127 Comments

I am quite comfortable releasing my name I am Natalie K Björklund-Gordon. I retired early because my husband is older than I am and we wanted to enjoy his retirement together. I no longer apply for grants, need to be on academic committees or publish to avoid perishing (though I just did just submit yet another paper in an unrelated field for peer review.) There is very little anyone can do to cancel me that has not already been done because of my views on climate change. (No I am not a true believer in carbon taxes.) Has anyone else noticed a lot of the criticism has come from us retirees who are insulated from cancel culture?

Expand full comment

Natalie, you are a gem!! I’ve read your letter here and all your insightful comments as well. Some of the best material I’ve read in a long time.

Expand full comment

Thank you for your kind words. I have felt so helpless in the midst of what I see as the most disturbing unethical behaviour imaginable.

Expand full comment

Natalie, I post a video roughly every two weeks on Rumble. Here’s my most recent one: https://rumble.com/vtliaq-the-tide-is-turning-also-yikes-beware-of-mrna-technology....-episode-89.html... posted on my 68th birthday!

I try to encourage people to stay strong in the midst of this. I live in a very liberal community (Santa Monica/ Pacific Palisades in southern California). I have an MSEE from Caltech, and also have long been interested in health issues. I “walked away” from the Democratic Party due to climate change alarmism, so you can imagine how much I resonated with what you wrote! I intend to discuss your letter on my next video (this Saturday). Damn, you are one smart woman with LOTS to say, and we all need to hear it! If you start a substack and/or need support in any way, I’m here and ready to do whatever I can to help.

Expand full comment

Thank you so much. I have a pet fantasy for when I get angry about this. For example today my provincial authorities just announced they will be offering booster jabs to children 12-17. That made me really angry. My fantasy is to testify in a court about crimes against humanity saying I saw how bad this potentially was so why didn't the people in charge see it? I don't regard myself as being especially smart. I was just blessed to have had training from good people who knew their stuff. I am very happy you think my stuff is useful and I welcome having it shared. I will think about substack. It does seem to be a great venue.

Expand full comment

Natalie! I talked about you and read some of your comments on my Rumble video posted last night: https://rumble.com/vusufg-freedom-tucker-bannon-as-leaders-in-this-new-realignment...episode-90.html

Expand full comment

I did watch and again, thank you for the kind words.

Expand full comment

Thank you for speaking up! It is very valuable. Yes indeed retirees can enjoy the 'freedom' to speak up as you have almost nothing to loose. In working age group and definitely before going up on the ladder speaking out is basically a career suicide.

Expand full comment

Bravo Natalie, thank you for sharing your expertise and writing up this clear and frank report. I'll be sharing it with my family and friends who consider me a selfish degenerate for not going along with the "vaccine" experiment.

Expand full comment

Thank you for your diary and for your logic and honesty. Best from Oregon

Expand full comment

So you are the author of the letter? I was a bit unclear on “Further, symptoms of suspected cases of COVID occurring in the vaccine group in days 1-7 happened twice as often as in the placebo group yet there appeared to be no PCR testing to confirm COVID” - is this just in reference to solicited events, fatigue / headache etc?

Expand full comment

No it's COVID symptoms specifically. The case group developed COVID symptoms in days 1-7 post jab but never tested for it. But COVID is only counted as COVID in days 14+. I never got a clear explanation as to why this exclusion existed except for some hand waving about how it take the body 14 days to begin producing antibodies so we'll just ignore those cases.

Expand full comment

It insane to me that they can inject you with a treatment and say any negative effects within the first 14 days "don't count"

Expand full comment

Covid-Like symptoms is how you know your anti-covid vaxcine "is working"

also remember this was at the time when pfizer was promising 94% effective at PREVENTING infection!. oh the lols......

Expand full comment

Ok, I found it, on 41 - "Suspected COVID-19 cases that occurred within 7 days after any vaccination were 409 in the vaccine group vs. 287 in the placebo group."

I do find Pfizer's speculation that this was related to reactions from the vaccine pretty plausible, given that in reality more than half of BNT2 recipients reported symptoms after the vaccine that could count as "suspected COVID-19" and that ended up being in the solicited events reporting. There should have been more testing. The Ventavia whistleblower report makes it unsurprising that there wouldn't have been any way to for the vendors to test 696 suspected cases a week after dosage.

Expand full comment

Natalie,Thank you for your efforts in getting the truth out, and for the courage to stand up.I expect by now you will have made many more contacts here.Your knowledge will be appreciated.

Unfortunately I found the Substack community only after I rcd my PfizerBooster. Debilitating Adv.effects,( now 80% recovered) led me to research….everything!

It is a shock at 71 to discover that almost everything you believed is untrue.I will never trust the NHS advice,the MSM or the Gov again.I truly believe we ( retired) are surplus to requirements…

I have believed for years that man made Global Warming was a lie, but just didn’t understand the level of corruption, we know it’s part of The Globalist ,Build back Better ! Plan, Inc. the Covid Plandemic.

I sincerely hope your husband has made a recovery and you both can enjoy life in the UK.

I and many others ( a large percentage retired)are working on a local level to inform people.If you want to find a local community awake group ,astandinthepark.org is a great place to start.

I live in the New Forest and joined with over 200 people ( mostly unvaxed) are building a self supporting Community,inc.food security,Peoples Health Alliance ( Unvaxed blood bank goals)etc. Very Interesting times ahead……😊

Expand full comment

Thank you for sharing these personal remarks. While I'm still active in academia and not in the STEM fields (tenured faculty in the Humanities), I feel competent enough at *reading* bespoke studies to have concluded in the likewise manner.

Now, my wife, our two kids, and I all 'tested positive' for Covid in early January 2022, and for the past year we also felt pushed into a corner of society that was, frankly, uncomfortable and wrong.

Just two days ago, I had a spare-time conversation with someone who also elected to forego the 'vaccines', overheard by an elderly septuagenarian who asked us to leave 'for the sake of her husband who's at high-risk' (of course, the husband was triple-jabbed). Talk about 'shame by association'.

I did give her a mouthful of my opinions, but my conversation partner and I elected to leave the room a few minutes before we were supposed to. Nothing is changing these minds, it's almost as if they're all brainwashed.

I very much sympathise with you and your experiences, and I hope you will stay strong on your convictions.

Expand full comment

In my local community I have been banished from the Senior Centre and people who were once my friends there now literally pull on their masks and cross the street and duck down a back alley when they see me in terror of my vaccine-free status. One of my neighbours had knee surgery and she developed a post surgery infection. That is apparently my fault for speaking to her outside on a nice sunny day with a cool breeze while maintaining the six foot distance. According to some local Facebook posts I am also personally responsible for a local child's epilepsy getting worse from stress over the pandemic because my refusal to do the right thing for society is prolonging the misery. The fear that has been inculcated into people in my community is appalling. It borders on psychotic. We will be generations recovering, if ever.

Expand full comment

Recovery will be quick and dramatic. Funerals have a remarkably revitalizing effect, especially at the scale they're coming.

The psychotic people will self-disappear, just sit and wait for it.

Expand full comment

The trucker convoy seems to have changed the minds on a lot of people. I'm not sure why a bunch of truckers seem to have broken the psychosis while scientists like me couldn't. More power to them.

Expand full comment

I agree. Brainwashed

Expand full comment

More like braindirtied

Expand full comment

Most persons canot use their brain, after by news (sponsored by Bill Gates) being idoctrinated that the need vaccination, or else they will die. But why, after vaccinating afraid of being infected, unless if the "vaccines" actually don't work? Persons totally are losing understanding of the word vaccination.

Expand full comment

Thank you and my best to you and your loved ones. It gives me a great deal of strength to have knowledgeable, honest and compassionate people to listen to and learn from with platforms such as this. I am in Canada and the Truckers are awesome. So many people around me are not looking at the true essence of what they are doing and why. The fact that most people will not use their common sense and use prevention and early treatment stuns me. Our Innate Immunity is precious.

Expand full comment

No special training, education or experience in science, medicine, epidemiology or anything related, but I knew instinctively before the “vaccine” came out that there was no way in hell I was going to take anything so rushed, w/ short & long term effects COMPLETELY unknown, & w/out proper trials normally taking years.

Couple that w/ all of the “safe & effective” BS from the very start, knowing that there was no one on the planet, no matter the related “expertise,” who could honestly say or believe that….

And finally, the GLOBAL lockstep to “vax” every person on the planet as the SOLE solution, the immediate instigation of masks, lockdowns, banning of cheap therapeutics, demonization of experts w/ a different opinion & ignoring / denying naturally acquired immunity - in fact, if one believes this started circulating as early as summer 2019 (& I do), this thing had ripped through the world almost w/out notice by March 2020 - 6+ months later - when the world went mad over something w/ a 99.7% survivability for the vast majority, globally.

It doesn’t take any special training or experience to know I wanted no part of this. And I’ve held my line.

Expand full comment

I have no training, either. I'm a college group out, but make good money being self-employed. I was skeptical because 1) I'm not in a high risk group 2) the previous coronavirus vaccines couldn't get out of animal trials 3) the lack of truthful messaging and risk analysis from our public health officials, specifically about the risks to kids and young adults. (I have 5 kids between 17 and 28.) If they can lie or obfuscate about these risks to terrify the population (and the "you'll kill grandma" messaging) they will lie or misdirect on anything. And, like you, I think this was circulating long before. I believe (based on symptoms) that my husband and I had it late January/early Feb 2020 (my oldest daughter, a cop, had it in July of 2020 -- she was tested, had the exact symptoms I had six months earlier.)

Expand full comment

My husband and I are both in our 70’s with no special training in medicine. Both college graduates; he is a chemical engineer and my degree is in business administration. I believe any thinking person can read about Covid and realize the reality does not match the narrative. Reading and reasoning through basic knowledge of mRNA technology should give one pause before submitting to an experimental “vaccination”. Early on we determined that there was no clear evidence to recommend such treatment. Nothing has changed in the subsequent months and we will not comply with any further mandates.

Expand full comment

Agree wholeheartedly. I’m 63 & my husband is 72. We both had the misfortune of developing WuFlu-pneumonia right before Christmas, worse in my case than his, & I just finally made it back to work in mid-January. I

know my friends who have self-abused with 3 jabs are dying to ask me if I regret not having gotten the “vaccine” but they haven’t yet, probably because it could be perceived as impolite (which of course it would be, just like earlier on, when people I didn’t even know would ask if I’d gotten my “vaccine” yet!)

In any event, should anyone ever work up the courage to ask if I have regrets, it will be a resounding hell no, & my naturally acquired immunity now is a helluva lot better than yours, without an experimental cocktail circulating throughout my body.

Expand full comment

exactly, we also had the cruise ship evidence very early on showing these govt responses were never about health

Expand full comment

"The first real red flag can be found in Table 2, page 18. There were 311 cases excluded for protocol deviations. only 60 placebos were excluded. Fives times as many cases had been excluded. Those two numbers should have been the same. Why were five times as many cases excluded as controls for protocol deviation? I recall thinking at the time ‘What was the protocol deviation? Did they die?”. That's mind blowing to me. If fraud can be shown an easy place to find it in the trial is in the exclusion numbers. Pfizer could have literally been hiding the bodies...an alternative is that some people were so vaccine injured from the first dose that they could not continue with the second. Either way it's no good!

Expand full comment

It's actually worse. If you math out the numbers of the Pfizer trial you literally can see protection out of the gate is 43% and not almost a hundred. Product was botched since it's inception.

Expand full comment

That caught my attention too -- because I wanted to know why no one at the FDA asked questions about that.

Expand full comment

The revolving door between the FDA and the pharmaceutical companies is why no one asked questions about that. Or maybe the FDA dissenters who quit during this time left because they were horrified at what is happening.

Expand full comment

Yeah that's the part. What exactly are the "other important protocol deviations"?

Expand full comment

Thanks so much for sharing. I’m not a scientist so have to rely on others interpretation of studies and data and knowing who to trust in that regard is difficult. I tell you who I don’t trust. Big Pharma.

Expand full comment

The devil is in the detail, like categorised unvaxxed people die after getting the first jab.

Expand full comment

Great one. She also gave a spoiler for part IV or V of the hypothesis I am working on. People will come to see using that spike was the dumbest mistake in human history. It's a shame, becuasr mRNA had massive promises, and when this thing blows apart, nobody will ever want to use the tech for vaccines.

Reader analysis was honest and similar to many like us.

Expand full comment

Why do you think it was a mistake?

Expand full comment

Because the spike protein isn't a naturally occurring, evolved part of the virus. It's a literal Frankenstein construct. I will cover it soon enough, but left clues in my Twitter feed.

Expand full comment

And I repeat: What makes you think it was a *mistake*? It’s simply not possible for these outcomes to be the product of bungling bunglers.

Expand full comment

Would also like to see her thoughts on the Pfizer 6 month trial study, that must have substantiated her fears even more, like the over 1200 dead in vaccine group. This death rate is higher than covid!

Expand full comment

In my province, Manitoba Canada, any adverse events in days 1-14 after getting the jabs is automatically catalogued as COVID in the unvaccinated. I know of one situation where a healthy young women developed very severe symptoms that left her incapacitated for three days eight hours after the jab. (Vomiting, diarrhea, swollen face, difficulty breathing, unable to get to the bathroom herself, uncontrolled shaking, ringing in her ears, and a strange rash on her chest and face.) At one point her terrified husband contacted the "help line" number and the nurse on duty told him all the symptoms she was having were not on the approved list of potential adverse vaccine reactions. The the only possible explanation for her condition was that she had been exposed to the virus and must have only started developing symptoms eight hours after the jab. He was told not to take her to the hospital or call an ambulance in case she infected others. Just wait it out and self isolate and get a PCR test to confirm the COVID infection later. It was three days before she was well enough to get out of bed and go for the test which was negative. I think this protocol has very conveniently placed a lot of adverse vaccine reactions into the COVID in the unvaccinated numbers. I have suspected for some time that the waves of COVID infection are probably waves of adverse vaccine reactions.

Expand full comment

I think you are correct that vax AEs are probably lumped in with covid numbers. My death rate comparison was more pre-vax. When covid first started, the death rate was around 2%, but that was due to numerous factors and things we did wrong, like putting people on ventilators and not distributing drugs that work. Now the death rate is what, a fraction of 1%? But still, the death rate from Pfizer's own vaccine 6-month study is closer to 3%, and who knows what it is now!? And of course the control group is gone because most of them have been vaccinated so we lost any long term comparison. In either case, I don't want to downplay covid either- it is still a bioweapon, it causes microclots everywhere, it crosses the blood brain barrier, and it has other long-term effects we are continuously finding out now.

Expand full comment

To be frank I did not go and look at Pfizers subsequent data beyond scanning it because it made me feel nauseous. I tried to get the numbers on partially vaccinated and COVID for my province so I could have a proper look but they simply refused unless I went through a lengthy FOI process and even then it would take years for them to get me the data. It's kind of pointless to try to analyze data when the data is clearly muddied by grotesque confounders.

Expand full comment

I have a tendency of not trusting people or organizations that have a track record of not being honest or transparent, so anything they say or tell me to do, I will either do the opposite or wait for more info.

Expand full comment

Dr. Björklund-Gordon , firstly, thanks for allowing your letter to be publicly available and I applaud your bravery in being forward with your identity.

As for the 2 week window after each shot, see the following for how the it is used to manipulate the statistics

https://metatron.substack.com/p/alberta-has-been-fiddling-again-revealing

https://robertmoloney.substack.com/p/outrageous-data-manipulation-by-albertaca

And this article demonstrates how that window can produce apparent efficacy, even with a placebo.

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/why-vaccinated-covid-deathshospitalizations

I have my own theory on the operation of these gene therapy spike protein vaccines which explains the rapid fade, the suppression of the innate immune system and the continuing presence of spike proteins several weeks after the shots. I pulled the findings from several medical papers to form my theory and have been trying to discuss it with an immunologist or toxicologist to assess its viability. Would I be able to contact you directly on this?

Expand full comment

Why don't you post your theory here, there may be others that can discuss it as well?

Expand full comment

OK, I have put up the summary version in a reply to Dr. Björklund-Gordon below. I've mentioned it on some other substacks hoping for someone with a solid background in human physiology could provide some assessment

Expand full comment

The third reference there, the foxhole model, is easily the best explanation yet about the problem with the days 1-14 (1-21 in BC and Sask) I have seen yet.

Expand full comment

I would love to discuss it even though I am not an immunologist or toxicologist.

Expand full comment

This is the essence, sans references

Dr Malone has posted on his substack about how the mRNA "vaccines" persist for months.

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/a-health-public-policy-nightmare

This is consistent with my theory, presented below, that the gene therapy spike protein vaccines do not produce any substantial B cell memory but rather work by eliciting a toxin response to the spike proteins being continually expressed by targeted cells through the production of antibodies. In other words, the production of the antibodies is a TOXICITY response rather than an INFECTIOUS response.

Unlike the story given by the vaccine manufacturers and health authorities, the antibodies are not just produced in response to the spike proteins on the cell surfaces but also to the spike proteins on the outer of exosomes shed by these cells which enter the bloodstream (and almost certainly more so against the exosomes than the cells exuding the spike proteins since it has been found that antibody levels correlate DIRECTLY with levels of exosomes with spike proteins). These are transported around the circulatory system and with the spike proteins ending up on the outer of cells absorbing the exosomes where they can interrupt blood flow, etc.

The fade is due to the natural die off of the cells targeted by the mRNA capsules/adenovirus vectors reducing the levels exosomes with spike proteins in the bloodstream which reduces the corresponding antibody production. The targeted cells are not killed by the immune response but continue to produce spike proteins which results in the observations found in Dr Malone's article.

Finally, the innate immune response is suppressed by the adjuvants in order to prevent a cytokine storm in response to the toxic spike proteins - this allows the spike proteins to be tolerated by the innate immune system requiring the adaptive system to create antibodies in response. This is a long term effect that outlasts the spike protein production that is induced, leading to negative efficacy over time, even when the antibodies are able to bind and neutralise spike proteins from the SARS-CoV-2 infection (which is decreasing as mutations take the spike protein further away from the Wuhan type that the vaccine induced spike proteins are modelled on). This general reduction in innate immune response also opens up the vaccinated to infections from other viruses and reduces the response to cancers.

I'm not going to mention the autoimmune responses (although the exosome transport may contribute to this), myocarditis and other direct side effects of the gene therapy spike protein vaccines - many others are covering this comprehensively. My thesis is on the operation of these vaccines and how they are a deception and the consequences.

Expand full comment

Do you think it’s worthwhile for me to expand on the details?

Expand full comment

This does fit with some other things I have read but you have to keep in mind that I am not an immunologist and I am retired and have no access to any ability to test the idea. Is it worth expanding on? Always. Worst case you're wrong but no harm has been done. Best case you are right or partially right. One thing we have to be doing is trying to understand what is going on so we (meaning the medical community not me personally) need to find a way to help all these people with adverse vaccine reactions. I also think for visibility's sake, it should be publish it in a separate post. That way the idea is not buried in the comment section.

Expand full comment

Personally , I love that Natalie identified herself and the fact that she has nothing to lose at this point in her life . I see so many articles written about this current situation without any names , that I see how they can be deemed not credible . Just in awe of such brave credible people like Natalie who are giving their opinions in the face of such massive censorship . Maria Ressa wasn't off with her view of totalitarianism taking over the world view. It is way beyond the vaccine data at this point, in my opinion.

Expand full comment

it is very obvious from what we knew then and know now, that Pfizer and probably the rest, committed purly fraudulent testing and evaluation to get these "vaccines" across the finish line. The FDA clearly conspired with them to do so. Why else is FDA attempting to hide all their data, evaluations, and reports for 75 years?

Expand full comment

My thoughts exactly. I also reviewed all the data Pfizer put out early on, especially the reverse transcriptase. I did not take the experimental genetic injection either. I am now focused on keeping my adult children and grandchildren safe from the covid crazy public school system. FYI the WHO has/had a document that stated "IMPLIED Consent" if you send your child to school on a Vax pop up clinic day. The Superintendant stated to me that public schools that recieve/accept federal covid monies are trumped by such documents and I can personally attest to the covid clown world psychotic nature of the nurses within the public school system. I have been singled out by them. They only know my voice by telephone, I think, although the PoPo have been called on me once for prsenting factual documents MY college professors. They have All drank the whole pitcher of purple Kool Aid.

Expand full comment

In the end Covid will turn out be the greatest shaggy dog ever told.

Expand full comment

When I heard about the miracle vaccine I did some research and found this https://www.wired.com/2003/05/feds-race-to-make-sars-vaccine/

Expand full comment

This is what is now technically termed “misinformation”. It definitely makes you wonder what the bar is to express a legitimately dissenting opinion…

Expand full comment

The world was well primed to dismiss anything contrary to the Big Pharma line by the canceling of any scientist who dares to question anthropogenic global warming. Journalists are just as culpable as Big Pharma in this debacle in my opinion. And the fact that most journalists as innumerate does not excuse them for failing society.

Expand full comment

Yeah, I've never understood this fixation with the causes of global warming though. Like who cares? The real question is whether you think that governments are remotely well placed to do anything about it. Given how they couldn't even manage Covid, I think the answer to that is beyond obvious. Even if we are on a highway to climate hell, governments will only make it worse. So the scientists they should want to cancel aren't the ones who say there isn't a problem but the ones who point out that problems are solved by the free concourse of ideas, not Stalinist bureaucracies.

Expand full comment

I am often asked if I believe in global warming. I always answer I do not because science is about science not belief however my home in Manitoba was under two kilometres of ice about 12,000 years ago so I understand global warming exists and I'm actually all for it.

Expand full comment

You're cherry-picking the data though - that was in the middle of the Younger Dryas, it did get a bit chilly around that time ;)

Expand full comment

I want to thank both 'The Naked Emperor' and Natalie. For the past 24 hours I have been feeling such a deep lose of family and friends who will not include me in their lives because I have made an informed decision not to take an mRNA vaccine. I have a very small family to begin with and I am a widow and it is a lonely road. Reading Natalie's article this morning has reminded me why my decision matters so much to me. Even if I were to get the vaccine in order to be included in my family I think the relationships might not ever be able to be repaired. I simply can not risk getting an injury from the vaccine and not be able to work and earn a living. I needed to read this article to help keep being true to what my heart and head are telling me. My Gratitude and Blessings. It feels like such a long road and I will keep taking one step at a time.

Expand full comment

As you grieve your losses there may you be blessed with the loving companionship of many kind friends who take for granted that they would honor your decisions to do what you think is best for you.

Expand full comment

Thank you, deeply from my soul. That is the kindest thing anyone has said to me through all of these challenges. Blessings to you, your loved ones and our new communities.

Expand full comment

You're welcome, Sandra. I'm glad that the message I was sending reached you. Thank you for your blessings.

Expand full comment

I am so sorry Sandra. I have felt this sense of loss and loneliness acutely myself and that is part of what they have done to us. I went to see the convoy off as its nearest point to my home and it was literally the most joyous day of my life since this horror show began. I was surrounded by people who felt the same way I did, many who were vaccinated. The truckers have done what us educated scientificky elites could not. They have put their foot down and said "enough". You are so not alone.

Expand full comment

I am sad for you that so many of your friends and family have shown themselves so intolerant of other views. I really hope someday they see how unkind they have been and offer you apologies! I hope they come to see they were the ones who were wrong, not you. And may you meet new and wonderful friends who love faithfully!

Expand full comment

an excellent read. vaccines that do not provide immunity are not vaccines. The question now is what are they ???

Expand full comment

Are they are a planned depopulation event? It's a horrific thought but I am having trouble understanding what else it could be. Even just pure greed wouldn't explain it.

Expand full comment

The globalist aggressiveness suggests that this is something nefarious...

Expand full comment

Absolutely. And it’s been in the works a very long time

Expand full comment

As a Human Geneticist in a profession that was responsible for the horrors of the Eugenics movement, I have been deeply steeped in ethics and the importance of abiding by codes of conduct especially those created after WW2 such as the Nuremberg Codes. As soon as one strays from these codes, one immediately falls into the danger of recreating the past horrors. Individual rights must always be respected over any other consideration and any abrogation of those rights no matter what the rationale must always be challenged and justified and as temporary and minimal as possible. One thing I learned taking courses in the mathematics of epidemiology is that public health are not trained in ethics in the same way. In fact they are almost trained in the opposite to always think of the good of the whole of society over the rights of individuals. Of all branches of medical health out there, it does not surprise me that tyranny came from public health. I can see some of them deciding the good of humanity requires culling the population and doing so with a clear conscience.

Expand full comment

This horrible, evil “experiment” is absolutely crimes against humanity, worthy of Nuremberg 2.0. My greatest fear though, is that the original Nuremberg trials judged the evils of a single country. What do we do, how can we bring to justice the evil perpetrators of virtually the whole world? Sometimes I feel great despair

Expand full comment

And that despair is part of their plan. Stay strong.

Expand full comment

Biden’s Bounty on Your Life: Hospitals’ Incentive Payments for COVID-19

https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/2022/02/07/bidens-bounty-on-your-life-hospitals-incentive-payments-for-covid-19/

Expand full comment