49 Comments
Jul 24, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com

Yipe, that's... not good. That it is The Lancet publishing it without apparent comment or telling to the authors to get their shit together and stop cheating is just a splash of vomit on the turd-cake.

Expand full comment
Jul 24, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com

The fact that The Lancet published this without comment shows either that they are incompetent or they are corrupt. Neither option is acceptable for a supposedly reputable organization.

They have taken down multiple articles dealing with the Covid vaccines on very questionable grounds but they let this slide.

This is blatant propaganda and they should be called on it.......

Expand full comment
Jul 24, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com

Because this is so egregious and bizarre and NOT SCIENCE, I went and looked at the graph for myself.

What an absolute load of horse manure.

These people are just plain evil.

And they wonder why no one trusts them anymore.

I don’t even have words.

Expand full comment
Jul 24, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com

Bad, but not nearly as bad as the Lancet HCQ Hydroxychloroquine fraud study, check this video out. Probably over a million people died because of this fraud. Lancet deserves far more than the $billion lawsuit over the obsolete Dominion Scam Voting machines or the Alex Jones $500M Sandy Hook hurt feelings lawsuit. Listen here for the sordid story @38m12s in this video:

DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH - IMPORTANT, COMPLETE AND GREAT INTERVIEW MAY 19, 2021:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/vM0Yr1uCQoL0/

And then there was the Covid Proximal Origin absolute garbage work of fiction published in Peer Reviewed Journal, Nature, just shows how corrupted the Peer Review process is. Nature should sued and pay $millions in damages for publishing that unvetted schlock article that did not disclose EXTREME conflicts of interest of its authors, that alone is obscene for any Science Journal.

So much for "Peer Reviewed Journals".

Expand full comment
Jul 24, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com

This is CLEALY DISINFORMATION. WHERE THE HELL ARE THE CENSORS THEY WANT US TO HAVE?

Expand full comment
Jul 24, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com

Oh no, don’t let the Globalists figure this out! They’re going to have to change their whole agenda…AGAIN!

Expand full comment
Jul 24, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com

It’s frankly stunning how DESPERATELY they’re trying to turn normally-hot summer temps EVERYWHERE in the world into “the next big thing”, an abnormality beyond measure & advising staying home & wearing masks! Phoenix, AZ with multiple days of 110 or more...I’m an AZ native & newsflash: it’s f’ing hot there in summer & it’s hot or warmer everywhere else that is having “summer” right now.

I wonder when it all becomes “mandatory”....

Expand full comment
Jul 24, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com

The Kansas Dept of Health pulled the same stunt when comparing masked counties to unmasked. They were busted by the Wall Street Journal:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/kansas-democrats-covid-chart-masks-the-truth-11598483406?st=sueypk34h9ley52&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink

Expand full comment
Jul 25, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com

Isn't this an academic fraud? We should dig up the authors' other papers, even PhD theses, to validate their work.

Expand full comment
Jul 24, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com

Have the Lancet been asked to comment on the blatant attempt to deceive?

Expand full comment
Jul 24, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com

Research funded by UK Medical Research Council (UK Govt) and EU (Horizon Europe). What more -trusted- sources could you wish for?

Expand full comment
Jul 25, 2023·edited Jul 25, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com

i’m asking myself: is the problem with the graph really them or is it us — the avg joe — who is unable to see through shit? i mean it’s not like they omitted the axis labels…

and: it’s the lancet. the same shit show that published bullshit and cancelled people with data against the narratives for 3 years now. we know what operation this is.

Expand full comment
Jul 25, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com

There has definitely been a pivot from COVID-19 to Climate scare tactics. How long will people put up with this BS. Keeping people scared and anxious is bad for their health, mental health and for society. Do these nudge agents want to destabilise Western society or are they just mad scientist who like to play gods and minions?

Expand full comment
Jul 25, 2023·edited Jul 25, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com

Cutting off the x-axis on the right side where the heat related deaths are occuring is clearly a sign of manipulation so that you a get a distorted view of the overvall data. The normal averge Joe will not notice this and would feel entitled in his brain-washed mind.

Expand full comment
founding
Jul 24, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com

The Pied Paper of Hamlin is thought to have been a real event. The original story is here recounted. It has much to teach us about trickery - https://www.ancient-origins.net/myths-legends/pied-piper-hamelin-001969

Expand full comment
Jul 25, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com

I saw that chart by Bjorn yesterday - the mainstream climate narrative is 100% fraudulent

Expand full comment
Jul 25, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com

Can someone explain how the axis was changed?

Expand full comment
Jul 25, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com

Great catch. Linking this tomorrow @https://nothingnewunderthesun2016.com/

Expand full comment
Jul 25, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com

Excellent replotting of the data

Expand full comment
Jul 25, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com

BTW, if you want to know what is really going on and why, check out the documentary, Saving capitalism, on Netflix.

Expand full comment
Jul 24, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com

It is just science .... or rather, what used to be known as an apparently fairly trustworthy sector of humanity is now propagandized just like everything else. I recall the quote not so long ago, something to the effect of "I am the science"

Was further introduced to this notion while reading one of Graham Hancock's more recent works wherein he discussed how 'the science' essentially glossed over the fact that early America was populated by somewhat modern civilizations far longer into the past they they cared to admit, sweeping evidence of the same under the rug for decades, if not centuries.

Expand full comment
Jul 24, 2023Liked by NE - nakedemperor.substack.com

I must say it as it is: What motherfuckers! Manipulation of the graph is not cheating but it is criminal.

Expand full comment

Speaking of possibly corrupt, formerly distinguished, medical journals, did the Editor of the BMJ ever respond to Prof Angus Dalgleish's open letter regarding his experience of observing apparently vaxx-related turbo-cancers ?

And has a single MP responded positively to the 'Perseus' Report ? Or did that, to, die in The Void?

I'm not holding my breathe.......

Expand full comment

Well, as Mark Twain said, "There are lies, damn lies and statistics."

Expand full comment

Yes they were very disingenuous and slimy. But the deeper reality here is that very few of these deaths are caused by heat or cold. The implication that a temperature change would save more than a few of these lives is very dubious. Yes, hammer them for their lying graph. But don't give them a pass on data harvesting to claim causation that isn't credible.

Expand full comment

Pretty blatant huh?

Expand full comment

I didn't even look more below on the graph because the writers are so inept that they want to show you an 85+ age group with a sign of <85.

Expand full comment

We've known for a while now that the Lancet was one of the propagandist captured journals, so this is hardly surprising, but it DOES add more to the evidence of the corruption so that at least is a good thing.

Expand full comment

Editorial pointers for The Lancet, courtesy of The Father of Lies

Expand full comment

The Lancet WAS a reputable publication. Phooey.

Misrepresenting data to promote a narrative that they want us to believe is "the science." Nonsense.

Only makes the aware consumer wonder what else they are willing to do.

Expand full comment

That is so unethical and wrong! You wouldn’t mark that correct in a high school science paper.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment