The Naked Emperor’s Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Subscriptions are best but if you would prefer to/ also like to buy me a coffee then click on the button below.
At this point I think this is a marketing plot. Everyone thanks for the 4 doses then starts a paxlovid course for the contrary of the recommendation!? This doesn't make any sense.
It's to model behavior and expectations for the audience. It's not what they are actually experiencing and doing. It's to normalize what people are going through. It's to show the audience how to interpret their experience of vaccine failure and how to react.
I'm genuinely conflicted. I've read that totalitarian leaders are often so effective because they are completely owned by the ideology -- true believers if you will.
I hear you. I doubt that it's absolute. Totalitarian Hitler hated Jews; totalitarian Mao hated the educated; totalitarian Trudeau hates Canadians; totalitarian Bourla hates us 'useless eaters', BUT saw/knew that the jab trials injured and killed.
Like this: those that believe their own ideology for real are ineffective. Those that can utilise doublethink, weaponise it they it is intended to be (Lenin, Stalin as the most triumphant examples) are higly effective. It must be remembered though that effective must be understood by their metric, not your own or some universalist one.
To Himmler, the extermination program was highly effctive since the massmurder was the entire point according to his ideology, as he was a true believer. To someone like Speer, who had to make it work, it was just a waste of resources better used in different ways. A good example I think of how two people in the same ideological framwork still can have greatly differing metrics for effective.
And any power structure becomes the point of its own existence, inevitably so.
It would be rejected as a movie script.. it's beyond belief for an audience to see repeated confirmation of failure & still trust chronic, criminal profiteer over seeing with their own eyes.
Good odds one is underway.. fun flashback to Zero Dark Thirty the soft sell for torture as valuable & deep state partners.. always most fun in their own words.. declassified archive is perfect. :~)
The Zero Dark Thirty File
Lifting The Government's Shroud Over the Mission That Killed Osama bin Laden
Emails and memos, released in response to a Judicial Watch FOIA request, detailing director Kathryn Bigelow's and screenwriter Mark Boal's extensive access to CIA Deputy Director Mike Morell, DOD Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence Michael Vickers, and five CIA and military operatives involved in the raid, whose identities remain concealed from the public. The documents say Bigelow and Boal's work received the "full knowledge and full approval/support" of CIA Director Leon Panetta.
If there is justice in the Universe, this bastard will have a stroke and myocarditis and linger for a few months drooling on himself. SOB is too kind a label for this psychopath.
Aimee... Sorry for your loss. My mother-in-law had two jabs in Germany and immediately had a stroke after the second. Left-sided weakness until she passed while staying with us about 18 months post-vaxxx. Her German TV, of course, promoted and pushed the vaxxx thing for all Germans and she was always one to follow the "authorities". Sad.
So sorry for your loss as well. 😢 My mom lived in a different state, with friends in an assisted living property. She was healthy and loved her little apartment, dining with friends etc. Then one of our “healthcare heroes” talked her into getting jabbed. They told her she wouldn’t be able to have visitors if she didn’t get it which is ironic, because two days later after her stroke, they locked everything down and she STILL couldn’t have visitors. This was January 2021. A nightmare. I know she never understood why we weren’t coming to visit, but we were not ALLOWED to. We were trying to get her out of there when she died.
So sorry Aimee. Think of the millions of other people with the same stories over the past three years. This is criminal and I pray to God for justice on this earth.
I’m thinking those devastating neurological effects. Where you can’t walk and are shaking uncontrollably. Something very visible & that you can’t hide. But not ill enough to have to stop work or disappear without raising eyebrows.
Then he can become one giant amyloid fibrous clot and die, a few months later.
we just don't have real information about these people
but, if they're unvaccinated, we'd want to know: what would motivate Bourla or Fauci or Biden to tell us that they're vaccinated and boosted and also got Covid? wouldn't we expect them to lie about it and say "I'm vaxxed and never got Covid?"
OTOH, if they really are vaccinated, we'd also want to know: why would they ever tell us they got Covid. wouldn't we expect them to lie about it in that case too, and say "I'm vaxxed and never got Covid?"
I don't even know what theory to believe any more. I guess most people on this comment board read the news about Bourla and think: these Covid jabs are terrible and don't work and we will definitely avoid the jabs in the future, end of story. And even if Bourla never even got jabbed, we're still thinking that same thing: no on the jabs.
I think the idea is to sell the notion that even though you can/will catch covid (meaning you will at some point get a positive test result), you are not dead because the injection worked and protected you.
If they said the injection prevented you from "getting it", it would soon be shown false, since the tests will eventually throw a positive result. Therefore this is not good for their plans.
Doing it the other way, they achieve their goals:
- Keep selling the injections: they work, so you must have them
- While they keep fear of "infection" alive since it's still "spreading". Keep arbitrary rules and regulations alive.
- Maybe more importantly, blame the harms caused by the injections on previous "infections" and "long covid". They can't do that if they claim the injection will prevent infections.
Blame the alleged disease for what the cure actually does is standard MO for this industry BTW. See HIV/AZT.
Thank you. You actually made me realize something that I knew but didn’t actually formalize into a coherent thought.
Their strategy is chaos. And humans inherently despise chias, we want things ordered. So my continuing to sow chaos, they’re keeping us off balance and on the defensive, which limits our critical thinking.
The Lancet did an article a number of years ago explaining the difference between relative vs absolute risk reduction as applied to the flu vaccine. It was something like the difference between 96.5% of unvaccinated and 98% of vaccinated people not getting the flu for an absolute benefit of under 2%. It went on to mention that if people actually knew this fact few would get it. What a tragedy for pharma that would be. The manipulation of these numbers is applicable to most if not all of the drugs that are foisted on the public today. For instance, going back 15 or 20 years now, a meta-analysis of chemo-therapy was done in, I believe New Zealand. The result was an absolute benefit, as they described 'a very generous' 2.5%. Not quite what we were lead to believe. Just sayin'..........
Aimee, it isn't like the warning signs weren't there, but murder for profit?
What? I never thought it could have possibly come to that!
I got used to having my pharmacy license threatened by "State Inspectors" over trivia, because I was illuminating these massive Rx for profit "pain/nerve/anxiety clinics" which were actually or "virtually" being run out of every kind of establishment you could imagine, with massive illegalities and fictitious patients and physicians that didn't want to know what was going on, "plausible deniability."
That is why I call bullshit on many of these "Docs" who express amazement at how evil their employers were. If they had any exposure to their patients in any way, THEY KNEW! I had a 38 year career after 5.5 years of education plus continuing ed every year, and I had it figured out in under 4 and spent the next 35 years maneuvering my patients around the crap.
Most health care "professionals" I interacted with DID NOT WANT TO KNOW!
One of the very first “questioners” I ever connected with, in March of 2020, was a pharmacist on Facebook. She was a TROVE of information! Brilliant gal who caught onto this scam earlier than anyone I knew. We both got banned on Facebook multiple times for posting “false information” lol, eventually we both deleted our accounts. I miss her to this day.
You may be in mourning that you can no longer rely on health institutions that you trusted for your entire life. But, this new realization is a blessing. Now you are free to pursue health from an entirely new perspective.
It's fascinating isn't it? You would think he knew all along that the jabs were useless and dangerous but, like Fauci and others, he acts as though he believes they are "safe and effective" even though he orginally thought they were effective at stopping transmission and illness. He has morphed into believing they were always meant to just stop you being terribly ill. Whilst still being very safe. And he believes they are so safe and effective that he needs to take Paxlovid too. Obviously he could simply be lying over what he believes and merely be keeping the gullible on board by saying what they all say. But I think he is symptomatic of the world we live in where men in lab coats, men in banks, government buildings and tech offices seriously believe they know better and can never be wrong. I think it's called hubris!
And Birx is running around claiming she always knew they’d never work! This is ClownWorld we are living in. Who believes a single thing any of these people say anymore?
This is marketing BS. He should know better than anyone that fully vaccinated people WILL get a rebound infection and worse symptoms after taking Paxlovid. But as the manufacturer of both products, he isn't going to admit that a) the "vaccine" doesn't work and b) Paxlovid should only be used in the non-vaccinated (a smaller market). Incidenatlly, Pfizers Phase III trial for Paxlovid excluded vaccinated people - they probably just wanted to eliminate any "efficacy impact" from the safe and effective "vaccine"?
I know a man who is 55 who had 4 jabs and got covid and was better in 5 days. He says it is because he got the boosters. Another one who is 51 had 2 jabs and got covid twice in 6 months but took 2 weeks to test negative the second time. Wth?
I know someone who is a quadrashotted and said he's never had covid so the shots work. I said I've never had covid and I'm zeroshotted. He stared at me like I was talking Greek. Maybe I am.
Anecdotal evidence can be countered with anecdotal evidence.
How about the unjabbed 58 year old who tested positive before the vaccines and was never sick, never got jabbed, has been surrounded by jabbed, sick people, and never got it again, 2+ years later?
These people either have the memory of goldfish or inchworms, or they are so convinced of their vast superiority and by extension, our pathetic stupidity, that they can say whatever they want whenever they want however they want without any fear whatever of consequence.
The latter. Nobody will call them out on their lies (except us on Substack and nobody even knows we exist). But truth doesn't stop being truth and eventually it comes out. Too bad it takes centuries.
This could be just pure "advertisement." He may not have taken the shots, but is describing what many are experiencing, so that people (sheeple) will feel "SAFETY in numbers."
That it says "ArtMeetsScience" (tm) in the upper right corner of the second image, that's the icing on the cake, really.
Being somewhat namoured with the idea that the etymology of a word gives us insight in the one using it, even incorrectly, and especially insight in what they really are saying, or are trying to keep hidden while still talking about it, I looked up art.
Oh dear.
'"early 13c., "skill as a result of learning or practice," from Old French art (10c.), from Latin artem (nominative ars) "work of art; practical skill; a business, craft," from PIE *ar(ə)-ti- (source also of Sanskrit rtih "manner, mode;" Greek artizein "to prepare"), suffixed form of root *ar- "to fit together." Etymologically akin to Latin arma "weapons."'
A business. Akin to weapons. To prepare and fit together.
Sometimes, the actual meaning of a word really gives the game away, dosen't it? Also found a very fitting quote:
"In science you must not talk before you know. In art you must not talk before you do. In literature you must not talk before you think. [Ruskin, "The Eagle's Nest," 1872]
Hard to argue against that, I think? Think is what neither Bourla nor whomever put the "ArtMeetsScience"-thing together did. Especially given the original latin meaning of science...
Does anyone believe he has taken 4 doses of his own medicine as well as Paxlovid? If that were true, one would have to label him Dumber than a Box of Rocks, which I do not believe is true.
Proof that the "Phase 3 study" was RIGGED. People need to be held accountable, especially when they used such "studies" to mandate vaccines on population.
This fucking loser has taken 4 jabs and a course of shady as fuck medication for a virus with self-described "mild symptoms". I bet he'd wear his pants on his head after going two hours on a spin bike if "experts" told him to do so.
I don't believe for a second that this man has this poison in his body.
At this point I think this is a marketing plot. Everyone thanks for the 4 doses then starts a paxlovid course for the contrary of the recommendation!? This doesn't make any sense.
Yes. These famous figures come out one after another, they all use the same script.
Around New Year - Hillary, Obama, and a bunch of others: "Tested positive, feeling fine, grateful for vaccines, get vaccinated and boosted!"
Recently - Fauci, Biden, Bourla: "Tested positive, mild symptoms, fully vaccinated and boosted, taking Paxlovid, oops got rebound, on Paxlovid again"
It's to model behavior and expectations for the audience. It's not what they are actually experiencing and doing. It's to normalize what people are going through. It's to show the audience how to interpret their experience of vaccine failure and how to react.
Bingo!
Nobody seems to recall that Donald Trump was treated, likely with monoclonal antibodies and other meds, and was back in action in two days.
No Paxlovid, no rebound, no nephrotoxic Remdesivir. I should look up his entire regimen if it is available.
Advertising, all the way.
And it works! In this comment thread:
https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/jama-article-more-evidence-of-ade/comment/8402562
In the comment by Mary G:
"Both couldn’t wait to be on Paxlovid “because the president....” "
Haha we run in the same circles! Saw that one too.
Gahhhh “because the president…”!
But it does.
Exactly. He's just out there, normalizing the narrative. Business as usual: 100% lies.
I'm genuinely conflicted. I've read that totalitarian leaders are often so effective because they are completely owned by the ideology -- true believers if you will.
I hear you. I doubt that it's absolute. Totalitarian Hitler hated Jews; totalitarian Mao hated the educated; totalitarian Trudeau hates Canadians; totalitarian Bourla hates us 'useless eaters', BUT saw/knew that the jab trials injured and killed.
Like this: those that believe their own ideology for real are ineffective. Those that can utilise doublethink, weaponise it they it is intended to be (Lenin, Stalin as the most triumphant examples) are higly effective. It must be remembered though that effective must be understood by their metric, not your own or some universalist one.
To Himmler, the extermination program was highly effctive since the massmurder was the entire point according to his ideology, as he was a true believer. To someone like Speer, who had to make it work, it was just a waste of resources better used in different ways. A good example I think of how two people in the same ideological framwork still can have greatly differing metrics for effective.
And any power structure becomes the point of its own existence, inevitably so.
My "you can't make this shit up" file drawer is now completely overflowing!
And people think this is actually how it's supposed to work.......
Patrick that’s the part that boggles my mind.
It would be rejected as a movie script.. it's beyond belief for an audience to see repeated confirmation of failure & still trust chronic, criminal profiteer over seeing with their own eyes.
Oh I can’t WAIT for the movie. It will be a blockbuster, even better than the “Dopesick” series or the Theranos film.
Good odds one is underway.. fun flashback to Zero Dark Thirty the soft sell for torture as valuable & deep state partners.. always most fun in their own words.. declassified archive is perfect. :~)
The Zero Dark Thirty File
Lifting The Government's Shroud Over the Mission That Killed Osama bin Laden
Emails and memos, released in response to a Judicial Watch FOIA request, detailing director Kathryn Bigelow's and screenwriter Mark Boal's extensive access to CIA Deputy Director Mike Morell, DOD Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence Michael Vickers, and five CIA and military operatives involved in the raid, whose identities remain concealed from the public. The documents say Bigelow and Boal's work received the "full knowledge and full approval/support" of CIA Director Leon Panetta.
https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB410/
The good news is he is taking Paxlovid, so "reinfection" is guaranteed.
I’ll laugh my head off (again) if that happens. He assured investors just a couple of weeks ago less than 1pct had rebounds.
Amazing how it happened to both Fauci and Biden then.
Actual rate is AT LEAST 40%. Probably closer to 90%... We shall see.
Lol none of these clowns are taking their own poisons. They know how the sausage is made.
If there is justice in the Universe, this bastard will have a stroke and myocarditis and linger for a few months drooling on himself. SOB is too kind a label for this psychopath.
What you describe is exactly what Moderna did to my poor mom. You need to add “in isolation” at the end, because that’s how my mom had to die. 😢
Aimee... Sorry for your loss. My mother-in-law had two jabs in Germany and immediately had a stroke after the second. Left-sided weakness until she passed while staying with us about 18 months post-vaxxx. Her German TV, of course, promoted and pushed the vaxxx thing for all Germans and she was always one to follow the "authorities". Sad.
So sorry for your loss as well. 😢 My mom lived in a different state, with friends in an assisted living property. She was healthy and loved her little apartment, dining with friends etc. Then one of our “healthcare heroes” talked her into getting jabbed. They told her she wouldn’t be able to have visitors if she didn’t get it which is ironic, because two days later after her stroke, they locked everything down and she STILL couldn’t have visitors. This was January 2021. A nightmare. I know she never understood why we weren’t coming to visit, but we were not ALLOWED to. We were trying to get her out of there when she died.
Tragic. Condolences. There should be criminal charges brought against all the admin types in these "care" facilities.
Heartbreaking. I am so sorry.
So sorry Aimee. Think of the millions of other people with the same stories over the past three years. This is criminal and I pray to God for justice on this earth.
So sorry, Aimee, for your loss.
A story we hear all too often.
The isolation part is particularly painful, it hurts more over time, not less.
I’m thinking those devastating neurological effects. Where you can’t walk and are shaking uncontrollably. Something very visible & that you can’t hide. But not ill enough to have to stop work or disappear without raising eyebrows.
Then he can become one giant amyloid fibrous clot and die, a few months later.
I just put up another post about this stuff in the brain: https://medquotes.substack.com/p/rosy-prospects
"I thank the vaccine gods for in their infinite mercy and wisdom they have granted me a mild course of covid. Blessed be the vaccine gods."
Do any of us actually believe that Bourla, Bancel, or any of the other "elites" are actually vaccinated?
we just don't have real information about these people
but, if they're unvaccinated, we'd want to know: what would motivate Bourla or Fauci or Biden to tell us that they're vaccinated and boosted and also got Covid? wouldn't we expect them to lie about it and say "I'm vaxxed and never got Covid?"
OTOH, if they really are vaccinated, we'd also want to know: why would they ever tell us they got Covid. wouldn't we expect them to lie about it in that case too, and say "I'm vaxxed and never got Covid?"
I don't even know what theory to believe any more. I guess most people on this comment board read the news about Bourla and think: these Covid jabs are terrible and don't work and we will definitely avoid the jabs in the future, end of story. And even if Bourla never even got jabbed, we're still thinking that same thing: no on the jabs.
I think the idea is to sell the notion that even though you can/will catch covid (meaning you will at some point get a positive test result), you are not dead because the injection worked and protected you.
If they said the injection prevented you from "getting it", it would soon be shown false, since the tests will eventually throw a positive result. Therefore this is not good for their plans.
Doing it the other way, they achieve their goals:
- Keep selling the injections: they work, so you must have them
- While they keep fear of "infection" alive since it's still "spreading". Keep arbitrary rules and regulations alive.
- Maybe more importantly, blame the harms caused by the injections on previous "infections" and "long covid". They can't do that if they claim the injection will prevent infections.
Blame the alleged disease for what the cure actually does is standard MO for this industry BTW. See HIV/AZT.
He has not taken the jab nor is he taking Paxlovid.
I don’t know why they’re gaslighting us with all these people who know the dangers of the jab, thus wouldn’t take, that they have COVID.
I don’t understand the strategy.
There's no strategy. They are evil and evil is chaos.
Thank you. You actually made me realize something that I knew but didn’t actually formalize into a coherent thought.
Their strategy is chaos. And humans inherently despise chias, we want things ordered. So my continuing to sow chaos, they’re keeping us off balance and on the defensive, which limits our critical thinking.
Always wise to keep the Newspeak translator handy when they use the word “effective”.
RELATIVE RISK VS ABSOLUTE RISK REDUCTION - AS PER PFIZERS' OWN DOCUMENTS - YOU'VE BEEN PLAYED
https://www.bitchute.com/video/W5sgLUekMmVT/
The Lancet did an article a number of years ago explaining the difference between relative vs absolute risk reduction as applied to the flu vaccine. It was something like the difference between 96.5% of unvaccinated and 98% of vaccinated people not getting the flu for an absolute benefit of under 2%. It went on to mention that if people actually knew this fact few would get it. What a tragedy for pharma that would be. The manipulation of these numbers is applicable to most if not all of the drugs that are foisted on the public today. For instance, going back 15 or 20 years now, a meta-analysis of chemo-therapy was done in, I believe New Zealand. The result was an absolute benefit, as they described 'a very generous' 2.5%. Not quite what we were lead to believe. Just sayin'..........
I have completely lost faith in the medical industrial complex after this scam. I never had any idea how deceitful our healthcare system is.
Aimee, it isn't like the warning signs weren't there, but murder for profit?
What? I never thought it could have possibly come to that!
I got used to having my pharmacy license threatened by "State Inspectors" over trivia, because I was illuminating these massive Rx for profit "pain/nerve/anxiety clinics" which were actually or "virtually" being run out of every kind of establishment you could imagine, with massive illegalities and fictitious patients and physicians that didn't want to know what was going on, "plausible deniability."
That is why I call bullshit on many of these "Docs" who express amazement at how evil their employers were. If they had any exposure to their patients in any way, THEY KNEW! I had a 38 year career after 5.5 years of education plus continuing ed every year, and I had it figured out in under 4 and spent the next 35 years maneuvering my patients around the crap.
Most health care "professionals" I interacted with DID NOT WANT TO KNOW!
One of the very first “questioners” I ever connected with, in March of 2020, was a pharmacist on Facebook. She was a TROVE of information! Brilliant gal who caught onto this scam earlier than anyone I knew. We both got banned on Facebook multiple times for posting “false information” lol, eventually we both deleted our accounts. I miss her to this day.
You may be in mourning that you can no longer rely on health institutions that you trusted for your entire life. But, this new realization is a blessing. Now you are free to pursue health from an entirely new perspective.
How does that saying go - "Once a liar, always a liar"...
Unless there is irrefutable evidence, bulla bulla Bourla did NOT take his own poisons. However, I am 95% certain he took a paper vaccine.
by my count this picture has less than 100 words
are you telling us that Albert Bourla's face is worth 900 words?
It's fascinating isn't it? You would think he knew all along that the jabs were useless and dangerous but, like Fauci and others, he acts as though he believes they are "safe and effective" even though he orginally thought they were effective at stopping transmission and illness. He has morphed into believing they were always meant to just stop you being terribly ill. Whilst still being very safe. And he believes they are so safe and effective that he needs to take Paxlovid too. Obviously he could simply be lying over what he believes and merely be keeping the gullible on board by saying what they all say. But I think he is symptomatic of the world we live in where men in lab coats, men in banks, government buildings and tech offices seriously believe they know better and can never be wrong. I think it's called hubris!
And Birx is running around claiming she always knew they’d never work! This is ClownWorld we are living in. Who believes a single thing any of these people say anymore?
Never give a liar a second chance!
Or sociopathic narcissism. Take your pick
It is these people I would not feel sorry for if they contracted Sudden Adult Death Syndrome.
Sorry, not Sorry.
This is marketing BS. He should know better than anyone that fully vaccinated people WILL get a rebound infection and worse symptoms after taking Paxlovid. But as the manufacturer of both products, he isn't going to admit that a) the "vaccine" doesn't work and b) Paxlovid should only be used in the non-vaccinated (a smaller market). Incidenatlly, Pfizers Phase III trial for Paxlovid excluded vaccinated people - they probably just wanted to eliminate any "efficacy impact" from the safe and effective "vaccine"?
Perhaps he isn't fully vaccinated!!
I know a man who is 55 who had 4 jabs and got covid and was better in 5 days. He says it is because he got the boosters. Another one who is 51 had 2 jabs and got covid twice in 6 months but took 2 weeks to test negative the second time. Wth?
I know someone who is a quadrashotted and said he's never had covid so the shots work. I said I've never had covid and I'm zeroshotted. He stared at me like I was talking Greek. Maybe I am.
Anecdotal evidence can be countered with anecdotal evidence.
How about the unjabbed 58 year old who tested positive before the vaccines and was never sick, never got jabbed, has been surrounded by jabbed, sick people, and never got it again, 2+ years later?
And this is how stupid our society has become...
These people either have the memory of goldfish or inchworms, or they are so convinced of their vast superiority and by extension, our pathetic stupidity, that they can say whatever they want whenever they want however they want without any fear whatever of consequence.
The latter. Nobody will call them out on their lies (except us on Substack and nobody even knows we exist). But truth doesn't stop being truth and eventually it comes out. Too bad it takes centuries.
This could be just pure "advertisement." He may not have taken the shots, but is describing what many are experiencing, so that people (sheeple) will feel "SAFETY in numbers."
That it says "ArtMeetsScience" (tm) in the upper right corner of the second image, that's the icing on the cake, really.
Being somewhat namoured with the idea that the etymology of a word gives us insight in the one using it, even incorrectly, and especially insight in what they really are saying, or are trying to keep hidden while still talking about it, I looked up art.
Oh dear.
'"early 13c., "skill as a result of learning or practice," from Old French art (10c.), from Latin artem (nominative ars) "work of art; practical skill; a business, craft," from PIE *ar(ə)-ti- (source also of Sanskrit rtih "manner, mode;" Greek artizein "to prepare"), suffixed form of root *ar- "to fit together." Etymologically akin to Latin arma "weapons."'
A business. Akin to weapons. To prepare and fit together.
Sometimes, the actual meaning of a word really gives the game away, dosen't it? Also found a very fitting quote:
"In science you must not talk before you know. In art you must not talk before you do. In literature you must not talk before you think. [Ruskin, "The Eagle's Nest," 1872]
Hard to argue against that, I think? Think is what neither Bourla nor whomever put the "ArtMeetsScience"-thing together did. Especially given the original latin meaning of science...
Ugh, why don’t all these horrible people drop dead??
Does anyone believe he has taken 4 doses of his own medicine as well as Paxlovid? If that were true, one would have to label him Dumber than a Box of Rocks, which I do not believe is true.
It is true. He's dumb as F. Anyone that listens to a word he says loses intelligence points by the bucketful.
Is it wrong that I'm hoping for a rebound? It's a little wrong, right?
Proof that the "Phase 3 study" was RIGGED. People need to be held accountable, especially when they used such "studies" to mandate vaccines on population.
He's a lying POS, and anyone who believes a word he says is a rube.
Paxlovid rebound don't fail us now!
This fucking loser has taken 4 jabs and a course of shady as fuck medication for a virus with self-described "mild symptoms". I bet he'd wear his pants on his head after going two hours on a spin bike if "experts" told him to do so.
Taking an awful long time for them to deliver our gibbets...