Yes just boosted vs the really unvaxxed. They don't produce rates for the double jabbed anymore (wonder why!?) but you can see the raw numbers in the report.
Here we are in the middle of a societal and economic catastrophe that was created by the high financiers, the medical cartel and their political puppets with millions of lab rats being repeatedly injected with immune system destroying experimental toxic shit.
I guess we could call it "omicron" or ADE or whatever you want. Fact is anyone who keeps pumping this shit into their body is destined for an early death or a life of chronic disease.
Another fact is that some significant number of people, literally tens of millions, have had this garbage forced into them through various mechanisms of coercion, threats, blackmail and assorted manipulations. Those are called crimes.
There must be a reckoning.
Crimes Against Humanity.
Absolutely. This is the missing piece at the moment, any avenue that we will find the full truth about its origin and that those responsible will be prosecuted for their malfeasance.
https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/02/03/cic-announces-grand-jury-trial/
Starts tomorrow.
“Ultimately this will hopefully end up with an indictment against the six figure heads, which we picked as future defendants, we know they’re only symbolic, but still: Dresdon, Fauci, Tedros, Gates, BlackRock and Pfizer.
“It is not so much about getting indictments against these people and institutions but rather, what we really have in mind is, to give the people the whole story. Not just pictures of the puzzle, but the whole story through a judicial proceeding, which has credibility and authority to enable them to understand that they not only have a right, but a duty to resist. Because as it will be made very clear, this is about life and death now.”
Ya but those are the same people that you may have warned... who got angry and told you to f789 off. Maybe time for a bit of schadenfreude?
While I do think that is very poor form and should never be done I can't help but do a Nelson Muntz (The Simpsons bully kid) "Ha Ha" (complete with finger pointing) at least once per occation. If they get sick and recover I get to bug them once. I think that's fair.
The great thing ... is they won't recover... they/ve f789ed themselves with Reverse AIDS... https://worldedge.substack.com/p/reverse-aids-part-ii-the-toll-of
Yea I'm hoping that some vaccine damage remediation protocols will get developed quickly. So many people took the damn shots and the medium term stuff is grim and the long term is completely unknown.
I hear a song by Prozzak playing ...
https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/097/749/105/original/38425cb6617ee3e4.jpg
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/more-aggressive-hiv-strain-that-leads-to-aids-twice-as-fast-discovered-in-netherlands/ar-AATtZGE
cant wait for a different virus to show up next, influenza a or b see what happens then
Jabbed will get destroyed, see my Toll of TLR post. Any jabbed will now get continuously infected by stupid infections
Really, let's hope it's all okay, and those who got jabbed and made it without vaccine injury still have a billion years worth of evolution weighing in their favour.
We could do with a good cull - 8B is way too much. The injected failed the Big Test. The penalty is ADE?
Jabbed will get destroyed, see my Toll of TLR post. Any jabbed will now get continuously infected by stupid infections
https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/097/749/105/original/38425cb6617ee3e4.jpg
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/more-aggressive-hiv-strain-that-leads-to-aids-twice-as-fast-discovered-in-netherlands/ar-AATtZGE
in some of these presentations from other the numbers are reported as absolute numbers not rates. I've seen charts and graphs of hospitalizations and deaths among vaxxed vs unvaxxed that show 50 percent of the ICU admits are vaxxed and 50 % unvaxxed . But in many places the vaxxed are a much greater proportion of the population . So the rate of ICU admission is lower among vaxxed people. This difference between nominal values and rates has been used by the universal vax proponents and mandate pushers to try to discredit those of us who are making claims like you are making here. I think its very important to publish the data with rates.
There are two points here, the ONS data is based on the population and there is still a large % of the population that are not eligible for vaccination (children)
There is also a significant amount of people who cannot have the vax due to ongoing medical issues, these are also more likely to be chronically ill and end up in hospital/ICU
The rates and raw data are all in the report, linked to above. I compared the rate of change in rates per 100,000 between the last report and this one.
Why did they take the risk and then why do they continue in spite of the data?
It’s all so maddening
Lots of money? Promises of fulfilling any debauchery they fancy? Someone has compromising photos and videos of politicians, journos, police chiefs, generals, judges, etc?
Exactly… they think our stuff is misinformation… off with our heads!🤯
It's safe and effective. It's safe and effective. It's safe and effective. It's safe and effective.
Of course it is! They are 'proud' to be injecting their child. Good remove the stupid genes before they reach breeding age https://twitter.com/i/status/1489265634957414400 The parents will be boosted so we don't have to worry about them either
Unless we take into consideration the various strata of what we call “vaccinated” to incorporate 1 jab, 2 jabs & 3 jabs then these figures are unreliable because the earlier jabs predispose the victim ( careful choice of words there ) to certain levels of immunodeficiency so I think we still have a watered down snapshot of the true situation that is biased in favour of the Covid lie 🤕
Interesting choice of words - "watered down." Dr Yeadon, former Pfizer VP, has analyzed the "vaccine" effects by batch and has surmised that many of the batches are showing to have a similar number of side effects as straight saline solution. So I add to your fine comment the fact that very likely not all people are getting the actual "vaccine" after all.
That would mean the "vaccine" I actually more dangerous than even the "watered down" results being put out there by VAERS.
But that is in America
Over here info is hard to get
I have a yellow card by vaccine batch FOI in for review as they refused it in the U.K.
And the MHRA answered that there are no “placebos” and it’s all the real stuff in the UK
I suspect that the reason for the obsfurcation is that if we knew the truth then it would be a bombshell
No doubt. We are the lab rats. Some of us choose to be the control group.
4.5 billion people vaccinated globally. Considering the potential mechanisms of death in these injections, what percentage will die in the next 5 years? ADE, cancer, neurological diseases, cardio vascular diseases, blood clots, auto immune diseases - Dr. Tenpenny has documented 40 potential mechanisms of death caused from these "injections" Pick your percentage of 4.5 billion people and it will amount to MILLIONS if not a billion deaths. Check out Dr. Tenpenny here: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/QN8kAob1zRJ7/
This is going to make the Black Plague look like a Sunday picnic in the park.
Excess mortality not showing that to be the case so far... Excess deaths falling sharply alongside booster rollout rate.
Usmortality.com euromomo.eu ons
Yes excess mortality trend has been falling since September but would need the figures split by age group to compare.
There's filters on those sites. Slightly More granular on usmortality.com
Our bodies have remarkable healing power. Let’s hope it is enough.
Thank you for this discussion. I follow data on BTIs and I am seeing a similar shift in the data in California and in Vermont. California DPH now includes boosters as a forth category of their data. In one month all BTI cases (double vaxxed plus boosted) increased by 40%, double vaxxed increased by 26% and boosted by 85%. BTI hospitalizations in one month all BTI hospitalizations increased by 48%, double vaxxed by 41% and boosted by 81%. BTI deaths in one month all BTI deaths increased by 30%, double vaxxed by 22% and boosted by 83%. The overall percentages for boosters is small. But there are clear trends of increased BTIs in both groups. Combined boosters and double vaxxed BTI make up 64% of cases, 48% of hospitalizations and 33% of deaths for the week of 1/9-1/15.
Vermont in one month has had a 15% increase in BTI (data on booster vs double vaxxed is not seperated). The last weeks BTI case percentage was 59%. BTI hospitalizations have increased by 40% with the last week's data showing 63% of new hospitalizations for COVID were BTI.
For both states the percentage or portion of positive cases, hospitalizations and deaths that are BTI have been steadily rising. Could be more omicron, but it could be something else. I would post a few graphs but can't in a comment.
What’s BTI?
Thanks for the info on the ground. Interesting
Great data ! Thanks
I feel the most likely reason the unvaccinated are in better shape than the vaccinated at this point is that the unvaccinated were exposed previously, and whether they showed symptoms or not, acquired a much more durable and real immunity. The vaccines, which become less effective quickly, merely kicked the can down the road for that group, and omicron is strolling right past the Jab Guards.
Exactly, however, the problem for the vaccinated group is the inability to make durable immunity when they do get omicron or other variants as they do not make a significant N antibody response. The unvaxed who don't have previous exposure are able to gain robust immunity. The following is a nice review of recent antibody analysis in UK following omicron infection in vaccinated patients.
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/ukhsa-explains-endless-reinfections
Populations self police one another,
As the sadists in power turn brother on brother.
They need not order this divisive behaviour,
Just withhold temporary freedom until all bow to the saviour.
They'll get so desperate for the release from the squeeze,
Their crowd sourced compliance not controlling a disease,
Just controlling their future for the coming wave,
As free spike proteins send many to their graves.
-
"I've had mine" , they'll sing from the rooftops,
But at least they'll get to wear their NHS flip flops.
The individual's not allowed in the sacred morgues,
They're just reserved for the bleating cyborgs.
just curious to the sentence "had their boosters a while ago so are in the peak of their antibody production"...wondering why would that matter if those antibodies do not work on the omicron anyways right?
I said it's just one explanation for the difference. They may not work on omicron specifically but fire up the immune system to react.
maybe also having a prior infection and then also being vaxcinated would also be the case. (having a prior infection but still believing in the vaccines would probably make them the same people first in line for boosters aswell right?) : from this study's logic : "A possible case of ADE was observed in a patient with a second SARS-CoV-2 infection (59). Early vaccine results show significant antibody responses by day 14 (60) which represents memory B-cell responses (i.e., original antigenic sin) with cross-reactivity antibodies from likely other coronavirus strain" : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7943455/
its difficult to deduce if vaccination after natural infection would hinder or enhance immunity to covid and immunity in general. Id wager on hinder, but it would probably most likely just come down to individual's body chemistry at the time.
Thank you for another informative article!
Observations from UK data have been very reveiling and I really appreciate your analysis.
I would like to suggest that the immune system and immune response to both covid infections and covid vaccinations are significantly more complex than just antibody response as it pertains to infection and re-infection. Discussions about vaccine failure seem to always revolve about antibody related OAS and AED which I feel is a significant over simplification of what is occurring. Antibodies, cellular immunity, interferon response and their degradation following mRNA vaccination all play a role here. That is why I think VAED (https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/pfizers-documented-antibody-dependent)
was listed as a concern, not AED but Vaccine Associated Enhanced Disease. ( AED and OAS are subsets here). Others have referred to VAIDS or vaccine acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. So, I think it is more appropriate to attribute vaccine failures to a broader definition of immune response failure than just antibody OAS or AED.
Vaccinated and boosted people are showing increased rates of infection from not only Covid but common colds, influenza etc which implies VAED and VAIDS, not just just antibody related processes. Making ineffective or enhancing monoclonal Covid 19 spike protein antibodies has little to do being more susceptible to other respiratory viruses.
The following link is a great discussion of a more global disruption of ones immune system following mRNA injections
https://media.mercola.com/ImageServer/Public/2022/January/PDF/covid-shots-suppress-immune-system-pdf.pdf
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/321674
What is the difference between Original Antigenic Sin and ADE
read this
https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/the-new-normal-pandemics-of-the-vaccinated
This does look concerning but a % change in death rate can be misleading if you don't disclose the actual differential death rates. If the booster wanes quickly, unless it overtakes the death rate of the unjabbed, it's not ADE - just reverting to the unjabbed rate?
The death rates are in the report. The death rates might not show ADE but the infection rates look suspicious
"Recently they changed the vaccinated population they were comparing from persons with at least 2 doses to persons with at least 3 doses."
So is it the boosted vs the really unvaxxed here?
If so, how do the double vaxxed fare?
Or are the unvaccinated here really mostly double vaccinated, at least to a significant percentage (%age total double vaxxed per age group minus %age total boosted in that age group minus %age total really unvaxxed in that age group)?
Yes just boosted vs the really unvaxxed. They don't produce rates for the double jabbed anymore (wonder why!?) but you can see the raw numbers in the report.