The Naked Emperor’s Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Subscriptions are best but if you would prefer to/ also like to buy me a coffee then click on the button below.
Aug 15, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
It would be rejected as a movie script.. it's beyond belief for an audience to see repeated confirmation of failure & still trust chronic, criminal profiteer over seeing with their own eyes.
If there is justice in the Universe, this bastard will have a stroke and myocarditis and linger for a few months drooling on himself. SOB is too kind a label for this psychopath.
It's fascinating isn't it? You would think he knew all along that the jabs were useless and dangerous but, like Fauci and others, he acts as though he believes they are "safe and effective" even though he orginally thought they were effective at stopping transmission and illness. He has morphed into believing they were always meant to just stop you being terribly ill. Whilst still being very safe. And he believes they are so safe and effective that he needs to take Paxlovid too. Obviously he could simply be lying over what he believes and merely be keeping the gullible on board by saying what they all say. But I think he is symptomatic of the world we live in where men in lab coats, men in banks, government buildings and tech offices seriously believe they know better and can never be wrong. I think it's called hubris!
Aug 16, 2022·edited Aug 16, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
This is marketing BS. He should know better than anyone that fully vaccinated people WILL get a rebound infection and worse symptoms after taking Paxlovid. But as the manufacturer of both products, he isn't going to admit that a) the "vaccine" doesn't work and b) Paxlovid should only be used in the non-vaccinated (a smaller market). Incidenatlly, Pfizers Phase III trial for Paxlovid excluded vaccinated people - they probably just wanted to eliminate any "efficacy impact" from the safe and effective "vaccine"?
Aug 16, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
I know a man who is 55 who had 4 jabs and got covid and was better in 5 days. He says it is because he got the boosters. Another one who is 51 had 2 jabs and got covid twice in 6 months but took 2 weeks to test negative the second time. Wth?
Aug 15, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
These people either have the memory of goldfish or inchworms, or they are so convinced of their vast superiority and by extension, our pathetic stupidity, that they can say whatever they want whenever they want however they want without any fear whatever of consequence.
Aug 15, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
This could be just pure "advertisement." He may not have taken the shots, but is describing what many are experiencing, so that people (sheeple) will feel "SAFETY in numbers."
Aug 15, 2022Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com
That it says "ArtMeetsScience" (tm) in the upper right corner of the second image, that's the icing on the cake, really.
Being somewhat namoured with the idea that the etymology of a word gives us insight in the one using it, even incorrectly, and especially insight in what they really are saying, or are trying to keep hidden while still talking about it, I looked up art.
Oh dear.
'"early 13c., "skill as a result of learning or practice," from Old French art (10c.), from Latin artem (nominative ars) "work of art; practical skill; a business, craft," from PIE *ar(ə)-ti- (source also of Sanskrit rtih "manner, mode;" Greek artizein "to prepare"), suffixed form of root *ar- "to fit together." Etymologically akin to Latin arma "weapons."'
A business. Akin to weapons. To prepare and fit together.
Sometimes, the actual meaning of a word really gives the game away, dosen't it? Also found a very fitting quote:
"In science you must not talk before you know. In art you must not talk before you do. In literature you must not talk before you think. [Ruskin, "The Eagle's Nest," 1872]
Hard to argue against that, I think? Think is what neither Bourla nor whomever put the "ArtMeetsScience"-thing together did. Especially given the original latin meaning of science...
Does anyone believe he has taken 4 doses of his own medicine as well as Paxlovid? If that were true, one would have to label him Dumber than a Box of Rocks, which I do not believe is true.
Proof that the "Phase 3 study" was RIGGED. People need to be held accountable, especially when they used such "studies" to mandate vaccines on population.
This fucking loser has taken 4 jabs and a course of shady as fuck medication for a virus with self-described "mild symptoms". I bet he'd wear his pants on his head after going two hours on a spin bike if "experts" told him to do so.
I don't believe for a second that this man has this poison in his body.
My "you can't make this shit up" file drawer is now completely overflowing!
And people think this is actually how it's supposed to work.......
It would be rejected as a movie script.. it's beyond belief for an audience to see repeated confirmation of failure & still trust chronic, criminal profiteer over seeing with their own eyes.
The good news is he is taking Paxlovid, so "reinfection" is guaranteed.
If there is justice in the Universe, this bastard will have a stroke and myocarditis and linger for a few months drooling on himself. SOB is too kind a label for this psychopath.
"I thank the vaccine gods for in their infinite mercy and wisdom they have granted me a mild course of covid. Blessed be the vaccine gods."
Do any of us actually believe that Bourla, Bancel, or any of the other "elites" are actually vaccinated?
He has not taken the jab nor is he taking Paxlovid.
I don’t know why they’re gaslighting us with all these people who know the dangers of the jab, thus wouldn’t take, that they have COVID.
I don’t understand the strategy.
Always wise to keep the Newspeak translator handy when they use the word “effective”.
RELATIVE RISK VS ABSOLUTE RISK REDUCTION - AS PER PFIZERS' OWN DOCUMENTS - YOU'VE BEEN PLAYED
https://www.bitchute.com/video/W5sgLUekMmVT/
How does that saying go - "Once a liar, always a liar"...
Unless there is irrefutable evidence, bulla bulla Bourla did NOT take his own poisons. However, I am 95% certain he took a paper vaccine.
by my count this picture has less than 100 words
are you telling us that Albert Bourla's face is worth 900 words?
It's fascinating isn't it? You would think he knew all along that the jabs were useless and dangerous but, like Fauci and others, he acts as though he believes they are "safe and effective" even though he orginally thought they were effective at stopping transmission and illness. He has morphed into believing they were always meant to just stop you being terribly ill. Whilst still being very safe. And he believes they are so safe and effective that he needs to take Paxlovid too. Obviously he could simply be lying over what he believes and merely be keeping the gullible on board by saying what they all say. But I think he is symptomatic of the world we live in where men in lab coats, men in banks, government buildings and tech offices seriously believe they know better and can never be wrong. I think it's called hubris!
It is these people I would not feel sorry for if they contracted Sudden Adult Death Syndrome.
Sorry, not Sorry.
This is marketing BS. He should know better than anyone that fully vaccinated people WILL get a rebound infection and worse symptoms after taking Paxlovid. But as the manufacturer of both products, he isn't going to admit that a) the "vaccine" doesn't work and b) Paxlovid should only be used in the non-vaccinated (a smaller market). Incidenatlly, Pfizers Phase III trial for Paxlovid excluded vaccinated people - they probably just wanted to eliminate any "efficacy impact" from the safe and effective "vaccine"?
Perhaps he isn't fully vaccinated!!
I know a man who is 55 who had 4 jabs and got covid and was better in 5 days. He says it is because he got the boosters. Another one who is 51 had 2 jabs and got covid twice in 6 months but took 2 weeks to test negative the second time. Wth?
And this is how stupid our society has become...
These people either have the memory of goldfish or inchworms, or they are so convinced of their vast superiority and by extension, our pathetic stupidity, that they can say whatever they want whenever they want however they want without any fear whatever of consequence.
This could be just pure "advertisement." He may not have taken the shots, but is describing what many are experiencing, so that people (sheeple) will feel "SAFETY in numbers."
That it says "ArtMeetsScience" (tm) in the upper right corner of the second image, that's the icing on the cake, really.
Being somewhat namoured with the idea that the etymology of a word gives us insight in the one using it, even incorrectly, and especially insight in what they really are saying, or are trying to keep hidden while still talking about it, I looked up art.
Oh dear.
'"early 13c., "skill as a result of learning or practice," from Old French art (10c.), from Latin artem (nominative ars) "work of art; practical skill; a business, craft," from PIE *ar(ə)-ti- (source also of Sanskrit rtih "manner, mode;" Greek artizein "to prepare"), suffixed form of root *ar- "to fit together." Etymologically akin to Latin arma "weapons."'
A business. Akin to weapons. To prepare and fit together.
Sometimes, the actual meaning of a word really gives the game away, dosen't it? Also found a very fitting quote:
"In science you must not talk before you know. In art you must not talk before you do. In literature you must not talk before you think. [Ruskin, "The Eagle's Nest," 1872]
Hard to argue against that, I think? Think is what neither Bourla nor whomever put the "ArtMeetsScience"-thing together did. Especially given the original latin meaning of science...
Ugh, why don’t all these horrible people drop dead??
Does anyone believe he has taken 4 doses of his own medicine as well as Paxlovid? If that were true, one would have to label him Dumber than a Box of Rocks, which I do not believe is true.
Is it wrong that I'm hoping for a rebound? It's a little wrong, right?
Proof that the "Phase 3 study" was RIGGED. People need to be held accountable, especially when they used such "studies" to mandate vaccines on population.
He's a lying POS, and anyone who believes a word he says is a rube.
Paxlovid rebound don't fail us now!
This fucking loser has taken 4 jabs and a course of shady as fuck medication for a virus with self-described "mild symptoms". I bet he'd wear his pants on his head after going two hours on a spin bike if "experts" told him to do so.
Taking an awful long time for them to deliver our gibbets...