I never doubted the 9/11 narrative until the 2017 Russia Hoax. That's when I started to question. Now, after all the COVID/Vax B.S., the Nov 3/Jan 6 FBI-coup, and the Biden-cover-up Ukraine war, I have no doubts that 9/11 was fully planned and executed by people in *our* gov't. Ditto JFK assassination, Watergate, and every other major political upheaval of the last 60 years.
Don't forget RFK's assassination, while you're at it. Forget any of the debate about how in charge of his faculties Sirhan Sirhan was. He was standing in front of RFK and RFK was killed by a bullet that entered the back of his head from behind his right ear. So, the official story is that a guy standing in front of him, a few feet away, killed him with a shot to the back of his head. The official story about any event is almost certain to be crap.
"The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building."
15 years later: on the physics of high-rise building collapses
"It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11. Did we witness an unprecedented event three separate times on September 11, 2001? The NIST reports, which attempted to support that unlikely conclusion, fail to persuade a growing number of architects, engineers, and scientists. Instead, the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition."
If the official story about WTC 7 was true they'd have had to rewrite every building code in the world because, contrary to previous experience in which it had never happened anywhere, it was "suddenly" possible for fire alone to bring down a steel framed skyscraper. But no building codes anywhere were rewritten to address this amazing new possbility. Because everyone in a position of responsibility knew the official story about WTC 7 was bullshit.
Interesting, I hope to find some time to look into that.
I have long been dismissive of "inside job" ideas because of the abundance of bad arguments around that. Although I did have a slight suspicion that distributing either somewhat easy to debunk, or totally over the top, claims connected with some fishy event to create a whacko association with people who mention anything connected to it, and thus preventing a lot of people from looking past those things, might be right up the alley of the Clandestine Insidious Abomination - not just with regards to this topic. Let's be honest, there are people who are willing to believe almost anything as long as it is somehow sinister - and are prepared to carry forward such purposefully sown fragments.
Among the not crazy, but IMO not convincing, popular things there was stuff like "jet fuel can't melt steel" - bad argument, it may be sufficient to decrease its stiffness and thus the reinforcement being below spec.
Now if that paper can explain in a more detailed way why it's still not enough, that'd be something.
"Building 7 too far away to catch fire" seemed mostly a hipshot argument without any solid modelling by anyone behind it. But even if it were true, it could still be something like opportunistic insurance fraud rather than be part of a big plan. (it would also seem a stupid goof if it's really so clear that that couldn't happen, so someone seeing his chance for some unexpected cash literally burning away some dozen yards away and has to make a quick decision, they may be more inclined to make/risk that mistake than Conspirative Inside Agitators planning in advance.)
There is an abundance of evidence and analysis at the website of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth. ae911truth.com Yes, you will need a lot of time to go through it.
I suggest stop fence-sitting and go whole hog on conspiracies. It turns out most of them are true. There are some exceptions like Flat Earth. Those are probably intentional plants to discredit wholesale rejection of official narratives. This points us exactly toward what everyone needs to do.
Once you see that, you're on a straight and wide-open highway to figuring out the whole plot.
Things become really simple once you realize most - but not all - conspiracies are true.
Official narratives have always existed to confuse. Once you black out "official sources", almost all the confusion is gone. Your model of the world gains great clarity and predictive power.
In a nutshell: just look at who owns The Economist. You'll find it's Lady and Sir Evelyn de Rothschild. Now realize: The Economist does not publish anything that's not meant to mislead you. For every person they discredit; every piece of narrative they push; you can assume the exact opposite is true.
Follow this rule, and you will not be confused. :)
"go whole hog on conspiracies. It turns out most of them are true"
-
That's unlikely to be true - because "most conspicary theories", or hypotheses rather, are formed by people with some spare time on their hand digging information and trying to connect dots. But humans are notoriously seeing patterns that aren't really there in stuff (I can draw your face going through dots on dimpled wallpaper - the "art", or rather, error source is to focus on some thigns to form an image but omit/overlook other things. But that paper may seem to easy - I do tend to see things others don't, on first sight, on seat cushion fabric patterns, or otherwise furniture, I know what I am saying, lol).
And since with any of these more interesting types of conspiracy hypotheses, it lies in their nature that it's very hard to get any real data, the worse the more close to the actual things or people, it will always remain highly speculative.
There also are always quite a bunch of competing hypotheses on the same subject area, partially contradictory - they can't all be true.
A lot of people make the mistake to believe the next best thing coming along as a supposed explanation, just because it's anti-official-narrative, where they rightly smelt fish. But that's a false dichotomy. Just because the original story has problems, it doesm't mean some other thing that gained some popuparity could be the only other way that things really are.
-
But I will admit without shame that I threw a few coins here and there in the "Alex Jones was right" tip jar ;-)
Try out my suggestion. You have a false picture of reality because your expectation is that the media and governments are not malicious. Once you assume the media and governments are in fact malicious, and have been for decades, a very clear picture of the world eventually crystallizes.
Science always finds results consistent with your assumptions. If an assumption is false, experiments will not disprove it. Instead, experiments will produce confusing results.
If world events are confusing, try changing your initial assumptions.
"You have a false picture of reality because your expectation is that the media and governments are not malicious."
-
You couldn't be more wrong about that.
I have no TV for over 10 years because I actually did quite a bit of source backtracking of media claims (original sources, not sites with people making wild claims) back in the day, and I can say I know how routinely manipulative the media are from testing that hypothesis rigorously, instead of just wanting to believe something - that's far superior.
But you are also in a confirmation bias bubble. I try to be cautious of that and *try* to look at different angles.
Try to actually understand what I wrote in the last post, especially the last paragraph before the closing comment - it is important. And has NOTHING to do with believing in media goodness whatsoever - if you came to that conclusion, it almost seems you're not reacting to me and what exactly I say, but some template in your mind of "an unbeliever". (reacting too quickly to apparently recognized patterns is common, I'm not saying it's esspecially bad about you. But one should try...)
I see that over and over - there _really_ are dumb people in "truther" scenes that jump to conclusions and don't understand the least bit about cognitive biases and how to actually approximate the truth of something without falling prey to them - at the end of the day.
Add the first bombing of the WTC and that of the Murragh building (Oklahoma City). Author James Perloff has written on the sacrifice of the Lusitania, of foreknowldedge on the attack on Pearl Harbor, etc. These and many other examples can be found in the many fine presentations by James Corbett of corbettreport dot com.
He bought explosives with what was probably a government credit card used in the 1993 World Trade Center attack, roomed with not only the 20th hijacker, but 2 others of the original 19, co-signed Mohamed Atta's apartment lease, and was seen with Timothy McVeigh the day before the Murrah Building bombing arriving and leaving at a veterans help center, where he showed his ID, in the car McVeigh was stopped in after the bombing.
Then they "couldn't find him" after 911 because the DOJ was hiding him out in a Fed Prison on "gun charges."
I might have missed that one, if you remember the title, we would like to know.
There was an unidentified "suspect no 2" or something, that was described as middle eastern.
Oh, but then they decided it was "probably nothing." You know, "Thin, very thin."
Charles Krauhammer said something like never attribute to "conspiracy" what you can attribute to "incompetence."
He may have "overstated" his case here.
It seems these false conspiracy theories are determined to actually be true, 6 months, 6 years, 12 years, or 18 years after the fact, except of course for most of them which are put out by the creator of false conspiracy theories, the CIA and their colleagues, the KGB/FSB.
Oh Lord you may have mentioned it already and my brain just frazzled, but it was called the Third Terrorist by Jayna Davis??? I remember because she tried to get the information to the authorities and they all ignored her....
I forgot about that book, even had it on PDF but lost it with my last Windoze crash!
I am a solid MAC man now!
WIKI: The Third Terrorist: The Middle East Connection to the Oklahoma City Bombing by journalist Jayna Davis about evidence of Oklahoma City bombing was published in April 2004 by Nelson Current Publishers, and became a New York Times best-seller. The Justice Department initially sought, but then abandoned its search for, a Middle East suspect. In contrast to conspiracy theories that the bombing was a false flag attack perpetrated by elements of the US government or white supremacists in Elohim City, the book presents a theory that links the Oklahoma City bombers to agents of Iraq and Al-Qaeda, operating under Iranian state sponsorship.
Also, Rep Dana Rorhabacher mentions it in his report:
The Oklahoma City Bombing: Was There A Foreign Connection?
I so agree with this. What did it for me was the 2020 COVID Hoax. I went back and started to connect the dots. Maybe the "truthers" weren't so crazy after all. And maybe the Muslim terrorists were just bogeymen used by the establishment as a means to weaken our individual rights. Too many "conspiracy theories" turn out to be more plausible than the official narrative.
What's so powerful - in reading these comments -- is how their continued lying ways are doing more to wake up former believers in the official stories that anything those of us who began to clearly see through the narrative decades ago could have ever done! It's really not easy to get to the place where your are willing to lift the lid and look underneath -- at the dark underbelly of this nations actions. It's really not easy to be willing to let go of all the innocent trust and faith we once had in our leaders. I didn't come to this easily either -- neither has anyone who has arrived on the other shore. Thank you for being brave enough to do this. This is the only way this gets turned around.
Kathryn - so many of us are going through this most disruptive experience of waking up to the truth. I’ve been going through it for well near 60 yrs since the JFK hit while in Junior High on a bright early Friday afternoon in November, and all the way to these last 2 years where the rabbit holes seem endless and you start to wonder just how people can be so evil and so clever at the same time; and how those that are deceived can be so gullible. It’s definitely the adventure of a lifetime - our sudden and unavoidable undetermined termination date is a reminder to remain bold, hopeful, and able to see the absolute absurdity of it all. All said, I can’t help but see that many of us were brought here to be a beacon of light in a very gray lost world. Do you read me?
“For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence -- on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised.”
He did not mean the communists. He meant the same people we're up against today.
I just read the speech and that's not entirely clear to me. But earlier in it he says: "…there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit, to the extent that it is in my control." JFK. A man ahead of his time.
(1) he refused Operation Northwoods - a number of proposals by the CIA to stage false flag attacks on US citizens as a pretext to invade Cuba;
(2) more than once, he stated the intent to disband the CIA and scatter it to the winds;
(3) he authorized the issuance of Treasury bonds backed by silver, bypassing the monopoly on the creation of money by the (elite-owned) Federal Reserve.
He was subsequently shot, and then the shooter was also shot. Make of this what you will.
The shooter was shot by a Jewish guy. And the JFK assassination was videotaped by a Jewish guy who just happen to be standing in the optimum place to catch the whole thing perfectly. Coincidence? No.
9/11 was done by Israeli operatives who long ago infiltrated our government. Bill Clinton fell for their Monica Lewinsky honeytrap. Monica is a Mossad operative exactly like Ghislsine and Epstein were, and Ghislaine’s father Robert Maxwell. The paintings of Clinton in a blue dress and Bush knocking down block towers with a paper airplane are their trophies…a sick inside joke. Bet there’s one if JFK, who was assassinated at the orders of Ben Gurion.
It's the way Clinton loved that painting that I think is the biggest part of the problem. These people still own the Democratic Party and the party has no desire to kick them out.
It was painted in 2012 and acquired by Epstein who saw it at an exhibition and bought the pair of 'em. Tame journalists and social media oligarchs did nothing to censor mention or sharing of the image. If the Clintons had wanted it suppressed you think they couldn't have managed it? With Hillary running in 2016? Epstein hanging it prominently in his home was a big "fuck you" to everyone who already knew how sleazy these people are, and reaffirming how completely untouchable they are.
Well they were/are touchable by Israeli Intelligence. They are used to push agendas via the Maxwell/Epstein honey trap. Whoever has the evidence holds the cards I’d say
Considering how good Trump was for Israel in obliterating official Arab support for the Palestinians via the Abraham Accords (business always--uh--trumps ideals), I'd say Israeli Intelligence was awfully incompetent in permitting ClintonWorld to push that whole Russian collusion thingy and allowing Biden to get elected.
I doubt that Clinton knew about that painting or loved it. I think that painting was done as a trophy. It was done as a big FU by Epstein who was a Mossad operative. They trapped Clinton in a honeypot like they do so many politicians and powerful and wealthy men of both political persuasions. They blackmail everyone.
There's NO way somebody like Epstein, once nabbed by non-participants in the Secret World of these globalist psychopaths, could be allowed to live... HE KNEW TOO MUCH. Period. A lot of things happen because of blackmail, doncha know.
Epstein and Maxwell (and her father Robert) were Mossad agents. People who have dug deep into the 9/11 plot are well aware how much Israeli intelligence was involved in the whole false flag. They are also connected with bioweapons and the blackmail recording of many influential powerful people in satanic pedophile acts. While this is a horrific subject to bring up, it’s important to speak out. Those involved are banking on our silence. The Hunter Biden laptop is finally coming to the surface. These monsters must be stopped.
Well, first off, there should have been all kinds of debris and plane parts, but the main thing, I would say, is that the wings would have made a certain kind of entry hole, if you will... there would have been building damage where the wings went in. There were none. It was just a round hole.
I’ve never looked into all of this, honestly. Only recently began reading about the legit concerns re the WTCs. Prior to now, I had dismissed out of hand all such “conspiracy” theories, but after realizing how easily the Gov has killed hundreds of thousands of people during the last two years, I realized that 3,000 on 9-eleven would’ve been a pittance to them. So I started reading.
So if the plane didn’t hit the pentagon, where did it go?
I know, I am probably peering into a very deep rabbit hole….
That's what I'm saying... there was no plane anywhere near the Pentagon. There was no plane that went down in Pennsylvania, either. NO debris there, either... and finding things like ID cards... LOL gimme a damn break. But I'm no expert... Ask Boris Legume, who is commenting directly below me. I'm better with overall stuff; I often remember some details, but not ALL of them. Anyway, good job your scales are falling and you're seeing things now... there's plenty of stuff to spend your time finding out... sadly.
Dick Algire kept getting Popeye in his session and was bewildered.
"A long-range submarine-launched cruise missile variant of the Popeye Turbo has been speculated as being employed in Israel's submarine-based nuclear forces."
Several years ago, Dick and Daz Smith were tasked with remote-viewing 9/11 for Farsight.
Not included in the session (too controversial as this is YouTube) but Daz mentioned in an interview subsequent to this, Dick he says, saw the "flag" of the sub, Israel, and too saw the badge name of the soldier - with a beard - who pressed the button.
The beard on a soldier concurs with Israel military.
***
When they remote-viewed The Kennedy Assassination, this cast of characters come up.
I want to think the guy he draws, who speaks like someone from Illinois... it seems like it would be Cheney, but Cheney was bald... ? I don't know who works standing up at his desk... I feel very strongly that Cheney was involved in 9/11, and also the CIA. It seems pretty obvious... PLENTY of nastiness is done by those people. They are rogue.
I saw a film a long time ago about JFK, and it seems very likely to me, considering there's a PHOTO of Bush Sr. near the "grassy knoll," that it was him, or that he was involved, but I sure as heck don't believe the official story... and Johnson was in on it, I think, and there's a guy, I don't know his name, who was on the plane that took Jackie O and Johnson back to DC... who actually is caught on film WINKING at Johnson as he gets on the plane...
And I also don't believe for one second that Sirhan Sirhan shot RFK. Both these men, and MLK, all CIA, as far as I can tell. That's my intuition, but also based on some evidence. What do you think?
Remember when the Pentagon was hit, Rumsfeld comes out on the lawn and tinkers away at debris. Huh? Should not the Secretary of Defense be in a secure place if it is under attack?
He knows he is not in danger. He is in on it.
Condie Rice was on the board of Chevron. She would have had access to oil drilling results in the Caspian Basin. At the time, the results were not good. Peak Oil was a concern.
Within months of Bush election, Cheney created the NEPDG. Two thirds of the world's oil came from a triangle of land the size of a US state. Poor Iraq.
PNAC wanted complete American domination. What better than another, now infamous, "Pearl Harbour" attack to justify subsequent action.
Cheney was key architect.
On May 8th, 2001, Bush announced "I have asked VP Cheney to oversee the development of a coordinated national effort ... protecting our people from catastrophic harm. ..."
FEMA now reported to Cheney.
Cheney now had control and we know from testimony, he was calling the shots from his bunker on 9/11.
Then there were the various war games that day. Thus a complete paralysis of an airforce response.
Thought Rumsfeld after I got offline!!! lol Yes, indeed. And Cheney... These people are horror stories all by themselves, working for the Absolute Evil of the Black Nobs... I remember, too, after FEMA was taken over, and if I remember correctly, it was under Obama, that BILLIONS of rounds of ammunition were sent to FEMA. And then of course, there was Katrina, surely a deliberate "weather" attack to get rid of poor people in the way of turnover to the filthy rich... oh, we could go on and on, eh? What a cartel of scumbags...
I thought of him, too, but thought, nah, he's too stupid. I think that's an act. I thought Cheney, because he's clearly a psycho A-hole. But... Rummy. So cute. (barf)
Yes it can be stopped by We the People. Standing together as one. Three percent of the colonists here were actively trying to revolt and stop the tyrants a quarter of a millenia ago. But freedom is contagious for many. For those that don’t care they’ll will sadly just roll over and fall into a deep sleep. Heaven help them.
Why do you think every American politician at a certain level must take the obligatory trip to Israel and be made to put on a yarmulke and bow before the wall? While they are over there, they are also plied with alcohol and/or drugged and put in compromising positions with children. Then they are blackmailed for the rest of their lives. This is why presidents, in particular, age so badly when they’re in office. It’s not really the stress of the office. It’s because they are threatened to within an inch of their lives into doing exactly what Israel demands they do. They know their families and they will be killed if they do not.
Did you ever hear Meyer Lansky oversaw the JFK hit? Part of his offer was lifelong protection to stay in Israel. But the Israeli government turned him over to the US like they do to anyone who stands in their way. I don’t need to tell you about the USS Liberty. Here is the truth about these creatures who Americans believe can do no wrong. After all they (including me) are Gods chosen ones whose victim hood is a free ride of sympathy thanks of course to AIPAC - The Liberty was the stain the brothers of Zion can never erase https://youtu.be/tx72tAWVcoM
This is disturbing, and thought provoking, but nothing like the monstrous art in the home of John Podesta. (John David Podesta Jr. is an American political consultant who served as White House Chief of Staff to President Bill Clinton from 1998 to 2001 and Counselor to President Barack Obama from 2014 to 2015.) These people are sick.
Loved seeing this painting NE. Enjoying your Substack very much! At first glance I saw Bush, but as I kept looking/studying it, I also saw Bush AND Epstein - kind of like taking one side of each of their profiles and merging them as one face. And then as I stared longer, I saw Fauci and BGates in it too. The paper airplane and building blocks are quite symbolic. Brilliant and chilling.
I know W is a painter, but I don't think he painted this one. It seems that Epstein commissioned paintings like this and Clinton in the blue dress. And all of his guests would have seen them.
9/11. Inside job. 19 suicide hijackers, who could not fly Cessnas, of whom 8 were still alive the day after, pulled off an operation military pilots stated on the record, would be impossible to carry out and for the Pentagon hit, beyond the capabilities of Boeing aircraft.
BUT, Dr. Judy Wood will knock your socks off and leave you with more questions than answers.
Well painted. The classic look on his face as it used to be when he was happy - just like a 2 y/o who's just about to fill the big throne through the little plastic throne on top.
I never doubted the 9/11 narrative until the 2017 Russia Hoax. That's when I started to question. Now, after all the COVID/Vax B.S., the Nov 3/Jan 6 FBI-coup, and the Biden-cover-up Ukraine war, I have no doubts that 9/11 was fully planned and executed by people in *our* gov't. Ditto JFK assassination, Watergate, and every other major political upheaval of the last 60 years.
Don't forget RFK's assassination, while you're at it. Forget any of the debate about how in charge of his faculties Sirhan Sirhan was. He was standing in front of RFK and RFK was killed by a bullet that entered the back of his head from behind his right ear. So, the official story is that a guy standing in front of him, a few feet away, killed him with a shot to the back of his head. The official story about any event is almost certain to be crap.
It is worth hearing what investigator James Corbett has to say on this story too.
Exactly! And he happened to be Palestinian. Suuuure.
Two useful resources:
A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7
https://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7
"The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building."
15 years later: on the physics of high-rise building collapses
https://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/abs/2016/04/epn2016474p21/epn2016474p21.html
"It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11. Did we witness an unprecedented event three separate times on September 11, 2001? The NIST reports, which attempted to support that unlikely conclusion, fail to persuade a growing number of architects, engineers, and scientists. Instead, the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition."
If the official story about WTC 7 was true they'd have had to rewrite every building code in the world because, contrary to previous experience in which it had never happened anywhere, it was "suddenly" possible for fire alone to bring down a steel framed skyscraper. But no building codes anywhere were rewritten to address this amazing new possbility. Because everyone in a position of responsibility knew the official story about WTC 7 was bullshit.
Completely correct Wolf!
I am a signatory to the AE911truth petition for a proper investigation.
Interesting, I hope to find some time to look into that.
I have long been dismissive of "inside job" ideas because of the abundance of bad arguments around that. Although I did have a slight suspicion that distributing either somewhat easy to debunk, or totally over the top, claims connected with some fishy event to create a whacko association with people who mention anything connected to it, and thus preventing a lot of people from looking past those things, might be right up the alley of the Clandestine Insidious Abomination - not just with regards to this topic. Let's be honest, there are people who are willing to believe almost anything as long as it is somehow sinister - and are prepared to carry forward such purposefully sown fragments.
Among the not crazy, but IMO not convincing, popular things there was stuff like "jet fuel can't melt steel" - bad argument, it may be sufficient to decrease its stiffness and thus the reinforcement being below spec.
Now if that paper can explain in a more detailed way why it's still not enough, that'd be something.
"Building 7 too far away to catch fire" seemed mostly a hipshot argument without any solid modelling by anyone behind it. But even if it were true, it could still be something like opportunistic insurance fraud rather than be part of a big plan. (it would also seem a stupid goof if it's really so clear that that couldn't happen, so someone seeing his chance for some unexpected cash literally burning away some dozen yards away and has to make a quick decision, they may be more inclined to make/risk that mistake than Conspirative Inside Agitators planning in advance.)
There is an abundance of evidence and analysis at the website of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth. ae911truth.com Yes, you will need a lot of time to go through it.
thanks
I suggest stop fence-sitting and go whole hog on conspiracies. It turns out most of them are true. There are some exceptions like Flat Earth. Those are probably intentional plants to discredit wholesale rejection of official narratives. This points us exactly toward what everyone needs to do.
Once you see that, you're on a straight and wide-open highway to figuring out the whole plot.
Things become really simple once you realize most - but not all - conspiracies are true.
Official narratives have always existed to confuse. Once you black out "official sources", almost all the confusion is gone. Your model of the world gains great clarity and predictive power.
In a nutshell: just look at who owns The Economist. You'll find it's Lady and Sir Evelyn de Rothschild. Now realize: The Economist does not publish anything that's not meant to mislead you. For every person they discredit; every piece of narrative they push; you can assume the exact opposite is true.
Follow this rule, and you will not be confused. :)
"go whole hog on conspiracies. It turns out most of them are true"
-
That's unlikely to be true - because "most conspicary theories", or hypotheses rather, are formed by people with some spare time on their hand digging information and trying to connect dots. But humans are notoriously seeing patterns that aren't really there in stuff (I can draw your face going through dots on dimpled wallpaper - the "art", or rather, error source is to focus on some thigns to form an image but omit/overlook other things. But that paper may seem to easy - I do tend to see things others don't, on first sight, on seat cushion fabric patterns, or otherwise furniture, I know what I am saying, lol).
And since with any of these more interesting types of conspiracy hypotheses, it lies in their nature that it's very hard to get any real data, the worse the more close to the actual things or people, it will always remain highly speculative.
There also are always quite a bunch of competing hypotheses on the same subject area, partially contradictory - they can't all be true.
A lot of people make the mistake to believe the next best thing coming along as a supposed explanation, just because it's anti-official-narrative, where they rightly smelt fish. But that's a false dichotomy. Just because the original story has problems, it doesm't mean some other thing that gained some popuparity could be the only other way that things really are.
-
But I will admit without shame that I threw a few coins here and there in the "Alex Jones was right" tip jar ;-)
Try out my suggestion. You have a false picture of reality because your expectation is that the media and governments are not malicious. Once you assume the media and governments are in fact malicious, and have been for decades, a very clear picture of the world eventually crystallizes.
Science always finds results consistent with your assumptions. If an assumption is false, experiments will not disprove it. Instead, experiments will produce confusing results.
If world events are confusing, try changing your initial assumptions.
"You have a false picture of reality because your expectation is that the media and governments are not malicious."
-
You couldn't be more wrong about that.
I have no TV for over 10 years because I actually did quite a bit of source backtracking of media claims (original sources, not sites with people making wild claims) back in the day, and I can say I know how routinely manipulative the media are from testing that hypothesis rigorously, instead of just wanting to believe something - that's far superior.
But you are also in a confirmation bias bubble. I try to be cautious of that and *try* to look at different angles.
Try to actually understand what I wrote in the last post, especially the last paragraph before the closing comment - it is important. And has NOTHING to do with believing in media goodness whatsoever - if you came to that conclusion, it almost seems you're not reacting to me and what exactly I say, but some template in your mind of "an unbeliever". (reacting too quickly to apparently recognized patterns is common, I'm not saying it's esspecially bad about you. But one should try...)
I see that over and over - there _really_ are dumb people in "truther" scenes that jump to conclusions and don't understand the least bit about cognitive biases and how to actually approximate the truth of something without falling prey to them - at the end of the day.
Add the first bombing of the WTC and that of the Murragh building (Oklahoma City). Author James Perloff has written on the sacrifice of the Lusitania, of foreknowldedge on the attack on Pearl Harbor, etc. These and many other examples can be found in the many fine presentations by James Corbett of corbettreport dot com.
Don't forget Melvin Lattimore.
He bought explosives with what was probably a government credit card used in the 1993 World Trade Center attack, roomed with not only the 20th hijacker, but 2 others of the original 19, co-signed Mohamed Atta's apartment lease, and was seen with Timothy McVeigh the day before the Murrah Building bombing arriving and leaving at a veterans help center, where he showed his ID, in the car McVeigh was stopped in after the bombing.
Then they "couldn't find him" after 911 because the DOJ was hiding him out in a Fed Prison on "gun charges."
Who was that writer woman, Jane something, who wrote an incredible book about the OK bombing.....noting three I think Iraqui's and McVey not there?
I might have missed that one, if you remember the title, we would like to know.
There was an unidentified "suspect no 2" or something, that was described as middle eastern.
Oh, but then they decided it was "probably nothing." You know, "Thin, very thin."
Charles Krauhammer said something like never attribute to "conspiracy" what you can attribute to "incompetence."
He may have "overstated" his case here.
It seems these false conspiracy theories are determined to actually be true, 6 months, 6 years, 12 years, or 18 years after the fact, except of course for most of them which are put out by the creator of false conspiracy theories, the CIA and their colleagues, the KGB/FSB.
Still waiting to hear the whole story about the Las Vegas shootings and Nashville bombing. Why is the FBI so silent?
Oh Lord you may have mentioned it already and my brain just frazzled, but it was called the Third Terrorist by Jayna Davis??? I remember because she tried to get the information to the authorities and they all ignored her....
You go girl!!
I forgot about that book, even had it on PDF but lost it with my last Windoze crash!
I am a solid MAC man now!
WIKI: The Third Terrorist: The Middle East Connection to the Oklahoma City Bombing by journalist Jayna Davis about evidence of Oklahoma City bombing was published in April 2004 by Nelson Current Publishers, and became a New York Times best-seller. The Justice Department initially sought, but then abandoned its search for, a Middle East suspect. In contrast to conspiracy theories that the bombing was a false flag attack perpetrated by elements of the US government or white supremacists in Elohim City, the book presents a theory that links the Oklahoma City bombers to agents of Iraq and Al-Qaeda, operating under Iranian state sponsorship.
Also, Rep Dana Rorhabacher mentions it in his report:
The Oklahoma City Bombing: Was There A Foreign Connection?
PDF available @ https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=468530
I so agree with this. What did it for me was the 2020 COVID Hoax. I went back and started to connect the dots. Maybe the "truthers" weren't so crazy after all. And maybe the Muslim terrorists were just bogeymen used by the establishment as a means to weaken our individual rights. Too many "conspiracy theories" turn out to be more plausible than the official narrative.
What's so powerful - in reading these comments -- is how their continued lying ways are doing more to wake up former believers in the official stories that anything those of us who began to clearly see through the narrative decades ago could have ever done! It's really not easy to get to the place where your are willing to lift the lid and look underneath -- at the dark underbelly of this nations actions. It's really not easy to be willing to let go of all the innocent trust and faith we once had in our leaders. I didn't come to this easily either -- neither has anyone who has arrived on the other shore. Thank you for being brave enough to do this. This is the only way this gets turned around.
Well said and inspiring, Kathryn. I have unofficially joined the 'awakened'- as opposed to 'woke'. Grammar is still a thing.
Kathryn - so many of us are going through this most disruptive experience of waking up to the truth. I’ve been going through it for well near 60 yrs since the JFK hit while in Junior High on a bright early Friday afternoon in November, and all the way to these last 2 years where the rabbit holes seem endless and you start to wonder just how people can be so evil and so clever at the same time; and how those that are deceived can be so gullible. It’s definitely the adventure of a lifetime - our sudden and unavoidable undetermined termination date is a reminder to remain bold, hopeful, and able to see the absolute absurdity of it all. All said, I can’t help but see that many of us were brought here to be a beacon of light in a very gray lost world. Do you read me?
I do -- and I couldn't agree more!! Thank you for continuing to shine your light!!
Famous words of John F. Kennedy:
“For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence -- on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised.”
He did not mean the communists. He meant the same people we're up against today.
I just read the speech and that's not entirely clear to me. But earlier in it he says: "…there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit, to the extent that it is in my control." JFK. A man ahead of his time.
The general context of JFK's death includes that:
(1) he refused Operation Northwoods - a number of proposals by the CIA to stage false flag attacks on US citizens as a pretext to invade Cuba;
(2) more than once, he stated the intent to disband the CIA and scatter it to the winds;
(3) he authorized the issuance of Treasury bonds backed by silver, bypassing the monopoly on the creation of money by the (elite-owned) Federal Reserve.
He was subsequently shot, and then the shooter was also shot. Make of this what you will.
The fact that Oswald was subsequently rubbed out was enough to make me suspicious.
The shooter was shot by a Jewish guy. And the JFK assassination was videotaped by a Jewish guy who just happen to be standing in the optimum place to catch the whole thing perfectly. Coincidence? No.
9/11 was done by Israeli operatives who long ago infiltrated our government. Bill Clinton fell for their Monica Lewinsky honeytrap. Monica is a Mossad operative exactly like Ghislsine and Epstein were, and Ghislaine’s father Robert Maxwell. The paintings of Clinton in a blue dress and Bush knocking down block towers with a paper airplane are their trophies…a sick inside joke. Bet there’s one if JFK, who was assassinated at the orders of Ben Gurion.
A public exhibition of all the paintings in Epstein's home. That would be something hahaha.
And he was able to have paintings like this one, or of Clinton in a blue dress, without fear of retribution because...
It's the way Clinton loved that painting that I think is the biggest part of the problem. These people still own the Democratic Party and the party has no desire to kick them out.
What do you mean Clinton loved the painting? Has he remarked on it?
It was painted in 2012 and acquired by Epstein who saw it at an exhibition and bought the pair of 'em. Tame journalists and social media oligarchs did nothing to censor mention or sharing of the image. If the Clintons had wanted it suppressed you think they couldn't have managed it? With Hillary running in 2016? Epstein hanging it prominently in his home was a big "fuck you" to everyone who already knew how sleazy these people are, and reaffirming how completely untouchable they are.
Well they were/are touchable by Israeli Intelligence. They are used to push agendas via the Maxwell/Epstein honey trap. Whoever has the evidence holds the cards I’d say
Considering how good Trump was for Israel in obliterating official Arab support for the Palestinians via the Abraham Accords (business always--uh--trumps ideals), I'd say Israeli Intelligence was awfully incompetent in permitting ClintonWorld to push that whole Russian collusion thingy and allowing Biden to get elected.
elected....
I doubt that Clinton knew about that painting or loved it. I think that painting was done as a trophy. It was done as a big FU by Epstein who was a Mossad operative. They trapped Clinton in a honeypot like they do so many politicians and powerful and wealthy men of both political persuasions. They blackmail everyone.
Well, it does seem like he got a bit too cocky, so much so that even all security cams and both guards went on strike out of protest.
There's NO way somebody like Epstein, once nabbed by non-participants in the Secret World of these globalist psychopaths, could be allowed to live... HE KNEW TOO MUCH. Period. A lot of things happen because of blackmail, doncha know.
Freedom.
Epstein and Maxwell (and her father Robert) were Mossad agents. People who have dug deep into the 9/11 plot are well aware how much Israeli intelligence was involved in the whole false flag. They are also connected with bioweapons and the blackmail recording of many influential powerful people in satanic pedophile acts. While this is a horrific subject to bring up, it’s important to speak out. Those involved are banking on our silence. The Hunter Biden laptop is finally coming to the surface. These monsters must be stopped.
It was an Israeli sub that fired the missile that hit the Pentagon.
Do you have any information on that?
I'd like to see info on that, too. We all know it was NOT an airplane. It had to be a missile... it seems.
Can you explain please? Why not a plane? As this is the first I have ever heard this suggested, I am completely ignorant. Thanks.
Well, first off, there should have been all kinds of debris and plane parts, but the main thing, I would say, is that the wings would have made a certain kind of entry hole, if you will... there would have been building damage where the wings went in. There were none. It was just a round hole.
So, there were no plane parts in the debris?
I’ve never looked into all of this, honestly. Only recently began reading about the legit concerns re the WTCs. Prior to now, I had dismissed out of hand all such “conspiracy” theories, but after realizing how easily the Gov has killed hundreds of thousands of people during the last two years, I realized that 3,000 on 9-eleven would’ve been a pittance to them. So I started reading.
So if the plane didn’t hit the pentagon, where did it go?
I know, I am probably peering into a very deep rabbit hole….
That's what I'm saying... there was no plane anywhere near the Pentagon. There was no plane that went down in Pennsylvania, either. NO debris there, either... and finding things like ID cards... LOL gimme a damn break. But I'm no expert... Ask Boris Legume, who is commenting directly below me. I'm better with overall stuff; I often remember some details, but not ALL of them. Anyway, good job your scales are falling and you're seeing things now... there's plenty of stuff to spend your time finding out... sadly.
Popeye.
Dick Algire kept getting Popeye in his session and was bewildered.
"A long-range submarine-launched cruise missile variant of the Popeye Turbo has been speculated as being employed in Israel's submarine-based nuclear forces."
Several years ago, Dick and Daz Smith were tasked with remote-viewing 9/11 for Farsight.
https://www.remoteviewed.com/remote-viewing-911-attacks-2/
"the controls don't work": https://youtu.be/671ziiLlBBs?t=6018
Viewing the organizers, Dick kept getting the letters PNAC in his mind's eye. He saw a man who wore glasses that worked at a standing desk.
Who does THIS guy look like? And who is famous for working standing up at a desk? https://youtu.be/ZbdxXWN4DGk?t=5356
Not included in the session (too controversial as this is YouTube) but Daz mentioned in an interview subsequent to this, Dick he says, saw the "flag" of the sub, Israel, and too saw the badge name of the soldier - with a beard - who pressed the button.
The beard on a soldier concurs with Israel military.
***
When they remote-viewed The Kennedy Assassination, this cast of characters come up.
https://youtu.be/9Ka_vjCU-qg
https://youtu.be/9Ka_vjCU-qg?t=3603
Bush and Hoover did not trust each other but served purposes for each other.
John wanted to break the CIA into a thousand pieces.
FBI was under threat from Bobby as AG.
Bush needed Hoover onside as the FBI would poke around.
An unlikely alliance.
I want to think the guy he draws, who speaks like someone from Illinois... it seems like it would be Cheney, but Cheney was bald... ? I don't know who works standing up at his desk... I feel very strongly that Cheney was involved in 9/11, and also the CIA. It seems pretty obvious... PLENTY of nastiness is done by those people. They are rogue.
I saw a film a long time ago about JFK, and it seems very likely to me, considering there's a PHOTO of Bush Sr. near the "grassy knoll," that it was him, or that he was involved, but I sure as heck don't believe the official story... and Johnson was in on it, I think, and there's a guy, I don't know his name, who was on the plane that took Jackie O and Johnson back to DC... who actually is caught on film WINKING at Johnson as he gets on the plane...
And I also don't believe for one second that Sirhan Sirhan shot RFK. Both these men, and MLK, all CIA, as far as I can tell. That's my intuition, but also based on some evidence. What do you think?
At the desk is Rumsfeld. Born in Illinois. Sketch is a dead ringer. Former CEO of Searle.
https://www.progressivedesk.com/blogs/top-tips/famous-standing-desk-users
Remember when the Pentagon was hit, Rumsfeld comes out on the lawn and tinkers away at debris. Huh? Should not the Secretary of Defense be in a secure place if it is under attack?
He knows he is not in danger. He is in on it.
Condie Rice was on the board of Chevron. She would have had access to oil drilling results in the Caspian Basin. At the time, the results were not good. Peak Oil was a concern.
Within months of Bush election, Cheney created the NEPDG. Two thirds of the world's oil came from a triangle of land the size of a US state. Poor Iraq.
PNAC wanted complete American domination. What better than another, now infamous, "Pearl Harbour" attack to justify subsequent action.
Cheney was key architect.
On May 8th, 2001, Bush announced "I have asked VP Cheney to oversee the development of a coordinated national effort ... protecting our people from catastrophic harm. ..."
FEMA now reported to Cheney.
Cheney now had control and we know from testimony, he was calling the shots from his bunker on 9/11.
Then there were the various war games that day. Thus a complete paralysis of an airforce response.
Thought Rumsfeld after I got offline!!! lol Yes, indeed. And Cheney... These people are horror stories all by themselves, working for the Absolute Evil of the Black Nobs... I remember, too, after FEMA was taken over, and if I remember correctly, it was under Obama, that BILLIONS of rounds of ammunition were sent to FEMA. And then of course, there was Katrina, surely a deliberate "weather" attack to get rid of poor people in the way of turnover to the filthy rich... oh, we could go on and on, eh? What a cartel of scumbags...
But we never got oil from Iraq? WE had to pay for it?
OMG. Rumsfield.
I've been watching some of this stuff... really interesting.
Who is that guy on the you tube video? I mean in the drawing? Can't place him...
I thought of him, too, but thought, nah, he's too stupid. I think that's an act. I thought Cheney, because he's clearly a psycho A-hole. But... Rummy. So cute. (barf)
Pretty interesting!
Thanks for going to the trouble to give me this. ^_^ I'll check it out.
Bang on! 👍🏻
Agree Jeff , pray the freight train of pure evil can be stopped.🤞🙏
Exactly
Yes it can be stopped by We the People. Standing together as one. Three percent of the colonists here were actively trying to revolt and stop the tyrants a quarter of a millenia ago. But freedom is contagious for many. For those that don’t care they’ll will sadly just roll over and fall into a deep sleep. Heaven help them.
Yes.
Why do you think every American politician at a certain level must take the obligatory trip to Israel and be made to put on a yarmulke and bow before the wall? While they are over there, they are also plied with alcohol and/or drugged and put in compromising positions with children. Then they are blackmailed for the rest of their lives. This is why presidents, in particular, age so badly when they’re in office. It’s not really the stress of the office. It’s because they are threatened to within an inch of their lives into doing exactly what Israel demands they do. They know their families and they will be killed if they do not.
Did you ever hear Meyer Lansky oversaw the JFK hit? Part of his offer was lifelong protection to stay in Israel. But the Israeli government turned him over to the US like they do to anyone who stands in their way. I don’t need to tell you about the USS Liberty. Here is the truth about these creatures who Americans believe can do no wrong. After all they (including me) are Gods chosen ones whose victim hood is a free ride of sympathy thanks of course to AIPAC - The Liberty was the stain the brothers of Zion can never erase https://youtu.be/tx72tAWVcoM
Zackly.
This is disturbing, and thought provoking, but nothing like the monstrous art in the home of John Podesta. (John David Podesta Jr. is an American political consultant who served as White House Chief of Staff to President Bill Clinton from 1998 to 2001 and Counselor to President Barack Obama from 2014 to 2015.) These people are sick.
I'm curious, and maybe I'll regret it, but... where is this art to be seen? Is there a link?
I'm assuming based on the leaks from his mobile phone during 2016 (blamed on hackers if memory serves me correctly) that it's pretty much porn.
Disturbing to say the least
Loved seeing this painting NE. Enjoying your Substack very much! At first glance I saw Bush, but as I kept looking/studying it, I also saw Bush AND Epstein - kind of like taking one side of each of their profiles and merging them as one face. And then as I stared longer, I saw Fauci and BGates in it too. The paper airplane and building blocks are quite symbolic. Brilliant and chilling.
Holy crud: how blind am I? I didn’t associate the airplanes and Twin Towers until reading your comment!
That’s the beauty of this portrait post. So many interpretations and that’s the wonder of “art”. Also a nice break from word content!
Gold bullion bricks
Twin towers.
Extraordinary, isn't it, how evil attracts people like flies to honey?
They say maggots have their purpose in nature. I'd say we need to make sure they're kept to the absolute minimum.
Yes imagine if the maggots conspired together to create more eating places.
Things that make you say “Hummh?”
Is that meant to be Bush?
I just zoomed in and yes it is. But regardless of subject matter, it’s a terrible terrible painting. Did he do it himself?
I know W is a painter, but I don't think he painted this one. It seems that Epstein commissioned paintings like this and Clinton in the blue dress. And all of his guests would have seen them.
Why did he pick such a dreadful artist?
Its not the art. It's the message, I think, "I own you, bitches"
9/11. Inside job. 19 suicide hijackers, who could not fly Cessnas, of whom 8 were still alive the day after, pulled off an operation military pilots stated on the record, would be impossible to carry out and for the Pentagon hit, beyond the capabilities of Boeing aircraft.
BUT, Dr. Judy Wood will knock your socks off and leave you with more questions than answers.
https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/
Oh, and remember the map of Iraq carved into oil fields, held by Cheney's National Energy Policy Development Group which was sourced by Judical Watch?
And too, on the first anniversary of the attack, a small group questioning the official story took to a stage in New York.
Guess who was on that stage. RAY MCGOVERN.
McGovern was long time CIA analyst who presented the Presidental Daily Breifing to daddy Bush.
Just him sharing that stage was a huge statement.
Yeah... what a crazy coinky-dink.
Here’s the Story Behind The Painting of George W. Bush titled : "War Games" Seen at Jeffrey Epstein’s Home :
https://news.artnet.com/art-world/bill-clinton-blue-dress-painting-jeffrey-epstein-1628437
Holy Shit
The explanation the apparent painter gives seems more innocuous. Whether that's to fend off the flames, can only be guessed. https://news.artnet.com/art-world/artist-epstein-clinton-painting-1628953
Too bad we can't ask Jeff anymore what he liked about those paintings.
Oh about that art academy where it was shown... More bizarre pictures
https://news.artnet.com/art-world/maria-farmer-new-york-art-academy-1610506
Well painted. The classic look on his face as it used to be when he was happy - just like a 2 y/o who's just about to fill the big throne through the little plastic throne on top.
Butare there 2 messages? What kind of grown man plays with blocks and paper airplanes sitting on the floor.....